S.L.

Bhawan, Kaiser Ganj, Kaisarganj, Ajmer - 305001 |View Map Call: +(91)-(145)-2426611

Specifications of ASUS X53SC-SX536D / 2nd Generation Core i5 / 4 GB / 750 GB / DOSPrice:

Rs. 35960
PROCESSOR Processor Variant Chipset Brand Clock Speed Cache MEMORY Memory Slots System Memory STORAGE Hardware Interface RPM HDD Capacity OPTICAL DISK DRIVE Read/Write Speed Optical Drive PLATFORM Operating System DISPLAY Screen Size Resolution Screen Type 15.6 Inch 1366 x 768 Pixel HD Glare Display DOS DVD RW 8x SuperMulti Dual Layer Drive SATA 5400 750 GB 2 (Unused slots 0) 4 GB DDR3 2nd Generation Core i5 2430M Mobile Intel HM65 Express Chipset Intel 2.4 GHz 3 MB

GRAPHICS Dedicated Graphics Memory Type Dedicated Graphics Memory Capacity Graphic Processor INPUT Web Camera Pointer Device Keyboard AUDIO Internal Mic Speakers COMMUNICATION Ethernet Wireless LAN Bluetooth POWER Battery Backup Battery Cell PORTS/SLOTS USB Port Mic In RJ45 LAN HDMI Port VGA Port SECURITY Lock Port WARRANTY 1 Year Global On-Site Limited Warranty See Details Yes 2 x USB 2.0, 1 x USB 3.0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Up to 3 hours 6 cell 10/100/1000 Mbps IEEE 802.11 b/g/n v3.0 + HS Yes Yes 0.3 megapixel Touchpad Standard Keyboard DDR3 1 GB NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

Intel Core i5 2430M

The Intel Core i5-2430M is a fast dual core processor at the time of introduction in Q3 2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.4 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.7 GHz (2 cores active) and 3 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2430M does not support VT-d and Trusted Execution functions. Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. The i5-2430M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2430M it is clocked from 6501200MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M or the otherwise nearly similar i5-2435M). Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part. Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2430M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. In our benchmarks, the 2430M was able to beat the fast Intel Core i5-560M with 2.7-3.2GHz and is therefore suited for even demanding tasks. The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.
Series Codename Clock Rate Level 1 Cache Level 2 Cache Level 3 Cache Number of Cores / Threads Max. Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power) Transistor Count Intel Core i5 Sandy Bridge 2400 - 3000 MHz 128 KB 512 KB 3072 KB 2/4

35 Watt

624 Million

Manufacturing Technology Die Size Max. Temperature Socket Features

32 nm

149 mm2 100 C PPGA988 HD Graphics 3000, DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization 64 Bit support VT-x $225 U.S. 11/02/2011 Intel Core i5 2430M

64 Bit Hardware Virtualization Starting Price Announcement Date Product Link (external)

CPU Benchmarks
3DMark 06 - CPU: 0% 100% min: 2878 avg: 3205.9 (38%) max: 3375 Points Show comparison chart

7 benchmarks and specifications Super Pi 1M: 0% 100% min: 13 avg: 13.1 (3%)

max: 13.4 Seconds Show comparison chart

6 benchmarks and specifications Super Pi 2M: 0% 100% min: 30 avg: 30.4 (1%)

max: 31 Seconds Show comparison chart

6 benchmarks and specifications Super Pi 32M: 0% 100%

min: 694

avg: 722.5 (3%)

max: 765 Seconds Show comparison chart

6 benchmarks and specifications SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS): 0% 100% min: 47280 avg: 50975 (24%)

max: 54670 MIPS Show comparison chart

2 benchmarks and specifications SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS): 0% 100% min: 33000 avg: 33345 (26%)

max: 33690 MFLOPS Show comparison chart

2 benchmarks and specifications PCMark Vantage: Result 1024x768 0% 100% min: 5674 avg: 6435.6 (32%)

