Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubrics Group Members: list alphabetically Presentations will be evaluated using the following criteria:

I. Content 20 points Accurately follows the coverage of the topic as instructed Informative and mind-provoking II. Knowledge of subject material: - 30 points Demonstrates an understanding and comprehension of the topic? Demonstrates advanced understanding or include any original content/approach Ability to answer questions III. Organization 25 points Secures audience attention Objective and outline well formulated in the introduction Well structured, flowing logically and with good transition between the sections The sequence of information and ideas are easily followed Offers summary of ideas and provides closure IV. Delivery 25 points Clear pronounciation and speech rhythm Effectively uses vocal variety in rate, pitch, and intensity to maintain audience interest Use of appropriate, clear and legible audio-visual or multimedia support materials Good visual quality (content displayed well, visible, good choice of font, colours, pictures, well balanced screens) Uses physical behavior that supports the message (including appropriate eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, posture, personal appearance) Adheres to time requirements TOTAL SCORE : _________ points

1. Like Follow Post 4 hours ago


Ma'am Obach

ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CHECKLIST Presenters Name Presenters Topic CRITERIA Excellent (90-100) Good (80-90) Fair (70-80) Needs Work (50-60) COMMENTS (1) ORGANISATION talk was well-prepared topic clearly stated structure & scope of talk clearly stated in introduction topic was developed in order stated in introduction speaker summed up main points in conclusion speaker formulated conclusions and discussed implications (2) CONTENT Speaker: was in control of subject matter covered what s/he intended to cover displayed knowledge of topic by referring to other sources (3) CONFIDENCE Speaker: looked relaxed and confident controlled nervous hand movements used appropriate body language established good eye contact initially maintained eye contact throughout talk was aware of the audience response speakers movement and posture were relaxed PTO CRITERIA Excellent Good Fair Needs Work Comments (4) SPEECH pace was varied and not too rushed volume was appropriate intonation varied & appropriate pronunciation and articulation were clear grammar accurate (5) VISUAL AIDS equipment handled with confidence introduced at appropriate times were legible did not contain too much information showed appropriate use of diagrams (6) TIMING/MODE OF DELIVERY talk was well-timed time was divided appropriately speaker spoke from notes speaker read text in spoken style (7) DISCUSSION MANAGEMENT Speaker used appropriate strategies to: initiate discussion control flow of questions and focus of discussion respond confidently deflect difficult or irrelevant questions

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi