Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CD 292
Katrina Fe D. Cordova Richell Joy Q. de los Santos
3.20.12
Research Description
Descriptive and Exploratory Non-experimental Design - One shot case study
Research Hypothesis
LBTs tends to be less participative on LGBT Advocacies
3/20/2012
Objectives
1. To identify different LGBT organizations and their advocacies in the Metro Manila. 2. To determine the level of awareness, knowledge and attitudes of LBTs about LGBT advocacies 3. To describe the level of participation of LBT community on LGBT advocacies 4. To know the reason why LBT get involved or dont get involved in LGBT advocacies
Framework
3/20/2012
Data Gathering
Methods: Non-probability sampling Survey In-depth interview with LBT advocates Participant Observation/ Environment scanning Library Research
Findings
Objective No. 1: To identify what are the different LGBT advocacies and organizations in the Philippines.
Party Organizations Cliques and Clans
LGBT LBT Lesbian Bisexual Women Trans Women GBT Gays Transmen
LGBT orgs and NGOS LGBT Orgs on Campuses and Workplace LGBT International organizations with presence in the Metro Manila LGBT Sectoral Orgs LGBT organizations under Main Orgs
3/20/2012
Findings
Objective No. 2: To determine the level of awareness, knowledge and attitudes of Filipino LBT community about LGBT advocacies
Level of Awareness, Knowledge and Attitude
2.0000
1.5000
Axis Title
1.0000
0.5000
0.0000
Mean
Table 1. Comparison on Awareness, Knowledge and Attitude based on Quali and Quanti Data
Findings
Objective No. 3: To describe the level of participation of LBT community on LGBT advocacies
Level of Participation
2.00
1.50
Axis Title
1.00
0.50
0.00 Mean
3/20/2012
Findings
Objective No. 4: To know the reason why LBT get involved or dont get involved in LGBT advocacies
Correlations
.703** .000
There is a significant correlation between LBTs Awareness and their tendency to Participate
31 1
Correlations
Participation2
Sig. (2-tailed)
Pearson Correlation
Participation
31 N 31 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2tailed). Table 5. Correlation between Awareness and Participation
There is a significant correlation between LBTs Knowledge on LGBT Advocacies and their tendency to Participate
Knowledge
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 31 31 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2tailed). Table 6. Correlation between Knowledge and Participation
3/20/2012
Correlations
Pearson Correlation
Participation
Attitude
Sig. (2-tailed) N
There is no significant correlation between LBTs Attitude towards LGBT/LBT Advocacies and their tendency to Participate KII Result for not participation Class and Economic Attitude of LBTs towards being an LGBT and LGBTs advocacies Knowledge on being an LGBT and LGBT advocacies Organizational and internal politics
Analysis of Findings
Despite high level of Awareness and Knowledge on LGBT Advocacies, attitude of LBTs is neutral gearing towards the negative direction. This could be attributed to internal homophobia, apathy on advocacies due to their class or economic conditions or disillusionment to the internal politics within the LGBT/LBT organizations. In addition to that LBTs attitude toward LGBT advocacies are also highly influence by prescriptions of the society, society being more tolerant to the Gays, Bisexual men and Transgendered women. The level of participation of LBTs on LGBT/LBT organization and advocacies is gearing towards the low level direction. 61% of the survey participants admit that they do not participate in any LGBT/LBT advocacies and organization, while 26% performs LGBT/LBT advocacies through their personal capacities such as Information dissemination among friends thru text messaging, social networking, organization, making videos about LGBT advocacy and voting for Ladlad partylisy, only 13% considers herself to be performing advocacy work through membership, volunteerism and social development work.
3/20/2012
Analysis of Findings
From the correlation between Awareness and participation it showed there is a positive correlation between awareness on LGBT advocacies to the level of participation of LBTs towards LBT/LGBT advocacies. It also showed that there is a positive correlation between Knowledge on LGBT advocacies to the level of participation of LBTs towards LBT/LGBT advocacies. However, it shows that there is no correlation between attitudes on LGBT advocacies and the level of participation of LBTs towards LBT/LGBT advocacies. Qualitative data coming from the survey also support that reasons for non-involvement of LBTs on LBT/LGBT issues are based on their attitudes towards LBT and LGBT advocacies. Result of the KII also mentioned that attitude towards LBT/LGBT advocacies is also a factor on LBTs participation.
Conclusion
The Result of the study supports the hypothesis of the research that LBTs tends to have low participation on LGBT Advocacies and organizations. Factors that surfaced on LBTs low participation can be attributed to LBTs attitudes towards LGBT/LBT advocacies. However, Knowledge and Awareness is a factor for LBTs Participation. At the same time knowledge and awareness is also a factor on LBTs Attitude towards LBT/LGBT Advocacies. Therefore, we can safely conclude that LGBT advocacy work have a positive impact on making LBTs aware of LGBT organizations and advocacies.
3/20/2012
Recommendations
For LBT/LGBT organization and advocacy groups to: To focus their work on raising the knowledge of LBTs on LGBT advocacies to increase LBT participation. To strengthen their work on changing the attitudes of LBTs on LBT/LGBT advocacies to increase LBT participation For future researchers to: To conduct further study on the topic with larger audience and wider representation among the LBTs. To look further into the attitudes of LBTs on LBT/LGBT advocacies that surfaced during the study as an issue of LBTs on their participation