max: 7229 Points Show comparison chart

8 benchmarks and specifications Cinebench R10: Rendering Single 32Bit 0% 100% min: 3410 avg: 3733.3 (74%)

max: 3853 Points Show comparison chart

6 benchmarks and specifications Cinebench R10: Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit 0% 100% min: 7068 avg: 8058.3 (30%)

max: 8303 Points Show comparison chart

6 benchmarks and specifications Cinebench R10: Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit 0% 100% min: 8767 avg: 9758.2 (30%)

max: 10170 Points Show comparison chart

10 benchmarks and specifications Cinebench R10: Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit 0% 100% min: 4425 avg: 4696.7 (74%)

max: 4809 Points Show comparison chart

10 benchmarks and specifications

3DMark Vantage: P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024 0% 100% min: 7748 avg: 9558.6 (22%) max: 16921 Points Show comparison chart

8 benchmarks and specifications wPrime 2.0x: 32m 0% 100% min: 17.7 avg: 18.9 (4%)

max: 20.079 seconds Show comparison chart

2 benchmarks and specifications wPrime 2.0x: 1024m 0% 100% min: 564.08 avg: 595.8 (7%)

max: 627.602 seconds Show comparison chart

2 benchmarks and specifications Windows 7 Experience Index: Processor 0% 100% min: 5.6 avg: 6.8 (87%)

max: 7 points Show comparison chart

9 benchmarks and specifications Cinebench R11.5: CPU 64Bit 0% 100% min: 2.32 avg: 2.6 (25%)

max: 2.71 Points Show comparison chart - Range of benchmarks for this CPU - Average benchmark score

10 benchmarks and specifications

Cinebench R10 in comparison Intel Atom Z670 (min) ... Intel Core i5 580M Intel Core i5 2410M 7699.7 7878.8 691

Intel Core i7 640M Intel Core i5 2430M Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 Intel Core i5 2450M Intel Core i5 2520M ... Intel Core i7 (Desktop) 3960X (max)

8018.6 8058.3 8059.4 8461 8515.8

27189.5

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX is an entry level dedicated laptop graphics card presented in 2011. It is based on the GF119 like the GT 520M, but features a higher core and shader clock rate. Using DDR3, the 64 Bit memory bus may become a bottleneck of the graphics card. Architecture The GF119 offers 48 ALUs, 8 texture units and a 64 Bit memory interface for DDR3-VRAM. Therefore, it is similar to a half GF108 (GeForce GT 540M) but already manufactured with optimized transistors. As a difference the amount of raster-operation-processors (ROP) stayed the same counting 4. The GF119 is the smalles chip of the Fermi generation and is used for low end laptops. Performance As an entry level card, the GT 520MX has to compete against the Intel HD Graphics 3000 in the current Sandy Bridge processors. Due to the higher clock speeds, the MX should be faster than the GT 520M which was only slightly faster than the HD 3000 but clearly still beyond the faster GT 525M. Therefore demanding games like Crysis 2 or Mafia 2 run only in lowest detail and resolutions fluently. Less demanding games lik Fifa 11 or Sims 3 should be playable even in high detail settings. Features As the other 500M series chips, the 520MX supports Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) output via HDMI. That means the card is able to transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream-wise without quality loss to a HiFi receiver. The GT520MX offers the PureVideo HD technology for video decoding. The included Video Processor 5 (VP5) supports feature set D and therefore the GPU is able to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). Compared to the older VP4, the VP5 offers faster decodes at lower power, HD-to-SD transcodes and 4K x 4K resolution H.264 decode support.

Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g. for Blu-Ray Picture-inPicture). Through CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute 2.1 support, the GeForce GT 520MX can be of help in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can considerably faster encode videos than a fast CPU can. Furthermore, physics calculations can be theoretically done by the GPU using PhysX (e.g. supported by Mafia 2 or Metro 2033) but the performance wont be sufficient for this.
Manufacturer GeForce GT 500M Series NVIDIA

GeForce GT 555M 144@525-753MHz GeForce GT 550M 96@740MHz GeForce GT 540M 96@672MHz GeForce GT 525M 96@600MHz GeForce GT 520MX 48@900MHz GeForce GT 520M 48@740 / 600MHz
48 - unified 900 MHz 1800 MHz 900 MHz 64 Bit DDR3 1024 MB

Pipelines Core Speed * Shader Speed * Memory Speed * Memory Bus Width Memory Type Max. Amount of Memory Shared Memory DirectX technology Features

no DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 40 nm Verde Drivers, CUDA, Optimus, DirectCompute, OpenCL, DirectX11, OpenGL 4.1 30.05.2011

Date of Announcement

Benchmarks
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720

0% 100% min: 674 avg: 674 (8%) max: 674 points Show comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications 3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720 0% 100% min: 600 avg: 600 (7%)

max: 600 points Hide comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications

Radeon HD 6250 -71%

...

GeForce 410M -31%

GeForce 610M -23%

Radeon HD 6480G -22%

Radeon HD 6520G -18%

Radeon HD 7470M -17%

GeForce GT 520M -17%

NVS 4200M -14%

Radeon HD 6470M -11%

Radeon HD 6490M 0%

GeForce GT 520MX

Radeon HD 7450M 3%

Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 4%

Radeon HD 6620G 8%

GeForce GT 420M 14%

GeForce GT 525M 24%

Radeon HD 7610M 24%

GeForce GT 425M 26%

GeForce GT 435M 33%

Mobility Radeon HD 5650 43%

...

GeForce GTX 590 1428%

0% 100%

3DMark Vantage - P Result no PhysX 1280x1024 0% 100% min: 2681 avg: 2681 (9%) max: 2681 Points Show comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications 3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 0% 100% min: 2222 avg: 2222 (7%)

max: 2222 Points Show comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications 3DMark 06

0%

100% min: 5357 avg: 5718.7 (22%) max: 5995 Points Show comparison chart

3 benchmarks and specifications 3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768 0% 100% min: 10556 avg: 10556 (33%)

max: 10556 Points Show comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications 3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768 0% 100% min: 13717 avg: 13769 (13%)

max: 13808 Points Show comparison chart

3 benchmarks and specifications

Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024 0% 100% min: 9.3 avg: 9.3 (7%) max: 9.3 fps Show comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768 0% 100% min: 4219 avg: 4219 (19%)

max: 4219 Points Show comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit 0% 100% min: 18.46 avg: 18.5 (24%)

max: 18.5 Points Show comparison chart

3 benchmarks and specifications Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit 0% 100% min: 4752 avg: 4752 (44%)

max: 4752 Points Show comparison chart

1 benchmarks and specifications Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics 0% 100%

min: 4.5

avg: 4.6 (58%)

max: 4.7 points Show comparison chart

2 benchmarks and specifications Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics 0% 100% min: 6.5 avg: 6.5 (82%)

max: 6.5 points Show comparison chart

2 benchmarks and specifications

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2070 (2011) low: 55.3 fps med.: 21.2 fps high: 13 fps Compare Compare Compare

With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) low: 31.3 fps Compare

med.: 21.8 fps high: 14 fps Compare Compare

The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings. CoD: Modern Warfare 3 (2011): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings low. - more...

Fifa 12 (2011) low: 218 fps med.: 107 fps high: 86 fps Compare Compare Compare

With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

F1 2011 (2011) low: 66 fps med.: 47 fps high: 27 fps Compare Compare Compare

With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..

Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) low: 62.6 fps high: 26.3 fps Compare Compare

With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

Dirt 3 (2011) low: 101.2 fps med.: 41.4 fps high: 27 fps Compare Compare Compare

With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med.. The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings (2011): Not playable with a weaker graphics card. - more...

Call of Duty: Black Ops (2010) low: 62.6 fps med.: 40.6 fps Compare Compare

With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med.. Fifa 11 (2010): Playable with a weaker graphics card in detail settings high. - more...

Crysis - GPU Benchmark (2007) high: 21.6 fps Compare

The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.