Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Printed in
the United States of America. For information, address St. Martin’s Press, 175
Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010.
www.stmartins.com
Hopkins, Kate.
Sweet tooth : the bittersweet history of candy / Kate Hopkins.—1st ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 978-0-312-66810-5 (hbk.)
ISBN 978-1-250-01119-0 (e-book)
1. Candy—History. 2. Candy industry—History. I. Title.
TX784.H67 2012
641.85'3—dc23
2012009741
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Chapter 1
The Innocence of Candy
I t’s odd, the memories that stay with you. I can recall being
about four years old, and my parents had taken the family to a
diner that was tucked back in a strip mall in the blue-collar
town of Butler, Pennsylvania. I can remember one of my four
siblings creating a bit of a fuss over the lack of hot dogs on the
menu. I can remember the cup of coffee that my dad ordered,
and the plain ceramic mug in which it was served. I can even
remember the pattern of the Formica that surfaced the table.
But the event that makes the day most memorable was that
this was the day I first spit out a piece of candy.
The candy itself was a Brach’s jelly nougat, a smallish piece
of candy that the waitress gave to each of us children while our
parents drank coffee and checked the validity of the bill.
The candy perplexed me. The texture of the nougat was soft
and gritty, and the jelly pieces stuck in the candy felt oddly out of
2 Sweet Tooth
place. The colors were new to me as well, with the pieces retain-
ing either a matted pink or a dull orange after surviving what-
ever process the folks at Brach’s had inflicted upon them. What
fruits they were supposed to represent is likely unknown to all
except the people who made these candies.
It was not as if I disliked the piece of candy. It was chock-full
of sugar, and thus had an appeal that would raise the eyebrows
of most preschoolers and test the patience of the majority of par-
ents out there. But it wasn’t chocolate. Nor was it a Life Saver, a
marshmallow, or even a candy cane. It was something else.
I spat it out into my hand and looked at it. I reflected for a
moment on whether it tasted good, setting aside for the time
being the fact that it tasted weird. It did pass the sweetness test,
so how bad could it be?
My father, of course, solved the situation, demanding that I
stop “playing with my food,” not recognizing the moment for
what it was. I was tasting nougat for the first time, and I was
determining whether it was worth the effort.
It was.
What makes this scene so important in my development
was that it was the first time I can remember having a surpris-
ing moment with a piece of candy. This was the first time that
candy had left me intrigued.
This is what makes that moment so memorable. It wasn’t
that I mindlessly liked candy. It was the first time that I had
formed an educated opinion about food, based on experience
and introspection. Not only did I like the nougat, I liked the
process that allowed me to reach that conclusion. I vowed right
then and there to repeat it as often as possible. I have since had
ample opportunity to accomplish this goal.
For the first dozen or so years of my life, candy was the pana-
cea for every trial and tribulation that came my way. If I scraped
my knee, my mom would be there with a Tootsie Pop. When I
The Innocence of Candy 3
* For those who don’t remember, Bub’s Daddy bubble gum was the bubble gum to have
before Bubble Yum hit the market a few years later. Coming in flavors that included
grape, apple, as well as the classic bubble gum, it was sold in a twelve-inch long tubular
shape that was not only delicious but the perfect shape to whip trouble-seeking brothers
and sisters who wanted to swipe the gum when they thought you weren’t looking.
4 Sweet Tooth
did I learn that Peter Paul was not a person, but a company, and
that the wife of President James Madison had precious little to
do with Zingers and Donut Gems.
Then, when I was seven, an amazing thing happened. My
father instituted a practice that changed my candy life forever.
He offered every one of his children an allowance. Into our
greedy, grimy little hands, he placed money, with a promise of
more each week. In theory, I’m sure he felt he was teaching us
fiscal responsibility. In practice, what we learned was thrift shop-
ping. Why buy a twenty-five-cent Milky Way bar, when for the
same price we could buy Lemonheads, Boston Baked Beans,
and a three-pack of Lik-m-Aid? Making a big purchase such as a
Snickers bar was deemed fi nancially irresponsible.
Economics seemed to fi lter throughout our family’s candy
universe. At Halloween, each of us children would go off with
our circle of friends, the older children dressed in costumes of
their own creations, while we younger kids wore those prepack-
aged costumes that smelled of polyvinyl and included cheap
plastic masks that chafed the face. Not that the masks mattered,
because they would fall off when the cheap rubber band broke
fifteen minutes after we set off on our routes. After all five of us
had completed our neighborhood rounds, we would compare
stashes while a parent looked on.
A currency system was soon created, and trades occurred in
great haste. Our living room looked like an elementary school
version of the New York Stock Exchange as our entire evening’s
haul littered the floor. Soon, a hierarchy of candy developed. In
the middle of the value range sat the York Peppermint Pattie.
Those above the York Peppermint Pattie were highly valued:
Snickers and Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups at the top, with 3 Mus-
keteers and $100,000 bars close behind. Those below the pattie
line were trade bait, valued more for the quantity one could col-
lect than for the short-term indulgence of the “quality” candy
The Innocence of Candy 5
1. Christmas
2. Halloween
3. My birthday
4. Any day that I was able to receive/discover/consume
candy
5. Easter
sure I leave my porch light off. I’m not sure there’s anything
more pathetic than a woman in her forties trying to avoid seven-
year-olds dressed as hobos and princesses.
As for my birthday, the less said about it the better.
And Easter? Easter went by the wayside when I could not find
anything in the Bible about chocolate rabbits and jelly beans. If
Christianity wanted to retain my interest in the day celebrating
the resurrection of Christ, it could have at least explained how
marshmallow Peeps entered into the equation. If they had found
a stain mark on the shroud of Turin that came from the filling
of a Cadbury Creme Egg, it’s possible that I would still be cele-
brating Christ’s ascension with ham and spiced gumdrops.
In other words, I grew up into a cynical adult. No longer
does bliss seem like an attainable goal. Instead I have settled for
“comfort.” I’ve compromised the joys of my childhood in order
to have a better understanding of the world around me.
Candy falls squarely into this worldview. No longer is it repre-
sentative of the happiness that life can bring you. Now it
represents the unhealthy, the immature, and the gluttonous. So
I have set candy aside in order to pursue the American dream—
a two-and-a-half-bedroom house with a white picket fence, a
thirty-year mortgage, and ready access to the local grocery store.
But in middle age, with the brute force of a watermelon
dropped from a fifth-floor balcony to the sidewalk below, I had
a startling revelation: I was miserable chasing that dream. I
didn’t want my life to be defi ned by a house that was smack in
the middle of suburbia. I didn’t want to have political discus-
sions based on whether I could get a better tax rate on my mort-
gage. I didn’t want to be associated with people who defended
wars that allowed us to have cheaper gas.
Every day, the media presents me with things that are go-
ing wrong. My country is fighting two wars. Several banks
nearly brought down the world’s economy. Institutional reli-
The Innocence of Candy 9