Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

Downloaded from ard.bmj.com on February 13, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.

com

Extended report

National cohort study of reproductive risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis in Denmark: a role for hyperemesis, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia?
K T Jrgensen,1 B V Pedersen,1 S Jacobsen,2 R J Biggar,1 M Frisch1
1

Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2 Department of Rheumatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Correspondence to: Mr K T Jrgensen, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark; ktj@ssi.dk Accepted 3 March 2009 Published Online First 15 March 2009

ABSTRACT Objectives: While reproductive factors might plausibly be involved in the aetiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the female predominance remains unexplained. A study was undertaken to address the possible impact of live births, pregnancy losses and pregnancy complications on the subsequent risk of RA in a nationwide cohort study. Methods: National register data were used to link reproductive histories and later RA hospitalisations in a cohort of 4.4 million Danes. As a measure of relative risk associated with different reproductive histories, ratios of first inpatient RA hospitalisation rates (RRs) were used with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained by Poisson regression analysis. Results: Overall, 7017 women and 3041 men were admitted to hospital with RA in 19772004 (88.8 million person-years). The risk of RA was inversely associated with age at birth of first child in both women and men (p for trend ,0.001). Overall, nulliparity and a history of pregnancy loss were not associated with RA risk but, compared with one-child mothers, women with two (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.90) or three (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91) children were at reduced risk. The risk of RA was increased in women with a history of hyperemesis (RR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.54), gestational hypertension (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.02) or pre-eclampsia (RR 1.42; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.84). Conclusions: One-child mothers and young parents are at increased risk of RA later in life, possibly due to socioeconomic factors. The novel finding of a significantly increased risk of RA in women whose pregnancies were complicated by hyperemesis, gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia might reflect reduced immune adaptability to pregnancy in women disposed to RA or a role of fetal microchimerism in the aetiology of RA.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is more than twice as common in women as in men.1 2 This skewed sex ratio remains unexplained, but reproductive factors might be involved.3 During pregnancy, women with already established RA often undergo clinical remission whereas, in the postpartum period, symptoms may exacerbate.4 5 Several studies have investigated possible associations between reproductive factors and the risk of RA.621 While studies generally agree that abortions and stillbirths are not related to the risk of RA,6 9 13 15 19 results for other pregnancy variables vary considerably.9 10 13 15 17 20 The present study aimed to re-evaluate associations between reproductive factors and risk of RA

using nationwide hospitalisation data from Denmark spanning three decades. Persistence of fetal cells in maternal circulation, known as fetal microchimerism, has been suggested as one possible mechanism for the development of autoimmune conditions.2224 Given the recent evidence of increased levels of fetal microchimerism in women whose pregnancies were complicated by pre-eclampsia,25 26 we paid particular attention to the possible impact of hypertensive diseases during pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


We established a cohort comprising all Danish women and men born in 193589. This cohort was linked to national health registries by means of the unique identification number ascribed to all Danish inhabitants to obtain information about reproductive histories and RA hospitalisations. Although the risk factors considered were related to pregnancy, we also analysed their possible impact in men because fathers probably share major socioeconomic characteristics with mothers but do not share the biological factors related to pregnancy. Thus, fathers served as a control for unmeasured lifestyle factors.

Reproductive histories
For both women and men, information about live births was obtained from the Civil Registration System, a continuously updated database that has recorded all demographic events in Denmark since 1 April 1968. As described elsewhere,27 this database provides a virtually complete record of live births for women born in 1935 or later. For each parent, children were defined as pregnancies that resulted in at least one live born child. For women born in or after 1955, we also obtained detailed information about induced abortions (International Classification of Diseases (ICD-8) 640, 641, 642; ICD-10 O04, O05, O06) from the National Registry of Induced Abortions and the Danish National Patient Registry (period 1974 2004). For ectopic pregnancies (ICD-8 631; ICD-10 O00), spontaneous abortions (ICD-8 643; ICD-10 O03), missed abortions (ICD-8 63461, 63462, 63463, 63469, 6451; ICD-10 O021), hydatidiform moles (ICD-8 63429, 6450; ICD-10 O01), hyperemesis (ICD-8 63809, 63899, 76249; ICD-10 O21), gestational hypertension (ICD-8 63700, 63702; ICD-10 O12, O13, O16), and pre-eclampsia (including eclampsia) (ICD-8 63703, 63704,
Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:358363. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.099945

358

Downloaded from ard.bmj.com on February 13, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com

Extended report
63709, 63719, 63799, 63999, 76219, 76229, 76239, 76299; ICD-10 O14, O15), we used data from the Danish National Patient Registry (period 19772004). Data about stillbirths were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry (period 19732004). analyses were made for men who fathered children born after pregnancies complicated by these diseases.

RESULTS Women
Among 2 140 056 women born in 193589, 7017 patients were hospitalised with RA during 43.5 million person-years of followup between 1977 and 2004. Median age at first hospitalisation for RA was 45 years (range 1569). Compared with nulliparous women, parous women were at no unusual risk of RA (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.04). However, compared with one-child mothers, women with two or more children had a significantly reduced risk (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.90 for two-children mothers; RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91 for three-children mothers) after adjusting for age at first childbirth (table 1). Women who had their first child before age 20 years were at higher risk than women who were 2024 years old at their first childbirth (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.29), and the risk declined further with increasing age at first childbirth (p for trend ,0.001). We also studied the risk of RA for a subset of 1 387 186 women born in 195589 for whom data on adverse pregnancy outcomes and pregnancy-related diseases were available. This analysis was based on 1648 cases of RA occurring during 23.6 million person-years of follow-up (tables 2 and 3). The median age at first RA hospitalisation was 30 years (range 15 49). After adjusting for number of children and age at birth of first child, RRs did not differ significantly between women with and without histories of spontaneous abortions, missed abortions, stillbirths, induced abortions, ectopic pregnancies or hydatidiform moles (table 2). As shown in table 3, however, women with histories of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis (RR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.54), gestational hypertension (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.02) or pre-eclampsia (RR 1.42; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.84) had a significantly increased risk of RA compared with women without such histories. Indeed, the risk of RA increased significantly with increasing number of pregnancies complicated by gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia (p for trend = 0.003). After taking the number of such complicated pregnancies into account, the risk of RA did not differ with time since the most recent complicated pregnancy.

RA outcomes
Information about first inpatient hospital contacts for RA (ICD-8 71219, 71229, 71239, 71259; ICD-10 M05 and M06) was obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry (period 19772004).

Stratification of person-years and RA outcomes


Women and men were analysed separately. Each cohort member contributed person-years at risk from her or his 15th birthday or 1 January 1977, whichever came later, to the date of first RA hospitalisation, death, emigration, disappearance or 1 January 2005, whichever came first. By the end of the study (31 December 2004), cohort members born in 1935 or later were 15 69 years old and women born in 1955 or later were 1549 years old. Specifically, person-years and RA outcomes were stratified in a time-dependent manner according to age, birth cohort, calendar period (all in 1-year age groups), marital status (unmarried, married, separated/divorced or widowed) and each of the following live birth-related variables: number of children (0, 1, 2, 3, 4+), age at birth of first child (,20, 2024, 2529, 30+ years) and time since birth of the most recent child (0,2, 24, 59, 1014, 1519, 20+ years). For women born in 1955 or later, we also stratified person-years and RA outcomes in a timedependent manner by the number of spontaneous abortions (0, 1+), missed abortions (0, 1+), stillbirths (0, 1+), any of the three preceding idiopathic pregnancy losses (0, 1, 2+), induced abortions (0, 1, 2+), ectopic pregnancies (0, 1+), hydatidiform moles (0, 1+) and according to the number of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis (0, 1+) or pregnancy-related hypertension, including diagnoses of gestational hypertension (0, 1+) or pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (0, 1+) and time since most recent pregnancy-related hypertensive disease (0,2, 24, 59, 1014, 1519, 20+ years). This time-dependent handling of exposures and outcomes ensured that only pregnancies that preceded the first recorded RA hospitalisation were considered.

Poisson regression analysis


The statistical analysis of the resulting table of stratum-specific RA incidence rates was carried out as a log-linear Poisson regression analysis, yielding rate ratios (RRs) of first inpatient hospitalisation rates for RA and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In RR calculations we adjusted for marital status as well as for age, birth cohort and calendar period using cubic splines restricted to be linear in the tails.28 Adjustment for other variables was performed using the categorisations described above. In trend tests, categorised quantitative variables were treated as continuous variables by replacing each category by the person-years-weighted median of the original variable in that category. Trend tests were carried out only after acceptance (p>0.05) of the corresponding model reduction from a categorical to a linear description of the association between RA and the variable in question. Two-sided tests were applied; p values ,0.05 and 95% CIs excluding unity were considered statistically significant. To further address findings in women whose pregnancies were complicated by hyperemesis, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, a set of parallel
Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:358363. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.099945

Men
In the cohort of 2 243 840 men born in 193589, 3041 cases of RA occurred during 45.3 million person-years of follow-up. The median age at first hospitalisation for RA was 46 years (range 1569). Overall, the risk of RA was unrelated to whether a man had children or not (table 1), but the risk of RA was higher among men who fathered their first child at a young age (p for trend ,0.001). Men were at a transiently reduced risk of RA in the first 2 years following the birth of the most recent child (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91) compared with the period 10 14 years after. Men fathering children following pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.93; n = 10 RA cases), gestational hypertension (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.30; n = 30) or pre-eclampsia (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.59 to 1.20; n = 32) were at no unusual risk of RA compared with other men.

DISCUSSION
With 7017 hospitalised cases of RA among women and 3041 cases among men, our study is by far the largest to investigate
359

Downloaded from ard.bmj.com on February 13, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com

Extended report
Table 1 Rate ratios of rheumatoid arthritis according to live birth history among Danish women and men aged 1569 years*
Women RA cases Children{ 0 1406 1+ 5611 Number of children 1 1234 2 2595 3 1265 4+ 517 Test for homogeneity Test for trend Age at birth of first child (years) ,20 1143 2024 2756 2529 1311 30+ 401 Change per additional year Test for homogeneity Test for trend Time since birth of most recent child (years) 0,2 290 24 386 59 686 1014 771 1519 857 20+ 2621 Test for homogeneity Test for trend Person-years 16639010 26851590 7075248 12965114 5130019 1681209 RR{ 1 0.96 1 0.84 0.83 0.89 95% CI Reference 0.89 to 1.04 Reference 0.78 to 0.90 0.77 to 0.91 0.80 to 1.00 p,0.001 NA 1.12 to 1.29 Reference 0.81 to 0.93 0.68 to 0.85 0.96 to 0.97 p,0.001 p,0.001 0.86 to 1.14 0.83 to 1.08 0.91 to 1.13 Reference 0.96 to 1.18 0.98 to 1.21 p = 0.48 p = 0.08 Men RA cases 808 2233 464 1065 500 204 Person-years 21958015 23316720 6515052 11052467 4293401 1455800 RR{ 1 0.94 1 0.93 0.91 0.95 95% CI Reference 0.84 to 1.05 Reference 0.83 to 1.04 0.79 to 1.04 0.79 to 1.12 p = 0.51 p = 0.33 0.96 to 1.40 Reference 0.72 to 0.88 0.63 to 0.81 0.95 to 0.97 p,0.001 p,0.001 0.57 to 0.91 0.81 to 1.19 0.98 to 1.34 Reference 0.92 to 1.25 0.83 to 1.14 p = 0.002 NA

