Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
com/IFRS
Negotiation series
When negotiating a business acquisition, one of the furthest things from the negotiators mind may be the accounting consequences. However, it is the negotiation of the deal that establishes the method of accounting for the acquisition that will affect companies far into the future. This is a first in a series of publications looking at the issues to be considered when negotiating a business acquisition.
Acquiring subsidiaries has a bearing on the fortunes of the companies involved for years to come. While this is to be expected from combining the operations, accounting for the acquisition of a subsidiary that has been acquired in stages has different impacts on reported results and equity. An investment in a subsidiary is often acquired in stages both in the lead-up to gaining control and after control has been obtained. Sometimes this is because an initial strategic investment has been made as part of a long-term strategy leading to control. In some cases, it makes commercial sense to acquire part of a business, and leave part owned by the vendor executives for a period of time to ensure they have some skin in the game and are committed to the continued success of the business they are selling.
Accounting for step purchases has always been complex. The revised standards on accounting for business combinations (IFRS 3 Business Combinations) and consolidated financial statements (IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements) have introduced significant changes to the way these transactions are accounted for. Whilst in many ways the changes simplify the accounting, the new approach also creates new risks if the accounting impacts are not fully understood and planned for in advance. In this publication, we take a closer look at the changes to accounting for step acquisitions and the effects on reported profits and financial position, to help avoid surprises in the future.
control in stages (and on loss of control) create gains/losses and recycling from equity and the consequential impact on subsequent reported results. All affect financial covenants, and management remuneration structures.
Understand the impact on equity effects on performance measures (return on
equity), financial covenants (gearing ratios) and sometimes tax (when tax is based on financial measures).
Consider involving accountants, lawyers and valuers to understand and plan for
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
Impact
None Recycle AFS reserve to income statement Recycle share of associates / JVs reserves to income statement1 Recycle share of JVs reserves to income statement1
1Applies to all recyclable reserves, i.e., available-for-sale reserve, cash flow hedge reserve and foreign currency translation reserve.
Where there is a change in the measurement of the existing interest (as in cases 3 and 4 in Table 1 above), we would normally expect this to give rise to a gain. However, there may be some instances where a loss occurs, as illustrated in Box 1.
Care will be needed in determining the fair value of the existing interest, particularly if it is unlisted its value will not necessarily be proportionate to the price paid for the controlling interest since that price may include a control premium.
Immediate impact
The effect of this sale accounting is that the acquirer recognises a gain or loss on any remeasurement of the existing investment. If the existing investment had already been carried at fair value with changes recognised in equity (because it was an available for sale (AFS) investment in accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement), the AFS reserve is recycled (or reclassified under the new terminology) to income. The same applies to other recyclable reserves, such as cash flow hedge reserves and foreign currency translation reserves, which would arise from an investment in an associate or joint venture. The impact of this fair value reassessment and the sales accounting is summarised in Table 1.
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
The tax consequences also need to be carefully considered. The gain or loss recognised may create additional deferred taxes, as it is unlikely that for tax purposes this will be considered an effective disposal. When the investment was carried as an AFS investment, giving rise to an AFS reserve, the deferred tax would already have been recognised. When the reserve is recycled to income, the tax is also recycled to income in the same period, therefore holding the effective tax rate static, and retaining the deferred tax liability. The deferred tax associated with this gain has no bearing on the calculation of goodwill associated with the subsidiary. In some jurisdictions where the tax treatment is based on the accounting treatment, the acquisition could give rise to an additional current tax payable on the gains generated, thereby potentially giving rise to real additional cash outflows, if tax planning is not also undertaken before the acquisition is completed. The gain or loss is easy to understand once you get used to reporting a profit as a result of a purchase transaction. Similarly, communication of the financial reporting impact should not be difficult to manage as it will usually be presented as a significant one-off gain or loss. Box 2 illustrates the impact of the new accounting and the effect on the profit.
As always, care needs to be taken to understand the impact on other accounting-based measures such as loan covenants. Many loan agreements are not clear on which significant items, if any, are excluded for covenant purposes. Therefore, questions will arise as to whether the gains/losses created from the fair value step-ups or recycling of equity items are taken into account or not. For some entities, it may be the difference between meeting a covenant or being in breach of the covenant. For example, an acquirer with earnings-based covenants may be at the points of meeting a covenant. Where it gains control of an investment and there are recyclable debit reserves, if these are to be included in the assessment, this may result in a breach of the covenant. It will therefore be critical to determine in advance whether the gain or loss is included for covenant purposes or, if it is unclear, obtain prior agreement from the financiers. Similarly, bonus and profit share arrangements are often based on accounting profit. However, it is not always clear from the terms whether the gain or loss arising at the date of acquisition should be included. If it is not clear, then it may be advisable to amend the terms of agreements before entering the transaction rather than risk the commercial disruption of a dispute later on. As the concept of a gain or loss arising on the acquisition of a subsidiary (because of the deemed disposal of the existing investment) is new, it is unlikely that this will be contemplated in borrowing and remuneration arrangements.
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
Box 2: Example of a step acquisition and the impact of the new requirements
Entity A acquires 25% of Entity B on 1 January 2007 for 225. Entity A acquires a further 75% of Entity B on 1 January 2010 for 910. Details about Entity B for these dates are as follows (ignoring tax effects): 1 January 2007 Fair value of the business Value of % acquired Fair value of the net assets Value of % acquired Equity accounted balance Fair value of interest held Change in fair value of assets (versus change from other activities) Profit since date of acquisition of first interest Share in profit since acquisition OCI since date of acquisition of first interest Share in OCI since acquisition 900 225 800 200 1 January 2010 1,200 900 1,000 750 258 300
70 80 20 50 13
Entity A accounts for the acquisition as if it had disposed of its equity accounted investment and acquired 100% of Entity B. The following table summarises the accounting result under both the current and new requirements. Old treatment Identifiable net assets of Entity B recognised Goodwill Asset revaluation reserve (25% of 70) Profit or loss (re-measurement of 25% interest from 258 to 300) OCI reclassified from equity to profit or loss for the period
* Goodwill is currently calculated for each tranche acquired: First 25% - Consideration (225) less 25% of net assets (200) = 25 Second 75% - Consideration (910) less 75% of net assets (750) = 160
1,000 185* 17
** Goodwill is calculated as consideration given (910) plus the fair value of the previous 25% interest (300) less 100% of net assets (1,000) = 210.
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
Future impact
The accounting consequences of step acquisitions will also affect subsequent reported profits compared with the current requirements. Firstly, there will be an increased risk of impairment losses in the future for:
Goodwill. The fair value step-up means
that goodwill on an existing interest is effectively revalued to current fair value. Not only will the amount generally be larger, but any headroom over historical cost may also disappear. So there will be an increased risk of a future impairment loss.
these were also revalued under the former IFRS 3, those revaluations were taken to equity and the resultant reserves could have been used to absorb future impairments before affecting the income statement. Under IFRS 3R, there is no reserve to absorb any future impairments and so any such future charges will be recognised in the income statement. Secondly, because AFS and other reserves are recycled at the acquisition date, they are no longer available for recycling in the future. These effects are summarised in Table 2. This effect is illustrated in the example in Box 3.
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
Old treatment
New treatment
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
It is important to understand the reserve impact to avoid unwelcome surprises. An investor in an associate may have budgeted for profits from the associate that include recycled AFS reserves and the recycling of cash flow hedge reserves. When an investor takes control, these reserves will now flow into the calculation of the one-off gain or loss on obtaining control, and will not be available postacquisition. As a result, there could be significant changes to budgeted results from the acquired business. Again, where reported results are used for other purposes such as loan covenants and profit sharing arrangements it is important to consider in advance the potential effects of a step purchase and ensure that these are included in the due diligence process. For example, there may be potential anomalies whereby a gain on a step acquisition is excluded for profit-share purposes, but a subsequent impairment loss on the resulting goodwill is not.
Effect on equity
The fair value step-up also affects reported equity. This can be particularly significant where the acquiree was a longstanding associate (and not, therefore, already recorded at fair value). The step acquisition will typically result in a gain and an increase in reported equity. Reported equity is another measure often included in loan covenants and ratios and potentially profit sharing arrangements. Performance measures, such as return on equity, could be adversely affected by a significant increase in reported equity which may require careful management of the reporting of such measures or where they are used as performance hurdles adjustment or normalisation to avoid inequitable outcomes.
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
Some step purchases can have a negative impact on equity. Where an additional interest in an existing subsidiary is acquired, i.e., an acquisition of a non- controlling interest (NCI), the revised standards treat this as an equity transaction. Any difference between the consideration paid and the reduction in the NCI is charged directly against the parents equity. Previously, an entity that adopted the parent entity extension method would record this difference as additional goodwill.
The partial goodwill approach results in a larger reduction in equity because the goodwill attributable to the original NCI is never recorded it is effectively debited against equity. An example illustrating the effect of this new requirement is included in Box 4. This has implications for the subsequent goodwill impairment which we intend to explore further in a future publication. These reductions will have a flow-on impact for gearing ratios, returns on equity and other measures based on equity. Therefore,
it is vital to have an understanding of the likely future strategy regarding ownership of the acquiree when making the original choice of full or partial goodwill recognition. For combinations that occurred under the previous IFRS 3, only the partial goodwill method applies and any planned acquisition of the NCI for these will result in an erosion of equity, which could have consequences on equity based covenants. As noted above, this may require discussion with financiers to avoid a breach that may trigger repayment of any loans.
* This method was commonly applied by entities in the absence of specific guidance in the existing standards.
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
Conclusion
The revised IFRS 3 and IAS 27 introduce significant changes to the way step acquisitions are accounted for that can significantly affect reported results and equity. Managing the impact of these changes requires a considerable planning effort and potentially involves a variety of experts such as accountants
(to understand the impact on reported results), lawyers (to evaluate the impact on loan covenants and bonus and sharebased payment agreements), and valuation professionals (to determine the value of the existing ownership interest). Renegotiations with financiers may also be required.
10
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
Acquiring a subsidiary in stages the hidden consequences of the revised accounting model
www.ey.com
EYG no. AU0364 2009 EYGM Limited. All Rights Reserved.
This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither EYGM Limited nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter, reference should be made to the appropriate advisor.