Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Outlines
Key Takeaways Recommendations Study Overview Research questions Participants Methodology Findings SuiteX Navigation Consistence Experience Mobile Phone Note Management How Miles takes notes on mobile How Miles likes to be reminded on phone Next steps Contributors
Key Takeaways
Navigation for SuiteX: Swipe Participants like swipe navigation significantly more than back button. The preference on Swipe navigation is across Windows Phone (WP) users & NonWP users Participants think drill down & back button navigation is simple but not a best navigation model for touch phone
Consistency: App across Platform > Platform Participants prefer to have consistent SuiteX experience across devices (desktop, mobile phone & tablet) compared to phone platform Participants expect user interface designs customized for devices
Note Management A big call for reminder/alarm Search is not the top 1 need currently for users who dont have notebooks on phone
Recommendations
Swipe for SuiteX hierarchy navigation Design within app navigation for SuiteX & use Windows phone back button as the 2nd option Use tap, scroll, swipe rather than button when possible. These 3 gestures are what users do naturally on touch phone. Commands which can leverage the 3 gestures help improve discoverability compared to buttons on the bottom menu bar on Windows Phone for new users. Design visual cues for SuiteX hierarchy indication to help users know where they come from and where they go Integrate Note reminder with calendar only as an OPTION Design strikethrough (e.g. buy tickets for Sounders) for checked off notes
55%
Non-Windows Phone Users (n=12)
Demographic Information Age (years old) Notes Experience (times/week) Mobile Note Experience(times/week) Phone Usage (hours/day)
N 20 19 14 14
Participants play SuiteX Swipe model & Drill down model, interview for the navigation experience
Participants play
Likeness
Like it very much
3 2 1
0 -1 -2
Dont like it at all
-3
Swipe
Back Button
Descriptive Statistics Mean Swipe Back Button 1.9 -0.1 Std. Deviation 1.0 1.3 N 18 18
11
Importance
Very 7 Important
N efficiency importance
Descriptive Statistics Minimum Maximum 15 5.0 7.0 Mean 6.567 Std. Deviation .6230
5 3
Very Unimportant 1 6.6 6 5.7 5.5
smooth importance
natural-importance clear-importance
14
13 12
4.0
4.0 4
7.0
7.0 7
5.464
6.038 5.67
1.2780
.8771 .985
Efficiency
Natural
Clear
Smooth
13
Efficiency
Very Efficient
3 2 1
0 -1 -2
Very Inefficient -3
Swipe
Back Button
Descriptive Statistics Mean Swipe Back Button 0.6 -0.7 Std. Deviation 1.7 1.4 N 19 19
14
Clear
Clear
3 2 1 0 -1 -2
Confusing
-3
Swipe
Back Button
Descriptive Statistics Mean Swipe Back Button 1.0 -0.2 Std. Deviation 0.7 1.4 N 14 14
15
3 2 1 0 -1 -2
Smooth
Rough
-3
Swipe
Back Button
Descriptive Statistics Mean Swipe Back Button 1.1 -0.6 Std. Deviation 0.7 1.4 N 14 14
16
17
User Experience Desirability Emotion connection Customer loyalty (meeting needs, easy to work with, enjoyment)
19
Follow-up research
Windows Phone Task Analysis Desirability / Emotion: SuiteX vs. Experience Consistency: When to break the consistency & to what extent Android Phone W1 scorecard usability benchmark
21