ENG 105 English Composition I Peer Review Worksheet

Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Copy and paste the completed review into your reply to the post containing the assigned draft. Do not post your review as an attachment. Name of the Drafts Author: Name of the Peer Reviewer: Summary: After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (35 sentences) of the paper in the box below.

Evaluate the Essay After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric located at the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft assignment drop box. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.) Observation Focus What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?

What evidence do you have for this score?

2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Descriptive Details What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?

What evidence from the paper do you have for this score?

Thesis Development and Purpose What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?

What evidence from the paper do you have for this score?

Paragraph Development and Transitions What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?

What evidence from the paper do you have for this score?

2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?

What evidence from the paper do you have for this score?

Paper Format What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?

What evidence from the paper do you have for this score?

Research Citations What level of achievement did the author score for this criterion?

What evidence from the paper do you have for this score?

Three positive things about this paper are: 1)

2)

3) 2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Three things that could be improved are: 1)

2)

3)

Grading Criteria
The assignment will be assessed according to the following criteria:

1) 2) 3) 4)

Clarity: The intent of the writer is clear. Logic: The answer makes sense. Answers question: The questions are addressed fully. Mechanics: Proper punctuation and grammar was used.

2011. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.