I,\I]'ED STATES DISl'RIC'I COURT 98 Civ 8272 ( RPP ) \OTICE OF ltoTto:{

:::l:.:.:l_".::-:ii:1.9_::::.1.:i:".".."_....._..."
RO\\ F E \TFR Tl I\\IE {I! ET \ T . ! Plrintifis.

TIt[ \\'|l-LI,\Nl ]lOltRIs. El AL..

atlinlaiion olLcona.d ']re.nnlxcd Ro\re.alirDcd on March2. l0ll. dnd$c acconpdying Mctxn.ndlm.ft arv in plannilTLcdnddRow..r,/1, h.d suppoi ofLhismotion.andrll pleadings herein, i?. $ill Districr UniledStates o'c dlis Coun. bciitrelhe Ilon. l{obcfi P Pallerson.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICI tl[rlpon

ro Coui hdge. fof an orderittrsuant Rulc 60. itcl drd. ol lhe Iredehlltulcs ol Ci\ilProccdrrc errntilg. in the faccoffraDd upon tht court, dcshnction ofiital e'idlnce! and in the intcrcst ofjusticc: (a) r.licf itorn th.judgnremin dlis acldr k) rcr,le \r.rus: b) !aca!ns andlenin8 !\ide rhe]udgm.rir (h) resro.rne 'he.ase elidcnceto:1he(iiminal Divisior ol ll S. {c) rcf.ding ihe ncvly discovcred of on Auorne' s Olfice.rh.Ii_BI.rheConrmiftce Gricla].es oll]te Bodrdol Judgcs Dnirion. rheSou$.mDistricr oINe* York andihc n".$ York starcAppcllatc Coonlittcc (the'.DlX ): and (d) and DiscrPlinary Dcpdrlflrenral FtrsrDqramrenL. suchtunhcr reLief.sthcHonoubleCourtdccms troPer t .l.tlute u,dt peralt^ of pctjtutr thnt.thefottgoihq is truz.4hd 'onecl'

Marc b 0l 2 2.l

-r'/.a -:;l

j )

/t !::L

Bddgc Road.Sunc lj0 i805 Slare Johis Cfcck,Gco.gia 30097 enu i I : turee nlerlai n(Llo l..oM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

::_"::T:',:T:":1":'T:____,.
E'T ROWEENTERTAINMENT, AL., PlaintilTs,

- .9E.Cin4272 (RPP) AFT'IRMATION OF SERVICE

THE WILLIAM MORRIS,ETAL.,

x
AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE
penalty ofperjurythatI have declarc under I.leonardRowe. served copy of thc aftached: a l. 2, 3. NOTICEOFMOTION| MEMORANDUMOF LAWi Tnd AFFIRMATIONOFL'ONARD ROWE

lhis List SeNice asindicared, dav, pafiies theattached on trpon following the March 2,2012:

March .2012 2

. Jzz
350 Suite Bidge Road, 5805State 10097 Georgia Creek, Johns end l : tuweente aitdeqolcon

SERVICE LIST
IlI
I C h a r c sh mp rn V l i l l rrE :q .l .o cb& l- .cb.LLI' > .l,1j kAvc.N.\r k. \\ l0li3:lll$ r .r 9l 0: l Par lor udi rumb.. :l2 l{)r-l{X)lr.lnxll2.1Ol 1+)0: Sf:Rv l-:D I I A tlscha. f. r@lNb,..,t l\.wYor r ..N\ .1 0016:l :l l r L C k i o r \ , \ C l d ck h n t..N l i ri n . P h elp!&Phillips 1P?lnnesSqur r e ,1r-8 6 l r 4l I I r 16.16) 94ll4fr\ -\'E?lvED Vl \ !.1an.k@.etla,xonl . J ! a f . c ) L ti e Jsl e rF -\q D !N .rB n l Lanr r cLLPliolathavc.\es\itr k- \Y.llx) l9212159r l {150 SrRVLD I Ia )It\,lrr@ dl..ott .1. ! l a t h . $ l . Po p p l l l l .E mn c!.C o b b .$iir \&K.sscnich.Pa.l5liR,j_dr x!Sr r .r . a |.10|.(jLr4)53I 2l)i\ JtR\1ED VIAnlp@)ecwko.con t LLP.:145 k^ve..\.RYor l.N\' .l0tj.1 P.r 2l2.l 0r i l 9{'0 l i \ l i r h a . l P Z *ci ! tl {l -l i e h & L o e b 112208158:fr\ Sl:RvED l'1:{ tt:*2i!@beh xap I' a r. RudnickCn'car yLs LLPl2il6 Alr .\cs r d.L N \. M o r r . r P . u a sl i a v.crb r E sq ..D L Aiper I 00?1) a)\\' 2 r: 16.16300 DL A Piper Mntging I'ohntr P.t.r S. fantuI.o l \csOnertrs LA.t0II:r5({ri3l SERf ED I I A p!4L@rl4b!1!l!j4Lie!t!r!! I $ ? s l . ! R P .q e l l L .q ..H l rto n & Wi llir n,!.Ll- P.200P.r kAv.nu..Ner \it[.N\.10i( ,{' ) !ow T NE$ W l l l k , . F a tr& a a L h g h L rL l l '>.i S TSer enthA!.r tr c.NcwYoik.N\' llnl96099.llSA Pt4t Lta J. Sotto 2121091040, 212 tl3 3264. I Ll rllJ 9?6,f H utuon,!. rl illiads LlanagnrE F sER\'I:D v IA: N 212 309.11u0...... 'owell@+illkie.con oillr eAnen.as\esYor k.NY m ?0. 8 C h n n ' E L rp .m.sN RD e tl rnL ,sL LPINY) .i22l Av.ntr .
I L 3 7G i :l: .dDlGr..t \/l{l/trIrr' llin 4 rlll

9.

! l a r i r s p e n !rd o .C n rJ.w i l l ra m\.Par Fr iney.Lewis.jil.Manu\' r r aL.W ater sidPr ol r s nonal en! 561 Btrildh s. Stuxn. Fl- .1.199:1 287 g160lLRl LD flA Cary Wilians I'a,1ner ltt@wilieaa^.rM Prolessional 10. NlarkrILemn,tG3.y.williaorr.Par.rii l'mcy. Lr$is. \'lcMinu\. ct r '.NhleaLde l'I,'t 6a4 lt iUiaB Ponhet Utlltillietafl .on Build'i g. S1Mn. IiL l4qq4 561 231 82(o Srlivlir N.sYor k N\ 'l OO20. oftheAnr eli.as U C R ll M a n R o th o L d .S N D cn ro D S L l- P( NY) i2llAleDue (2i2)1933?01.ll2 r('3 63(lJlal \;Rl'rlD }7^ nreoldlasoni.0s.!'sr!.!or]] ivlcM adr ( .{ al' .\\nr e r i de 6 w i l l a n c ca mp b rL l .E sqxry.\l i LlixnrPr r ent Fiftr ev.L.wis l: 56 A Pruld\ronal u'ldri!. \!iad. FL .1499,1 i 2813260vir StrRl/r, WA Adry \ritti'ns Ponntr o t. A ND wiIIia t 1 t 996@n Lt otfl !reyillils!4,elttt F ll Douelas Lambtn.C!ry tilLixJns Parenri nk! l-dq\ N1'rvlrnus rl \\arc'sde Prolestr'iaL 'r B trirdrj-g.sban. FL 14994 56t 23i 32.n)sfRl tD t IA Cz4' rvll iznr t'anns ll9villi!t!!4!!a (2lll l4t 1Ildl Nl l4 lleler Cara'r. Loeb& rr.b..l45 PsrkAvetrue.New\ork. 101540011 SERvED l-IA .vtiq@laeb.cont

--' /r

15. N l a d i $ .B N l (l e i L a n .Ga D .Wrl l LaN.Pir eDr l.Flnncr .lceis.VcMantr s.dr l.$ir eN deftdes l oi al Btrildi"g. Srten. Ft- .1.1991 . 281 8260J-'tR! tD t'1,,1 561 6ary \lillianr Partner ll@yiri.eon..o"1 I:idner.l-ewis.NlcManur.eral $:id6!de Protssional SekoriV Oary.Cnrt.$rillirnrs-Parenri B0Llding.SlMn- tl, .l.19lt t6 | 231 3261J.SrIlVfD vll Carf lfi iattt PanM lf@Nili.etnron l? . l r i . i r PH o ll l e '.C rry.\!i l l l {n L .P n reiti.FinnetLcEis.NIcivlafur .er r l.\\.ter sidcPntt$i otal BnildiRg.Snlan-Fl-.14991561 a2gi SERVEI,VIAGaT $illiafls Panttr lf@wiqi.!6.corl 2al Fflh Avenue.l5d FIN.R Yor k - \] l ol 5r [ti LLPINYc) .767 l8 J c f i r e t . Kl e i n . l .C o h h r]& l u a r- eer 5 2 l2 I l0 30{x)f.r: r2 | 2) 8:].r'l l,l8 ,SFRr'rn t,1'1jcfle!.L!c!!!!qdrJ1ljr l6

Dnkict ol N0w\o.k. one sr.A drew\ l.r Jefiret;\. Fuisz.Llnird Star* Atorneysolricc.5outhe.n t , la z , . N o w Yo . \ YrO0 0 ? 2 1 2 3 1 6 8 tu 0 212816Gi7fx\SERVEDvIAiIlL&Ley;tfulllEltt 20 G . m l d Nl a ryo l i s.Ma n a tt.P h eips&tr nr piPhillips.ll.l55we{ ol!nr picBor lovar d.L.s Ai eel es . q\a;, 16,.r. i l0 I r2 l{XlO DECEI\SED SERVED VIA Ctuit Malzr ea!t!!!!!!t!t@.!!2!! Par Ar NYC 10169:ll66t 5000 2l S a n a oF r arke.i F n n ke l &A trri n 's.210 k etr uc. r SERv I: D vtA r:[!s!!t!!9!!!rLe!Lh44]!!4

: C onroB ie G r eS le n J r illd E f & a n r plla y e s . L L PI l2 Ma d 6 0 r ! 22. Sr e ve tr i .hac i l tates .l l adl t Nl . \ ! cnu e .\cw York .\Y l 00l 62l 2l 8+a)1 { 0 2 1 ? 7 8 4 . 6 . { 2 0 h r J ^ CI r t ) v t A \ h r v e n n ha n l vr .n d v.o r n ltL.cus Mn2n.rccrstseo.Srvage.Kaplotritz.wiil.& LLP(t x.Av..)6l)0L!\iiatoD 2j Adam Dana
sr RvFDVr { r ni/tr " "r " r cn'\' er ''1 A\ n u ! \ r $ \ o r N.\\ tm : 2 l ,l .l o l ri 2l) ob.r ' ,i.r \ 21. BrianS FBler. sp.m & lmesLLP.5l ltladronArerue.\cs YorL.NY 1ml0 2125l(l l30t) VIA blrasttitrko n.coil 2ll i:10130llr\ SERVED li. J a n r . s A C o h b .td me rC .h h w h h s &K.setich.li15l' ovdr asSte.t.str ir e1950.N ew Or l .ans .l - A r0llz j01i31 il0l SERV!:DvlAjegClss\!.lo4 V i k e n r Ard ro n j S rn ra .K rte S ch oler LLP..l25Par kAlentr eN.{ Yor k.NY10022 2i 23163l {l ) ?6 SERI FD VIA _!!4a!a!t!4!9L!!!rrbek!.!9!4 2D 816.8689llr NJ Ro Ljst. Prnrcetor. 0854) Corp. ioo Collcgc 2? Alan(l (dner.Btrchanar l!!c6ol1 Profesional 6@ 981 68A0 sERvIiI) vIA akcsler@tlutfl.mdt-cont Nes lladisotr Avenue Yor l.Nt l0010.2l2 5l 0l l l ( r 1) J a m e s Q $ d ke r-sp e rs& a n rp :l mesLLi.5l -r0 212 5r0 r8orhr sF:RvEDvIA jygUllgLLeAzpa. Nr M o d ' c , P e ra -g |l a vcca b e .D I-A tiper Usl- LP( \Y) 125lAr enueofthe,\mdr i' as .N '\r Yor k lL Lan20212 ]J5,1500 2r2 115.4501St:tlval] v.r,l 44!!!t!9!!!L!4!.!!a! l-$,s & llockiusLLP(Ner \ork).l0i PltrkAveiucNewYoir'\Y \l.lis\rC Rodnercu.Mor8ar. 32. nw-lanLe\rrom F l0l13212l0!J.61942l2109621:lfaxSER\ED VIA mcrodrieuezc ll. R . b e n E! \'rd D o n n e l l r.L o n rn r.f.Ahdo.( .lc.ltr g&Suleb' r g.lllr v25r lr Sr eetid fl ootN YC com lomnretr VI;\ bobdonneLivri lOml 2l2 tlJl ll??i SERvED J {'ttrld FrnatrcialCentcr'lcw RichardC Priornt.Esq.LlS.Securnies&ErchangeCommis:ion 14 lork.Netr York 10231-loll SCIlt?Ir t?A prinofir@s@.go! ctn SERvtl} v IA A 15. carl Rohe(Aron.Esq. 580PrrkAvetruc. F l28. NYC ]1INJ5 'aron@RCC

,[ ^'

UNITED STATXSDIS'I RJCT COTRT

::TY"'Ty:-:y"'::__",.
ET ROWEENTXRTATNMENT. AI-.. Plrinrlffr,

'1 .. . 9a Civ.4212 (R"P) NOTICE OF

APPEARANCE

THD WILLIAM MORRIS, ET AL.,

NOTtCtr] APPEARANCE OF

1ake nolicethati. Leonad Rowc,a plaintiff id this &rion' Pl@se and blreby afi!arpro re and!ha1all tuiureconespondcnce papeNin comeclion below wirh rhis acdo! de ro bediteted to me at theaddre$ indicarcd

March2.2012

5805Stab Br'dgeRoad,Suite350 IohnsCrcek,Ceo.gia 10097 ena i I: rc peente.t4i^@o l.con

:::r:_Tr lTi:T.:tT:1T_,..____ .
ROWI ENTIRTAIN}If,NT, ET AI-., Plaintiffs, -agatnst_ THE WILLIAM MORRIS, ETAL., 98 Ci! 8272 (RPP)

UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT

AFFIRMATION OF PLATNTIFFLEONARD ROWE

rJ,,I SUPPORT MOTION OF penahy olPerjuryftar: l. LeoMrdRo*e.aftim unde. l. aft i, Leo.ardRowe. an iadividuall]nanedplaintitlin rheabotc

ar dole thisCoudlo issue order: (a) lacatints enlirled aclion, and.especdull) (b) to the aside drejudgnenq rcstonng case acile $aru$ (c) reibning andse$ing Artomev's O$iceto:theCiininalDivisionof U-S. evidence rbenewlyiliscole.ed ofJudgcs oIlhe Sourhern of the F81.ihe Comnitee onCrielances the Board Divisjon.Fi.st Appellare Di$ricr of New Yorkard fte New YorkState (ihe DDC")rmd (d) such Disciplinary Commiltee Departmeltal Depanmeni, CoundeemsjNlandPopet: $e fuftherreliefas Honorable

FRAUD UPON THE COURT

2. Counnusl acl swiily and ofjuslice.rhis Honorable In the interest perpeftated illegalltaud an poweitull)agdinstl|e oilce.s of thecoun who have lhe diseraced rule oflaw in ihis ereat againsl tideralcoun.andwho have lhis

nation, and by theirownaction$ha!eidvanced improper the redji.in8ofConcen promote6 because offte colofoftheir sknr.

3.

Whenthiscasc wasiDitiau]broughr belbretbis couft.1lvasnora*are

ofdle depti andellentofrhe cor.uplion collusion m! o$n r onrelswerd dd thar r panl to in rhiscase.

,1.

Specifically.wnsonly irforned oDTuesday, I Febru.y 7.2012,

$it my own attorneys trd committed series , ofcrimes.rd gross,ttorrey etlical liolations in thh case.

5.

AftorneyMarlin Roth Gold and members ofhk law tirm had onBoing

with delendanri counscl,wi|]1ou ourkro$lede.- and conspned 10 'neerinss conce.l lilale-nail evidence. which we. as plaintifii paid oler $100.000 lor 'lhis cruciale!idencecomprised ofdocunenls thal conlained word lriggef neany thc .100rimeswhich clearll dc,nonsrakd thc.acial dninls ofrhesedefendants ii ds relaredrorhejrcorrmctualdealingswith pla;nriffs. Had Anome) Manin Cold and hjs co-conspir.Io6nor perpelu.bd this lraud uponthe.ourt b) their inlenlional (fte e-majls)aDdolher viral eviden.eofsri-|.usr con.ealnent ol Lbese docuDenrs hom bodrlhci.clienls and ihjs court).1lruly \iolarions (which was concealed would hale reached diilcrcnl outcode on sunm.ry a believetharthis Clourt

6.

de despicable lhingsaftercharging andolher MadinGolddidlhese

Io'e naild'scove'v doilare tbousad($200.000) plaintiffs hore fia.lwo hurdred files. ofthe delendants

?-

pmcticallv o| lhe all had Ai:erAltomeyManin Gold3ndolhers taken

Io tbr in mone!.ceived panialselremetls thel)laintifii helhenth'eatened in by my tunlrersabobge case comingloyou,fie jud-qe fiis ciseandnteLe aPolta MartinGoldsaidhewouldgo directlv disldaging.emark ind assenio.s ' to &e Judge'ifnol allo$edro wltirdmwfromthec,se

8.

mav one inibrnedabou{ }ea'ago tharm} case while I wasgenerally

actioDs. attomev oiherceiain utelhical and/or haveinvolred"inefecdvccounsel" $at actions leamed 1he is wasnt unlil lebruary7. 2012thal l specificalll crimes ol violations various constiluted

DESTRUCTIONOFEVIDENCE From the Courtl Secreted vital Evidence

9Lepera Richdd Primoff'Christine MadinOold,ttay Heslin, Altorneys

and for over5100.000 e'Daildiscotery cdnpellineus andCarlA.on.afterlakin-e thal advised nolhing LePera PrinolTand Gold-Hesiin, atrorteys io uair. palienrly, to m e'I wa hadbee n l o u n d a s a r e s u l t o fth e e m a ;lseWh e n th is sr e p o n e d d ch

could th Mr.Gold,Mr.Primotrand Heslin reu Mr. were be;n8 no! mlhftl bulI hadno 'proof at thatl;me,

10.

I fien asked theyplease lhar sendallofrheenri.e e-mailsea.ch

.esults, *nicb weE Io be included inall tnditrss.n{idocumems, m.. t carefulll to examined provided me andioundno$i'rg cachdocumenr thatthese attomeys lo that provedour positionagainstthe defendams.Havina sorked in dis indu$ry lb. over2JyeaNat thaltim.ud enduring $emcis rhatall Afdcan-Ahedceshad then}nd conti.ueto endure alongwirhthecollusion tha!exisrcd ed rhen conlinues date, tbundlhis to beinpossible believe. to I b

ll.

Aboultwo (?) weeks late., w6 calied NewYorkIbr a meeting I ro

withAnonrey Heslin.WhjleI waswaitine outside olhisofiicc I overhedd Atomey Heslinonthephone discBsing wjth opposing me.tings coun*l in my case whichhehadnorpreviously infomed usoi Aier goinsinto hisofiice. ltofter call od hetlmed hisbackto ne Ib. p.i!acy. I AnomeyHeslinrceived thenglancedon hisdeskand a file tlEt w6labeled"RoweEnterlainment saF v. the william Moris, D-Mailrcsuhs".Ir wasthnihal I obse^,ed wo.d nigger" offe rcpon. WhnAnoney Heslin nnished hG waslinedon theentireftst page report onhis desk. to call.l asked "whatwasthatl" pointing thee-mailrcsulB h;m Anom.y Heslin thentrmed over the rcpon. in ny tace.dd told me $a. l wd not

supposed see ' !o that,

12.

I thenasked quesrion the -WHy? sinceit penained m) car. ro

AuomeyHeslin lhe, got veryangryandargumenrali!c me. I thencalted wirh Altomel willie Caryandlold hislarvtim shar t hadseen Anomevlleslin\ oo desk.Abmey Garylhenasked rhee-mailrcponbesentro rhen for review. rhar But, imponanlly. HOSEEMAILS WERENEVTRSIN1l Thisis howonly $c I rcponrzs finall! ohainedby $e plaint s. ButMr.ColdnorMr lteslinorfteir frnn.despite nuDercus my requests theadualdocumenrs(the ol emaih) for stack thatconained $ord niSAef oedl' 400times. the th) alwars- lhisdale,hove ro relused requesr rum overproperty rig| illy belongs me asa plainlitT by ro lhar ro andibrwhich we hadpaidover$200.000 obtain.Mi l{eslinmd Mr. coid- and ro orhers whohadknowledee.lqar_failedrc rcponfiis (thecmaiis) la$. to enfbr!emedr AND theCoud.

13.

ManinGoldandRay I alsosubrquentlyleamedthlr A.tomeys

rclationshipwith ln"House Auoner.ib. Heslin a pr!,vious had Dlle Head.lhe *clement di$usions with ClearChannel. lhe Dcfendanr ClearChannel. Durin-e pressured was by Howard RoseAsency aswellasMontercy PeDinsula,I always fie of Atrcme' N.llniD Cold andhis iim losettleundet conrinualihreat then $ ilhdrarval t-rom theca.

l.l.

Rob whichwG deposition ofCAA employcc.lvlr' LighL. Duringthe

Lee by bein8conducted Anome) CarlAfon.ofMarti' Cold s las fimr. Plainliff,

King. whileusing r.sr roomdu.inga brcakin tneproceedings. ihe overhea.d the allome\s!tun \VeilGorchr. reljingMr Lighrrharhe wouldnol beasled*an] h&d queslionsiiom Mr Aon. Whcnever Iwoutd askAuo.nerAronro askdeiendants penrnenr queslrons. as.e blacks such give. thesame opponunirt whites, as he would.efuse asktherequesred to querdon whhour co.t;onrarion. k.cw rhe! a I ftatour casc s?s beinginrentionallv sabomged byAnomey\4ai1in cold andhis

15.

Ii is reprehensibie rhese rhai anorne)rs. we.esupposed be rhar lo

represennng inlcresrs, ny rerc actuall)engaged rheintcnlion.lsabdLagr in ofnrr. case sublcditr8 bt ourpositions hidingkey evjdencc and frommeandtheother plaintiiis.This ltononble Court,I respectfully $ubnit! MUSTvaclte tne judgmentand restore lhis case the r.tive calendai to

16. I havenorvbeen madelirlly aware $e e!.egious were-in lhat acts fact. Dotonl) aclsofgiossaliomcymisconduct. fiaudandcollusion. thdtthese bu aclsspeciicauy consilulelhe coDnlission ofserious $imes. A Hf,ARINC ON T Hf , SEIS S ! T ] S S R I Q U I R E D,IN' T HEINT ERI]ST .r u ST ICI. I OF

KnolriogCrimesBy Officers lhe Coun of

17. whenAnomeys Mudn Gold,RayIleslin.Richard SpeciilcaU),

with theirco-consp;mrors. withheld evidence rhe l-epera. PrimoiiandChrisline

(thedannin8emails) f.om theplaintitrs, thisCouGandlaw enforcemen! rhe!, kroejngly co,rmined the.rimesofconsp;ac),obstructioD ofjuslice_ misprison of a lalon), tlter z//i?.Aid fiese afiorneysgrossl] breached e$ical oarhsand. obviously. vaiousattomey di$iplinarvrulsofconducr mu$be tull! rhar in\ eiigrl e do y , E r ca n dt e d e , a l tto m ee r h i( ".o x,,n kr e e i. a )

18.

Specilicall). whenthes sme adomeys destmyed e-mailelidnce rhe

whichPlaintitrs paidover$100,000 roobrain, rhry conmjnedthe$jDe of destroying evidence. a/d. irrel

t9.

whenthese !!ilh Specjfically. same attomeys. theconscious inpul

liofr diei. co-conspiFtors tbedeten* sideotde table, o! cde into rhisCoundd lied.on therecord. theycommitled $ime ol peQetraring"li"ud uponthis the a Couit- fhey lied d;ectly 10the Coun,andftey licd by omission whentheydid not produceto the Coun rhedamninsedails lhe} hadi, lheir posse$io. and

20.

Funher,spcilicall), rhe ero6 soughr1osway fcus .way lrom lh

q y d se r rhe. dge q u n u r y oe , n J i h h e n An o m eM a n ;n Co ld a nRj) He sr in . n mcd l me sum letrer. threareni.8 riqhtbefore their c$- thari{ | opposed

whbdmwalthal rheywould cometo you and funher ebolage my cse. This and misconduct alsoa crhneof co$cionandextonion, w4 donewhilerailingto is md ol repontheirknowledge misdeeds crimes.

2l-

jnprope. I believe Counsbould ourngedb) lhe knowingly this be

a$ionsolmy lbrmeraftomeys resulred a despicable calculaled fiat in and fraud perpemted uponm. dd thiscoun. k is norhinA shodofreprehensibte I and bclieveftalrheLl.S. orners'Office, F.B-landrh. various A rlB atromey disc;pli.ary mc.hanisds ofthe Stere ofNew york will undenake complete srd a tull. compleF andimpanial invesdgalion ofall whower. invohed,in anl *q. wilh themanner whichthiscase in was

True JusticeMust Prevail

22. Theprevious rulingthalwasenrcred thisCounsinglchandedly by

desroledpracricallyall blackbusinesses wercdependenr theblackconcen thal oD promo.ea rherrIvel \ood 'uch dslrm(,us.de Lorlndrici.(arering .ompdres. 'or stagchands.productioncohptnies andorherswhom have tokrupt bdause -qone wroughL lhe inpennissible delrmiiation ollhcdimjnisled opportunities by ollhis

case sunma4Judgmenr. on

in tiis NEVER b.enrodeslroy the 23- My etfons bringing mane.has jnstanc.:s of ;ndustry ror) andslifledenumerors but music enlenainmert pemicious ofdisc mination. SADLY insleccs disparitiesd olher conrracuai bec.use hos thisest.nd.d, andr. theh.ndsofoneftical!trd illegal of
rcl3 of acton, the widspre*d

M) tuLher se^cd prouJiJIn

l f . | \ . A r) ,o f I,4 ve J6 . l n I oob he tldJ,r .Jr dooqn h,. t:,c or .,.r han,<,i er d!

oi ViehanrllShting forfiis country rhat*e allcouldha!e a ch.d.e lo so experience lieeddoandlibeny. leavin8 od n\ mo$e. behind. wrs 14yea6 me I old ar rhetime.W;.eceived thousand ren dolla6 iiom the U.S.Army ibr iris<teaih. I alsorcccileda purpleheananda bronze whichI amlery proudofro $is sra., day.NIymorherAnd tookour paymetrl I liom theAmry ard p.oceeded rry and rc purchase boniein Colunrbus. {hc.e we livcd.Ar.he rnnewc werenoL a GA. allowed buya hone in dreneighbo.hood rc ofou choice becaose ofour race. We wereonly allowed purchase homein theblackneighborhoods. we arc to a Here Iodarsir.somelbrtl ti veyea6 lare.wirhcivii righrslaqs tidly pta.eandrhe 'n musicindu$ryconrinues operate to underthe same discriminlrory policies oiLhc paslandienorirrS ci!il rightslawsof ftis g.eatnation. the

24.

panial"selrlenrcnf' ln retrospeci, iact lhatANY purponed lhc was

auowed wilhout$c ending thecriminalandrace-bascd ol discrim ination is unthinlGble. Surelr. aromeywl$ a spc any ofe$ics $ould hareinsured the that wouldend. Theon aoin8andcurrcnt te o| imp perandillegalpracrice st redlining.ould $ho onlyresuhliom lhe arog.nceandgreedofthose improperiy by similtulybtnr acled. tha! kno{ing pe.haps !he} wouldbeproEcted those

towdd conuption.ThisCounCANNOl let thiscondnue. Duringlhislirigarion. rhedeLndana. becau*oi rheireogancr',ne\cr made a emp.ro*nlc&is dI case orro mrct ushalf$ay on theproblcms surrou.ded lnigrtion. hhd! that $is never been inlention deslrolthis m) to in any\.!. But I thoughr we rhlr 'ndustry sbould for h0vebecn comp.nslted thend) ldrctlatourC;vil Righrs been had viol.Gd. I alsol-elt we should that giren anqu.rl have been opportunh! ll' contract withoulregard our mceandto beemploledin ftis induslry fie same to on terms conditions allothers.D@snl1hisCou.l.tireleealp.oilssionand. and d indced. lo allgoodpeople oweit to iuru.egene.arions in$!e iharequalopponunity ofAmerica? exists allin theUnited tbr Statcs

25.

u) lt lhis Coundenis panof$is molion.l bclielethalii lvould

ior onl! becondorine u.e(hical iUe8,1l dd behat ofth. arbnEysin $is ca*, rhe oi uponftis counof lAwandallo$ingfie rcdlining b) lpprovingol thciri-.aud p.ornoters based solelyon thecoloroftheir skinto continue. ente.uinmenr

2o.

lhe onEuine ond *nrinlou" hdd"hip lha' ie dnd m) orh(t

colledgues havcendured beedsu w.enchirg.eDorioidll) d.!inn,g and hss it delastaringand is verf diliicuh to rhinklhxl itallhas happened economicall)-

because traud, of collusion, attomqmisconduct $e impermissibie and 'weiShing ' ofthe evidence waspre*nled in d'js ca* on sunrm.rvjudgmerr. lhal

27.

All th3t I ever wantedwasa chalce 10senlethis cae: on rermsrlar

wtre liiif,just andimpanjalso ny litmilyed I. lnd rhose that ofthe orherblack prcmoreE. concert couldmakean honest livinaat lhe onlycER md prci-ession tharwe havc eaerknown. 1
o@nbitu, ,eordlarl ol rh. .al* .f ,hzir s*in.

!8.

justicewasnorsned in this casbut il wasn\ uniil I was I knw

askedto ily rc New York for a meding on Tuesdan februa.y7, ?01?tharthedeprh cl.ar ro ne. of(he injlsdce$as made

29.

I Judge Patersoo counroom s and Prcviously. salifl theHonorable

Iide andiine unfoldd. winessed Coun$dy I lhis witnessed iiNr-hand .justce as

this rededto rnle this case. I can also rcmember again,that the detbndanls Court slating,in opencourt, lhat lhee was obv;oudy somemonkeyingaroundin lhis indusrry". This Coun als sa;dthal with lhe evidencethat hadb-<n prcsnted, defendmts]could thattheCoundid nol sechow they[1he !.evailwift ajury' The Coun conlinuedto pleadwilh dle defendanbro settle- I aho wsted the

deiendants makesomsor! ofanmpi .o settlerhis iegal banteso ihar I. alo.e to wrth hy colieaaues, could continuein rhe only professiootbat we kne*.whicb wouldailowuslo tal careofou. faniliesandlovedones, provide basis dd a fo. need chsge soothers wouldnol be similarly discriniEredaSainst.

30.

Sittine in JudgePatiesont coun oom thoughout the manyyeds of

this leftme feelin8 p.oudofmy couffry'ssystem oltaw. Bul lhensobethiry happened. ir wasn'1 And untilFebruary 20I 2, thal ir wasmade 7. ctear me what !o had.in f&t, happened: there that wasa se.ies ofknowi.g ittegal aclsandarcss attooeynisconduct inlolvedattomeys by against fte orher me, plaidtifts, the and ruleoflaw- ands out-lined above-

31.

I pX formyselfand othe6similarly all situaled, this Courltook thal

inlo the deplhsof ils hean and.onscienced fairly undefiakean impa.tial elaluation ofthe basis uponwhichtheinstanl molionto vacate, aside set and restoreis premised ftal lhis Court placelhis matterbackon iis docketibr and adjudication, fo. theotherrelief.equested. and

A Hearing These otr is Issues Required, ln the Interestof Justice

12. I askrhisHonorable Courr rpstore rc myfairhin rny

in rhE greorcodnrll s dle oflaq. This Coun mdsr

fie inlolvedatbmeysonlheirmisdeds-g.oss actstharleave place in the redliningbased $e colorol a person's on disgracefulp.actice ofpromoler skin.

34.

I rm rnfomedthatfieseaturmels haveviolald \anour anorney

di$iplinsr-v rulesofconduct. believe Honorable I this Counis obligated rcport to ilrese elhicscomminee to the U.S.Southern dd Districrof atomeysto thestaie New York anomeyseihicscommineas*ell.

3s.

offelon))A@I1o a I aminfomed it is acnme(nisprisof, thar repon

what herein attorneys when did iheyreNaired crime, rhalis exactly and involved was rhetall chose NOTrorport when silenr crnicalevidencc *crcleddd when
(he evidence) theCivil Righ6 Division lhe to of trhartheyknewcxisted enrail U.S.Arbme) s OIIicei

36.

and I am infomedtharil isa.rime to desrcyelidence. $at is exacrly

the the whaiManinGolddid. wnh othe6.whenhede$royed maptisl con{aininA

ofthewords nissel'and coon'and orhcr.eferences tothe ll9 emailuses p.omoFrs beause oftle.olor oiour skjn. redlining ofne ard o&e.black

37.

I belielelhisc()ult hasan obligation 10takc allapprupriate action.

conducr la.iousethics comdiuesand to Law includine lbmally rcponsuch rc thal Enforc.nent, lad confidenl Justces'illsoonp!e\iil. and

18.

I am infomed that it is a fiaud upon$e coun shen a person-andin

it attorneysi' tirilsto br'ngro theCourts anentio.the thiscdse wasnufterous in anome). thal happenrd lhis ca$ whe. $e lttoftels miscooducl anothe. of emaile!idenceand tailedto intbrmtheCou.Iftat who knewofrhesecredngofrhe in slch rctons hadhappened a lbdenl.oun ofldw

By FraudsUpotrthe Court Murt BeReported the Court to AttorneyEthicsEntities All Appropriate

39. CounMUSTbetbnnauv liaudsuponftis llono.abte Theabove

rcpo.tedby this Courr I bliele this HonombleCoon will iulfill its obligatios ro

.10. I pr.y that lhis Horomble Courtwill standup to the iueg.l rnd imprcpracriotrs those*ho woulddr.e df.lud a cood of kr o. of kooritrgly$offal oursyrlem of hsr I tru.t this Codrt *itljoio tte courageorimmbers ofthis nation'sfederalbenchas in:

Mills oi O\lb.d Mi$isippi \ho. in thc MasnJ t.) I)istrid CoudJudg.Michael csc. boldl! depaded guid.lines Norlin publiccoruplion lion s.itcncnre dd rcspoDdcdr{' grecdl lbm{public oflicirl h) sa)ii8. rhe "adlok destroled theloith ofth. people in ,hei. govenrcnt."

lured artomct (b) t.r.S. Diskicrcoufl Sennrr Judge Bi!Ac6.Jr.Nhobrrutcd Neal ,nd Dic\ir Scrue_ls said. -ThejBtice sfs/etano.le lou a .ich nnn, I et !'ou ottnpte.l to conupt it. "

Dk'ricrcdun Jldee litlsin M. KosiiL. {c, Iheiloror.blel.nrsrlvaDj.LI.S. in $ho bnvel) r.j{!cd ! plearSrccmcm $e i:rbla' c,r, scandal.

OF IN TIIE INTEREST JUSTICE,

IS A HE A RI NGO N TH ES EISS U E S R E Q T J IR E D

CONCLUS!ON

WHEREFORf,, for the abovercasods in the inrcer ofjusricc, ptaiiriff and LeonardRowcrcspectfully rcquests rheflonomblc Coun mter an ORDER: iiar

6ide thcjudgmenr thiscdei Sening in that be and Orderin8 thecase .eopcnd restofed thc carcndsr to as Anactive case ftatjustice prolerlyadminislered and be undcrthc law: Referirgth. nsly dis.ove(\l.viddc ro:theCrini.al Divisid of U.S.Attomey s Ofiice the Comminee Gnevames on ofthc Boardof DhrictofNew Yofkandto theNe\rYork Judges oflhe Southem Slate Appellate Division, Departmcdal Disciplinary FirsrDepartNent. _DDC")i.dd Coonntee(ft .
d.

0ftnting such funherreliefasthHonorable Coundeems.ju$ and

DECLARAIIO\

UI\I'ER PENALTY Of TEII,'URY

lhar nrc undenigned decldes udcr lh. penalty perjnry h. is. t'ldintiflinrh..bo!c actiod, ol $d hehasr.ad rheabove rharrheinfo.ndrion contahedhdin ir tue andcomcl l dnd 3 U . 5 c . \ l 7 l |6 i l 3 U .S .C 1 6 2 1 . I

submincd. Respecrfllly

M!rch?.2012

L.-o;rd Rowc

-.-,J-:,-L

Bridge Road. Sune 350 Srare 5805 30097 Creek, Gcoryia Johns : entuil rcweenteoir@tol.con

UNI'TED S"TAT'DS DISTRICT COTJRT NEWYORK SOUTHERN DISTRICTOF

ROWf, ENTf,RTAINMENT,['I'AL., Plaintiffs, 'againsf_ E]'AL., THE \{ILLIAM MORRTS,

98 Civ. 82?2 (RPP)

-------x

!N]!OD!Cr!ON
I. plaintifiin thc p,, i.eonard Rowe. ie andasan indiliduallr namcd

subnitsthehefcinlvlenorandrnoi Law in respectfull) aboleentitled action. (a) pursu.nl Rule60.itcr a/i4 tbr anorde.r \ acat'ns to Suppo ol I is motion. (b) the toactivestatus: relering andsefii.glsidelhe iudgmert; restoring case ic) Dilision 01U 5 Atbmer's Otn.e. ro: e!idence theCriminal thenewlydiscolered of oflhe Boardol Judges theSoulhem on rheFBl. rheConmiltee Grie\ances Fnsi Division. DisriclofNe$ YorkandtheNervYorkSlaleAppellatc Disciplinary Comnitiee0he DDC-): and(d) such DepanmenL. Depanmenbi and Coundeemsjusl prope. lurther.elieldstheHonorable

2.

Counis a seiesol newlvreveaLed the Noe beJbre Honorablc

oi pracLicc the.edlnring of the c\ idence lhattlrongl) cortinues * idesprcdd

skin based Promoters onthecolofofthei. Conced

3.

PlaidtiffLeonard Rose,appea.ins in hisown indjvidusl now

capacity, ftis originally brought acdon with otherAliican-Am$ican Musicconcen Promotcrs. filingagairslthedefendants The va.ious aileged cau*sofacrion ircludinS. not limited10AntiTrusr bul Violations, CivilRighrsViolations undef .r2U-S.C.l98l md orhe.claims rcli.f. for

4.

Two)ea6 afle.ol?largument. afterext.nsive ad di$olery andprc-

judgneDr $e lrial moton pracdce, Honorable this CounSrdred sumna.y lo dlbndan$. The Coun s Order lailed to includemy m.nlion of the derogalory utilizadorofrhetenrl"niggers (which$'asfoundin |ltedefendanrs william Moris AeencyandCAA s -mail Kords some3.19rimes), coons- andodEr tha! blaunl evidence racialdiscrimination defendants hasben andcontinues of by plaintiffand others Additionau), Coun the 10bedirected toward simildly situated. d@umntary elidence. consisling over2000 of Ordtr did not nenlionsubstanrive plainlitrs, inconracdngbetween conlmcts whichshowed systemic fte d;sparities ofaproteted class, le6us 'while" whoareall Af.ican-Amencan membrs and pro'noreG lens of tlvorable l.ms e{endedlo white"concen concen in

promoters saidrems andcondilions wholtydcnied ed ar. Afican_Ame.ican concen prmotes in clea.vjolation of&e temsof l? Ult('/9a,/.

5,

Il isofextreme imponance concem nore white Coun and to thal the

weighcd .eflain evidence dunngrhesunm.ly judgmenr phac of lhec4, $e Couri corlld have not conside.ed actual the e-mail records becausc oftheinproper actions misconducr cerrain and by involved anomysIn shon,fte evidenc emaik we.einprcpedykeptfromfie Coun.

6.

Plaintifibrings mo.ionashe hd only Nently teamed lhjs tbatrhe

aclsofmi$onduct that.ranspiredi. dris casewererequiredby law lo be epo.red to ftderalofiicialsby inlolvedauomeys. Each veryinvolvcd and indilidualwirh a law deareetras awareofaheegrcgiousinjusticeoccasioned rheperpe$ationof by &e tiauduponthecouncdncming$e hund.eds oteDails.andall ofrhose "ofilcrs ofthc coun" failed to properly rcpon thesmatteBaccordingto civil ard criminal laq anda variety of slaleand lideml anomeyethicsruls -

R I L I F F UNDF R RT IIf, 6 0 ?. The generalpurpose ofRule 60 "... is to strikea prupcr baldce

principles litigation muslbebroughl anendand lo thar bctwen rheconnicling

rh:rtJuslice bedone.'Bllsblrr v. iru51

FJlc. & lllqllffe

571

F. ] d9 7 6 . 9 7 7 ( l d C i r . l 9 7 8 ) lh e d e cisiorn g r a no r d e tr rr e tie lp u r sua . r o ro Rule60(b)liesin Lhe$und discarionoflhc rrialcounguided .ccepred b,legalprinciplcs applied liehl ofallrhe relevant in cir.u,nsranccs.t'trited !tal9!l!Er44!d92. I j8 F. Supp. 188. { D l)el. 1001 (quotinA ld l9l Ross v. )

(ld Mragq!. 638 l:.ld 64't.6,18 Cir i 98I ). Rule 60 piovidcs . meehen lbf isn cxlraordinary.iudicial rcljeflrlailablej only il ft. hoving pan) dedonsrrares exceprionai ctcumslances." Ruorolo citv of NewYork. 514F..ldI84. l9l i. marks lld Cir.:ooii)(inlernalquotation oniLtcd)(sec Paddioqtop also Pannes v B ou c h a r ld +l . l d l l l l . l l l li:d Cir .1 9 9 ,r ) ) . l e lisllin g o n co r n o re b of

Rule60(b)grounds lorreliel tiomjudgnent.\'atr Skiver!: tlnited Srates,952 ( 10 f . 2d l:. 1 1 .l : . 1 . 1 - , 1 . 1 )"( ' i r l9 9 l) .

AN TJLTRA VIRf,SACT RESULTSIN A VOID JUDCMENT U N DER!' RCP6 0 ( 8 ) I rj. pennils i{ured patu 10seek FRCP 60(b)(,1) ! rcliel liom ajudgmenr

o. o.de.whenthej udgneniis void. Plainriilrespecrtu conlends rhe ll) thar qhen rhecourt'weighed lainted Counwdsde&auded inlolvedauorneys b) resuhing an ,rra uer ac1.. in Gross* Rell.ctal,5E5 I'.ld 72 .vidcncc.lhus (l'! Cir :0091e\enrhougn \ould srill bepeBon.llyimnrune he corsislenr wirh tr 5 lr S ilo i5 b - i? 4 8 S a r l0i )o

5i t-.Ed.ld I ( 1978). iudgmen! $is case. order summar) ii his in fte on judgnent, wolld bcvoid. Scc 7: Ctesr_lrjlclldal, 585F.3d (:d senerallx Cir 1009) ljRCP60(bX.l). and

A Pf,RPf,TRATIONOFA FRAUD UPONTlIE COURT REQUIRESREINSTATEMENT THE CASI O}' tTNDERFRCP60(a),1 9. Thel"! Ci.cuirCounofAppeals heldthar"liduduponrhecoun" has

consisrs fiaudpcrpc.E.ed oiilceB ofthe cdurIso rharjldicialft"chinery of by presentcd pe.fo6 in usualDanner inpanialLastof.iudging..scs its cannol ib.
Tnnraero. lnc. u La lu.rz, Ad Bolici!!!. :{ F 1d l< 7, ao I ld

5 t 8.. . n d e n , e d .: o t \ l l . r o . llq \ Cr .:0 ::. l+ 1 .I F d r d I' r i.: lo o r r :b-Ie 5 '

( li n r o n s rrer l ood ( ord.. :54 B R. j: l { : 0 0 0 ) :( ilt lr o n r . I u n d r u L L o .8 6 0I

:d556 (1988). shich heldthat u.aud uponthe.oufl ' s amntins Eliei iio

final

judement, disringuished iiaud uponanadleNepany.is linned to lnld as Fom \hich se.iousl) rtlbds integrit)olnomalproess ol ddjudicalionAcco.d.
i. : lo f RD 7 l ( l0 u l) . Cr t s k iu De r ln n m en l .

,l8 o F .Su p p .lll0 9 l:0 0 1 ) .

10. ThisCounh6 inherenr thal fraudhasbeen PetttrateduPon

!acdrclls o$n judEnenLon Foot

ofcrrnel. 20 F.Supp.:d 630{1998}, Levirip { HonbtrFer,912 F. Supp.508, am.med.l07t.id3(1996). In independea.rionro er asidejudgmcn. based on Aaud.misconducr, frauduponrhecoun,plaintiflmusr or oemonsFa.e absence an

of plaintifl's iault.neglect carelessnes. yeld!td1"5.. 8.{5 Supp. own o. F. 72. stimed 70l..ldI (1994).

u.

I1b6 ben held thar whenananomey misreprcsenK omiE malerial or

laclsroa coun.o.actson c]ienf!peiuy or distortion rvidence. conduct of his

ha) consuure thud upon coun.:tr the

r r i, 6l B. R. 00 .

appal aftrremo'j, 85 B.R.9?0(1986).TheFedenlPro.edures govemrctjct' iiom judgmentdue to f.aud, mis.epreseDktion. orher misconduct adverse o. ol partt applies bolhinrentionaland ro uninrendonal misreprcrentarions. DiPirro !.

(t999). F.R.D.60 !J5., 189

12.

(o haud uponthecounhd been defined l:deral by courts embEce

thatspecies oftud whichdcs, or a$empls defile Io, perpetRted oRiceBofthecoun softar thejudicial machinery perlbrmin by canoot th. usualmamdils iftpaniallaskof adjudsine cases

Serltdlos!-LldtsLsts$s,

761F.ld 1 1 1 5 lo L iCii 1 9 8 5 ) , {

Knnerv.c.I.T-- 187Fld 689. A frauduponde counmakes voidfie orders and judgmen6oftharcouri.

THE COURTCANNOT"WEIGH" TAINTEDEVIDENCE FROMA FRAUDON THE COURT PERPETRATED INVOLVED BY ATTORNEYS INASUMMARY PROCEEDTNC
components 13. Oneoftheprincipal ofrhe insra morionrcucalc,set sideand.estore, tharrhisCou.l,unlnowi.gly admiLted ed evidence d is "tai 'weighing' of all fte evidnce $is case in violariorofrhe law in inpennissible ' Judgment. &s 'Conclusionof Jaiuary5,2005,OrderonSur,rmary

judgmenr tbe weigh 14. Ona summary motion. counis no1lo lainted evidence. e.s.. &e, Ards!4r.di!r!!&l&1,jl!.477 U.S. l5s. 106 ar S.Ct.

ar )) ll: lJril3d-Sl!lr!-v.8'rl[. -id f.Id o3J.b41(:d ( it loolr: D!n3-bllr-!. \tihdsor h.ks Bord or Fim coFmi.<ione6. El4lJM. 58{:d Cn.la87}.

llzi-:l

and (ld C;r1994). ThedraNitre inferences the6e$ment oflhe of

ofthe finders oilacl. remain withintheprovincc credibilirtoffte wimssses

15,

the cou.tis tn rulingonamotionfor summaryjudgment, district

,ssertionsrequired dnw sll fact!,l iniercnesin tulorol andt ke:rll faclual to

ro,lheparry opposi.g nlt tointel eiden,e- tnrhelightmosl tbvorable summary judenen'. S((,i s. $ftI S..r :qLr:.i.lj-l4,ol
ih e r tr L o b b r ,In c..1 7 7ll 5 . :+ 1 .:5 5 ,1 !!l

ILo d u ( ru8o): Bpd!ie!s!-!...lcio-dl!q!&4. l:

courtin considerinB the (ld ofthe disr.ict Tbe F.id 1051, 1061 Cir 1995). funclion oftaclbuonl) to issues is morion sumrnaryjudenent norro resol!edispuled lbf dcrem ine wheiherthcre is a genuineissuelo belded &4. e g , Aldsrsg!-L : 1 7 7 . S at 2 5 t. 1 0 6S.Cra i 2 5 ll- 1 4 :Er stm r nM a chi re U . 1169,173 Cirl988). Asscssmen$ (2d olcredibililv co. { tjpitcd strles. E4l F.2d versions oflhe evenbarcmatte6ibrthejury. nol confl;cring andchoices bcrween judsmen|See, Adlisorv e.ts.. R Ci! P 56(e)1963 Fed for fte cou.!on summary 4 7 7t .5 r r :5 5 1 0 0 S.Crdr
:5 l l ltr tl ni l ed S tarerv . R em .u

(2d Federal 6 I rdjil. 6.14 Cirl99,1)1 Moore's

(2d p P.a ru ce E j h.(rl . ar 50-45 e r l la 8 6 )

16.

whaiinttrences ofthe coud itselfrodecide lt is not thc province

to $hcn ibc coonhadllntled cvidence Presentcd be should dra*\ especialiy (our b),n \ o l \ . d a t r o r n e r& e - t e s :16l.
1 l F . ld a I lE r it t h e r eis a n y illerence could 6:: .vidence in rhe r.cord iron an) sourcetrom which arcasonable

see i drawnin ftvor oi thenonnovingpart! sunmary udgm'mrs nnproPer, e g l

. lil (.l ch e sre r. 8 0 i t l J l 0 i . tt

F ld r L l li B m d r r . T o $ n of

(ld cir ta88l.

ol 17. An] rleighiDg ztrd,k/

isrheprerogltileolrhe linderof cvidence

t n r , " L a r . tn c.

i;., r Jr ,n er<.(,'c ror'n(.oL r o r s u m n ? r tt u o ; n e n i ( ' . 1 S .

v. Morton l'oods.lnc., . : j s I j d - a E.r 0 r lt^ | ,( ir l0 6 r ' - h . - u i+ i,' g

jud-erncDt constilutesiiaud a ui cd elidence ftis case theCounon sum'har) in hy in and uponihe Court$hich nust becorected. theintetsloijuslice. asa natter

TqE AITORNf,Y MISCONDUCTCOMMITTAD IN THIS CASE WAS REQUIREDTO BE REPORTEDTO TEDERALAU'THORTTIES I8. under colofofla\, oi d righl, the l8ll.S.C.21: prohibils deprivaiion.

lawandis.rininaliy phish.ble pri!ileseo. immun:ty is protected tederal thrt b), lhe in a dumber of$ays by ltderalolllcials.I E tj.S.C.2'll Prchibits conspi.acy or in ro bel}eenrwo (l) or nrorepersons !iolate.indmidare harass4othc. the exc.cise the,.lidcral .ign6 of t9. preceded,wasonl] recenll, ir In. manner whichrheidsumcase in

ol the movanl, underuco.es parricipation in\olvedditornevs to revealed $e hercin las. underfederal ro deprive rlainlitlofhis rlghlsp.otedd 20.
ol b) ThisCourt, becaur it was defrauded membcrs the ba! was

thal actionto stoplhe pemiciousraciSm prclented liornEking necessary

pemeates live concert the promolion busidess ofthe entertainment industry in

21.

presented Whenfte opponunity itselftlnough auspices lbe ofrhG

lawsui!. for five (5) yed, dris Court indicatedthat lhe defe.darrs would i:re insunnounBble obstacles survive scrutiny to the ofthis Cout dd thejury Unfortunaiely. Counwasdefmuded, the was andjustice denied.

22.

The time ha comefor th;s Hono.ableCourt and ajury to seethe real Finally,ihis HonorableCoun andajury hasthe

e\ide$e, tfu-utlalzla!fuzidc!!8.

plethora oppoltunity considerthe to ofdocumentary evidence Ecial disparity of in contractual!e.msa.d conditions,which clearly violate the leuer ed sphit of42

u.s.c. 1981.

23.

and injustice vacating setting by aside the lt isnowiime ro conecrthis

smmaiy judgment order thatwas enteredin this matterbasd on a iiaud uponrhe thatthiscase added be to submitted arbmeys-l!h respectfuuy 'nvolved the docketfor adjudicationaccordinsro law dd !o allow thejury, asthe finder of counby on fact, to maketheir deteminalion based ihe fac$, rhe law qndthe !!lbi!]lgl

2.1. I he UnitedStates Suprcme CourthasreafiimedtheprinciDal thar

'Justi.emusr satistv appea.ance fie ofjusrice. Levire '. lJnir.d St ies,162t).S.

610.810 cr. l0i8( t960). orbn- udred s. stat6.i.t8u_s I1.75 cr. 13, s.
( l95l). As it prcsendy stlnds.theprevious order sumary judgnenldoes on nor havethe -le* , the feel or'1he appeearce' ofjusdce ha\ i.g ben p.oqrl,

sen'ed inthis case.Dueprocess compeis iln andimpaniallribuoalfree a from fraud. bi6 or prcjudice. lts,&lsriuo, 52I f.:d 842( 7rh Cir. I 996). Plaintif was

pceedings before Courtwhen cleadydepriv.dofduc p@essin theprevious this a lfaudwaspui uponlhe Honorable Courtby cenaininvolved attomeyseithe.by anyoneadomey deliberare s illegal&6orby d improper silencemdlirilurclo reponsuch conducr required. 4

2s.

Pr;mofidd Christine Anomeys ManinCold.RayHeslin,Richard

(the witbheld Lepera. wirh rheirco-conspi.ators, fteevidence dmnine emailr) they thc from$e plaintitTs.Ihis Coun,andlaw enlbrcernent. knowi.glycommined ofjusticc.misp.ison felony. ofa irrer d/ia.And obstruction crimes ofconspicy. anomey cthical oaths, beacbed theinvolved "officeBoffie coun grcssly "Concealmcnt ourhisrory"ar4,E6r,s c condemned ftrouShour ofcrime hasbeen l/al?s. 408tr.S.665.696(1972).

CONCLUSION

WHEREFORf,, for thc abovcreaens andin the inte.esr ofjusrice, Dlaidriff Leonard Rowcrespftftlly rquests thc Honoble Coun flts s ORDER: rhat

Sc[in8 asidctheJudgnmt in this qsj Ordcrjrg fiat the casebrcopcned resror.d1orhecalcndr as aid ud! rhlaw; aneiiw ce ard tbatjusticcbeprcperlyadministcrcd ol Itefening ncwlydiscovorcd thc ovidenceto: C.iminal fte Division oftlc Boardof U.S.Anomcy'sOfiicc, thc Co|midee on Cricvancs ofrhc Southem Districl ofNew York andto the Ne\r York Judges Divisiotr, DiscipLinary SrareAppcllalc FirslD.panmml D.panmcntal (rhc Comnirtcc "DDC ); lnd just Coun dccms md CBntins suchtunherrclief [J the Honomble

I d.clare snderp.nal.r ofpcrj.ry that theloretotna is ttue on t.ar.ct-

2,2012 March

' , 1 .,1 2 L6al;n*-

Bndge Roa4Sdile350 5805Srat Creek, Ceoeia10097 Johns ehai|: tuwent rt i^@oLcon