Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Member FINRA
SPECIALISTSINSATELLITE,TELECOMANDAEROSPACEINVESTMENTBANKING
FROMTHEGROUNDUP
March2012 InsidethisIssue:
Page 1: The Way We See It Satellite, Telecom and Aerospace News Guest Column: Revolutionary Change Evident at Satellite 2012 Thats Quadrillion with a Q Page 2:
Page 6:
Page 10: In Defense of Space Prizes Page 13: Are FSS operators facing a GX moment? Page 17: Virtual Worlds and Real Dreams Page 21: Near Earth Analysis: Market Comparables Page 22: Near Earth Analysis: M&A Transactions
THEWAYWESEEIT
Satellite:
Seepage21 fordetailsonindexcomponents
At the Satellite 2012 conference, Boeing Satellite Systems announced a breakthrough contract for the sale of four satellites to Asia Broadcast Satellite and Satmex. In addition to using electric propulsion technology for orbit raising and stationkeeping for the first time commercially this breakthrough contract employed a block buy and teaming between smaller operators to get the kind of pricing that only larger operators usually get. Defense conglomerate Cobham plc bid 420 Danish Krone per share for maritime telecom and Inmarsat equipment provider Thrane and Thrane. The bid was rebuffed, but Thrane and Thrane initiated a strategic review. In maritime satcom, KVH Industries announced its Tracvision V11 a breakthrough dual mode Ku/C band VSAT terminal that, thanks to ViaSats arclight technology, gives customers global broadband coverage with only a 1 meter antenna. In the not a moment too soon department, the U.S. DoDs first (of five) Mobile User Objective System satellites was successfully launched. MUOS-1 will support new capabilities and more than double the UHF communications capacity for the U.S. armed forces. Congratulations to Lockheed Martin. In the friends sometimes fight department, ViaSat filed suit against Loral Space and Communications alleging that Loral appropriated its intellectual property in constructing Hughes Jupiter satellite. Loral claims to have meritorious defenses and will vigorously defend itself were hoping these old friends find an amicable way to settle their differences. Meanwhile, the Loral built ViaSat-1 has just entered commercial service offering 140 Gbps of broadband capacity.
Telecom:
Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. DISH Network got authorization for its acquisitions of DBSD and TerreStar, bringing 40 MHz of the S band under one corporate parent, but then the FCC decided to embark on a rulemaking for the AWS 4 spectrum that seems likely to keep it bottled up for some time. In the close, but not quite department, Sprint Nextel apparently got cold feet and decided to withdraw from negotiations to acquire MetroPCS. While the combination makes a lot of sense to us by consolidating spectrum assets and broadening Sprints franchise in prepaid, we suspect Sprint didnt have the stomach to face the dilution completing a deal would have required. In the M2M space, automated (and conventional) metering giant Itron recently acquired privately held smart grid firm Smartsynch for about $100 million, extending its skill set to the rapidly growing smart grid sector.
Aerospace:
In a first step towards a future where the skies are full of aircraft, the FAA solicited comments from the public on establishing rules for the operation of UAVs in the national airspace. The Paul Allen venture to build the worlds largest aircraft to conduct airborne launch, Stratolaunch, took delivery of two 747s for disassembly and started construction of their massive new Mojave hangar. In other slightly more down to earth news, United Technologies, as part of its efforts to finance its $16.5 billion bid for Goodrich Aerospace announced that it intends to sell its Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne unit, along with portions of Hamilton Sundstrand and Clipper Windpower. Quite the yard sale. Meanwhile in space, Iran launches a remote sensing satellite, North Korea prepares for satellite launch, China confirms next Shenzhou flight will be manned, and NASAs budget is cut Huh!
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page1/24 Volume8,Issue1
Satellite 2012 was an assault on all the senses. I attended 14 sessions, typed up 48 pages of notes, and read all the articles published in the trade journals. The conference was well attended and the sessions were better attended than in past years. The conference added a cellular feedback system for polling. This was available to the 50% of the audience that carried the latest smart phones. Part of the polling was devoted to advertising for Proton and Baikonur. Nonetheless, the polling provided a way to interact with the audience on significant issues where subjective opinions could be displayed. The exhibit area was packed from one end to the other with about 280 exhibitors. The satellite communications industry is thriving. Profits are growing but there are signs that it may be slowing down a bit. Some of the new satellite launches have been stretched out. The number of commercial GEO satellites ordered dropped from 28 in 2010 to 17 in 2011. Most operators are expecting a larger fraction of unused capacity as new, higher-capacity satellites are launched. Since the conference I have been thinking about what was said and discussing it with various investors. It seems that we are in the midst of some major, even revolutionary, changes to the satellite industry. Here is a summary of 10 key topics. 1. Good News) Ka-band is now mainstream and will transform the business. It is definitely accepted as conventional technology today and no longer to be feared. DirecTV has been broadcasting in Ka-band with great success for nearly a decade. Eutelsat reports good results with KASAT. ViaSat has introduced Excede service, which is comparable to most terrestrial alternatives and praised by users and reviewers. Big Ka-band satellites have 10 times throughput of the ordinary C and Ku-band satellites and cost 1/5 as much to transmit a Megabyte of information. High Throughput Satellites (HTS) are in operation over Europe, North America, and the Middle East and most FSS satellites under construction now include some Ka-band transponders. These satellites represent a vast expansion of transmission throughput that may take a little while to absorb. Not all of these innovative systems will be successful. The migration from C and Ku-band to less expensive Ka-band is likely to put pressure on transponder prices over the next five years. As just one data point, ViaSat claims its ViaSat-1 satellite has 140 Gbps of capacity which is more than all traditional C and Ku-band capacity covering North America. ViaSat also stated they are already beginning to explore Q-band and V-band, so there may be even greater increases in capacity on the more distant horizon. Newtec and Novelsat have also made impressive gains in ground segment spectrum efficiency over standard DVBS2 and
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page2/24 Volume8,Issue1
All-electric satellites double satellite capability or cut launch costs in half. This breakthrough caught many off guard.
there are indications that even funds for surveillance transmissions have been constrained
Latin America now has rapidly growing demand for communication services.
...energetic particle bursts from the sun are causing anomalies on satellites, but there is very little public information
Many of the questions and issues at the conference were the same as in the past, but some of the answers are changing.
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page5/24 Volume8,Issue1
Hyperinflation aside, real value creation has to be constrained at least partially by the boundary conditions of the economic system
There was a period in 2010-2011 when commentators would say, often in wide eyed voices, Thats Trillion with a T. They wanted to make sure the listener was fully aware we were entering new uncharted economic territory and would no longer be talking in such pedestrian amounts as billions or even hundreds of billions. Trillions have, in fact, become quite commonplace in our dialog. Almost nothing worth a vigorous national debate involves mere billions anymore. Our annual budget deficit is in trillions, we increase our debt ceiling in increments of a trillion or more, Quantitative Easing exceeded a trillion, the Iraq/Afghanistan War cost over a trillion, we owe China more than a trillion, and some believe that if only the Stimulus Plan had been a trillion we would have had a faster recovery. How silly of us to think we could stimulate our economy with mere billions. But, surely Trillions is as far as it goes right? We wont in a few decades hear commentators say Thats Quadrillion with a Q will we? Hyperinflation aside, real value creation has to be constrained at least partially by the boundary conditions of the economic system; which in this case would be the finite surface area of the Earth, its limited extractable and recyclable resources, the amount of population such area and resources can support productively, and the ability to generate enough energy, alternative or otherwise, to power it all. Whatever our future, surely it cannot involve Quadrillions, can it? The United Nations predicts, under its medium fertility variant set of assumptions, that the Earth will reach a population of 10 billion around 2080 and enter a prolonged period of rough stabilization at that level. While this is a 10x gain from approximately 1 billion people in 1800, no one seems to be suggesting 100 billion people is doable in another 280 years, say by 2360. Our land, resources and energy sources may maintain modest economic growth rates for another century or so, but has anyone suggested 520 years of such growth (the period since Columbus) or even 386 years (the period from the Dutch purchase of Manhattan where our office sits)? Surely, we are heading toward an era of slower growth to, at best, the Stabilization the U.N. hopefully predicts. Will Trillions be it then; the apogee of human economic value creation? What does a constrained future without growth even mean? Can the human psyche even handle that prospect? Just think about these dates. 2080 is only 68 years from now. Our grandchildren will experience this event; a maxed out Earth. Is this what we want to leave our grandchildren, double digit trillions of debt and underfunded entitlements and no growth? Lets hope not. Growth with its creative destruction, business cycles and disproportionate allocations of wealth may at times be painful, and even seem unfair, but it is a heck of a lot better than decline, stagnation or even
What does a constrained future without growth even mean? Can the human psyche even handle that prospect?
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page6/24 Volume8,Issue1
Asking why we should spend money exploring and colonizing space is like asking why we are human. Were going to go.
It is not too hard to actually get to Trillions when you add up satellite communications, GPS, and hundreds of other computer and healthcare technology spinoffs
If Wall Street focuses on next quarter and private equity investors look at five year investment horizons, who is in charge of investing for the next century?
Earth orbit has hundreds of satellites, billions of dollars of commerce and is easier to get to than deep space, but is it really worth more than the rest of the universe?
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page9/24 Volume8,Issue1
The success record of prizes for accelerating innovation and leveraging scarce funds is quite remarkable
During a speech as part of the Republican Florida primary, Newt Gingrich proposed setting aside 10% of NASAs annual budget (roughly $1.8 Billion) to support prize competitions to encourage greater commercial activity and investment in space. While some may think this idea is unaffordable or even zany, it has many supporters in the space industry and, if scored appropriately against its annual budget, could even have considerable support within NASA. By scoring I mean that it would hardly be fair to deduct the full amount of the hypothetical prize amount from NASAs budget as the prize may not be won for many years, if at all. The success record of prizes for accelerating innovation and leveraging scarce funds is quite remarkable. The primary obstacle to more and larger prizes has not been that they do not work, but that Congress for the most part does not like them. As it was explained to me by a leading space policy analyst on the Hill, Congressmen do not like to vote money for something unless they know what district will benefit from it and when. An open ended commitment on future tax dollars that Congressmen cannot have a hand in allocating is just too much for many politicians to stomach. Prizes, therefore, end up being difficult to protect during budget negotiations and are often the first to go. And yet the prizes do work. Here are three recent examples: Ansari X PRIZE. On October 4, 2004, the X PRIZE Foundation awarded a $10 million prize to Scaled Composites for building and launching a spacecraft capable of carrying three people to 100 kilometers above the earth's surface, twice within two weeks. This $10 million prize inspired Burt Rutan and Paul Allen of Microsoft fame to invest a much greater amount in their effort, not counting the many other teams that raised money and tried, but failed to win the prize. After winning this prize, Scaled Composite was able to attract Virgin Galactic to become its strategic partner. Virgin Galactic is aggressively pursuing a space tourism business plan. In 2009, less than five years after the prize award, Virgin Galactic raised $380 million from Aabar Investments for a 31.8% stake in the company, an $875 million valuation. In 2001, Aabar invested another $110 million to increase its stake to 37.8%, a $1.8 Billion valuation. One may dismiss all of this as mere thrill rides for the 1%ers, but the benefit to space development is a business that can now work out what NASA calls the ilities, meaning repeatability, reliability, maintainability versus the status quo of costly and infrequent expendable rocket launches. Google Lunar X PRIZE. Google has sponsored a $30 million X PRIZE to be won by the first privately funded teams to safely land a robot on the surface of the Moon, have that robot travel 500 meters, and send video and data back to the Earth. To date, there are 26 active teams around the
can now work out what NASA calls the ilities, meaning repeatability, reliability, maintainability
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page10/24 Volume8,Issue1
some entrants will spend as much as 5 times the prize amount in their efforts with expenditures of 2.5 times the prize purse being relatively common
The value of just knowing which techniques and technologies do not work was worth far more than [the] small investment.
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page12/24 Volume8,Issue1
GX represents a new type of service for Inmarsat providing new capabilities that substantially augment their legacy capabilities
Inmarsat Global Xpress spot beam coverage However, this new capability is coming at substantial cost! Inmarsats announcement came on the heels of its $1.5 billion investment in Inmarsat 4 satellites, which were finished just two years earlier. Given that the Inmarsat 4 series has a design life of 13 years, this substantial incremental expenditure for GX is going to need to result in equally impressive revenues to justify itself and it looks set to at least partially cannibalize the revenues its predecessor Inmarsat 4 system is generating. While its hard to say that this is a direct consequence, Inmarsats equity has suffered since the Global Xpress announcement as compared to other public FSS operators such as SES and Eutelsat (recent problems at Lightsquared have also contributed, as well as increased MSS competition in general).
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page13/24 Volume8,Issue1
Global Xpress represented the logical response take the best of the competing technologies, combine it with Inmarsats market leadership and print money
We are quick to note that Inmarsat is simply responding to technological and competitive dynamics that are affecting its core business and are not criticizing in as much as we believe it had little choice. In 2010, Inmarsat was facing pressure from service providers such as Ship Equip and KVH that employed tracking satellite antennas using Ku band capacity, which greatly lowered the cost per bit compared to Inmarsat 4. Likewise, in the case of technology, ViaSats HTS satellite program as well as Hughes Spaceway and Jupiter programs proved that with vast new spectrum resources and heavy spectrum reuse designs satcom cost per bit can come down by more than an order of magnitude compared to traditional Ku band. Global Xpress represented the logical response take the best of the competing technologies, combine it with Inmarsats market leadership and print money. All well and good, except this effectively meant that Inmarsats investment in Inmarsat 4 was, at least partially, stranded and as the market recognized this over time it got priced in. But then, if Inmarsats stock is being penalized because of the heavy investment needs of Global Xpress, which in turn we would argue was driven by evolution in technology and the marketplace beyond Inmarsats control, the question arises whether the remaining FSS operators face a similar risk from the advent of HTS satellites. With their 50+ satellite fleets and substantial financial leverage to boot (especially at Intelsat), this is not a trivial issue were talking about ~$10 billion in sunk fleet investments. While the marketplace will be the ultimate arbiter, ViaSats Exede broadband offering (soon to be augmented by an enhanced HughesNet) offers broadband connectivity at a breakthrough cost per bit that is likely to
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page14/24 Volume8,Issue1
given the higher cost of these massive spot beam designs as compared to conventional satellites, employing them for [data networking] may not always be capital efficient
If the untimely obsolescence of a significant amount of satellite capacity drives a new round of capex as operators upgrade their fleets , who is best positioned to spend the cash?
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page15/24 Volume8,Issue1
we expect the financial effects of a new HTS inspired capex cycle to be significantly more muted in [the FSS operators] case
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page16/24 Volume8,Issue1
Poor Mr. Falcone. What started as a glorious dream a wireless network spanning from sea to sea fashioned out of some underused spectrum is now rapidly disintegrating into a melee of claims, counterclaims, unforeseen technical barriers, FCC actions and an unending series of embarrassing newspaper headlines. What a mess. Less talked about will be role of the one piece of the story that was so critical that its criticalness was often just assumed - GPS Whatever the fate of Falcones Lightsquared dreams, fund or fortune, you can be sure we and a whole lot of other watchers will be studying the history and the aftermath of this spectacle and drawing lessons for future moguls. Some will note the cavalier attitude to market incumbents while others will note the close ties with government regulators. All sorts of wonderful things can happen when one aligns themselves with a major government mandate, in this case rapid deployment of mobile and rural broadband, unless of course an even more powerful government constituency has different priorities. Still others will cite the high lifestyle and risk-taking attitude for the plunging lows as much as for the soaring heights. Sometimes the risks are so large you just need a believing billionaire to make it happen or not. Less talked about will be role of the one piece of the story that was so critical that its criticalness was often just assumed - GPS. It has become so pervasive, so crucial to the modern world, that even the first hint that the Lightsquared network would interfere with it, even a tiny bit, was enough to cause serious concern by everyone involved. So many applications automotive, agriculture, aviation, military, logistics and many others depend on it that in retrospect, it is hard to see how any group, no matter how powerful, could have gone up against it and won. GPS and its associated positioning and navigation applications singlehandedly beat out wireless spectrum shortages, national broadband plans and billion dollar hedge funds. One lesson we can draw from this story is that the need to know where you are and how to get to where youre going can often be much more important than being able to communicate from where you are. History records that it was the compass and the astrolabe that discovered continents and conquered the oceans, long before the telegraph and radio were but a glint in an inventors eye. Mapmaking and surveying were arts at least hundreds of years older than any Pony Express. Now, not just GPS satellites, but digital roadmaps, satellite images, triangulation from cellular base stations and wifi hotspots, even 360 degree fully immersive streetview images help people, businesses and things find their way. Surely, as the multitude and economic importance of applications increase, the demand for precision, resolution and timeliness will only get more intense.
it was the compass and the astrolabe that discovered continents and conquered the oceans, long before the telegraph and radio
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page17/24 Volume8,Issue1
Higher resolution and more timely images of the Earth will likely be met by larger and more capable constellations of imaging satellites and airborne platforms
Having virtualized the real world for our benefit, theres no reason not to flip things around
If you had a fleet of affordable, eminently navigable but greatly autonomous robotics with almost total freedom of the sky what would you do with them?
The Google driverless car. Autonomous, but very connected. But why just stick to roads? If only the FAA would let amply creative inventors use them in American airspace (and indications are that it may start doing so), unmanned aerial vehicles may become the next major application. Already, small quadrotors simple but very stable helicopters with four rotors are proving popular toys for lazy Sunday afternoons. For others they have become a delightful engineering platform. In the last few months, very popular videos of the latest demonstrations of coordinated swarms of quadrotors from the University of Pennsylvania, ETH Zurich and others have made the rounds. For a sample of some of them, be sure to take a look at www.kmelrobotics.com
Simple, small and agile quadrotors For some, this is almost frightening but for others it is opportunity. If you had a fleet of affordable, eminently navigable but greatly autonomous robotics with almost total freedom of the sky and the same access to data and intelligence as the Google driverless car, what would you do with
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp Page19/24 Volume8,Issue1
the era of personal autonomous robotics may soon be upon us, made possible where big data intersects hardware and the real world
Despite economic calamities, a daunting pile of public liabilities and a growing beadledom of officious regulators, America has always been where people dream big dreams
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page20/24 Volume8,Issue1
3/27/12 Fixed Satellite Services (FSS) Eutelsat Communications ( c) SES Global S.A. ( c) Loral Space & Comm. Inc. EchoStar Corporation Mobile Satellite Services (MSS) Inmarsat (f) Iridium Communications Inc. ORBCOMM Inc. Globalstar Inc. Satellite Ground Segment Comtech Telecommunications Globecomm Systems Inc. Gilat Satellite Networks KVH Industries, Inc. ViaSat Inc.
$ $
$11,485.34 $15,415.20 $2,241.31 $4,814.81 Mean $4,652.44 $943.53 $96.78 $935.30 Mean $442.91 $304.41 $169.98 $136.10 $2,434.94 Mean $654.87 $164.13 $1,237.50 $286.29 Mean $31,451.81 $22,249.22 $8,858.01 Mean $23,155.68 $249,361.28 $200,698.44 Mean $20,780.29 $19,996.85 $46,177.14 $11,159.99 Mean $135,721.91 $47,184.65 $14,458.26 Mean $229.85 $119.95 $117.91 $148.70 $80.68 Mean $232,778.64 $475,223.40 $17,217.16 $169,788.33 $83,899.20 Mean $860.56 $909.71 Mean
7.2x 6.7x 2.0x 1.7x 4.4x 3.3x 2.5x 2.1x 12.8x 5.2x 0.9x 1.0x 0.5x 1.2x 2.9x 1.3x 0.5x 0.8x 1.6x 0.4x 0.8x 12.9x 10.9x 12.7x 12.2x 0.7x 2.0x 1.8x 1.5x 1.9x 1.4x 1.7x 3.7x 2.2x 2.4x 2.4x 2.2x 2.3x 1.1x 0.2x 2.3x 2.5x 0.5x 1.3x 3.2x 3.7x 3.5x 4.5x 1.7x 3.3x 2.4x 2.7x 2.5x
9.1x 9.1x 18.8x 9.6x 11.7x 5.4x 5.0x 12.8x n/m 7.7x 5.0x 8.5x 5.4x n/m 17.8x 9.2x 5.8x 4.2x 6.7x 5.0x 5.4x 8.3x 17.5x 20.5x 15.4x 4.5x 7.2x 5.7x 5.8x 8.7x 5.7x 6.6x 11.8x 8.2x 7.3x 6.5x 6.4x 6.8x 9.5x n/m 11.4x 27.3x 5.4x 13.4x 7.8x 10.5x 11.7x 12.1x n/m 10.5x 5.0x 6.3x 5.6x
13.2x 14.3x 25.9x n/m 17.8x 7.6x 12.3x 37.4x n/m 19.1x 6.4x 12.5x 23.0x n/m n/m 14.0x 8.2x 5.9x 7.1x 7.9x 7.3x 9.7x 31.0x n/m 20.3x n/m 15.3x 10.7x 13.0x 11.3x 7.7x 10.0x 16.5x 11.4x 12.5x 11.2x 11.6x 11.8x 15.0x n/m 14.0x n/m 9.2x 12.7x 8.6x 11.0x 20.9x 13.9x n/m 13.6x 8.5x 33.3x 20.9x
18.4x 12.2x n/m n/m 15.3x 9.5x 16.7x n/m n/m 13.1x 14.4x 13.8x 23.5x n/m n/m 17.2x 11.7x 10.3x 10.8x 17.4x 12.6x 11.3x n/m n/m n/m n/m 22.4x 13.4x 17.9x 14.3x 11.0x 12.7x 20.6x 14.6x 19.2x 14.6x 13.6x 15.8x 29.6x n/m 24.4x n/m 9.9x 21.3x 11.6x 17.4x 17.7x 20.6x n/m 16.8x 11.3x n/m 11.3x
17.5x 16.5x 20.4x n/m 18.1x 8.2x 11.9x 31.7x n/m 17.2x 24.3x 18.8x 16.1x 36.6x n/m 24.0x 13.0x 9.5x 12.1x 14.7x 12.3x 37.0x n/m n/m n/m n/m 13.5x 15.6x 14.5x 14.2x 11.8x 11.1x 32.1x 17.3x 16.1x 14.7x 16.2x 15.7x 23.4x 11.9x 16.3x 33.5x 8.1x 18.6x 12.1x 14.0x 18.8x 15.3x n/m 15.0x 11.3x 29.2x 20.2x
15.2x 16.5x 16.8x 27.9x 19.1x 8.2x 9.5x 21.1x n/m 12.9x 23.5x 15.9x 20.1x 22.1x n/m 20.4x 11.4x 7.7x 11.2x 12.8x 10.8x 31.4x n/m n/m n/m n/m 12.5x 13.9x 13.2x 12.7x 11.2x 9.0x 20.5x 13.3x 13.9x 12.2x 13.1x 13.0x 15.1x 10.2x 15.4x 24.5x 7.4x 16.0x 10.8x 12.3x 16.8x 13.0x n/m 13.2x 10.4x 16.0x 13.2x
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $
Satellite Space Segment Orbital Sciences $ COM DEV International (d) $ MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates (d) $ OHB Technologies (c ) Towers American Tower Crown Castle SBA Communications General Telecom Sprint Nextel Corporation AT&T Verizon Communications, Inc. Satellite Broadcast (DBS and DARS) British Sky Broadcasting (f) DISH Network Corp DirecTV Group Inc. Sirius XM Radio Cable Television Comcast Corporation Time Warner Cable Inc. Cablevision Systems Corp Machine-to Machine Communications Digi International Inc. Sierra Wireless Incorporated Telular Corp. Numerex Corp Telit Communications plc (f) Big Data and Mobile Microsoft Corporation Apple Inc. Yahoo! Inc. Google Inc. Amazon.com Inc. Satellite Imagery GeoEye DigitalGlobe Inc.
$ $ $
S T VZ
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $
GEOY DGI
$ $
24.64 13.42
$547.50 $621.61
(b) EPS estimates from Thompson First Call. Near Earth does not estimate EPS and does not condone or v alidate these estimates. (c ) Conv erted to US $ from Euro at an ex change rate of 1.3319 US $ per Euro. (d ) Conv erted to US $ from C$ at an ex change rate of 1.0045 US $ per C$. (f) Conv erted to US $ from British Pound at an ex change rate of 1.5948 US $ per British Pound. Member of NEAR EARTH SATELLITE INDEX Member of NEAR EARTH WIRELESS TELECOM INDEX
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page21/24 Volume8,Issue1
Target Iridium Satellite LLC WildBlue Coimmunications, Inc. Measat Global Bhd. (40.44% share) Hughes Network Systems, LLC Eutelsat (16% share) Hispasat (13.23% share)
Radyne Datapath, Inc. CVG-Avtec Systems, Inc. Intelek plc Wavestream Corporation CPI International, Inc. EMS Technologies
Telaurus Communications LLC Segovia, Inc. Carrier to Carrier Telecom BV CapRock Communications Schlumberger GCS Ship Equip International AS Group Vizada
DRS Technologies Inc M/A-COM Sparta Inc SpaceDev, Inc. EaglePicher Technologies LLC GD Advanced Information Systems Integral Systems Goodrich Corp
Argon ST, Inc Lockheed Martin EIG SPADAC Inc. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
Machine-to-Machine Communications 11/21/08 EMS Technologies Inc. 12/02/08 Sierra Wireless Inc. 07/01/09 Inmarsat plc 01/22/10 Francisco Partners 06/29/10 Gemalto NV 11/08/10 Novatel Wireless, Inc. 02/24/11 ORBCOMM 12/05/11 Telular 02/15/12 Itron, Inc.
(a) When Equity Value w as not disclosed, Transaction Value w as used
Satamatics Global Ltd. Wavecom SA SkyWave Mobile (19%) Cybit Cinterion Wireless Modules GmbH Enfora Inc. StarTrak SkyBitz SmartSynch, Inc.
(b) Calculated as Value of Equity plus interest bearing liabilities and preferred stock, less cash & equivalents
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page22/24 Volume8,Issue1
Headquarters 250 Park Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10177 Telephone (212) 551-7960
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page23/24 Volume8,Issue1
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT: Near Earth, LLC ("Near Earth") has published this report solely for informational purposes. The report is aimed at institutional investors and investment professionals, and satellite, media and telecom industry professionals. This report is not to be construed as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell securities. The report was written without regard for the investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific recipient, and it should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. The content contained herein is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as being accurate, nor is it a complete statement or summary of any of the markets or developments mentioned. The authors of this report are employees of Near Earth, LLC, which is a member of FINRA. The opinions expressed in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the authors but do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Near Earth itself or its other officers, directors, or employees. The portions of this report produced by non-Near Earth employees are provided simply as an accommodation to readers. Near Earth is under no obligation to confirm the accuracy of statements written by others and reproduced within this report. Near Earth and/or its directors, officers and employees may have, or have had, interests in the securities or other investment opportunities related to the companies or industries discussed herein. Employees and/or directors of Near Earth may serve or have served as officers or directors of companies mentioned in the report. Near Earth does, and seeks to do, business with companies mentioned in this report. As a result, Near Earth may have conflicts of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. This report is subject to change without notice and Near Earth assumes no responsibility to update or keep current the information contained herein. Near Earth accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any part of this report. No part of this report may be reproduced or distributed in any manner, via the Internet or otherwise, without the specific written permission of Near Earth. Near Earth accepts no liability whatsoever for the actions of third parties in this respect.
NearEarthLLC FromTheGroundUp
Page24/24 Volume8,Issue1