Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 17

John McCain Communist Mole

The Vietnam War is history. However there are many lies and deceptions still
floated by America's Marxist media about that war and many say that the war was
lost because of the media, just like Iraq is being lost because of the media.
It is a fact that the US media has subsequently paid for the sons of high ranking
Vietnamese communists to be educated in places like Harvard and Yale, where no
poor white Americans are allowed to go, but that's another story that will be told.
As I studied the way John McCain handled his run for president and his treatment
of his running mate, Sarah Palin, I realized that McCain was not what he claimed to
be, a patriotic war hero. I began to study McCain from the time he was trained at
the Annapolis Naval Academy, which has a reputation of harboring one of the most
leftist officers training faculties in America.
Then I studied the information from translated North Vietnamese sources about
captured US officers who broke, and then became allies of North Vietnam and
world communism. Then I heard and read and re-read the transcripts of pro-
communist broadcasts made by John McCain numerous times during his
incarceration in North Vietnam. McCain's pro-communist broadcasts went far
beyond the normal submission brought about by brutal communist interrogation. It
is evident that the reds broke and turned him.
A Manchurian Candidate is a POW that is turned by communist captors into a
covert agent of world communism. The news media, being Marxist itself, ignored
evidence of McCain's collusion with the enemy thirty years ago. That suppression
of evidence allowed McCain's political career to burgeon.
Where would a communist sleeper agent be the most dangerous in politics? The US
Marxist democrat party or in the so-called Republican conservative Party? It is not
surprising that McCain took on the personna of a Vietnam War Hero who was a
conservative Republican. People fell for that disguise for years.
hen when McCain was finally recognized as an influential long-time Republican
Senator, he began to wield his influence in ways that marked him as a Marxist, not
a conservative. In Congress he became known as Vietnam's most powerful friend,
the enemy of POW families wanting their relatives back from communist
incarceration and a supporter of many Marxist causes including completely open US
borders.
Then when Obama needed a stooge set up as a false candidate who would make
sure that he lost, in order for the foreign Marxist Obama to win, McCain was the
natural traitor for the job.
I am skipping over a lot of material that I will cover in detail later. It is part of a
book being written entitled John McCain Traitor. It is the story of a veteran who
was turned into a traitor by his communist captors, made sure a Marxist won
election as president of the USA and simultaneously destroyed, with the help of
the media, the only possible opposition to Obama criminality, the Republican Party.

Those following the proceedings during the


past year of the Senate Select Committee
on POW and MIA Affairs have been
mystified by the rabid actions of the one
man on the committee who should be
grateful that for the nearly three decades
there have been activists in America who
have refused to let die the issue of the fate
of Americans lost and missing in Southeast
Asia from the Vietnam War.

I am speaking of course of Sen. John


McCain (R-Ariz.). None of the Senators on
the Select Committee have been as vicious
in their attacks on POW/MIA family
members and activists than the man behind
the mask of war hero, former POW, and
patriotic United States Senator .

Not even Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), who


went into his job as chairman of the Select
Committee with a predisposition that no one was left alive in Southeast Asia, that
it was therefore "time to put the war behind us" and normalize relations with
Hanoi, has shown such a bias against those who have fought and kept alive the
POW/MIA cause.

Not even Sen. Kerry, with his own record as an anti-war protester during the early
1970s after serving in Vietnam--has turned a totally deaf ear to the numerous
individuals and groups who are, correctly or not, convinced that Americans were
and are alive in captivity in Southeast Asia.

What, therefore, motivates a John McCain to attack as a pit bull everyone and
anyone who has the opinion that men are still alive in the very same captivity that
he himself once experienced? Mr. McCain disguises his attacks on the POW/MIA
by claiming he is on the committee to ask "the tough questions" to grill and berate
in order to get to the truth. What motivates the man, who at the same time has
shown a sensitive, almost patronizing approach to U.S. government officials who
have lied to the committee? . . .

Borrowing from the title of a popular movie of some years ago, many activists who
have felt the fangs of this pit bull call him the "Manchurian Candidate." Is that a
fair accusation to level at Senator McCain, the war hero and the former POW?

In the movie, "The Manchurian Candidate," actor Lawrence Harvey portrayed the
character of a former POW and war hero of the Korean War, whose brainwashing
by his communist captors resulted in his enemies being able to manipulate his
actions. To trigger him to do their bidding all they had to do was have him play
solitaire with the Queen of Diamonds being the trigger that made him theirs, body
and soul . . .

SOMETIMES TAKES EXTREMES

While there are some who have over the years taken extreme measures to keep
alive the POW/MIA issue, to paint everyone--even some of the most extreme--
with a broad brush as being frauds and predators is not just.

As Senator Kerry, once an activist himself, knows, and I am sure understands in his
heart, the activist must be at times an extremist. He must do extreme things
because he is the David taking on the Goliath, or, to put it another way--you can't
fight a tiger with a dish rag.

In the case of Kerry, the anti-war activist, he could not fight the powerful, often
vengeful government officials with the proverbial dish rag. So, he and his followers
disrupted Senate committee meetings, threw red paint, representing blood, on the
Capitol steps, etc.
In the case of the POW/MIA activists they have chained themselves to the White
House fence, at times verbally abused government officials--whatever it took to
peacefully draw attention to their cause, just as Kerry before them.

Presently, Kerry the senator does not approve of POW/MIA activists and
POW/MIA activists, particularly Vietnam veterans, do not approve of the pro-
Hanoi Kerry. And yet there is a common ground with Kerry.

There is none with McCain. He has, simply put, declared his own personal war on
POW/MIA activists, and one must ask why?

Even during the Select Committee hearings, H.


Ross Perot, perhaps at one time, one of the
most devout POW/MIA activists of all, was a
target of Senator McCain. And yet, it is
doubtful if another POW in America would have
anything but the deepest respect for Mr.
Perot.

When someone suggested during the committee


hearings that Mr. Perot's efforts in drawing
attention to the plight of the POWs in Vietnam
during the war years which ultimately caused the POWs to receive more humane
treatment from their captors, McCain snidely remarked that he thought it was the
bombing of Hanoi that was responsible for their better care.

But after his release by Hanoi in 1973, McCain had nothing but praise for Perot and
his followers who ignited and fanned the flames of POW/MIA activism.

Nor has McCain stopped there. He has also viciously attacked fellow war hero,
fellow POW and fellow retired Navy captain, Eugene "Red" McDaniel, as a fraud
and a dishonorable man who preys upon the families of those still unaccounted for
from the war.

Again, it is a case of McCain attacking the activist. McDaniel has been in the
forefront of activism in keeping the POW/MIA issue alive during the years, before
the Select Committee, when few, particularly much of the press, could have cared
less.

Today, there is extreme pressure on members of Congress to lift the trade


embargo with Vietnam and to establish diplomatic relations with Hanoi, both
actions are opposed by the POW/MIA activists.

McCain, like his fellow Senator, Mr. Kerry, favors lifting the embargo and both
were on record as such long before they became associated with the Select
Committee. In fact, the efforts of both have reflected at times more interest in
bettering relations with Vietnam, in consort with greedy U.S. big business
interests, than resolving the POW/MIA issue by accounting for the missing men; in
McCain's case his FELLOW POWs.

However, before becoming a powerful figure in Congress, McCain the candidate,


said: "The regime in Hanoi, politically degenerate even by totalitarian standards,
refused to provide or even assist in providing a satisfactory accounting of
American MIAs . . .

EXPLOITATION OF POWS

While the Senate Select Committee in its final days of existence is spending its
time and resources on alleged instances of what it considers to be "fraud," and
"predator fund-raising activities," it has and is ignoring an issue which is vital to
resolving the POW/MIA riddle, that being the issue of intelligence exploitation of
U.S. prisoners of war by Soviet, Chinese, Cuban and Vietnamese psychological
warfare experts.

There has been some debate in the committee as to the extent of Soviet KGB and
GRU (Soviet military intelligence) involvement in attempts to "turn" American
POWs, with attempts by the Pentagon, supported always by McCain, to deny that
the Soviets were involved in any such activity. Nevertheless, there was extensive
testimony that POWs were interrogated and possibly recruited before the Paris
Peace Accords were signed in 1973 ending U.S. military involvement in the war--and
afterwards, possibly as late as 1978.

"While we all assume the very best about our servicemen who were held it
captivity," one POW/MIA activist wrote to Sen. Kerry, "there is a historical
precedence of Soviet, Chinese and North Korean exploitation of American
prisoners of war. The success of the communist program in Korea may well have
been duplicated to a degree in Vietnam."

The communist definitely had a sophisticated system of "turning" U.S. prisoners of


war in Korea and, ironically, the movie, "The Manchurian Candidate," fiction that it
may be, was nota misrepresentation of the creative experiments and attempts by
the communists to "turn" American prisoners of war into agents.

According to some, the FBI has/had a program to monitor the activities of


returned prisoners of war from Indochina. That FBI investigation is based on
historical knowledge which concluded that some American POWs had been "turned"
into agents of the communist.

"Turning" a prisoner of war is not necessarily the prisoner being convinced or "re-
educated" by his captors to change his beliefs or politics. The process can involve
the use of a variety of means, both subtle and brutal, elaborately contrived to
manipulate an otherwise patriotic U.S. prisoner's situation or environment to a
point where he is convinced that he must cooperate with his captors in order to
remain alive.

One method which had been used successfully by the KGB for their clandestine
purposes was the use of threats of exposing embarrassing behavior, particularly
any illicit sexual behavior. As a classic example, several years ago, the KGB used
sex and seduction to get the U.S. Marine guards to allow them to infiltrate the
U.S. Embassy in Moscow.

Another example, if a subject, in this case a POW, became involved in a homosexual


situation and his captors found out about it, his captors would most certainly make
a record of the homosexual behavior. Later an interrogator would use that record
as blackmail to extort intelligence information from anyone involved.

Thus, an otherwise defiant prisoner could be blackmailed into becoming an unwilling


collaborator and agent of his captors. After the first collaboration it is a process
of threatening to expose the prisoner to his peers or family back home unless the
prisoner further "cooperates" by giving even more information.

Another example, if U.S. prisoner "X," under duress or torture, reveals sensitive
information about prisoner "Y," which causes prisoner "Y" to be tortured or
punished, prisoner "X" certainly doesn't want prisoner "Y" to know he was the
source of that information.

Thus, even more information or collaboration can be extracted from prisoner "X."
What in the beginning would seem a necessary collaboration to save one's
reputation or life, could be used over the long term by experienced interrogators
to create an extensive dossier of collaborations by the prisoner. Anyone trained in
the interrogation of enemy prisoners knows this.

Nearly all of the POWs have reported that they were threatened with the denial
of medical treatment unless they provided their captors with specific information.

BOTH KOREA AND VIETNAM

According to sources, some of the same KGB agents


and their associates, often the latter posing as
foreign journalists, were involved in attempting to
exploit American POWs for intelligence and
propaganda purposes in both Korea and Vietnam. To
cite as just one example, Australian communist
journalist Wilfred Burchett, well known to American
POWs for this activity in Korea, later appeared in
the same role in Vietnam.

Pentagon files regarding exploitation of U.S.


prisoners of war in Indochina are kept secret, except from the hierarchy of the
U.S. intelligence community and some high U.S. government officials. It of course
also remains in the files of the communist exploiters of the POWs.

As it stands, the American people will never know the truth about this exploitation
in Vietnam, unless some official body, such as the Senate Select Committee,
subpoenas the files from the Pentagon. As an example, the Senate Select
Committee has never followed up on the explosive testimony of former KGB Maj.
Gen. Oleg Kalugin, who testified, under oath, that the KGB interrogated U.S. POWs
in Vietnam.

Kalugin stated that one of the POWs worked on by the KGB was a "high-ranking
naval officer," who, according to Kalugin, agreed to work with the Soviets upon his
repatriation to the United States and has frequently appeared on U.S. television.

Whether this is true or not it certainly begs to be investigated and, like it or not,
Sen. John McCain fits the description, and his behavior, also like it or not, raises
serious questions. The fact that he is a United States Senator should not be a
factor, alas, "The Manchurian Candidate" possibility.

When it comes to matters of national security and the welfare of every man,
woman and child in the United States, there should be no sacred cows, and it must
not be forgotten that Sen. McCain was being considered for higher office, prior to
his numerous appearances on national television defending his involvement in the
Savings and Loan scandal.

In November of 1991, when Tracy Usry, the former chief investigator of the
Minority Staff of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, testified before
the Select Committee, he revealed that the Soviets interrogated U.S. prisoners of
war in Vietnam. Sen. McCain became outraged interrupting Usry several times,
arguing that "none of the returned U.S. prisoners of war released by Vietnam were
ever interrogated by the Soviets." However, this was simply not true and Sen.
McCain knows that from firsthand experience.
Col. Bui Tin, a former Senior Colonel in the North Vietnamese Army, testified on
the same day, but after Usry, that because of his high position in the Communist
Party during the war, he had the authority to "read all documents and secret
telegrams from the politburo" pertaining to American prisoners of war. He said
that not only did the Soviets interrogate some American prisoners of war, but that
they treated the Americans very badly.

Bui Tin, who indicated he favored a normalization of relations between the U.S. and
Vietnam, also offered the committee his records concerning his personal
interrogations of American POWs.

A WARM HUG FOR THE ENEMY

Sen. McCain stunned onlookers at the hearing when he moved forward to the
witness table and warmly embraced Bui Tin as if he was a long, lost brother.

"Was that hug for Bui Tin, a Vietnamese official responsible for the torture of
some American prisoners of war, a message 'please don't give them my records?'"
one activist questioned at the time.

In any case, many of McCain's fellow Vietnam War POWs were aghast, not to
mention former POWs of World War II and Korea, who could, only in some
instances after decades, forgive but never forget the inhumanity of their captors-
-certainly not to the point of embracing them.

Shortly thereafter, as a direct result of Sen. McCain's lobbying of other


Republican Senators, Usry, a distinguished Vietnam veteran, and all other members
of the Minority Staff, who had participated in the POW/MIA investigations, were
abruptly fired.

If the Senate Select Committee finds it pertinent to investigate alleged instances


of "fraud" by POW/MIA activists, then certainly, by even the most liberal
standards, the charge of collaboration with the enemy by a "high-ranking naval"
officer should be investigated just as seriously as were the charges against Marine
Private Robert Garwood, the only American POW charged and convicted of this
crime.
THE ADMIRAL'S SON

John McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone on August 29, 1936. His father
was Admiral John McCain II, who became commander-in-chief of the Pacific forces
in 1968. Admiral McCain later ordered the bombing of Hanoi while his son was in
prison. His grandfather was Admiral John S. McCain, Sr., the famous commander of
aircraft carriers in the Pacific under Admiral William F. Halsey in World War II . .
.

On his 23rd mission in Vietnam on Oct. 26, 1967, he was shot down by a surface-
to-air missile.

To relate the event, McCain later recalled that he was "flying right over the heart
of Hanoi in a dive at about 4,500 feet, when a Russian missile the size of a
telephone pole came up--the sky was full of them--and blew the right wing off my
Skyhawk dive bomber. It went into an inverted, almost straight-down spin.

"I pulled the ejection handle, and was knocked unconscious by the force of of the
ejection--the air speed was about 500 knots. I didn't realize it at the moment, but
I had broken my right leg around the knee, my right arm in three places and my
left arm. I regained consciousness just before I landed by parachute in a lake right
in the center of Hanoi, one they called the Western Lake. My helmet and my
oxygen mask had been blown off. "I hit the water and sank to the bottom . . . I did
not feel any pain at the time, and I was able to rise to the surface. I took a breath
of air and started sinking again."After bobbing up and down, he was eventually
pulled from the water by Vietnamese who had swam out to get him.

A mob gathered on shore and McCain was bayoneted in the foot and his shoulder
was smashed with a rifle butt. He was put on a truck and taken to Hanoi's main
prison.

After being periodically slapped around for "three or four days" by his captors who
wanted military information from him, which McCain claims he refused to give,
providing only his name, rank and serial number, he realized he was in critical shape
and called for an officer. He told the officer, "O.K., I'll give you military
information if you will take me to the hospital."
Regardless of the reasons, the offer to give "military information" in exchange for
better treatment was a violation of the military Code of Conduct and Collaboration
No. l.

The doctor, according to McCain, said about taking him to the hospital, "It's too
late."

At that point, McCain knew he was in big trouble. According to information


obtained by the U.S. VETERAN, the flier in desperation invoked the name of his
famous father, Admiral John S. McCain, Jr., the soon-to-be commander of all U.S.
Forces in the Pacific.

And that was a violation of the Code of Conduct and Collaboration No. 2.

McCain admits that because of the Vietnamese having the knowledge of who his
father was, he thus survived because they rushed him to the hospital. The
Vietnamese figured that because POW McCain's father was of such high military
rank that he was of royalty or the governing circle. Thereafter the communist
bragged that they had captured "the crown prince."

Later, the Vietnamese would erect a monument in Hanoi near the site of his landing
in the lake, stone figure of a pilot raising his arms skyward in surrender and
referring to their catch McCain, by name, as an "air pirate."

At the hospital his wounds were treated. He readily admits that other U.S.
prisoners with similar wounds were left to die, pointing out "There were hardly any
amputees among the prisoners who came back because the North Vietnamese just
would not give medical treatment to someone who was badly injured. They weren't
going to waste their time.

"McCain has failed to mention in public what he has confided to another U.S.
prisoner privately, that since the Vietnamese felt they had in their hands such a
"special prisoner", a propaganda bonanza, a Soviet surgeon was called in to treat
him.

HOW MUCH MORE INFORMATION DID HE GIVE?

McCain has admitted that the Vietnamese repeatedly threatened to withhold much
needed operations unless he would give them more information. Did he provide it?

After six weeks of this type of threats and medical treatment, he was delivered to
Room No. 11 of "The Plantation" and into the hands of two other POWs, who helped
further nurse him along until he was eventually able to walk by himself.

For the next 22 months, McCain was kept isolated from the other American
prisoners. Because the Vietnamese considered him a "special prisoner" he was the
target of intense indoctrination programs. His communist interrogators believed
that because McCain came from a "royal family," he would, when finally released,
return to the United States to some important military or government job.

The communist were very much aware that POW McCain would be under great
psychological pressure not to do or say anything that would tarnish his famous
military family and they considered that to be the key to eventually breaking and
then "turning" him.

During that period of time McCain was visited by several foreign delegations
(including Cubans) and interviewed by many high ranking North Vietnamese leaders
including Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap, North Vietnam's Minster of Defense and national
hero . . .

On Dec. 7, 1969, McCain was moved out of "The Plantation" and into the "Hanoi
Hilton" with other prisoners of war.

McCain was released as a prisoner of war on March 15, 1973.

Following various medical and surgical procedures, he attended the National War
College in Washington, D.C. and was later posted as commanding officer of
Replacement Training Squadron 174 in Jacksonville, Fla.

In 1977, McCain was ordered to the Office of Legislative Affairs and was assigned
as the Director of the Navy Senate Liaison Office, where he remained until
disability retirement in April 1981.

A year earlier, in 1980, his marriage and personal life soured. His marriage to
Carol, who had been seriously injured and crippled in a motor vehicle accident
during his confinement in Vietnam, ended in divorce.
NEW WIFE, NEW LIFE, ENTER McCAIN THE POLITICIAN

Later that year, McCain married Cindy Hensley, whose father, Jim, was an Arizona
"beer baron," owning Hensley and Co., the Anheauser-Busch distributor for Phoenix
and Tempe, where McCain settled with his new wife after his retirement from the
Navy in the spring of 1981.

His new father-in-law made him vice president in charge of public relations for
Hensley and Co., and soon McCain was writing guest editorials for Arizona
newspapers and thus paving the way for a career in politics. Most of the articles
were of a patriotic nature--"For POWs in Hanoi, Christmas Eve 1971 marked a
spiritual turning point," "America--Bastion of liberty, beacon ofhope," "Remember
MIAs fought for valid cause," etc.

It was not long until McCain caught the attention of Sens. Barry Goldwater and
Paul Fannin, both Arizona institutions and devout conservative Republicans, men
who could easily be identified with "America--Bastion of liberty, beacon of hope."

Soon, McCain was their choice to succeed veteran Congressman John J. Rhodes, a
Republican representing Arizona's 1st Congressional DIstrict, which conveniently
included the city of Tempe.

When McCain was still with the Navy's congressional liaison office it was no secret
that Rhodes, the House minority leader, was getting ready for retirement. The
seat to be vacated in the House was a ripe plum waiting to be picked. The would-be
Congressman had long envisioned a career in government service.

And thus began John McCain's first run for elective office. From the beginning the
cards were in his favor, even though he was accused of being a carpetbagger since
he had only recently moved to Arizona . . .

THE COUNTERFEIT HERO

McCain's rising political power in Arizona Republican politics was due in large
measure to his friendship with Duke Tully, the publisher of the conservative and
powerful ARIZONA REPUBLIC and the PHOENIZ GAZETTE, with a combined daily
circulation of about 400,000.
Described as "equal parts cowboy, commando, swashbuckler and elegant tycoon" by
the CHICAGO TRIBUNE (Jan. 9, 1986), Tully was, according to the Chicago paper,
"a George Patton who drove a Corvette, a Randolph Hearst who flew an F-16, a
John Wayne in aviator glasses and Air Force dress blues."

"I tell Arizona what to think," he stated in public more than once, and it was
particularly true regarding backing for the efforts of his friend, Congressman
McCain.

Tully appeared to have a lot in common with his close friend, former Navy combat
pilot and war hero John McCain. He boasted of his 100 missions over Vietnam,
retiring from the Air Force as a lieutenant-colonel. His service, according to Tully,
also included air combat in Korea, where he once was forced to crash land his P-51
Mustang fighter and spent time in a hospital as a result--so he said. His smashed
front teeth were replaced with stainless steel, he also said.

He had, just like his friend John McCain, received the Purple Heart, Distinguished
Flying Cross and the Vietnam Cross of Gallantry.

However, the day after Christmas 1985, it was revealed, according to the
CHICAGO TRIBUNE, that John McCain's close friend had "an imagination as big as
his ego."

In fact, the man who even was the godfather to one of McCain's daughters, was a
total fake.

Duke Tully, the man who had arranged to have his newspapers endorse and further
the chances of McCain's first run for the House and was already touting him as
Goldwater's successor, had "never even went to boot camp."

Nevertheless, the genuine American patriot, Barry Goldwater, almost a national


icon, decided not to run for re-election in 1986 and McCain quickly moved in to fill
his shoes.

According to the NEW YORK TIMES (June 1, 1988), "When John McCain arrived in
here [in Washington] as a freshman Republican Congressman in 1983, one of the
issues very much on his mind was how the United States should deal with Vietnam .
. . He was, he said, dismayed by the Reagan Administration's flat refusal to afford
any kind of diplomatic recognition to Hanoi, something he thought could help clear
up a number of issues, including the fate of those servicemen still missing in action
. . . Mr. McCain, now the junior Senator from Arizona, is leading a legislative effort
to force the Administration to open a lower-level American post in Vietnam, which
could be preliminary to more formal relations."

SPEAKING OF FRAUD

Otherwise, McCain after his switch to the Senate differed little on any Reagan
Administration policy.

He made few waves until suddenly he found himself on television trying to explain
himself as one of the "Keating 5," five U.S. Senators who became enmeshed in the
scandal involving the collapsed Lincoln Savings and Loan and the financial
machinations of now convicted cheat Charles Keating. The U.S. taxpayers will feel
for years the aftershocks of what has become known as the "S & L scandal" and
will be paying off the billions that S & L clients found themselves swindled out of
by Keating and others involved in the massive fraud.

As one of the "Keating 5" Senators, John McCain saw his chances to higher office
go down the drain.

Reports from a variety of U.S. publications tell of the involvement of McCain in the
ever-widening scandal.

ECONOMIST, Mar. 9, 1991--"Mr. McCain, despite his claims of innocense, was the
only one of the five who benefited personally--family holidays in the Bahamas on
Mr. Keating's tab."

NEW REPUBLIC, Dec. 31, 1990--"The only Republican of the bunch [the five
Senators], John McCain of Arizona wins credit for finally drawing the line. After
the second of the two April meetings [with Federal regulators] he told Mr. [Sen.
Dennis] DeConcini [D-Ariz.] and Mr. Keating that he wouldn't lean on the regulators
any more. Mr. Keating called him a wimp. But before the rupture, Mr. McCain and
his family were regular guests of Mr. Keating's on trips to the Bahamas. Mr.
McCain reimbursed the owner of Lincoln Savings and Loan for only a small fraction
of the cost of these holidays. Yet, he never reported the vacations on Senate
disclosure forms, or his income taxes. He said he thought his wife had paid Mr.
Keating back. This is hard to believe."

NEW REPUBLIC, Sept. 9, 1991--Calling McCain part of the "Senatorial Lincoln


Brigade," the NEW REPUBLIC reported that Keating, while bankrupting his Savings
and Loan, had channeled $1.4 million to the campaigns or causes of the five
Senators, who in turn pressured the Savings and Loan regulators to "back off our
friend."Ultimately, the fall of Lincoln Savings and Loan will cost the U.S. taxpayers
$2 billion. It lost $1 million dollars a day from the time Keating bought it in 1984
until its collapse in 1989, and yet he continued to pay off McCain as "one of his
assets," REGARDIE'S magazine reported in its April-May 1992 issue.

POT CALLS THE KETTLE BLACK

Referring to POW/MIA activists who have raised public funds for their work in
trying to resolve the issue of Americans left behind in Vietnam, McCain said while
seated on the Senate Select Committee on POW and MIA Affairs:

"The people who have done these things are not zealots in a good cause. They are
criminals and some of the most craven, most cynical and most despicable human
beings to ever run a scam."

Yet, it's difficult to find anything bad Sen. McCain has said about his friend,
Charles F. Keating. And words like "craven" and "despicable" are impossible to find
at all to describe his friend, who cheated, among others, little old ladies out of
their life savings . . .

The U.S. VETERAN has also learned that during a meeting with Vietnamese
officials last July, Frances Zwenig, the $118,000-a-year staff director of the
Senate Select Committee, was told by the Vietnamese that something had to be
done about the POW/MIA activists.

Not long after the meeting in Hanoi, the Senate Select Committee started after
POW/MIA activists, painting them as cheats and con artists, prompting one
observer to ask, "Are the Vietnamese now directing the affairs of the Senate
Select Committee?"

The Senate Select Committee will make its final report to the Senate and the
American people on Jan. 5, 1993, as its plans now stand. If Sens. John McCain and
John Kerry have their way, as all factors seem to indicate that they will, the
report will trash POW/MIA activists, whose activities the Vietnamese have asked
the senators to curtail.

The report will conclude that U.S. Prisoners of war were left behind but all have
since died and that the Vietnamese are doing all they can to help search for the
remains of the dead.

Nevertheless, a report by Senators, each following his own personal agenda, will
not be written in stone and it will not end the dispute.

And the U.S. government will soon lift the trade embargo with Vietnam and
normalize relations.

However, if there are no POWs/MIAs left alive in Southeast Asia then it must be
assumed that in one way or another the Vietnamese caused their deaths. Certainly,
Sen. John McCain, a former POW, knows the current leaders of Vietnam were
responsible for murdering many while he was in a Hanoi prison.

Why, Sen. McCain, is there such a rush by you and others to do business with the
same regime, which you, yourself, once called "degenerate" and whose leaders'
hands are dripping with the blood of captive, helpless Americans--your fellow
POWs? Have the Vietnamese flipped you a Queen of Diamonds?

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi