Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Note: this assignment is being used to assess one of the program goals in the B.Bus., namely Understanding and application of major theories, models and tools for analysing and interpreting real world domestic and global issues, as part of the Griffith Business Schools commitments to assurance of learning and quality education. Criterion Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
21 or more Development of insightful and logical arguments in a concise and articulate manner. Arguments are excellent in terms of clarity and persuasiveness. 24 or more
18.5 to 20.5 Development of logical arguments in a concise and articulate manner. Arguments are generally clear and persuasive.
16 to 18 Most arguments are logically developed in a concise and articulate manner. Arguments lack clarity and persuasiveness some of the time.
12.5 to 15.5 A basic level of logical argument developed. Arguments lack clarity and persuasiveness in a number of areas.
12 or less Not developing logical arguments. Presenting arguments that are generally unclear and not persuasive.
Max 28
21 to 23.5
18 to 20.5
14 to 18
13.5 or less
Ability to reflect on the theory/ies in the context of a given scenario so as to make (a) rational, useful recommendation(s) for workplace change.
Deep reflection and complex links made from theory to the scenario, producing (a) particularly insightful, fully justified and highly practical recommendation/s targeted on specific workplace practices. 15 or more
Deep reflection and general links made from theory to the scenario, producing (a) workable, fully justified and practical recommendation/s targeted on specific workplace practices.
Reasonable reflection as demonstrated by the ability to reflect on the 'what' and 'why' of the scenario, producing (a) recommendation/s to effect some changes in the workplace.
Basic reflective skills as demonstrated by the ability to reflect on the 'what' but not 'why' of the scenario, producing (a) recommendation(s) to effect some changes in the workplace.
No demonstrated reflection of theory presented, and (a) recommendation(s) that are neither practical nor show any insights about the situation, and/or are much too generalised to be useful. 8.5 or less
Max 17.5
13.5 to 14.5
11.5 to 13
9 to 11
Max 30
25.5 or more
19.5 to 22
14.5 or less
Markers comments
Total mark
/100