Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • Diesel Nox Reduction Technologies

    Transféré par

    Hasan Kayhan Kayadelen
    74 vues11 pages
    Texas expects voluntary emission reductions. New engine / equipment / vehicle (accelerated turnover to lower emitting engines (diesel or CNG / LNG), possible hybrid-electric designs) retrofit technologies (water injection or inlet air humidification, injection modifications, more extensive engine modification, EGR, lean NOx catalysts, SCR, NOx adsorbers, plasma catalysts)

    Description originale:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formats disponibles

    PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    Texas expects voluntary emission reductions. New engine / equipment / vehicle (accelerated turnover to lower emitting engines (diesel or CNG / LNG), possible hybrid-electric designs) retrofit technologies (water injection or inlet air humidification, injection modifications, more extensive engine modification, EGR, lean NOx catalysts, SCR, NOx adsorbers, plasma catalysts)

    Droits d'auteur :

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    74 vues11 pages

    Diesel Nox Reduction Technologies

    Transféré par

    Hasan Kayhan Kayadelen
    Texas expects voluntary emission reductions. New engine / equipment / vehicle (accelerated turnover to lower emitting engines (diesel or CNG / LNG), possible hybrid-electric designs) retrofit technologies (water injection or inlet air humidification, injection modifications, more extensive engine modification, EGR, lean NOx catalysts, SCR, NOx adsorbers, plasma catalysts)

    Droits d'auteur :

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 11

    Diesel NOx Emission Reduction Technologies

    Chris Lindhjem
    ENVIRON International Corporation March 17, 2003

    1
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Review of Area Air Quality Plans


    Senate Bill 5 established a program to fund projects to reduce NOx emissions from most diesel engines Houston-Galveston Area SIP plans allow for offsets of mandated control measures with other emission reductions Texas expects voluntary emission reductions

    2
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Review of Diesel Emission Reduction Technologies


    Overview of technologies Verification status and reduction potential Cost effectiveness estimates Recommendations for improvements

    3
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    4
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Technology Review
    Fuel options (cetane enhancers, Fischer-Tropsch,
    fuel/water emulsions)

    New engine/equipment/vehicle (accelerated


    turnover to lower emitting engines (diesel or CNG/LNG), possible hybrid-electric designs)

    Retrofit technologies (water injection or inlet air


    humidification, injection modifications, more extensive engine modification, EGR, lean NOx catalysts, SCR, NOx adsorbers, plasma catalysts)

    5
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Fuel Measures
    Fuel reformulation (EPA review documents) Cetane enhancers

    (decreases NOx by 1 to 2 %) 12 to 14% reduction from Texas Low Emission Diesel (LED) possible 13% from on-road and 20% from off-road engines

    Other diesel reformulation

    Fuel/water emulsions

    6
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    New Engine\Vehicle Options


    Most prevalent project type Certified engines Accelerated turnover approach On-road engines pull ahead to 2004 standards Off-road Tier 2/3 engines CNG/LNG moderately lower emitting than diesel engines Could include hybrid-electric drive trains
    7
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Potential Retrofit Options


    Options (expected % reduction) Water injection or Humidified inlet air (~20%) Injection timing modification (~25%) EGR (up to 50% reduction) Lean NOx reduction catalysts (20 - 35%) Selective Catalytic Reduction (up to 90%) NOx adsorber or plasma catalysts (up to 90%; only
    prototypes available)

    No retrofit options have been given verification


    8
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Other Retrofit Options


    Turbine engines ( power source with low NOx emissions) Electrification; replace either diesel or SI engines Fuel or Solar Cells Retrofit of SI three-way catalysts

    9
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Cost Effectiveness
    Two kinds of Cost Effectiveness annualized over life of project 1-year where total cost divided by annual reduction California Carl Moyer experience On-road projects - $5,200/ton, annualized Off-road projects - $2,500/ton, annualized Overall 1-year cost effectiveness; $19,000/ton TERP experience; ~$10,000/ton annualized ~$40,000/ton 1-year cost effectiveness
    10
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Recommendations
    Compare cost effectiveness of measures to offset required emission controls Mid-course review of HGA SIP will change the nature of control measures and other opportunities

    11
    H:\ADEQ emissions\Data Needs\DataNeeds.ppt

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi