Questions for evolutionists

To find the deep truth about the origins and to have honest higher race human being look at all the evidence becore coming to a conclusion between lower and higher races and find if there are differences in between! What is the definition for science? If it is something we can test, demonstrate and measure, then why is most of the evolution not testable, nor can be proven? Why do many people think that science is evolution? Who made them think that? Is it possible that a teacher can be wrong? Where does the belief that the teacher is always right come from? Why can most people going to chool be deceived? If most people will not check for themselves what the truth is, can they be deceived by cunningly devised fables? How can a lie be accepted by the majority? Can mixing up erros 'evolution' with 'science' truth deceive people? How many scientist before Darwin were evolutionists? If none, then why isn't science called the finding of what God made as it was originally? It today about 50 percent of scientists are creationists, then why are people lead into believing that science is evolution? Who has ever proven the non existenc eof God? Who has ever proven the non veracity of the Bible? Why would someone embrace the evolution theory knowing that it is false?Because they do not want God.Why would someone not want a living and mrciful God who knows men are sinners? Does thinking or beliving something make that theory of thouth true? Does believing in the evolution theory be an excuse when thet person will be in front of God in the judgment? Does someone's dishonesty and willingly accepting a lie excuse him from the judgment? Does not believing in God be an exemption from God's judgment? Http://www.bible-tube.com

Is it because someone does not believe in God that they will receive a letter saying that they will be excused from appearing of God's courthouse? Is it becaus esomeone thinks they are not christian that they will be ecsused their sins without repentence? If they know what is right, they aren't they as guilty as a christian if they commit sin? Does looking at the majority of people excus me from doing or believing what is right? Is it because a majority of people in my country believes in evolution that i can believe the same and God will excuse me in the judgment? Is truth found by what the majority believes in? Can comeons take a teacher's word or a preacher's word on something without checking for themselves? Or should they examine what is truth for themsemves? Does our belief depends on what other people tell us is true? If what they told us is wrong? Would i be innocent for believing a lie because i did not come up with it? And think that the other person will be punished? Where does the evolution theory lead someone if it says there is no God? What would be the result of a life without God and full of wickedness? Freedom and misery where you cannot trust anyone like in some coutries? If the evolution theory is true, how is it we do not find animals and plants evolving now? How is it we do not find rock evolving into plants or animals? How is it if the evolution thery is true that we do not find half fish half monkey creatures all over the world? Or half horse and half shark? Or half chiken and half dog? O r half giraffe and half elephants? If the trilobite is supposed to eb one of the oldest creature to exist? Why did scientist find that their eyes could be the most advanced of any creature? Yet the trilobite is supposed to be found in the cabrian layer which 'supposedly' is the oldest. Why do scientists often find animals which are supposed to be older in the higher strats, and 'young' animal fossils in the lower strata. Why is there no fossils in the pre cambrian strata, and they supposedly instantly appeared in the cambrian strata? Because there was a flood and the animals were trapped. Http://www.bible-tube.com

Why is there no fossils formed today? If fossils go from simple to complex, then why do evolutionists scientist find that these 'simple ' fossile are actualy also very complex? Why every type of fossil and animal has been found in the cambrian strata, if only the 'older' fossils should be found there? Why were there no transitional specie preceding or leading up to the firt multi celled creature that appeared in the cabmrian? Why is there no transitional species elsewhere in the fossil record? Why are the species that appear in the fossils are frequently found in many different strata? Why does the great majority of the species found in the fossils are alive today? Why do evolutionists could come up with a theory which has as they call it 'fossil gaps'. Which is a theory which is not fully formed. If this theory did not fully evolve. Then they should wait until it is fully evolved in a theori which could be brought to the general punlic. If it is false, then put it in the thrash and face the fact that God has created the universe! Why are octopus found in all strata levels, from cambrian to higher levels? Why are nearly all fossils found just present animals, where are the missing links? Why don't we find links between them? Why do evolutionists know exactly how these transitional forms should look like, but cannot find them? Where did they get these transitional forms from? Just their imagination! If there has been notransitional forms in the fossil record, then there has been no evolution! Why is it that above the cambrian layers suddenly larger and faster life forms appear instantly by the millions? Why does evolution cannot explain this sudden emergence? Why do all creatures that did not become extinct are essentially indentical both in fossil form and in their living conterparts today? The only way evolution could had taken place is that if one specie could have changed into another specie, and we should be able to find transitional species, part one animal, and part the other animal, but all fossils are in perfect stasis. Why? Why in the 100000 millions of fossils that we have found all over the earth, there is no transitional specie fossil ever found? If evolution is true, everything should be getting bigger and better. Then why do we find fossils of animals found today but much bigger? Why do the three evolutionists whiwh have been ins charge of 50 percent of all the fossils in the world Patterson, Raup and Eldredge say that 'there is no transitional life form'?Http://www.bible-tube.com

But can ther be evolution with no transitinal life forms? No. The only wat ther could be evolution is if there was transitional life forms! Why did Darwin came out with a book that he knew was false? Why did Darwin say 'This (no transitional life forms) is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory. The explanation lies, as i believe in the extreme imperfection of the geological record' Why did many people believe his book, when Darwin himself said that there was no proof to his theory? Who really marketed Darwin's book? Why did the 9 people of the X club who promoted Darwin's book to the whole world who's chairman was Huxley could define science for the rest of the world? Would there be a secret push worldwide to secularise the masses and turn their minds away from their eternal destiny to pleasure and secularism? Why would some people do that? Why would they want the majority to accept a false theory to make them immmorals and base? Could they then control these masses, which are in a pleasure race? Could these masses know the diference, if they would have no time to check for themselves what the truth is in their race for materialism? Why are there only God given variation in the species and not across them? Is it true that most scientist have many doubts about the evolution theory? Why would they not speak out? Why would they loose their salary? Is it true that most scientists know thatbthe evolution theory is wring and because they are in a narrow scientific field do not see the big picture and think that maybe the evidence lies in another field of evolution? How can many animals like giraffes, tigers, salmons, pine trees, horses ect appear sudently just above thecambrian layer with no transitional form? Wouldn't that prove a worldwide flood that burried rapidly all these animals living in the antideluvian times? Why do animals dying today never fossilize?They rot if the buzzard does not find him first. Why is there no fossils of buffalos, yet there was millions just two hundred years ago? Could it be that only special conditions, like the the flood, burien all theses animals which turned into fossils? Http://www.bible-tube.com

They were all laid down, at the same time, and very very rapidly! The flatening out of these fossils prove that they were buried in the time of the flood! Uranium and thorium transform into hellium. If the earth is millions of years old, why isn't there a lot more helium? If Jupiter is millions of years old, the planet its mons should be completely cold now. Why is it that Io ont of Jupiter's moon has 300 active volcanoes that shoot lava 300 km in the air exploding every three hours? Jupiter and its moons should be all cooled down! And Jupiter is not 5 billion years old but 6000 years old. The sun is loosing ots mass. Going back just 1000 years the sun would had buenrd the Earth. The sun is not billions of years old. Why are the oldest writing found only 4000 years old? Id men has been on Earth since 150 millions years old, wouldn't we be able to find writing much, much older? Why are the oldest languages on Earth only 4000 years old if the Earth is supposed to have millions of years? Why are the oldest civilisations we know of are about 4000 years old? If the earth is 150 millions of years old, souldn's we be able to find civilisations much older? If man has been on Earth 150 millions of years old, shouldn't we be able to find, graves of billions of people who would have lived millions of years ago? Wouldn't we be able to find millions os speketons like Lucie? Why on the contrary do we find many skeletons of people why are a lot taller that humans today 1220 fet tall? Why is the oldest tree 4000 years old? If the Earth millions of years old, shouldn't we be able to find tres which are much older? If the Earth is millions of years old, then why is the oldest delta 4000 years old? Shouldn't we be able to find deltas much larger with sediment deposits? If the Earth is millions of years old, then why is the oldest coral reef 4000 years old? If the Earth millions of years old shouldn't there be bigger reefs? Why is there still mountains and valleys under the seas? If the Earth is millions of years old, wouldn't they be eroded by now? Why isn't there miles of deposits in the sea from the millions of years of the earth if the yearly rate is 1inch/1500 years? How could the 1st life form ever exist without being complete? With eyes, heart, and every needed cell to live? Scientists say it is impossible! http://www.bible-tube.com

If the millions of years only come from the dating methods like carbon 14. How can these be believed when living animals and human being have been dated millions of years old? How can carbon 14 be reliable when the same animal has been dated 14 million of years for the feet and 20 milliosn years for the head repeadly? How can the carbon 14 dating method be trusted when it depends on the electromagnetic field on the Earth being constant when this electromagnetic field is not constant? As these dating methods are fals, then all the dates we have millions of yearsn billions of years are all false! Is there any other way to know that these creatures, the univers os very old? No. Is it true that computer calculation have found that regardless how much time woudl be alotted for evolution, randomness could never have produced life on Earth? Yes! How can evolution be true, when the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that everything tends to chaod and disorder? Wouldn't all animals and human being tend to chaos and disorder and not evolve? Why do some people still believe in the crosing of species when many scientists have proven this belief wrong? Like Gregor Mendel- the father of genetics A woman called the Guadeloupe woman was found in a strata 1 mile deep. If evolution is true and only primitive lif eforms are found in these stratas. How can the evolution theory be true? Why did Darwin still believed in spotaneous generations still a few years after the writing of his book when hs gave up this idea. Why did he not see this when Pasteur proved to him that life cannot arise from non liging things? Why do some people still believe in spontaneous generations when Leopold Weissam cut the tail of 901 mices, for 19 generations straight. The 20 th generation still grew tails! Spontaneous generation doe snot work! Nor mutation , nor natural selection. The Wistar Institute symposium says that 'given the complexity of dura, proteins, cells and enzymes, evolution could not have teken place even with billions of years. The trilobite is supposed to have been extinct since billions of years, yes trilobites have been found alive all over the world, the 1st live trilobite was found Dec 25th, 1938 in South Africa. How can evolution be true if trilobites who are thought to have been extinct can be found alive today? Did Hiroshima bring about beneficial mutations? Http://www.bible-tube.com

Did Chernobyl bring about beneficial mutations? Does throwing a hammer on your tv screen bring about beneficial mutations? Hdoes having an accident bring about beneficial mutations? There are no example of beneficial mutations. Mutations are accidents and are always detrimental. As the moon has direct sunlight, the moor rock's top layers turn to dust. On the 1st landing on the moon the astraunauts were afraid they would die from miles of dust on the moon. When they landed they found th of an inch of dust. If the moon if millions of years of years old? Why isn't there 20-60 miles of dust? William Meister found June 15 1968 in cambrian strata, which is the so called 'oldest strata', sandal and trilobyte fossils in the rock. How can that ben when man and trilobite were supposed to have livesd in different ages? How is it that in 1971 when producers were trying to find someone to write the preface for 'origin of species' they could not find someone on Earth to write somethign positive for Darwin? Why is it that in the Nice symposium all the main scientist got together and asked each other questions about the evolution theory, the which left them many doubts? Questions like: How did hydrogen clouds form into stars? How did the linear momentum rom the big bang change into angular momentum and began circling? How did the planets, stars, sun, moon form? Why do some people still use carbin 14 when H.C Dudley proved using pressure, electric and magnetic fields and change of decay carbon 14 could not be used accurately? Why did the 160 main world scientists got together for the Chicago evolution conference in 1980 in Chicago came to the concli=usion that 'Darwinian mechanism is no longer regarded as valide or tenable'? Why did Colin Paterson, senior paleontologist of the British museum in the 1981 New York conference said: ' Evolution is positively anti knowledge, all my life i have been duped taking evolution as revealed truth.' Why did one of the world' expert on fish Eroll White say: 'I have often thought how little i should like to defend the evolution theory in a court of law;' http://www.bible-tube.com

Scientists R/H/Dicke and Roger St Peter proved that the evolution theory was not true because hydrogen and helium cannot pass the gap at mass 5, thus cannot transform into other gases. Thus the big bang would have only formed hyfrogen and helium. How is it that no population 3 stars exist today, when they were supposed to be the originals? Why is there no more star explosion today? If supernovas ecplode once in a white why isn't there more supernovas in the sky? If the big band made everything rush outwards, why are there stars all throughout space? Why aren't stars rushed in the outer edges? Why are stars evenly spaced and not all in the extremity? Why aren't the fartherest stars not the youngens stars if evolution is true? Scientists found that the sun is loosing 0.1 % of its mass per century.This proves that the sun is no more than a million years old! If the pangea theory is true, then why do we not find the same animals in all continents? Why do all hot countries do not have the same animals, and all cold countries have the same animals? Is the Earth is billions of years old, just going back 5 billion years ago, with the slowing down of the rotation of the Earth. 5 billion years ago the earth would had been changed flat like a pancake with the equator being 64 km in the sky and all oceans at the poles! The earth is not millions of years old, but 6000 years old like the Bible says. The Earth has 20 millions metaors colliding everyday on it, adding 25 tons of weithg everyday. If the Earth was billions of years old, then the deposits would be much bigger all over the earth. The scientist Carl Lynn proved that a crossover between specie is scientifically impossible! Hoc can the evolution theory be right when even fossils in the cambrian layers have been found with traces of amino acids in them? How can the evolution theory be true when the carbon deposits in plants and fossils have been found to be 500 times greater than today's plants and animals? Because there was a flood that buried all these plants and animals very rapidly. How can natural selection be true, when according to evolutionists the changes are random as produced by chance and something which would have no brain. Http://www.bible-tube.com

How this natural selection only select good changes and not bad when it would have no brain to do it? How this natural selection only select good changes and not bad when it would have no brain to do it? How can natural selection be true when not positive changes have ever been observed? Senection is only God given minor changes in species which have never been observed in specie change. Someone living in Canada and moving to Florida, will go through minor changes, like body adjustment to temperature ect. This person wil not change into a diferent specie! The Fibronaci's golden ration 1.618 is found all over nature If the evolution theory is true, then why do sunflower always have the same number of flowers? Why do other flowers always have the same number of petals? Why isn't there variation in the world now? The same is found in Elm () Oak (2/5) Large trees (5/13) Sunflowers (55/34/21) The same pattren is found in waves, pineaple, pine cones, starfish, petals and all over creation, there is the sign of a Creator! The galaxies follow the Fibronacci pattern. The DNA The mouth os 1.618 larger than the nose The tooths are 1.618 spaced The phalanges are 1.618 spaces in the fingers The tubule sin the brain are spaced 1.618 the fibronacci pattern, the proof that chance could not make the universe and have a pattren in all creation from the smalest flowers to the galaxies. In Nature magazine, which is an evolution magazine P 362-363 March 18, 2010 it is said that scientist have seen the golden ration 1.618 observed for the FIRST TIME in quantum physics! Amazing! The resonance of the atoms have a vibration which is 1.618 ! How can this be, a creation patern in all created things, if everything would have come by chance? Because the universe did not come by chance, God created the universe! One proteins are made up of 150 amino acids which are all connected by peptide buns. Just for one amino acid to have come by chance it is 10 to the _45 Which mathematically is impossible passing 10 to the _30 http://www.bible-tube.com

Then this amino acid would have has to connect with another amino acid and by chance make a peptide bun. This goes up to 10 to the _45 Then this peocess would have had to happen 150 times, by chance! Then each protein has a l and a r protein. Which doubles tha impossibility. Which adds up to 1:10 to the _164 Mathematically it would have been utterly impossible to have had 1 protein come by chance! Much less extremely human beings! What is the erosion rate of the Earth? The Niagara falls are eroding pretty fast, a few inches per year. If the earth has been around for billions of years ago, how is it that the Niagara falls have not been completaly eroded yet? Scientists say that according to the erosion rate the earth should have been eroded 24 times over! If the evolution theory is true, then why is it that the geologic colums is not found enterly anywhere in the world? Nowhere in the world do we find the strata layers in order like evolutionists' imagination have laid down in charts. Most of the time only 2-8 of the layers can be found on the earth. The only plce we can find the geologic colums in order and with all the layers are in the drawings taken from some people's imagination do try to do away with an almighty God. Accorging to the evolution theory an extinct specie cannot come back to life because the so called 'evolution theory' does not work in reverse. How can it be that the geologic column is so incomplete when evolutionists say that the layers were laid down slowly and uniformy? How could the coelacanth been extinct millions of years, yet be foud now on the earth? Why are there no coelacanth in the most recent strata? How can it ibe that evolutionists think than 'ancient man' came from Africa, when the earliest artifact are from the middel east? Is it true that Licie's skull and knee are now proven to be from 2 direrent chimpanzee? Http://www.bible-tube.com

Is it true that the man that found Lucie now says that it is only a chimpanzee? Why is it that the only so called 'ancient men' are chipanzees or fully humans? Where is the avidence of smeketons halp humans and half chimpanzeee? Why do people say that these 'ancient man' are transitions when in fact: 'rhodesian man and Taung man are apes, Nebraska man is only a pig tooth, and Peking man has just human bones? If something exists it must have had a cause. Everything has a cause? Why is there something instead of nothing? Where does morality comes from if evolution is true? As bones decay in years in damp weather and in centuries in dry regions, how come these co called ancient man's bones did not decay if they were millions of years old? Are tonsils proof of evolution? As humans had bigger skulls like are found all over the world, then the facial features had more space for more tooths. (1) The impossibility of nothing making itself into something (chapter 2). (2) The impossibility of gaseous matter (hydrogen gas clouds) sticking together and forming itself by gravity or otherwise into stars or planetoids (chapter 2). (3) The impossibility of random actions of any kind in producing the intricate, interrelated, and complicated orbits of moons, planets, stars, galaxies, and galactic clusters (chapter 2). (4) The impossibility of linear, outward-flowing gas from a supposed Big Bang changing to orbital or rotational movements (chapter 2). (1) The impossibility of random formation of the DNA molecule, amino acids, proteins, or the cell (chapter 8). (2) The impossibility of non-living matter producing living organisms (chapter 7). (1) The total lack of past evidence of trans-species changes, as shown in the fossil evidence (chapter 12). http://www.bible-tube.com

(2) The total lack of present evidence of change from one species to another (chapters 9-10). (3) The impossibility of random, accidental gene reshuffling (natural selection) to produce new species (chapter 9). (4) The impossibility of mutations, either singly or in clusters, to produce new species (chapter 10). (5) The fact that there is no other mechanism, other than natural selection or mutations, which could possibly produce trans-species changes (chapters 9-10). (6) The fact that changes within species, are not evolution (chapter 11). (7) The beauty is shown in the things of nature. An example of this would be the beauty of the flowers. Random changes would not produce such attractive forms and colors. (8) The marvelous purposive designs of the things of nature. (We have a special section on our website on the wonders of design in nature.) Two of the most powerful evidences negating both inorganic and organic evolution, either in origin or development, would be the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics