AHP

This Workbook is a companion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial Copyright Kardi Teknomo 2006
6 Visit the complete version of this tutorial in http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/
Worksheets
Table 2: Evaluation based on scores of each factor Table 3: Evaluation based on ranks of each factor Table 4: Converted New Scores based on Range
Table 5: Weight of Importance
Table 6: Weighted scores

AHP computation Size 3 by 3 Table 8. Random Consistency Index (RI) AHP computation Size 4 by 4 (Table 9) Table 10: Paired comparison matrix level 2 with respect to Factor A Table 11: Paired comparison matrix level 2 with respect to Factor B Table 12: Overall composite weight of the alternatives
tutoria/AHP/
Table 2: Evaluation based on scores of each factor Criteria | Alternatives Choice X Choice Y Choice Z Factor A 1 4 5 Factor B 20 70 50 Factor C -2 0 1 Factor D 0.4 0.75 0.4 Sum 19.4 74.75 56.4 Normalized Score 12.9% 49.7% 37.5%
Range 0-5 1-100 -2 to +2 0 to 1

150.55 = total sum 100%
This Worksheet is a companion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial Copyright Kardi Teknomo 2006 Visit the complete version of this tutorial in http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria
Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on
http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/
Table 3: Evaluation based on ranks of each factor Criteria | Alternatives Choice X Choice Y Choice Z Factor A 3 2 1 Factor B 3 1 2 Factor C 3 2 1 Factor D 2 1 2 Sum 11 6 6 Normalized Score 26.09% 36.96% 36.96%
23 100%
= total sum
This Worksheet is a companion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial Copyright Kardi Teknomo 2006 Visit the complete version of this tutorial in http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/
u.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/
Original Scores
Criteria | Alternatives Factor A Factor B Factor C Factor D
Choice X 1 20 -2 0.4
Choice Y 4 70 0 0.75
Choice Z 5 50 1 0.4
olb 0 1 -2 0
oub 5 100 2 1
new lower bound new upper bound
0 1
Table 4: Converted New Scores based on Range Criteria | Alternatives Choice X Choice Y Choice Z Factor A 0.2 0.8 1 Factor B 0.192 0.697 0.495 Factor C 0 0.5 0.75 Factor D 0.4 0.75 0.4 Sum 0.792 2.747 2.645 Normalized Score 12.8% 44.4% 42.8%
6.184 1
= total sum
gradient
0.2 0.010101 0.25 1
This Worksheet is a companion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial Copyright Kardi Teknomo 2006 Visit the complete version of this tutorial in
mpanion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on ocess (AHP) Tutorial http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/
Table 5: Weight of Importance Importance Level Importance Weight
Factor A Factor B Factor C Factor D Sum 6 2 2 1 11 54.5% 18.2% 18.2% 9.1% 100.0%
Table 6: Weighted scores Criteria | Alternatives Weight Factor A Factor B Factor C Factor D Sum Normalized Score 54.5% 18.2% 18.2% 9.1% 100.0%
Choice X 0.109 0.035 0.000 0.036 0.180 10.5%
Choice Y 0.436 0.127 0.091 0.068 0.722 42.2%
Choice Z 0.545 0.090 0.136 0.036 0.808 47.2%
1.711 1
This Work Analytic H
Visit the c
= total sum
tutoria/AHP/
AHP computation Size 3 by 3 Reciprocal matrix Choice X X 1.00 Y 3.00 Z 0.20 Sum 4.20 NORMALIZED MATRIX 0.238 0.714 0.048 sum 1.000
Y 0.33 1.00 0.14 1.48
Z 5.00 7.00 1.00 13.00 sum priority vector 28.28% 64.34% 7.38% 100.0%
0.226 0.677 0.097 1.000
0.385 0.538 0.077 1.000 3.097 4.84% 8.34%
0.849 1.930 0.221 3.000
lambda max consistency index (CI) consistency ratio (CR)
n=
tutoria/AHP/
Table 8. Random Consistency Index (RI) n RI 1 0.00 2 0.00 3 0.58 4 0.90 5 1.12 6 1.24 7 1.32 8 1.41 9 1.45 10 1.49 11 1.51 12 1.48 13 1.56 14 1.57 15 1.59
This Worksheet is a companion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial Copyright Kardi Teknomo 2006 Visit the complete version of this tutorial in
eet is a companion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on erarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/
mplete version of this tutorial in
AHP computation Size 4 by 4 Reciprocal matrix Criteria A A 1.00 B 0.33 C 0.14 D 0.11 Sum 1.59 NORMALIZED MATRIX 0.630 0.210 0.090 0.070 sum 1.000
B 3.00 1.00 0.20 0.14 4.34
C 7.00 5.00 1.00 0.33 13.33
D 9.00 7.00 3.00 1.00 20.00 sum Table 9 priority vector 57.39% 29.13% 9.03% 4.45% 100.0% 4
0.691 0.230 0.046 0.033 1.000
0.525 0.375 0.075 0.025 1.000 4.2692 8.97% 9.97%
0.450 0.350 0.150 0.050 1.000
2.296 1.165 0.361 0.178 4.000 n=
tutoria/AHP/
Y 1.00 1.00 0.33 2.33
Z 7.00 3.00 1.00 11.00 sum Table 10 priority vector 51.05% 38.93% 10.01% 100.0%
0.429 0.429 0.143 1.000
0.636 0.273 0.091 1.000 3.104 5.20% 8.97%
1.532 1.168 0.300 3.000
n=
tutoria/AHP/
Y 0.20 1.00 0.20 1.40
Z 0.50 5.00 1.00 6.50 sum Table 11 priority vector 11.49% 70.28% 18.22% 100.0%
0.143 0.714 0.143 1.000
0.077 0.769 0.154 1.000 3.088 4.40% 7.58%
0.345 2.109 0.547 3.000
n=
tutoria/AHP/
Table 12. Overall composite weight of the alternatives Factor A Factor B Composite Weight Weight 66.33% 33.67% Choice X 51.05% 11.49% 37.73% Choice Y 38.93% 70.28% 49.49% Choice Z 10.01% 18.22% 12.78% Overall Consistency of Hierarcy 9.39%
This Worksheet is a companion of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP Copyright Kardi Teknomo 2006 Visit the complete version of this tu

AHP

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

AHP

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

This Workbook is a companion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Tutorial Copyright Kardi Teknomo 2006

6 Visit the complete version of this tutorial in http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/

Table 6: Weighted scores

Range 0-5 1-100 -2 to +2 0 to 1

Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on

Criteria | Alternatives Factor A Factor B Factor C Factor D

new lower bound new upper bound

mpanion of Kardi Teknomo's Tutorial on ocess (AHP) Tutorial http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/ tutoria/AHP/

Table 5: Weight of Importance Importance Level Importance Weight

Choice X 0.109 0.035 0.000 0.036 0.180 10.5%

Choice Y 0.436 0.127 0.091 0.068 0.722 42.2%

Choice Z 0.545 0.090 0.136 0.036 0.808 47.2%

This Work Analytic H

Y 0.33 1.00 0.14 1.48

0.226 0.677 0.097 1.000

0.385 0.538 0.077 1.000 3.097 4.84% 8.34%

0.849 1.930 0.221 3.000

lambda max consistency index (CI) consistency ratio (CR)

mplete version of this tutorial in

B 3.00 1.00 0.20 0.14 4.34

C 7.00 5.00 1.00 0.33 13.33

0.691 0.230 0.046 0.033 1.000

0.525 0.375 0.075 0.025 1.000 4.2692 8.97% 9.97%

0.450 0.350 0.150 0.050 1.000

2.296 1.165 0.361 0.178 4.000 n=

lambda max consistency index (CI) consistency ratio (CR)

Y 1.00 1.00 0.33 2.33

0.429 0.429 0.143 1.000

0.636 0.273 0.091 1.000 3.104 5.20% 8.97%

1.532 1.168 0.300 3.000

lambda max consistency index (CI) consistency ratio (CR)

Y 0.20 1.00 0.20 1.40

0.143 0.714 0.143 1.000

0.077 0.769 0.154 1.000 3.088 4.40% 7.58%

0.345 2.109 0.547 3.000

lambda max consistency index (CI) consistency ratio (CR)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi