Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The Economic and Monetary Union or EMU is an umbrella term for the group of policies aimed at converging the economies of members of the European Union in three stages so as to allow them to adopt a single currency, the euro. As such, it is largely synonymous with the Eurozone. All member states of the European Union are expected to participate in the EMU. The Copenhagen criteria is the current set of conditions of entry for states wanting to join the EU. It contains the requirements that need to be fulfilled and the time framework within which this must be done in order for a country to join the monetary union. An important element of this is the European Exchange Rate Mechanism ("ERM II"), in which candidate currencies demonstrate economic convergence by maintaining limited deviation from their target rate against the euro. All member states, except Denmark and the United Kingdom, have committed themselves by treaty to join EMU. Seventeen member states of the European Union have entered the third stage and have adopted the euro as their currency. Denmark, Latvia and Lithuania are the current participants in the exchange rate mechanism. Of the pre-2004 members, the United Kingdom and Sweden have not joined ERM II and Denmark remains in ERM without proceeding to the third stage. The five remaining (post-2004) states have yet to achieve sufficient convergence to participate. These eleven EU members continue to use their own currencies.
On the basis of various previous proposals, an expert group chaired by Luxembourgs Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Pierre Werner, presented in October 1970 the first commonly agreed blueprint to create an economic and monetary union in three stages (Werner plan). The project experienced serious setbacks from the crises arising from the non-convertibility of the US dollar into gold in August 1971 (i.e. the collapse of the Bretton Woods System) and from rising oil prices in 1972. An attempt to limit the fluctations of European currencies, using a snake in the tunnel, failed. The debate on EMU was fully re-launched at the Hanover Summit in June 1988, when an ad hoc committee (Delors Committee) of the central bank governors of the twelve member states, chaired by the President of the European Commission, Jacques Delors, was asked to propose a new timetable with clear, practical and realistic steps for creating an economic and monetary union. This way of working was derived from the Spaak method. The Delors report of 1989 set out a plan to introduce the EMU in three stages and it included the creation of institutions like the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), which would become responsible for formulating and implementing monetary policy. The three stages for the implementation of the EMU were the following:
From the start of 1999, the euro is now a real currency, and a single monetary policy is introduced under the authority of the ECB. A three-year transition period begins before the introduction of actual euro notes and coins, but legally the national currencies have already ceased to exist. On 1 January 2001, Greece joins the third stage of the EMU. The euro notes and coins are introduced in January 2002. On 1 January 2007, Slovenia joins the third stage of the EMU. On 1 January 2008, Cyprus and Malta join the third stage of the EMU. On 1 January 2009, Slovakia joins the third stage of the EMU. On 1 January 2011, Estonia joins the third stage of the EMU.
The Founding Member States of the EMU Eleven of the fifteen European Union member states initially qualified to join the EMU in 1998. Those states were: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain. As part of the EMU, these eleven countries now make up the world's second-largest economy, after the United States. Some analysts have suggested that only by using flexible definitions did Belgium and Italy meet the deficit-related criteria. Two countries, Greece and Sweden, failed to meet the convergence requirements in time to join the EMU in the first round. Sweden failed to satisfy two of the conditions: laws governing Sweden's central bank were not compatible with the Maastricht Treaty and the currency exchange rates in Sweden were not sufficiently stable for the previous two years. Greece failed to meet all of the requirements. These countries will be reevaluated every two years to determine if they meet the requirements for joining the EMU. The two remaining members of the European Union, the United Kingdom and Denmark, chose not to join the EMU immediately. Both of these countries made provisions in the Maastricht Treaty that preserved their right not to join the EMU. To ensure stable currency exchange rates among all of the European Union member states, the currencies of those states that did not qualify to join the EMU or that chose not to participate in the EMU initially were linked to the single European currency of the EMU, the euro, by a new currency exchange rate mechanism, known as ERM2. The Launch of the Euro On January 1, 1999, the currency exchange rates of the eleven participating member states became permanently fixed, marking the beginning of the third and final phase of the EMU. On this date, the euro became a legal currency. Citizens in participating countries now can write checks, use credit cards, and write traveler's checks denominated in euros. Banks and businesses now have the option of using euros to transact business. The production of the first euro coins and banknotes began on January 1, 1999. An estimated 12 billion banknotes and 80 billion coins will be minted initially. On the first of January, 2002, the participating countries must begin to remove their national currencies from circulation. By the first of July 2002, the old national currencies will no longer be legal tender, and all transactions from that date forward in the participating EMU states must be conducted in euros. Once they are retrieved from circulation, the old national coins and banknotes will be destroyed. As an integral part of the EMU, a new monetary institution was founded in Frankfurt, Germany-the European Central Bank, or ECB. The ECB sets monetary policy for the EMU independently from the influence of any of the national governments or any other outside influence. The ECB together with the central banks of all of the states in the European Union form the European System of Central Banks, or ESCB, which is charged by statute with maintaining price stability. The ESCB implements the monetary policy of the ECB, and administers the foreign exchange reserves of the participating member states, among other tasks. Advantages of the Euro
The conversion to a single European currency provides a number of advantages. Use of the common euro eliminates the currency exchange fees from the cost of doing business between the European states. Companies will be able to quickly compare prices with their competitors, which may encourage competition and may result in lower prices for consumers. By encouraging stability and efficiency, proponents of the EMU hope that the use of the euro will stimulate economic growth and may reduce the unemployment rates in the participating member states. International investors will likely diversify their portfolios with euros, encouraging more investment in the European continent. The European states want the euro to become one of the premier currencies in the international financial market, alongside the dollar and the yen. Criticisms of the EMU Concerns about the EMU center around loss of national sovereignty for each of the individual participating states. Some fear that the participating states may not be able to pull out of a national economic crisis without the ability to devalue its national currency and encourage exports. Others worry that the participating European states will be forced to give tax breaks to compete with each other and that companies may have to lower wages for their employees and to lower prices on goods that they produce. Because taxes continue to be levied at the national level and not by the EMU, tax policy cannot be used as a tool to help individual states that may be experiencing an economic downturn. In this way, the EMU differs from the United States which has both a single federal monetary policy and a primarily centralized tax system. In the United States, the residents of an individual state with a lagging economy can pay less tax and the residents of another state with a soaring economy can make up some of the tax deficit. In the EMU, because tax policy is not centralized, the other states cannot help out an individual participating state that is economically troubled by shouldering a greater proportion of the tax burden. Also, because the participating EMU countries vary so much culturally, the labor force in these countries is not nearly as mobile as between the states of the United States. Because the labor force is fairly stationary, problems of high unemployment may persist in certain individual EMU states while other countries may not be able to fill positions with qualified employees. Finally, some countries (like the United Kingdom) may fear that joining the EMU may pull their country down to the economic equivalent of the least common denominator, saddling them with the economic problems of countries with a less successful economy.
European Union
Name - Alok Vishwakarma Class - F.Y.M.F.S.M ( Sem II ) Roll No. 30 Subject Business Environment
Name Santosh Jha Class - F.Y.M.F.S.M ( Sem II ) Roll No. 06 Subject Business Environment