4499934 12694478 7333289 2323889

1.20 1 0.87 0.76 0.97

122 929 810 372

1051807 8431564 9312039 4521309

1.16 1 0.80 0.72 0.96

3586852 4014014 4799077 4066317 3492438 6892891

0.99 0.95 1.02 1 1.06 1.09

97 183 346 325 354 928

3478845 3862178 4531082 3630550 2912759 4901307

0.72 0.98 1.15 1 1.07 0.97

*Analysis of the impact of live births were carried out for a cohort of 2 140 056 women and 2 243 840 men born in 193589 who were aged 1569 years during follow-up for RA in the period 19772004. {All RRs are adjusted for age, birth cohort, calendar period and marital status. In addition, RRs for number of children and age at birth of first child are mutually adjusted for each other; RRs for time since birth of most recent child are adjusted for number of children and age at birth of first child. {Number of children operationally defined as each womans number of pregnancies resulting in at least one live born child and, for men, as the number of pregnancies they fathered that resulted in at least one live born child. NA, not applicable; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RR, rate ratio.

possible associations between reproductive factors and risk of RA. Also, our study is the first to carry out parallel analyses of the impact of children in women and men, an approach which helps to distinguish between biological and social causes of the observed associations. Salient observations include an increased RA risk in one-child mothers, in women and men who became parents at a young age, and in women with pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis, gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Controversy surrounds the possible impact of parity. In some studies, women without children were found to be at increased risk of RA8 9 17 20 while others found no association.7 10 11 13 Our study clearly supports the view that nulliparity is not a marker of increased RA risk. However, we found that one-child mothers were at a significantly higher risk of RA than women with two or more children. Theoretically, women with one child only might have experienced fertility or pregnancy problems more frequently than women with two or more children. If so, the finding that one-child mothers are at an increased risk of RA is compatible with studies showing increased frequencies of subfertility before the onset of RA.6 12 14 17 21 In contrast to most previous studies, we found a significant inverse association between age at birth of first child and subsequent risk of RA among both women and men.7 9 11 13 17 Specifically, there was a significant 3% and 4% decrease in the risk of RA with each 1-year increase in age at first childbirth among women and men, respectively. The similar finding for men suggests that this association may not be related to
360

pregnancy. Instead, socioeconomic factors29 or lifestyle factors (such as tobacco smoking) that prevail in lower socioeconomic strata of society may be involved.30 We were able to adjust for socioeconomic differences that follow marital status, but we had no information about tobacco consumption in our study cohort. Thus, a possible confounding influence of tobacco consumption, which has a negative effect on fertility31 while conferring an increased risk of RA,15 cannot be excluded. We found no significant association between pregnancy terminationswhether by induced abortions or idiopathic pregnancy lossesand subsequent risk of RA. These observations are in agreement with negative findings in most previous studies that examined pregnancy losses as potential risk factors for RA.6 9 12 13 19 To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to examine the possible role of hyperemesis, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia in relation to RA risk. We observed significant increases in the risk of RA for all three conditions and, among women with pregnancies complicated by gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia, the risk was proportional to the number of such complicated pregnancies. Nausea and vomiting are common in the first trimester of pregnancy and probably attributable to the changing hormonal milieu of pregnancy.32 However, only the few cases severe enough to require hospitalisation with a diagnosis of hyperemesis would be registered in our records. Hospitalisation for hypertensive complications of pregnancy, including pre-eclampsia, usually
Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:358363. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.099945

Downloaded from ard.bmj.com on February 13, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com

Extended report
Table 2 Rate ratios of rheumatoid arthritis according to history of pregnancy losses among Danish women aged 1549 years*
RA cases Spontaneous abortion 0 1+ Missed abortion 0 1+ Stillbirth 0 1+ Any idiopathic pregnancy loss{ 0 1 2+ Test for homogeneity Test for trend Induced abortion 0 1 2+ Test for homogeneity Test for trend Ectopic pregnancy 0 1+ Hydatidiform mole 0 1+ 1520 128 1603 45 1640 8 Person-years 22349988 1222215 23081562 490640 23499365 72837 RR{ 1 1.09 1 0.99 1 1.12 95% CI Reference 0.90 to 1.31 Reference 0.73 to 1.32 Reference 0.51 to 2.09

1480 140 28

21908693 1382117 281392

1 1.08 1.01

Reference 0.90 to 1.29 0.67 to 1.44 p = 0.69 p = 0.53 Reference 0.88 to 1.16 0.90 to 1.34 p = 0.64 p = 0.42 Reference 0.82 to 1.57 Reference 0.02 to 1.84

1289 250 109

19724777 2854155 993272

1 1.01 1.10

1610 38 1647 1

23247907 324297 23546186 26016

1 1.15 1 0.42

*Analysis of the impact of pregnancy losses was carried out for a cohort of 1 387 186 women born in 195589 who were aged 1549 years during follow-up for RA in the period 19772004. {All RRs are adjusted for age, birth cohort, calendar period, marital status, number of children and age at birth of first child. {Spontaneous abortion, missed abortion or stillbirth. RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RR, rate ratio.

occurs in the third trimester.33 We are not aware of a common link between hyperemesis and hypertensive pregnancy complications that would explain why both would be related to subsequent RA risk. There may be both medical and social causes leading to hospitalisation. Generally, pregnancy complications have been reported to be more frequent in women from lower socioeconomic strata,34 35 so the observed excess risk associated with hyperemesis and hypertensive pregnancy complications might in part reflect the influence of uncontrolled socioeconomic factors. However, we did not see a similar significant relationship among men whose childrens mothers were hospitalised for hyperemesis, gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia, as might be expected for a socioeconomic explanation. When considering possible biological mechanisms for the increased risk of RA following hyperemesis and hypertensive pregnancies, it should be recalled that immunological abnormalities may occur even decades before a clinical diagnosis of RA.3638 It is conceivable that subclinical immunological activity in women destined to develop RA might somehow disturb these womens immune adaptation to pregnancy in ways that result in hyperemesis, gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Moreover, women with already established rheumatic disease are also more likely to develop pre-eclampsia than nonrheumatic women.39 Another mechanism to be considered is fetal microchimerism. Fetal cells may persist in maternal circulation for decades but are usually cleared soon after delivery.40 41 The concept that circulating immune competent fetal cells may give rise to
Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:358363. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.099945

autoimmune diseases has gained increasing attention in recent years.22 Of relevance in the present context, studies have shown that women with pre-eclampsia have considerably higher concentrations of circulating fetal cells.26 Thus, our finding of an increased risk of RA following pre-eclamptic pregnancies might be viewed as favouring a microchimeric mechanism. However, we saw no clear relationship between parity and RA risk, whereas one might theoretically expect that the risk of RA would be lowest in nulliparous women and increase directly with the number of children. Theoretically, the impact of fetal microchimeric cells on the risk of RA might depend on the mothers ability to clear the fetal cells, a feature whichfor as yet unclear reasonsmight differ between women with hyperemesis, gestational hypertension, or pre-eclampsia and women who do not experience such pregnancy complications. Despite its large size, its cohort design and its populationbased nature, our study has a number of limitations that need attention. Overall, the cohort comprised women and men in the age span 1569 years but, for the analyses of pregnancy complications, we only had data for women aged 1549 years. Thus, our findings may not necessarily apply to RA with onset in older age groups. Also, to identify RA outcomes in our study, we relied on first inpatient hospital contacts for RA among our cohort members because the validity of such inpatient records has been found to be .70% in the Danish National Patient Registry.42 However, it should be noted that, for some patients with RA, an inpatient hospital contact may occur rather late in the course of the disease. For the 10 058 cohort members who
361

Downloaded from ard.bmj.com on February 13, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com

Extended report
Table 3 Rate ratios of rheumatoid arthritis according to history of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis, gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia among Danish women aged 1549 years*
RA cases Pregnancies with hyperemesis 0 1+ 1627 21 Person-years 23433073 139129 RR{ 1 1.70 95% CI Reference 1.06 to 2.54

Pregnancies with gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia 0 1558 22920827 1 78 577839 2+ 12 73537 Test for homogeneity Test for trend Gestational hypertension 0 1+ Pre-eclampsia 0 1+

1 1.44 1.65

Reference 1.13 to 1.81 0.88 to 2.78 p = 0.004 p = 0.003

1609 39 1591 57

23312638 259564 23139738 432464

1 1.49 1 1.42

Reference 1.06 to 2.02 Reference 1.08 to 1.84

Time since most recent pregnancy complicated by gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia (years) 0,2 8 114531 0.82 24 20 143080 1.46 59 21 176688 1.03 1014 17 116243 1 1519 14 68179 1.05 20+ 10 32654 1.10 Test for homogeneity Test for trend

0.33 to 1.85 0.76 to 2.83 0.55 to 1.99 Reference 0.51 to 2.13 0.48 to 2.39 p = 0.78 p = 0.87

*Analysis of the impact of hyperemesis, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia was carried out for a cohort of 1 387 186 women born in 195589 who were aged 1549 years during follow-up for RA in the period 19772004. {All RRs are adjusted for age, birth cohort, calendar period, marital status, number of children and age at birth of first child. In addition, RRs for time since most recent pregnancy complicated by gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia are adjusted for number of such complicated pregnancies. RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RR, rate ratio.

developed RA in our study, we do not know when the initial immunological changes took place that eventually led to the diagnosis of RA and to admission to hospital. For the entire cohort, the median age at first RA hospitalisation was 45 years for women, which is well beyond the age when most women have completed their reproduction. However, for the subset of women born after 1955 (ie, the cohort for which we had information about pregnancy losses and pregnancy complications), the median age at first RA hospitalisation was 30 years. We cannot exclude the possibility that, for some of these women, the disease process leading to RA hospitalisation might have preceded the recorded reproductive events. Furthermore, an unknown proportion of patients with RA were not identified owing to milder disease that did not require hospitalisation. Our findings may not therefore necessarily apply to patients with mild RA. We believe that routine records of live births and stillbirths are close to 100% valid and complete in the Danish health registers, but formal validation of other reproductive variables has been undertaken only for pre-eclampsia.42 43 It is therefore noteworthy that our significant findings of an increased risk of RA associated with hyperemesis, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia occurred despite the possible influence of nonspecific data errors that would tend to favour null findings. Prevalent cases of RA could potentially have influenced the risk estimations. For example, women diagnosed with RA before the start of the Danish National Patient Registry in 1977 might have had their disease recorded for the first time in
362

connection with one of the studied reproductive events at some point after 1977. However, such bias is unlikely to have produced the observed significant association with hyperemesis, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia because the risk of RA in the first 2 years after the most recent complicated pregnancy was negligible. Finally, we had only a limited number of variables available to control for potential confounding by socioeconomic factors. We adjusted for marital status, but other confounders might have impacted on the observed risk associations between reproductive factors and the risk of RA. For instance, to the extent that tobacco smoking is linked to the pregnancy factors under study, RRs might be confounded. However, the observed increased risk of RA in women with a history of pre-eclampsia cannot plausibly be explained by unmeasured tobacco consumption because tobacco smoking, an established risk factor for RA,15 protects against pre-eclampsia.44 To partially account for the lack of ability to control for socioeconomic factors, we carried out all analyses of the impact of live births in both women and men. For instance, by finding a statistically significant association between young age at first childbirth and the risk of RA in both men and women, it seems likely that the underlying mechanism among women is not a physiological effect of pregnancy. However, a possible influence of socioeconomic factors and other unmeasured confounders cannot be excluded. Three main results emerged from this study. Women who had given birth to only one child and women and men who had their first child at a young age were at an increased risk of RA,
Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:358363. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.099945

Downloaded from ard.bmj.com on February 13, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com

Extended report
and women with a history of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis, gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia were at an increased risk of RA of 4270%. Socioeconomic factors may be responsible, at least in part, for the link with young age at first childbirth. If they represent genuine new clues to the aetiology of RA, the novel associations with pregnancy complications might be explained by a deterioration in immune adaptability to pregnancy in women predisposed to RA or by increased fetal microchimerism. Confirmatory studies are clearly warranted.
Funding: The study was supported by unrestricted research grants from the Danish Ministry of Interior and Health, Danish Graduate School in Public Health Science, The Lundbeck Foundation, The Danish Rheumatism Association, Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, Max Fodgaards Foundation, Aage and Johanne Louis-Hansens Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation and The A P Mller and Wife Chastine McKinney Mllers Foundation. Competing interests: None. Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (approval no. 2008-41-2374). Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Silman A, Kay A, Brennan P. Timing of pregnancy in relation to the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:1525. Spector TD, Silman AJ. Is poor pregnancy outcome a risk factor in rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 1990;49:124. Spector TD, Roman E, Silman AJ. The pill, parity, and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:7829. van Dunne FM, Lard LR, Rook D, et al. Miscarriage but not fecundity is associated with progression of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:95660. Lapaire O, Hosli I, Zanetti-Daellenbach R, et al. Impact of fetal-maternal microchimerism on womens healtha review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20:15. Nelson JL. HLA relationships of pregnancy, microchimerism and autoimmune disease. J Reprod Immunol 2001;52:7784. Sarkar K, Miller FW. Possible roles and determinants of microchimerism in autoimmune and other disorders. Autoimmun Rev 2004;3:45463. Holzgreve W, Ghezzi F, Di NE, et al. Disturbed feto-maternal cell traffic in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:66972. Lo YM, Leung TN, Tein MS, et al. Quantitative abnormalities of fetal DNA in maternal serum in preeclampsia. Clin Chem 1999;45:1848. Pedersen CB, Gotzsche H, Moller JO, et al. The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. Dan Med Bull 2006;53:4419. Harrell FE Jr. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. 1st edn. New York: Springer, 2001:203. Pedersen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, et al. Socioeconomic status and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish case-control study. J Rheumatol 2006;33:106974. Osler M, Holstein B, Avlund K, et al. Socioeconomic position and smoking behaviour in Danish adults. Scand J Public Health 2001;29:329. Soares SR, Melo MA. Cigarette smoking and reproductive function. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008;20:28191. Verberg MF, Gillott DJ, Al-Fardan N, et al. Hyperemesis gravidarum, a literature review. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:52739. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science 2005;308:15924. Clausen T, Oyen N, Henriksen T. Pregnancy complications by overweight and residential area. A prospective study of an urban Norwegian cohort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:52633. Silva LM, Coolman M, Steegers EA, et al. Low socioeconomic status is a risk factor for preeclampsia: the Generation R Study. J Hypertens 2008;26:12008. Jrgensen KT, Wiik A, Pedersen M, et al. Cytokines, autoantibodies, and viral antibodies in premorbid and postdiagnostic sera from patients with rheumatoid arthritis: case-control study nested in a cohort of Norwegian blood donors. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:8606. Nielen MM, van Schaardenburg D, Reesink HW, et al. Specific autoantibodies precede the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a study of serial measurements in blood donors. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3806. Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, de Jong BA, Berglin E, et al. Antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide and IgA rheumatoid factor predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:27419. Wolfberg AJ, Lee-Parritz A, Peller AJ, et al. Association of rheumatologic disease with preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:11903. Ariga H, Ohto H, Busch MP, et al. Kinetics of fetal cellular and cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation during and after pregnancy: implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Transfusion 2001;41:152430. Nelson JL, Furst DE, Maloney S, et al. Microchimerism and HLA-compatible relationships of pregnancy in scleroderma. Lancet 1998;351:55962. Pedersen M, Klarlund M, Jacobsen S, et al. Validity of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry. Eur J Epidemiol 2004;19:1097103. Klemmensen AK, Olsen SF, Osterdal ML, et al. Validity of preeclampsia-related diagnoses recorded in a national hospital registry and in a postpartum interview of the women. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:11724. Lain KY, Powers RW, Krohn MA, et al. Urinary cotinine concentration confirms the reduced risk of preeclampsia with tobacco exposure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:11926.

REFERENCES
1. 2. 3. 4. Cassell DK, Rose N. The encyclopedia of autoimmune diseases. New York: Facts On File Inc, 2003. Harrison TR. Principles of internal medicine. 15th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001. Kaaja RJ, Greer IA. Manifestations of chronic disease during pregnancy. JAMA 2005;294:27517. Barrett JH, Brennan P, Fiddler M, et al. Does rheumatoid arthritis remit during pregnancy and relapse postpartum? Results from a nationwide study in the United Kingdom performed prospectively from late pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:121927. stensen M, Villiger PM. The remission of rheumatoid arthritis during pregnancy. Semin Immunopathol 2007;29:18591. Brennan P, Silman AJ. An investigation of gene-environment interaction in the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:45360. Brun JG, Nilssen S, Kvale G. Breast feeding, other reproductive factors and rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective study. Br J Rheumatol 1995;34:5426. del Junco DJ, Annegers JF, Coulam CB, et al. The relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and reproductive function. Br J Rheumatol 1989;28(Suppl 1):335. Hazes JM, Dijkmans BA, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Pregnancy and the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:17705. Hernandez AM, Liang MH, Willett WC, et al. Reproductive factors, smoking, and the risk for rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology 1990;1:28591. Karlson EW, Mandl LA, Hankinson SE, et al. Do breast-feeding and other reproductive factors influence future risk of rheumatoid arthritis? Results from the Nurses Health Study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:345867. Kay A, Bach F. Subfertility before and after the development of rheumatoid arthritis in women. Ann Rheum Dis 1965;24:16973. Merlino LA, Cerhan JR, Criswell LA, et al. Estrogen and other female reproductive risk factors are not strongly associated with the development of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly women. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003;33:7282. Nelson JL, Koepsell TD, Dugowson CE, et al. Fecundity before disease onset in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1993;36:714. Pedersen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, et al. Environmental risk factors differ between rheumatoid arthritis with and without auto-antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8:R133. Pope JE, Bellamy N, Stevens A. The lack of associations between rheumatoid arthritis and both nulliparity and infertility. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1999;28:34250. Reckner OA, Skogh T, Wingren G. Comorbidity and lifestyle, reproductive factors, and environmental exposures associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:9349.

5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44.

Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:358363. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.099945

363

Downloaded from ard.bmj.com on February 13, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com

National cohort study of reproductive risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis in Denmark: a role for hyperemesis, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia?
K T Jrgensen, B V Pedersen, S Jacobsen, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010 69: 358-363 originally published online March 15, 2009

doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.099945

Updated information and services can be found at:


http://ard.bmj.com/content/69/2/358.full.html

These include:

References

This article cites 41 articles, 14 of which can be accessed free at:


http://ard.bmj.com/content/69/2/358.full.html#ref-list-1

Article cited in:


http://ard.bmj.com/content/69/2/358.full.html#related-urls

Email alerting service

Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the box at the top right corner of the online article.

Topic Collections

Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections Connective tissue disease (2492 articles) Degenerative joint disease (2739 articles) Epidemiology (837 articles) Immunology (including allergy) (2908 articles) Musculoskeletal syndromes (2950 articles) Rheumatoid arthritis (1882 articles) Health economics (32 articles)

Notes

To request permissions go to:


http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

To order reprints go to:


http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform

To subscribe to BMJ go to:


http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi