Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2
x
2
+
2
y
2
2
+ k
2
. .
k
2
c
_
_
_
h
z
= 0
Solving the above equation is sufcient to nd all the
elds.
We can also dene a wave impedance to simplify the
computation
Z
TE
=
E
x
H
y
=
E
y
H
x
=
> k
c
>
k
c
=
c
For wave propagation, the frequency must be larger
than the cutoff frequency
c
Thus the waveguide acts like a high-pass lter
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 4/22
TM Waves
Now the situation is the dual of the TE case, e
z
= 0 but
h
z
= 0
Our equations simplify down to
H
x
=
j
k
2
c
e
z
y
H
y
=
j
k
2
c
e
z
x
E
x
=
j
k
2
c
e
z
x
E
y
=
j
k
2
c
e
z
y
And for k
c
= 0, our reduced Helmholtzs Eq. for E
z
_
2
x
2
+
2
y
2
+ k
2
c
_
e
z
= 0
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 5/22
TM Wave Impedance
With e
z
known, all the elds can be derived from the
above equations
The wave impedance is given by
Z
TM
=
E
x
H
y
=
E
y
H
x
=
Since =
_
k
2
k
2
c
, we see that the impedance is not
constant as a function of frequency.
The same high-pass cutoff behavior is also seen with
the TM wave
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 6/22
TE/TM Wave General Solution
1. Solve the reduced Helmholtz eq. for e
z
or h
z
2. Compute the transverse elds
3. Apply the boundary conditions to nd k
c
and any
unknown constants
4. Compute =
_
k
2
k
2
c
, so that = j and Z
TM
=
2
= 0
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 8/22
Voltage Potential of TEM Mode
The waveguide structure imposes the boundary
conditions on the surface of the conductors
(x, 0) = 0
(x, d) = V
0
Neglecting fringing elds for simplicity, we have
(x, y) = Ay + B
The rst boundary condition requires that B 0 and the
second one can be used to solve for A = V
0
/d.
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 9/22
Transverse Fields of TEM Mode
E
H
s = Dn
J
s
= H
t
The electric eld is now computed from the potential
e(x, y) =
t
=
_
x
x +
y
y
_
= y
V
0
d
E = e(x, y)e
jz
= y
V
0
d
e
jkz
H =
z E
Z
TEM
= x
V
0
d
e
jkz
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 10/22
Guide Voltages and Currents
The E and H elds are shown above. Notice that the
elds diverge on charge
n
= n D =
V
0
d
e
jkz
This charge is traveling at the speed of light and giving
rise to a current
I =
n
wc = w
1
V
0
d
e
jkz
=
wV
0
d
e
jkz
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 11/22
Guide Currents
We should also be able to nd the guide current from
Ampres law
I =
_
C
b
H d = wH
x
=
wV
0
d
e
jkz
This matches our previous calculation. A third way to
calculate the current is to observe that J
s
= H
t
I =
_
w
0
J
s
zdx =
wV
0
d
e
jkz
The line characteristic impedance is the ratio of voltage
to current
Z
0
=
V
I
= V
0
d
wV
0
=
d
w
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 12/22
Guide Impedance and Phase Velocity
The guide impedance is thus only a function of the
geometry of the guide. Likewise, the phase velocity
v
p
=
=
k
=
1
2
. As before, we take
x
= 0 for
simplicity
_
2
y
2
+ k
2
c
_
e
z
(x, y) = 0
The general solution of this simple equation is
e
z
(x, y) = Asin k
c
y + B cos k
c
y
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 14/22
TM Mode Boundary Conditions
Even though e
z
= 0 inside the guide, at the boundary of
the conductors, the tangential eld, and hence e
z
must
be zero.
This implies that B = 0 in the general solution. Also,
applying the boundary condition at y = d
e
z
(x, y = d) = 0 = Asin k
c
d
This is only true in general if k
c
= 0. But we have
already seen that this corresponds to a TEM wave. We
are now interested in TM waves so the argument of the
sine term must be a multiple of n for n = 1, 2, 3, . . .
k
c
d = n k
c
=
n
d
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 15/22
Axial Fields in Guide
The propagation constant is thus related to the
geometry of the guide (unlike the TEM case)
=
_
k
2
k
2
c
=
_
k
2
_
n
d
_
2
The axial elds are thus completely specied
e
z
(x, y) = A
n
sin
_
ny
d
_
E
z
(x, y, z) = A
n
sin
_
ny
d
_
e
jz
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 16/22
Transverse TM Fields
All the other elds are a function of E
z
H
x
=
j
k
2
c
E
z
y
H
y
=
j
k
2
c
E
z
x
E
x
=
j
k
2
c
E
z
x
E
y
=
j
k
2
c
E
z
y
So that H
y
= E
x
= 0 by inspection. The other
components are
H
x
=
j
k
c
A
n
cos
_
ny
d
_
e
jz
E
y
=
j
k
c
A
n
cos
_
ny
d
_
e
jz
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 17/22
Cutoff Frequency
As we have already noted, for wave propagation must
be real. Since =
_
k
2
k
2
c
, we require
k > k
c
> k
c
>
k
c
=
c
c
=
n
d
=
nc
2d
=
n
g
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 18/22
TM Mode Velocity and Impedance
The TM mode wave impedance is given by
Z
TM
=
E
y
H
x
=
k =
k
This is a purely real number for propagation modes
f > f
c
and a purely imaginary impedance for cutoff
modes
The phase velocity is given by
v
p
=
=
k
_
1
_
k
c
k
_
2
=
c
_
1
_
k
c
k
_
2
> c
The phase velocity is faster than the speed of light!
Does that bother you?
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 19/22
Phase Velocity
Its important to remember that the phase velocity is a
relationship between the spatial and time components
of a wave in steady-state. It does not represent the
wave evolution!
Thus its quite possible for the phase to advance faster
than the time lag of light as long as this phase lag is a
result of a steady-state process (you must wait an
innite amount of time!)
The rate at which the wave evolves is given by the
group velocity
v
g
=
_
d
d
_
1
c
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 20/22
Power Flow
Lets compute the average power ow along the guide
for a TM mode. This is equal to the real part of the
complex Poynting vector integrated over the guide
P
0
=
1
2
_
w
0
_
d
0
E H
zdydx
z E H
= E
y
H
x
=
j
k
c
_
A
n
cos
ny
d
_
2
j
k
c
=
k
2
c
A
2
n
cos
2
ny
d
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 21/22
Power Flow (cont)
Integrating the cos
2
term produces a factor of 1/2
P
0
=
1
4
wd
k
2
c
|A
n
|
2
()
Therefore, as expected, if f > f
c
, the power ow is
non-zero but for cutoff modes, f < f
c
, the average
power ow is zero
University of California, Berkeley EECS 117 Lecture 26 p. 22/22