Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
MAY 3, 2011
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION-2011
What is the
01
How do we classify
a household
in the new SEC system?
02
advantages/ drawbacks
of the new SEC system?
03
created?
04
other systems
that we considered?
05
What is
the performance
06
Conclusion
07
01
SEC system?
DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS
18.4
15.4
14.7
11.4
9.7
3.2
4.3
7.5
7.9
C1
C2
5.3
1.8
0.4
A1
A2
A3
B1
B2
D1
D2
E1
E2
E3
*Figures in percentage
This round of analysis has been conducted using data from IRS 2008 (round 20)*.
We have drawn a sub-sample of 39,441
DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS
Urban
New SEC System
13.2
12.9
11.6
12.6
10.2
7.6
9.8
8.6
5.1
4.7
2.6
1.1
A1
A2
A3
B1
B2
C1
C2
D1
D2
E1
E2
E3
24
20.5
18.2
11.9
6.6
7.9
B1
B2
2.8
A1
6
A2
E1
E2
DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS
Rural
New SEC System
22.2
20.1
15.6
12.8
10.7
5.1
0.04
0.4
1.3
A1
A2
A3
2.3
3.2
B1
B2
C1
6.2
C2
D1
D2
E1
E2
E3
40.3
43
12.3
4.3
R1
THE NEW SEC SYSTEM
R2
R3
R4
7
02
How do we classify
a household
in the new SEC system?
Q1a Please take a look at this list and tell me which of these items do you have at
home? (It could be owned by you, your family, or provided by the employer or it
could be available in the house you live in; but it should be for the use of just you or
your family)
EXPLAIN, IF NECESSARY:
We have a standard list of items that we use in all kinds of cities and villages. So dont worry if an item appears
irrelevant for you, or too ordinary- just go ahead and tell me which items you do have. We need this information just
for survey purpose only.
Q1b
Does your family own any agricultural land, by agricultural land I mean
land that is currently under cultivation or plantation?
SHOW CARD/READ OUT
Q2
Could you tell me something about the person who makes the biggest
contribution to the running of the household. To what level has he
studied?
RECORD IN GRID. USE GRID TO DETERMINE NEW SEC.
RECORDING
The grid
01
1a
1b
Tick
Electricity Connection
01
Ceiling Fan
02
LPG Stove
03
Two Wheeler
04
Colour TV
05
Refrigerator
06
Washing Machine
07
08
Car/Jeep/Van
09
Air Conditioner
10
Agricultural Land
11
10
Circle
RECORDING
The grid
Chief Earner: Education (Q2)
02
11
No. of
Durables
(TRANSFER
FROM Q1)
Illiterate
Literate
but no
formal
schooling/
SchoolUpto 4
years
School- 5
to 9 years
SSC/ HSC
Some
College
(incl a
Diploma)
but not
Grad
Graduate/
Post
Graduate:
General
Graduate/
Post
Graduate:
Profession
al
None
E3
E2
E2
E2
E2
E1
D2
E2
E1
E1
E1
D2
D2
D2
E1
E1
D2
D2
D1
D1
D1
D2
D2
D1
D1
C2
C2
C2
D1
C2
C2
C1
C1
B2
B2
C2
C1
C1
B2
B1
B1
B1
C1
B2
B2
B1
A3
A3
A3
C1
B1
B1
A3
A3
A2
A2
B1
A3
A3
A3
A2
A2
A2
9+
B1
A3
A3
A2
A2
A1
A1
03
What are
the advantages
of the new SEC system?
Advantages
OF THE NEW SEC SYSTEM
to classify
13
03
drawbacks
to the new SEC system?
15
04
17
18
19
20
05
other systems
that we considered?
22
A system based on
occupation and education of
chief earner and the number
of consumer durables
owned
06
Performance
of the new SEC system
PENETRATION
54
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
13
10
19
9
10
0
B1
B2
E1
E2
0
A1
A2
A3
B1
B2
C1
C2
D1
D2
E1
E2
E3
A1
A2
96
90
100
90
82
80
71
70
54
60
84
80
68
70
50
56
60
50
38
40
30
43
40
30
30
23
15
20
20
12
5
10
13
10
10
0
A1
24
A2
A3
B1
B2
C1
C2
D1
D2
E1
E2
E3
A1
A2
B1
B2
E1
E2
PENETRATION
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
92
90
85
83
80
74
49
35
16
5
A1
A2
A3
B1
B2
C1
C2
D1
D2
E1
E2
E3
80
76
69
49
33
A2
B1
B2
E1
E2
72
70
70
60
60
53
50
55
50
37
40
30
40
40
23
20
28
30
19
13
10
19
20
7
16
10
E1
E2
0
A1
25
84
58
A1
86
A2
A3
B1
B2
C1
C2
D1
D2
E1
E2
E3
A1
A2
B1
B2
PERFORMANCE ON DISCRIMINATION
India ( u + r )
Gini coefficients for New SEC system compared with benchmark
Penetration
0.4
0.7
Own PC at home
1.6
3.5
5.8
6.8
8.2
12.4
Own Telephone
12.6
31.2
37.0
0
New System
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Gini Values
26
PERFORMANCE ON DISCRIMINATION
India ( u + r ) (CONTD.)
Gini coefficients for New SEC system compared with benchmark
Penetration
Jam
3.3
Ketchup / Sauces
5.3
Chocolates
6.6
Instant Noodles
6.7
Floor Cleaners
11.6
Toilet Cleaners
14.1
15.8
Skin Creams/Lotions
21.4
Utensil cleaners
29.7
49.8
Toothpaste
57.7
Shampoo
75.1
95.8
0
New System
Benchmark System (MHI)
27
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Gini Values
*Purchased in the last 6 months except soft drinks, skin creams and chocolates
Data Source: MRUC/ Hansa Research - IRS 2008 (Round 20)
27
GINI CO-EFFICIENTS
Urban
Gini coefficients for New SEC system compared with benchmark
Penetration
1.0
1.9
Own PC at home
4.5
8.5
12.7
15.7
20.9
Own Telephone
23.8
25.9
60.0
69.6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Gini Values
New System
Current System
28
28
GINI CO-EFFICIENTS
Urban (CONTD.)
Gini coefficients for New SEC system compared with benchmark
Penetration
4.1
8.9
Ketchup / Sauces
15.2
Chocolates
15.4
Instant Noodles
17.4
28.3
Floor Cleaners
30.2
Skin Creams/Lotions
30.6
Toilet Cleaners
32.0
Utensil cleaners
59.9
60.1
Toothpaste
80.8
Shampoo
84.9
0
New System
Current System
29
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Gini Values
*Purchased in the last 6 months except soft drinks, skin creams and chocolates
Data Source: MRUC/ Hansa Research - IRS 2008 (Round 20)
29
GINI CO-EFFICIENTS
Rural
Gini coefficients for New SEC system compared with benchmark
Penetration
0.1
0.1
Own PC at home
0.3
1.3
2.7
2.8
2.8
6.6
Own Telephone
7.6
13.4
18.6
22.8
30.9
0
New System
Current System
30
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Gini Values
Data Source: MRUC/ Hansa Research - IRS 2008 (Round 20)
30
GINI CO-EFFICIENTS
Rural (CONTD.)
Gini coefficients for New SEC system compared with benchmark
Penetration
Instant Noodles
2.1
Chocolates
2.8
Floor Cleaners
3.5
Toilet Cleaners
6.2
10.4
Utensil cleaners
16.5
Skin Creams/Lotions
17.4
45.3
Toothpaste
47.6
Shampoo
70.8
Biscuits
73.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Gini Values
New System
Current System
31
*Purchased in the last 6 months except soft drinks, skin creams and chocolates
Data Source: MRUC/ Hansa Research - IRS 2008 (Round 20)
PERFORMANCE ON DISCRIMINATION
Conclusion
32
Distribution of
Households %
Median LIFE
Inter Quartile
Range (IQR)
Level
Distribution of
Households %
Median LIFE
Inter Quartile
Range (IQR)
0.5
702
186
A1
0.4
804
116
1.5
618
236
A2
1.8
687
150
4.2
514
243
A3
3.2
590
173
3.5
455
236
B1
4.3
494
172
4.7
391
227
B2
5.3
430
164
7.1
347
207
C1
7.5
369
142
11.7
289
178
C2
7.9
319
124
19.3
232
155
D1
11.4
270
117
19.2
181
139
D2
14.7
222
106
10
13.5
136
110
E1
18.4
164
90
11
12.9
125
111
E2
15.4
117
75
12
2.1
95
101
E3
9.7
80
65
Median LIFE
Inter Quartile
Range (IQR)
Level
Distribution of
Households %
Median LIFE
Inter Quartile
Range (IQR)
SEC A1
2.8
702
189
A1
1.1
807
106
SEC A2
6.6
616
225
A2
5.1
704
132
SEC B1
7.9
539
215
A3
7.6
610
147
SEC B2
8.0
467
221
B1
8.6
532
158
SEC C
20.5
408
210
B2
10.2
463
158
C1
12.9
399
136
C2
11.6
347
118
D1
13.2
300
113
D2
12.6
251
100
E1
9.8
194
92
E2
4.7
148
93
E3
2.6
112
80
SEC D
SEC E1
SEC E2
34
Distribution of
Households %
24.0
320
167
11.9
280
155
18.2
212
137
PERFORMANCE ON HOMOGENEITY
Conclusion
35
07
Conclusion
THE NEW SEC SYSTEM
In Conclusion
We have a system that is simple, easy to administer. It
gives us good discrimination; the social grades created
are more homogenous
But we do need to revisit the system at least once every two
years; and make sure that when a change is needed, this is
a smooth process
Its easy to begin using the new system. For those who
need to keep track of the old SEC for reasons of
comparability, the new system means just one more
question- which can be tagged on right at the end.
37
Thank You
38