Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DigitalCommons@ILR
CAHRS Working Paper Series Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (CAHRS)
5-1-1991
John W. Boudreau
Cornell University
Broderick, Renae F. and Boudreau, John W., "Human Resource Management, Information Technology, and the Competitive Edge" (1991). CAHRS Working Paper Series. Paper 351. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/351
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (CAHRS) at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in CAHRS Working Paper Series by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact jdd10@cornell.edu. Please take our short DigitalCommons@ILR user survey.
Renae Broderick
and
John W. Boudreau Working Paper
91-19
This paper has not undergone formal review or approval faculty of the ILR School. It is intended to make the Center research, conferences and projects available to interested in human resource management in preliminary encourage discussion and suggestions.
Support for this research came primarily from the Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. Additional support came from the U.S. Army Research Institute, contract SFRC fMDA-903-87-K001. The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed as Center or Official Department of the Army policies, or decisions.
HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT,
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOOY,
EDGE
EXECUTIVE Global make faster competition and better are often is putting business more
decisions.
Investments means
technology
touted
as a critical Yet
management
realize
decision making.
difficult
This .is
the potential
of information areas
so in business times
such
(HR),
though
the mean
associated to benefit
is a prime
from
information
to pull costs,
the
lead
in global to high
competition, quality,
must
motivate
customer ways
performance, These
and better
of doing and
objectives
head
count and
are more
diverse tasks
located record in of
the
of employee
context. that
Such
go beyond thus
simply
improving
the management
of routine
managers their
have
a stake
technology to help
to
manage
human
resources. technology
managers
improve
resources
management
contribute
advantage.
EDGE how
they
were
kept
Faster!"...
till
as Alice in great
quite "Why
exhausted,
I do believe
whole else-
you'd sort
generally
somewhere the
of country!"
said
"Now,
it takes
in the
place.
to get Carroll,
at least
as fast..."
The Looking
Glass).
run and
results
must
strike
many
of u.s. fast
firms.
to "getting they
somewhere
race, Anxious
best for
only
keeps
to outrace
managers method
search and
motivation, edge:
technology,
sustainable,
above
business
Their Many
covers
information
to better
human
investments
in such
applications No one
to payoff
to firm competitiveness. of information Technology suggests technology in the on a firm's Center can use of to for
Project
Resource
at Cornell
enhance
research Fortune
technology they've
500 firms
what
from their
investments
in Human
Resource in Human
Information
Systems
technology
Resources
potential involved
in realizing
the match
between
BR competitive
3
objectives There and the types other of BR computer involved and applications in which a firm invests.
issues
in realizing
information force
technology's in databases
potential,
as planning
in work design)3.
skills,
of these
is beyond
scope
of this
in passing,
as they
relate
to our major
focus.
The
COmpetitive The
Potential
of Information
of information
accepted
Computer Citibank
of new products consumer American Research management example, specific inventory, meet deposit
market had
by developing locked-in
Teller
Machines
(SABRE). with
better
demonstrated. used in
For
applications settings
designed
manufacturing purchasing
reportedly costs,
and design
while Such
production
targets. market
systems
into high
position
by redefining
the
industry
producer.' technology can be used to develop been with competitive to improve groups HR in ten
information
but,
to date,
used
information. that
the HRIS
firms6,
we found
the majority
had invested
in computer and
to manage
employee
records,
payroll, to such
automated 'paper
and pencil'
calculations,
administration ninety
costs
by increasing Armstrong
accuracy
of pension
nearly
percent.
4
World's to self benefits insure management and better computer control applications benefit enabled costs the parent company claims HR has
health
via targeted
ARCO's improved
in computer
systems
to store Better
and process
to ask more
questions ratings
count, units'
affect
business that
to choose
that
cost
reduction
Finance how
managers about
jointly
application can
shows
hiring
units
affect hire
sales
revenues sales
effectively
and train
these
These
examples
demonstrate
that
information
technology
can
improve most
HR
operational, investments
and planning
decisions. technology
in HR information such
a narrow and
as those
payroll these
In many
competitive fully
investments we need
not been
this how HR
a framework
that
helps
different
types
objectives.
in the
sections
HR competitive types
objectives
and related
of computer and
applications
and the
to improve;
HR competitive them.
objectives
with
the computer
applications
that
support
5
BR Competitive Schuler EXECUTIVE, drivers Objectives and Related 1987 Decisions in The Academy of Management as primary
article
identified
firm-level
competitive Cost
strategies
of HR competitive and
objectives:
Leadership,
Quality/Customer
Satisfaction,
Innovation. strategy, Sources a firm of cost strives advantage access to become include the low-cost of sources
Leadership industry.
economies supply
proprietary
technology, etc.).
or favored
to important Satisfaction
existing
of commanding
strategy, but
Leadership
strategy
is concerned customers'
reductions, of quality
only
in areas
affect
perceptions
or value.
The
emphasizes
differentiation technology,
through
the creation
of new
methods, yield
The
Cost
results
firm the
industry's
producer, or service
resulting To achieve
in product
and realize
competitive --that
firm,
HR must itself.
HR function work
Restructuring or greater
in most
left
HR with
smaller Time
force,
yet equal
has become
as critical strategic
work
continue
to be done? and
can be done
by searching which
of scale
can be done
by delegating staffs
collaborating
functional from
satisfaction);
and which
creative work
(Innovation)? vision?
In short,
smarter,
more
6
Exhibit decisions streamline 1 illustrates how HR can divide strategy. records, its work and address related HR could
for each
competitive
Cost
Leadership, by
processing
of employee
and benefits
unnecessary
handling
HR
provider
for critical
administrative
as well
as a more
accurate
provider
of HR information. with
to become
needs.
HR could
a merit
pay process
an imposed, to
a system plans
increase
for their
units.
expertise.
managers
contribute that
of customer those
to achieve 15-20%
an Innovation creative
strategy, projects
of staff
time
with
term
payoffs. to other
Perhaps
expertise
making
cases, HR work
to Cost reveals
strategies over
be allocated
to support
another.
Types
of Computer Information
They
software,
providing and
management
increasing across
store,
communicate by many
information users.
access ability
We focus
on computer or present
to access, exist
manipulate,
information.
of hardware
--mainframes,
stand
as a network.
7
We consider Reporting/Tracking Exhibit terms level 2 each of the of the type three types of applications: Systems, is briefly Transaction processing/ Support Systems. in the
Systems,
Expert
In
of application of the
complexity demands
decisions on a user's
it makes
on user with
skills. Decision
complexity
the most
decision
and highest
demands
on user
Match
Computer In Exhibit
computer
applications benefits
2 to suggest
matches the
offer potential
The cells
in Exhibit cells
matches. potential
shaded
possible
sections
that
follow,
of the the
three
major these HR
types
in Exhibit We then
decisions of matching
elaborate
on the benefits
applications.
Transaction
Processing/Reporting/Tracking
volume
needs
The work
with
common
calculating
pay under
employee
transfers, ages,
calculating
retirement
current have
The rules
governing
predetermined
firm
or by law.
Transaction
processing,
reporting
and tracking
8
applications computer How routine can also be used effectively by people with minimal analytic or
skills. do these applications of these improve the decisions directly information data associated improve with such
tasks?
Some
applications
An application improve
for managing
on employee processing
HR decisions thus
by handling
improving
aggregate
estimates
of the
and benefit decision (including (including typically managers grades handles computer summary managers such and
other
increase
makers
easy to the
it in many applications
at higher
ask about
the distribution
business
divisions.
question
by allowing
back
in simple enable
and graphs9.
HR tracking
applications goals
or departmental completions,
performance merit
against
in areas turnover,
as performance hires.
appraisal
budget
allocations,
Transaction
Applications processing,
MATCH
Cost
Leadership
reporting
primarily reducing
support
leadership costs.
administrative work
administrative
layers
increasing Most
administrative processing
accuracy, enable
and auditing
transaction into
a computer
be entered layers
shuffling,
yet
an aggregate
9
transactions. other, more These productive processing any applications work, can thus even free up some decrease HR time to pursue count. that warn thus
and may
required
HR head audits
typically falls
information at entry
input
acceptable data
ranges,
errors
later
checking. early
When
signal faster
deviations
goals,
they
provide For
effective pay
corrections.
one them to
might
tally
total
increases
allocated, where
annual
pay
increase well
and report
the units
are running
of target. become
warnings
HR and
variances
transaction cost
a firm's
goals
by helping suggests
Exhibit innovation
3 also
applications HR must
quality
and
strategies.
By reducing
the time
on routine
administrative
can free time
advanced maintain
applications special
units
databases,
increasing
satisfaction firm.
with
information goals,
tracking
applications
supporting
Leadership
or Quality/Customer
Satisfaction
Expert
System Expert
Applications system applications through above, improve expert expert decisions for which the 'right' Like the
outcomes
knowledge
system from
derived
careful
programmed, without
applications
the presence
of a human
Expert
systems
can be applied
10
to many quality division higher content HR decisions. of recruits recruit For example: from various using historical where data on the number our and new
sources, goals?
should
to meet
Do labor Coast
market offices?
justify the
professional
salary
of performance There
appraisal 'right'
differ
units?
for these
a specific system
of expert
'training'. outcome
simply about
provide
how the
An
employees (such
covered
information recommends
as their
a 'personalized' Such
of options only
benefit
applications
on user
analytic
'training'
applications designed
guide
information
displays a decision.
to educate some
on the
reasoning
expert
system
conduct
performance
appraisals. experts
The
believe bias,
information history,
that
to appraisal performance
sources
of rater and
or unit this
personal suggests
so forth.
information,
outcome,
which
the manager
application
improves and
managers' interactive
appraisal expert
by providing
throughout be analytic
applications using
require the
that
situations,
guidelines
of the expert
computer
skills
would
be required.
11
'Black However, box' systems that are, to date, the most have common expert systems. to improve
we believe
'training' expertise
systems with
the most
potential
HR decisions,
by combining
education.
Expert
Applications in Exhibit
MATCH
Quality/Customer system
3, expert
applications
that
quality
satisfaction decisions
Expert deviations
These Such
strengths could
systems
in the
form of training solving could design goals skills review 'custom' tied
that
apply
for effective
modules
systems
performance
programs assist
that team
reflect
to customer
demands. appraisals
members
increases designs.
by letting Using
expert
systems, while
HR could
many
traditional that
to teams,
increasing
likelihood team
team
by using
expert
systems,
members
HR systems
work,
and thus
be better
prepared
improvements then
understanding firm's
of customer This
demands. is the
become
HR expertise.
essence
working
smarter. can also box' type contribute expert to cost that leadership recommended benefits goals.
system
Earlier,
system
'personalized'
to employees
covered
plans.
Such
that
demographic benefit
factors, These
an employer's record
option.
systems
accurately
and quickly
12
employee answer redeploy could spread choices. complex staff They may eliminate the need to train HR generalists the firm to to result
questions benefit
on benefits experts
or enable time.
and better
The overall
decisions
promotion,
of HR experts other
issues,
ability
by working liberate
harder HR time
information in
on
involved can
operations,
new perspectives
information
produced
support
HR innovation
objectives.
Decision
Support
System support
'right' hiring
outcomes
is the
level
of sales
optimal
sales? teams
Which
combinations
of people
will
productive
in our major
business
divisions? best
assignments
experiences
produce
executives
to manage
system
package
computer
tools
that
it in many memory
(graphs,
reports,
etc.), Although
the user
electronic HR people
there
talented
currently
applications,
HR examples group
Perhaps applications
a glimpse a group of decision of users, issue and of
to facilitate system
offer
potentiaill.
enable
simultaneously, to display
to call this
up a wealth
of information ways,
on the
information
in many
and to consider
13
capture charged in the
ac
as it emerges
during
brainstorming. needed
use a brainstorming
on a concrete set of
application
such compe
h Leve '
consensus
tencLes '
12
The
results
one
session
suggest
that
the
group the
reflect would to
a more
thorough
examination
alternatives allows
than
otherwise 'talk'
Moreover, their
system them
everyone
at once
ideas time
displayed
immediately
to the entire
substantial
savings
can
result.
Decision
Support
Systems
HATCH
Innovation
achieving innovative their strategies time in HR requires and risk of
Exhibit attracting
3 suggests
that
creative User
people,
and
taking.
decision represent
analytic system
use
support powerful
exploratory
of organizational talent,
discovery support
learning. work,
attract of
analytic more
innovative
and make
fruits
readily
available
example,
on quality they
to question
guessing Using
narrow
a view
a computer
from the
firm's
customer could
analysis
package,
a statistical targets
customer
satisfaction rate,
narrow
(time
to fill only
service a modest
results
targets
predict
might
decide
other
ideas
firm's
marketing
computer
14
marketing, one one the HR group sales might force revise promises its model about to include a product two new variables: deliver, The and
what
will
problems
during
product
installation.
revised
model
prediction HR group,
in other modeling
areas
of the make
firm
and
that
allow
might
discoveries
performance
targets
more
likely and
training
indicators team
a broader
definition parts
model part
in other
revised,
system
to assist process
in setting
performance
modeling
might
include input
external
information
systems
team
performance
between
team
members
and major
affecting assistance
team-customer
and visually
of brainstorming system
decision costs,
support
or to marketable
or services. in discovery
These less
that
enhance
decision from
to expert They
judgment,
do require
research, support
skills,
to those
skills.
HR people
vision.
staying
in Place We began
Versus
Getting with
this
article
That
quote
highlights
the difference
in place
and getting
15
somewhere: this more win running faster versus running of the face twice as fast as that. business race, We believe but even to
is an apt characterization so of the that race. needs in the not challenge managers
information
technology daily.
to advance and
almost
competitive them
that
in place,
ability
to sustain
average framework
industry applies
We have
focused
areas. majority of
vast
technology
applications. we believe
cost
objectives, types
potential
We know
in the advantages driven HR
differ
in competitive they
face,
strategic that
objectives
emphasize. in computer
should
not overlook
matching
investments offer
applications
to strategically
objectives
could
them
in the competitive
race. objectives, In our those however, interviews who were and good equipment the is only with most
computer
investments
and strategic
in using
information
additional
system
development databases,
investments. updating
These
included:
developing computer
operating
software, about
making
to critical
users,
educating
users
computers,
developing
organizational relationships
to manage information
information technology
technology, users
in the
of these
additional the
investments structure,
appeared culture,
strategic
and with
firm's
force.
16
A complete article. critical treatment some of these investments is beyond the scope of this
about
conditions
successful
types
applications tracking
we have
discussed. require
applications must
databases,
themselves, Expert
be available
to use expert
system
applications
require
builders,
in system
recommendations. high
an organization Finally,
to research
we point competitive
estimating possible
the
sustained
advantages measures
information
technology
investments these
requires
concrete
of their
benefits to cost
Viewing
investments
in terms
of their
contributions
or innovation difficult,
can point
to potential work
areas
of
measurement. measures
but critical
of establishing
still
ENDNOTES
1. We define data bases, Human computer Resource Information Systems or HRIS and as the composite necessary data to for HR. of
software
store,
deliver,
Boudreau, at the
a PC-Based
School
proceedings
Annual
Research
Association,
December,
1990,
441-453.
(Madison,
Leaders," School
Working
of Industrial
and Labor
University~
17
and J.W. (Plano, Boudreau, TX: Business Personnel/Human Publications, Resource 1991). of organization HRIS and system see R. Management: A Diagnostic Approach,
information considered
in successful
investments
Broderick
4. There
applications
and their
in 1984
and 1985.
see F. W. McFarlan,
Management
Information 61-82.
A Contemporary
Perspective,
MacMillan,
1988),
Tesseract
developed
the
first
relational and
dominated
the market
information 2.
on these
see R. Broderick
and J.W.
endnote
surveys
of HRIS Personnel
in many
firms,
such
as: C. Richards-Carpenter, Survey Peat Results, Marwick, TX: KPMG 1989." COmputer Peat
Information
Systems
August,
1989,
21: 48-49;
and KPMG
Resources:
A Competitive
Advantage.
(Dallas,
Marwick,
commands
(Voice
Recognition
or hand
writing
Character
Recognition
Systems).
10. See J.M. Hannon, G.T. Milkovich, and M.C. Sturman, "The Feasibility
Using Expert Systems in the Management Human Resource of Human studies, Resources," School Working
of
#90Labor
Paper and
19, Center
for Advanced
of Industrial
18
Relations, system Cornell University, currently software for a more used used detailed description of expert
applications
is "GROUPSYSTEMS".
It was
of Arizona. 12. Such a brainstorming Human session was recently conducted and at Cornell with HR 500 firm. Center
Resource
Studies staff
researchers,
and other
functional
representatives
Author Bios
Renae Broderick Human is currently Resource a Senior Research Associate in the Center for at
Studies,
School
of Industrial
and Labor
Relations and
University. strategy
experience
is in compensation both
consulting
and
for The Wyatt of Management, General examines other She Motors, the
Company, U.C.L.A.,
personnel
staff
at Philip resource
role
human
personnel
systems several
in achieving articles
performance such
to professional Resource
Association
Society. and
Broderick (1978)
a B.A.
in psychology of Minnesota
(1986)
Cornell,
in Human
Relations.
John Human
W. Boudreau Resource
is Associate Studies
Professor
Chair
and
Resource
Relations,
University.
in Industrial
Administration University.
in 1982
of Business, making,
Purdue
decision
staffing
as Personnel Relations,
Psychology,
Industrial
Behavior
in HR Management, Handbook
of Personnel of
Relations.
He has
and consulted
decision
information NYNEX,
companies
as Chevron,
Corning,
Mobil,
..'
..-
..
TRANSACTION
PROCESSING/REPORTING/TRACKING
High Volume Sorts, Lists,
SYSTEMS
Merges
BEST AT:
Editing
Simple Calculations Information & Spotting Discrepancies
Displaying Auditing
EXPERT
SYSTEMS
I
r;
BEST AT: Codifying Knowledge & Experience
U.I
~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
Expertise Action
~
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS BEST AT:
II
U.I
~ CJ
\iI:1 0
I Q
II
:= CI ~ :=
J
Exhibit Types of Computer 2 Applications
v ~ 1-1 :=
LEVEL
COMPBTITIVE
Quality/CUstomer
BR Competitive Objectives
for given
Continuous
improvement
Workable
discoveries
WORKING HARDBR
PEOPLE
WORKING SMARTER
PBOPLE
WORKING
WITH
VISION
Streamline Standardize Decrease production time/headcount Reduce costs (e.g. increase accuracy)
Educate line managers and other 'clients' Delegate/share decisions Use customer driven performance criteria Increase flexibility
Define vision Attract creative talent Reward risk Provide opportunities/tools for exploration
BR Division of Work
Administration
Operations
Planning/Creative
Expert Systems
. . ..... "... ..:::::::::::::::;:::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.:::::::" """" "'..", """'" ''''''..' '".".".',",'.",", ."."..";.",',',", ...
n"
...0. .. ...". n.".. "... ".."." .. ..",".'.'.',"..".",.".'. ",','.. ''''. '.,".".'.',".'..."."... '
. Increases
chance of
workforce
.. ... "'"
.. . . . .. ..
. Increases
"
".".",",'."."
. Increases
chance of
. Increases awareness of HR
':'::::::..."'!:':::"':':.'::";:':.':!:::':'::';::::':.::'::.:j;"::':::':"::':::::"":"::::::':::j::::..:':::[,..':"":1:::':':;':::::::1":;::::::..
..........
. ",".
""
-.
...'
...
-.....
.".".","."',".',',".".".."