M S. Rajasthan Industries, Vs State of Raj. & Ors. On 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors.
on 21 January, 2011
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011 1 1. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10230/2010 2. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4808/2008 3. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5416/2008 4. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6425/2008 5. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.240/2009 6. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2627/2009 7. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2690/2009 8. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2693/2009 9. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2695/2009 10. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2884/2009 11. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2945/2009 12. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3420/2009 13. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3653/2009 14. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3677/2009 15. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3678/2009 16. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3709/2009 17. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3715/2009 18. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3740/2009 19. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3742/2009 20. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3792/2009 21. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3793/2009 22. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3794/2009 23. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3816/2009 24. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4026/2009
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/125878515/ 1
M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011
25. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4077/2009 26. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4078/2009 27. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4079/2009 28. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4164/2009 29. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4169/2009 30. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4426/2009 31. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4447/2009 32. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4448/2009 33. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4449/2009 34. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4580/2009 35. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4692/2009 36. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4810/2009 37. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4811/2009 38. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5024/2009 39. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5077/2009 40. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5401/2009 41. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5428/2009 42. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5442/2009 43. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6205/2009 44. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6269/2009 45. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6405/2009 46. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6644/2009 47. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6645/2009 48. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6749/2009 49. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6752/2009 50. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6802/2009
51. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7301/2009 52. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7400/2009 53. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7603/2009 54. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7609/2009 55. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7646/2009 56. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7713/2009 57. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7922/2009 58. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8398/2009 59. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8720/2009 60. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8767/2009 61. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8794/2009 2 62. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8795/2009 63. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8796/2009 64. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9097/2009 65. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9191/2009 66. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9753/2009 67. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10096/2009 68. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10872/2009 69. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10873/2009 70. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10880/2009 71. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10886/2009 72. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11443/2009 73. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11668/2009 74. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11808/2009 75. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11810/2009 76. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11811/2009
103. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.781/2010 104. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.782/2010 105. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.783/2010 106. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.799/2010 107. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.855/2010 108. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.856/2010 109. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.857/2010 110. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.858/2010 111. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.859/2010 112. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.860/2010 113. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.909/2010 114. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.910/2010 115. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.911/2010 116. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.912/2010 117. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.913/2010 118. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1000/2010 119. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1001/2010 120. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1048/2010 121. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1049/2010 122. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1083/2010 3 123. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1084/2010 124. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1215/2010 125. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1259/2010 126. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1260/2010 127. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1736/2010 128. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1772/2010
181. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5679/2010 182. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5680/2010 183. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5831/2010 4 184. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5933/2010 185. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6041/2010 186. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6043/2010 187. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6167/2010 188. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6215/2010 189. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6232/2010 190. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6296/2010 191. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6553/2010 192. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6766/2010 193. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6872/2010 194. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7288/2010 195. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7716/2010 196. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7717/2010 197. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7860/2010 198. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7887/2010 199. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7888/2010 200. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8124/2010 201. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8223/2010 202. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8505/2010 203. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8506/2010 204. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8507/2010 205. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8541/2010 206. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8681/2010
233. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9740/2010 234. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9741/2010 235. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9742/2010 236. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9743/2010 237. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9744/2010 238. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9745/2010 239. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9746/2010 240. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9747/2010 241. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9748/2010 242. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10085/2010 243. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10087/2010 244. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10231/2010 5 245. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10252/2010 246. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10266/2010 247. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10284/2010 248. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10371/2010 249. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10385/2010 250. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10458/2010 251. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.739/2004 252. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.738/2004 253. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2879/2006 254. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3629/2006 255. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3630/2006 256. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3730/2006 257. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3868/2006 258. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3869/2006
285. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5675/2006 286. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5832/2006 287. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5834/2006 288. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5835/2006 289. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6050/2006 290. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6080/2006 291. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6198/2006 292. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6199/2006 293. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6200/2006 294. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6215/2006 295. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6216/2006 296. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6356/2006 297. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6617/2006 298. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6618/2006 299. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6701/2006 300. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6703/2006 301. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6704/2006 302. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7010/2006 303. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7102/2006 304. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7120/2006 305. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7193/2006 6 306. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7/2007 307. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8/2007 308. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.83/2007 309. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.84/2007 310. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.85/2007
363. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7957/2008 364. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8059/2008 365. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8072/2008 366. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9161/2008 7 367. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9633/2008 368. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11/2009 369. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.500/2009 370. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.903/2009 371. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.904/2009 372. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1036/2009 373. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2609/2009 374. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2610/2009 375. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2882/2009 376. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2887/2009 377. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2970/2009 378. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3903/2009 379. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3904/2009 380. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3943/2009 381. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4559/2009 382. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5520/2009 383. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6686/2009 384. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7554/2009 385. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11118/2009 386. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11119/2009 387. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.11120/2009 388. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4876/2010
389. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5039/2010 390. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5047/2010 391. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5176/2010 392. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6042/2010 393. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7923/2010 394. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9084/2010 395. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9085/2010 396. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9086/2010 397. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9087/2010 398. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9516/2010 399. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9590/2010 400. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10020/2010 401. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10021/2010 402. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.10026/2010 21.1.2011 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Arun Mishra Hon'ble Mr.Justice Prakash Tatia Mr.Anjay Kothari ) Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Manish Shishodia ) Mr.Pankaj Kumar Bohra ) Mr.C.S.Kotwani ) Mr.Dinesh Mehta ) Mr.Yogesh Sharma ) Mr.Dinesh Kumar Sharma ) 8 Mr.Sanjeev Johari )
Mr.Vijay Bishnoi ) Mr.T.S.Champawat ) Mr.Dinesh Kumar Joshi ) Mr.Ramit Mehta ) Mr.Abdul Aziz Khan ) Mr.Sachin Acharya ) Mr.Sunil Bhandari ) Mr.S.S.Jodha ) Mr.Anil Bhansali ) Mr.Lalit Pareek ) Mr.Kunal Paliwal ) Mr.Javed Moyal ) Mr.Digvijay Singh ) Mr.J.P.Arora ) Ms.Teena Arora ) Mr.Chetan Rajpurohit ) Mr.I.R.Choudhary ) Mr.R.L.Jangid, AAG ) Mr.M.S.Singhvi ) Mr.V.K.Mathur ) Mr.Sunil Beniwal ) for the respective parties. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In similar matters being D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.13765/2010; M/s Ramgopal Satyanarain V/s the State of Rajasthan and ors. & 264 other connected cases, the following interim order was
passed by the Jaipur Bench of this Court on 1.12.2010:"These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the validity of the Rajasthan Tax of Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1999 and the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Rules, 1999 as being ultra vires and further declaring the order of assessment and the consequent demand raised on the basis of the same to be 9 invalid. Since there are conflicting judgments of the Division Benches of this court regarding the validity of the Act. Vide judgment dated 31.05.2000, a Division Bench of this court in case of Godfrey Philips Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. held the act to be valid, whereas in the case of M/s. Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. decided on 21.08.2007 the act was found to be ultra vires and in a subsequent judgment of a Division Bench in case of Godfrey Philips Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. decided on 18.01.2008 the act was again found to be valid. As such this bunch of petitions has been filed challenging the order of assessment as well as the demand and in some cases for staying the proceedings of the assessment as well. The matter also came up before the Principal Seat of this court at Jodhpur and in view of the conflicting decisions a reference has been made by the Division Bench to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for referring the matter to the Larger Bench in the case of D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.739/2004 Laxmi Cement Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. vide order dated 12.09.2007. It may also be stated here that against the decision of the Division Bench of this court dated 21.08.2007 declaring the act to be ultra vires in case of M/s. Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. the matter is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and has been referred to a bench of seven Judges. It has also been brought to the notice of the court by Mr. Sudhir Gupta, counsel appearing for M/s Binani Cement Ltd. that a transfer petition was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court being Transfer Petition (Civil) No.29/2008 Binani Cement Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vide order dated 25.02.2008, the said petition was disposed of by the Hon'ble Supreme Court with following directions: "Heard. This is an application for transfer of W.P. (C) No.3630/2006. The said writ petition has been referred to a larger Bench. This court is examining the correctness of the judgment of the High Court which is assailed in SLP(C) No.16351/2007. The High Court shall take up W.P. (C) No.3630/2006 after the disposal of the aforesaid special leave petition by this Court. 10 The transfer petition is disposed of accordingly." In view of above, there is an
arguable question which is involved. Accordingly, all these petitions stand admitted and the learned Advocate General has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. So far as the interim relief is concerned, the matter came up before the court on two earlier occasions on 10.11.2010 and was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the parties. Subsequently, the matter again came up before the Bench on 26.11.2010 for consideration of admission as well as on stay and it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this court had earlier granted stay of the recovery in pursuance of the order of the assessment and the demand notice. It was pointed out by the Bench that there had also been another set of orders in which assesses had been directed to deposit 50% of the amount with stipulation that the remaining 50% amount shall remain stayed on furnishing a solvent security. It was, however, also observed in these orders that in case the petition succeeds the State would refund the amount so deposited under the orders of the court with interest @ 12% per annum. There were, therefore, two different sets of interim orders. In these circumstances the Bench presided over by the Hon'ble Chief Justice directed that all matters regarding entry tax be listed before the court on 01.12.2010 so that uniformity in interim orders could be maintained. Accordingly, all the matters have been listed today before the bench for consideration as to what interim orders should be passed in all these matters. The various orders which have been passed by different Benches of this court may be quoted for convenience. In D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1083/2010 on 08.02.2010 the court passed following exparte orders: "Admit. Issue notice. We have been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the matter in question has been referred to the Larger Bench, however, identical matter is to be heard by seven Judges' Bench of Apex Court. Prima facie we feel that there is a case of interim relief. Accordingly, in the meanwhile the recovery from the petitioner shall remain 11 stayed. Connect with D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2695/2009." Likewise in another D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9772/2010 decided on 26.07.2010 on being informed that the Division Bench of this court in case of M/s. Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. decided on 21.08.2007 has allowed the writ petition and held the act to be ultra vires. This court directed that meanwhile, the tax assessed against the petitioner as per the assessment order shall not be recovered from the petitioner in case the petitioner submits a solvent security for the aforesaid amount to the satisfaction of the Assessing Authority within a week from today. Apart from the aforesaid two set of orders, in the case of D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8692/2010 a Division Bench of this court passed order as follows: "Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. R.P. Singh accepts notice on behalf of the State. It would be open to the respondents to make the assessment. However, no recovery be made till next date. Counsel for the appellant is directed to supply a copy of this petition along with its annexures to counsel for the State during the course of the day."
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/125878515/
19
In D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13198/2010 Division Bench of this court to which one of us (Hon'ble Mr. Dalip Singh,J.) was a member after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate General for the State passed following order: "Heard on the stay application. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct that the recovery against the petitioner in pursuance of the assessment order, Annexure-8 and demand notice, Annexure-9 shall remain stayed on the condition that the petitioner deposits 50% of the assessed amount of tax with the concerned authorities within a period of four weeks from today. It is, however, made clear that in case the writ petition succeeds, the petitioner would be entitled to the refund of the said amount, so deposited with interest @ 12% per annum. The petitioner shall submit solvent surety for the balance 50% of the amount of the tax to the satisfaction of the assessing authority. The stay application stands disposed of." In another set of petitions where the petitioners had approached this court 12 even prior to passing of the assessment order. This court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13198/2010 had passed following orders on 09.11.2010: "Heard on the stay application. It has been submitted by the learned counsel that at present the assessment has not been made. In view of the above, it is directed that the respondents may proceed to finalize the assessment in respect of the petitioner- assessee. In case, the amount is found due against the petitioner in terms of the said assessment, the petitioner shall be liable to deposit 50% of the said amount after the assessment order and demand notice within a period of four weeks in pursuance on the same. The petitioner shall submit solvent surety in respect of the remaining 50% of the amount. It is made clear that in case the writ petition itself succeeds, the petitioner would be entitled to the refund of the amount, so deposited with interest @ 12% per annum. The stay application stands disposed of." In view of the aforesaid position where there were two sets of interim orders, one granting absolute stay and the other requires 50% of the amount of the assessed tax to be deposited, the Bench while directing the cases to be listed on 16.11.2010 has directed for listing all the matters together so that uniformity should be maintained in all cases. We are aware of the fact that in some cases the stay applications have been finally heard and in some cases even application filed by the State for vacation/modification of interim order has been disposed of. Nonetheless it is desirable that in such matters there should be uniformity and in future also if any petition is filed the same orders must be passed, therefore, the aforesaid bunch of cases have been listed together and all counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in these cases have been heard along with the learned Advocate General for the State-respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties do not dispute the fact that it is a peculiar case where the validity of the Act in one set of petitions has been upheld vide judgment dated 31.05.2000 and 18.01.2008 in case of Godrfrey Philips Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and in another judgment of the Division Bench of this court in the case of M/s. Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. decided on 21.08.2007 the act has been 13 held to be ultra vires. The position which further emerges is that vide judgment dated 31.05.2000 the Act was found to be valid but vide judgment dated 21.08.2007 it was held to be invalid and again vide judgment dated 18.01.2008 it has been found to be valid. The matter is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court against the judgment dated 21.08.2007 in M/s. Dinesh Pouches's case to be heard by a bench of seven Judges. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has already directed that the High Court shall not hear the matter till the matter is heard by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The interim order which has been passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M/s. Dinesh Pouches' case in the S.L.P. against the judgment dated 21.08.2007 is as follows: "There shall be an interim stay of the direction of the High Court so far as it relates to refund." In view of above it is clear that the direction so far as the refund of the amount of tax which has been deposited with the State by the assessee which had been ordered by the High Court while declaring the Act to be ultra vires, that has been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. With the view to balance the equity while passing interim orders and more particularly in fiscal matters it is necessary that the interest of the assessees as well as that of the Revenue may be balanced equally. Grant of absolute stay order staying the recovery on furnishing of bank guarantees does not serve either the parties or the State. Even assuming that there is a prima facie case in favour of the assessee-petitioners the two other relevant considerations of balance of convenience and irreparable loss must also be taken into account. In that view of the matter it is directed that recovery of tax in pursuance of assessment orders and demand notices where they have been issued in the case of such petitioners shall remain stayed on the condition of the petitioners depositing 50% of the assessed tax excluding any amount of penalty and/or interest imposed by the assessing authority. The deposit be made within a period of six weeks from today. It is further made clear that for the balance amount of 50% of tax and the amount of penalty or interest imposed by the assessing authority in the assessment order is concerned, the assessees shall furnish a solvent security or the security as provided under the Act for the said amount within a period of six weeks to the satisfaction of the assessing authority. Both these 14 conditions of deposit and furnishing security shall be complied with within six weeks, failing which this order shall stand vacated automatically. In the event if the writ petition succeeds the petitioner shall be entitled to refund of the amount of the tax deposited by the assessees or where the entire amount has been deposited, the entire amount with interest @ 12% per annum and in the event if the petition fails, the assessees shall be liable to pay the balance amount of tax plus penalty with interest @ 12%
per annum and where assessments have not been made so far, the respondents may proceed to finalise the same and the assessment orders/demand notices being issued, the petitioners' case shall be covered by the aforesaid order. The stay application in all the writ petitions accordingly stand disposed of. Earlier orders passed shall stand modified in the light of this order. Let a photostat copy of this order be placed in each file." These matters are similar, but different orders have been passed. There cannot be any inconsistency in passing the orders in similar matters. The above interim order passed by the Jaipur Bench has not been interfered by the Supreme Court in SLP No.539/2011 wherein the following order was passed by the Supreme Court on 12.1.2011:"Taken on board. Having heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. However, the time granted to the petitioner in the impugned order for compliance is extended by a further period of two weeks from today." 15 In view of the aforesaid interim order passed by the Jaipur Bench, the interim orders passed in these matters deserve to be modified and accordingly, we modify the interim orders passed in these matters and pass the same interim orders as passed by Jaipur Bench of this Court in D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.13765/2010; M/s Ramgopal Satyanarain V/s the State of Rajasthan and ors. &
264 other connected case (supra),which shall continue during the pendency of the writ petitions. The stay applications stand disposed of accordingly. A photo stat copy of the order be placed in each of the aforesaid files. (Prakash Tatia)J. (Arun Mishra)C.J. NK
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/125878515/
23

M S. Rajasthan Industries, Vs State of Raj. & Ors. On 21 January, 2011

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

M S. Rajasthan Industries, Vs State of Raj. & Ors. On 21 January, 2011

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors.

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/125878515/

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

M/S. Rajasthan Industries, vs State Of Raj. & Ors. on 21 January, 2011

Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/125878515/

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi