Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
78
ICTON 2008
ICTON 2008
79
Tu.B4.2
a frequency mixer with the phase-shift original carrier frequency to downconvert into baseband BPSK signals, and then passes through a UWB correlated receiver to obtain the original data sequence. The correlator consists of a power amplifier, an electrical integrator, a sample and hold circuit, and a data comparator. The receiving pulse signal is treated by a high-speed integrator and a sampling and hold circuit to extract a peak power point, and then using a comparator to recovery the original data.
Central Station DFB-LD Bias Tee
DC Bias
SMF A
EAM + Optical Gain
Ch.2
SG3 (200MHz)
PG Ch.1
RF Amp.
SG1 (4 GHz)
SG2 (6 GHz)
Rec. Antenna
Mixer
3. SYSTEM MODEL To enable multiple access (MA) capability, spread spectrum communication techniques can be adopted. Time hopping (TH) and direct sequence (DS) are two methods commonly considered for UWB MA applications. In direct sequence binary pulse shift keying (DS-BPSK), the modulation technique uses phase shift to enable binary signal; and a multi-channel coded pulse train using a set of Gold codes modulated UWB Gaussian pulses at the transmitted end can be written as [6]
k k STX (t ) = ETX j = n = 0
a c
N c 1
k k j n
g (t jTb nTc )
(1)
where ETX is the energy of a chip, Tc is the spreading code chip period, Tb is the bit period, Nc is the length of Gold code word (Tb/Tc), Cnk is the spreading chip value, a k is the modulated data symbol value, k is a number j of users, and g(t) is the Gaussian monocycle pulse waveform. The impulse response of the channel can be modeled as
h(t ) = k (t k )
k =0 L 1
(2)
where L is the number of resolvable multipath components, k is the fading amplitude of the kth resolvable path, k is the delay time of the kth resolvable path and (t) is the Dirac delta function. For previous studies, the fading amplitude is lognormally distributed and k is considered to be constant during a symbol interval. Here, let h(t)=0 (t0) to simplify the multipath channel modeling. When there are Nu channels in a multi-channel system, the received signal of the kth channel can be expressed as
r (t ) =
Nu k =1 j = n = 0
N c 1
(3)
= r u (t ) + r mui (t ) + n(t )
where ru(t) is the expected receive signal of the kth channel, rmui(t) is the received interference signals from other (k-1)th channels and n(t) is the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) process with a two-sided power spectral density of N0/2. Assume the expected channel is the first (i.e., k = 1) with a reference delay time 1 = 0 and the receiver signal ru1(t) and rmui1(t)can be calculated. The optimum receiver for the channel is a correlated receiver. The locally generated monocycle signal mk(t) at the receiver is synchronized with the incoming monocycle train and is given by
mk (t ) =
N c 1 n=0
k n
g (t nTc k )
(4)
after correlated receiver and sampling hold process, the output signal at the first receiver can be expressed
Authorized licensed use limited to: CICESE. Downloaded on June 28,2010 at 06:50:37 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Tu.B4.2
80
ICTON 2008
1 as Z1 = r (t )m1 (t )dt = Z u1 + Z mui1 + Z n . Zu1 is the expected receive signal of the first channel Z u1 = ERX a1 N c . 0
Tb
Moreover, we derive the bit error rate (BER) of this receiver. Because the energy of g(t) is normalized to unity, the instantaneous signal-to-noise ratio per bit, SNRb, is obtained as follows SNRb = Z u21
n2
1 2 ERX N c N0
(5)
2 2 where n is a bit noise energy. Furthermore, the interference energy mui of multi-channel signals to the first channel receiver can be expressed the following 2 mui =
Nc Tc
TW
k R 2 ( )d ERX k =2
Nu
(6)
where R() is autocorrelation function of the pulse waveform g(t) and TW is the pulse width. Here, we
2 let W =
TW
R 2 ( )d . Therefore, the signal-to-interference ratio at channel 1 can be achieved as follows SIRb = Z u21
2 mui
N c Tc . Nu k ERX 2 W 1 k = 2 ERX
(7)
For communicating over an AWGN channel with a correlated receiver (i.e. matched filter), the theoretical probability of bit error Pb for DS-BPSK modulation under standard Gaussian approximation (SGA) [7] hypothesis is given by1/2 Q( SNRtotal / 2 ), where Q is the complementary error function and SNRtotal is the total signal-to-noise ratio per channel. If there are perfect power controls in the multi-user system, the all channels of k 1 ERX is equal to channel 1 of ERX . The probability of bit error (i.e., bit error rate) can be written in the following way
1 SNRtotal Pb = Q 2 2
=
1 Q 2
(8)
Optical Amplitude ( W )
40 0 -40 -80 0 4 8 12 16 20
Optical Amplitude ( W )
40 0 -40 -80 0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (ns)
Time (ns)
Fig. 3. Waveform of the modulated 200 Mbit/s PBRS 210-1 bipolar data trains obtained at the output of the EAM.
13.8 mA and a sinusoidal RF signal with a frequency of 200 MHz in a bias-tee circuit (5575A/Picosecond Labs) to generate Gaussian-like optical pulses. Moreover, two channel data strains, 200Mbit/s bipolar NRZ PRBS data signals generated from pulse pattern generator (Agilent 81133A), pass through the frequency mixers with the carrier frequency of 4 GHz and 6 GHz on the EAM. The high-power pulses with a very flat dc offset were generated when the bias voltage of EAM was adjusted to 3.2 V.
Authorized licensed use limited to: CICESE. Downloaded on June 28,2010 at 06:50:37 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
ICTON 2008
81
Tu.B4.2
The pulse waveform and spectrum of channel 1 are measured by using a high-speed sampling oscilloscope (Agilent 86110A) and an electrical spectrum analyzer (Agilent E4407B) with the resolution bandwidth of 3 MHz at the end-user to analyze the pulse shapes of the proposed system. Fig. 2 shows the Gaussian-like pulse train obtained at the output of the gain-switched DFB-LD (i.e., point A), which has a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) amplitude of about 1.92 ns. Fig. 3 shows the modulated waveform by the 200 Mbit/s bipolar PRBS data trains measured at the output of the EAM (i.e., point B). From the figure we can see that the phase shift
0
40 0 -40
-20
-40
(a)
Electrical Amplitude (mV )
20 0 -20
-60
10
Frequency (GHz)
(a)
0 -20
(b)
20
-40
0 -20
0 1.6 3.2 4.8 6.4 8
-60
Frequency (GHz)
(c)
0 1.7 3.4 5.1 6.8 8.5
(b)
Time (ns)
Fig. 4. Frequency spectra measured at (a)the front-end of RAU (i.e. point C) and (b)the front-end of end-user (i.e., point D).
Fig.5. Eye diagrams measured at (a)the front-end of RAU (i.e. point C), (b)the output of end-user (i.e., point E) under 4 GHz and 6 GHz carriers and (c)the output of end-user (i.e., point E) under 4 GHz and 4.4 GHz carriers.
for two modulated signals under the bipolar data. Moreover, the frequency spectra measured at the front-end of RAU (i.e. point C) and at the front-end of end-user (i.e., point D) are shown in Fig. 4(a) and 4(b). From the Fig. 4(b) we can see that several harmonic signals are generated in the end-user. It is due to the multipath and channel fading effects. Finally, the eye diagram is measured at the front-end of RAU (i.e., point C) and the output of the end-user (i.e., point E) shown in Fig. 5(a) and 5(b). The clear eye can be achieved using an orthogonal frequency receiver of channel 1 (i.e., 4 GHz). Furthermore, we adjust the carrier frequency of channel 2 from 6 GHz to 4.4 GHz, and then rework again for the measurement of eye diagram as shown in Fig. 5(c). The clear eye can also be achieved at the output of channel 1.
5. CONCLUSIONS The newly developed schemes of the optical BPSK modulation to generate Gaussian-like pulses for the multi-channel UWB radio-over-fiber system have been proposed. The modeling analysis and experimental results demonstrated that the modulation scheme with an orthogonal frequency receiver is characterized by the potentially high capacity of the channel. The proposed system can indeed provide the high quality pulse signals for the applications of future high-bit-rate multi-channel communication systems. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan for financially supporting this research under Contracts No. NSC 96-2628-E-182-002-MY3. REFERENCES
[1] [2] [3] [4] G.R. Aiello and G.D. Rogerson, Ultra-wideband wireless systems, IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp. 36-47, June 2003. K. Siwiak and D. Mckeown, Ultra-Wideband Radio Technology, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2004. UWB Channel Modeling Contribution From Intel, IEEE P802.15-02/279-SG3a. H. Bo and N. C. Beaulieu, Accurate evaluation of multiple-access performance in TH-PPM and TH-BPSK UWB systems, IEEE Trans. on Communications, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1758-1766, Oct. 2004. [5] W. Siriwongpairat, M. Olfat and K.J.R. Liu, On the performance evaluation of TH and DS UWB MIMO systems, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1800-1805, Mar. 2004.G. Giancola, M.-G. Di Benedetto, A novel approach for estimating multi-user interference in impulse radio UWB networks: The pulse collision model, Signal Processing, vol. 86, pp. 2185-2197, 2006. [7] B. Radunovic, J.-Y. Le Boudec, Optimal power control, scheduling, and routing in UWB networks, IEEE J. Sel. Area Commun., vol. 22, pp. 1252-1270, 2004.
Authorized licensed use limited to: CICESE. Downloaded on June 28,2010 at 06:50:37 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.