SAMPLE EVALUATION FORM FOR ARCHITECTS

CRITERIA Previous Projects Principles involvement Projects of similar scope

Weight 10 10 10

ARCH 1

NOTES

ARCH 2

NOTES

Local representative

Energy efficient building Restoration / Heritage

5 5

Cost control consultant Electrical/mechanical consultant Interior design consultant Quality control consultant Library consultant Quality of presentation Gave information required Creative design awards

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Landscape consultant How related are previous projects Gut feeling Size of Firm TOTAL

2 2 2 2

RATING SCALE:

1 = NOT ACCEPTABLE

2 = POOR

3 = ACCEPTABLE

4 = VERY GOOD

5 = EXCELLENT

Note: multiply criteria score by weight factor

Sample Evaluation Form For Architects Plan22 June 2010

DEFINITIONS OF EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ARCHITECTS Previous Projects (10) public library buildings 10,000 square feet or larger public library buildings less than 10,000 square feet any public buildings 10,000 square feet or larger any public buildings less than 10,000 square feet any buildings 10,000 square feet or larger Principles' Involvement (10) principles directly involved in all aspects of the project principles directly involved in concept design and design development principles not directly involved in concept design and design development Projects of similar scope (10) Firm has previously completed projects of similar scope Firm has not previously done project management for projects of similar scope Firm has not previously done construction supervision for projects of similar scope Firm has not done site selection studies for projects of similar scope Firm has not done two of the three items above Local Representative (7) Firm will have a local representative Firm will not have local representative Energy efficient building (5) has built energy efficient buildings has not built energy efficient building Restoration / Heritage (5) has completed restoration of buildings has not completed restoration of buildings =5 =0 =5 =0 =5 =0 =5 =4 =3 =2 =1 =5 =4 =1 =5 =4 =3 =2 =1

Sample Evaluation Form For Architects

Plan22 June 2010

Cost control consultant (3) lists cost control consultant as part of project team does not list cost control consultant as part of team Electrical/mechanical consultant (3) lists electrical/mechanical consultant as part of project team does not list electrical/mechanical consultant as part of project team Interior design consultant (3) lists interior design consultant as part of project team does not list interior design consultant as part of project team Quality control consultant (3) lists quality control consultant as part of project team does not list quality control consultant as part of project team Library consultant (3) lists library consultant as part of project team does not list library consultant as part of project team Quality of presentation (3) excellent presentation very good presentation good presentation fair presentation poor presentation Gave information required (3) gave all information required gave all information except cost per square foot did not give enough detail about previous library experience did not give enough detail about project team did not give enough detail about two of the three above =5 =4 =3 =2 =1 =5 =4 =3 =2 =1 =5 =0 =5 =0 =5 =0 =5 =0 =5 =0

Sample Evaluation Form For Architects

Plan22 June 2010

Creative design awards (3) has received 4 or more design awards has received 3 design awards has received 2 design awards has received 1 design award has not listed any design awards Landscape consultant (2) lists landscape consultant as part of project team does not list landscape consultant as part of project team How related are previous projects (2) has completed three more public libraries in the last 5 years has completed one public library in the last 5 years has completed 3 or more libraries of any kind in the last 5 years has completed 1 library of any kind in the last 5 years has completed 1 or more libraries in the last 10 years Gut feeling (2) excellent very good good fair poor Size of Firm (2) Firm has adequate staff to carry-out project Firm does not have adequate staff to carry-out project =5 =0 =5 =4 =3 =2 =1 =5 =4 =3 =2 =1 =5 =0 =5 =4 =3 =2 =1

Sample Evaluation Form For Architects

Plan22 June 2010