Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Supply Chain Dynamics Supply Chain Integration
A new Supply Chain Paradigm
E-Business Strategies
Business-to-Consumer Strategic Pricing Business-to-Business
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Sources
Books
Designing and Managing The Supply Chain Publisher: McGraw-Hill, 1999 The Logic of Logistics Publisher: Springer, 1997
Articles The Effect of e-Business on Supply Chain Management, Working Paper, MIT, April 2001. By David Simchi-Levi (MIT) and Edith Simchi-Levi (LogicTools).
Customer Customer Demand Demand Distributor Orders Distributor Orders Retailer Orders Retailer Orders
Time
Source: Tom Mc Guffry, Electronic Commerce and Value Chain Management, 1998
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Time
Source: Tom Mc Guffry, Electronic Commerce and Value Chain Management, 1998
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
We Conclude:
In Traditional Supply Chains. Order Variability is amplified up the supply chain; upstream echelons face higher variability. What you see is not what they face.
P&G
Retailers
Customers
Consequences.
Single retailer, single manufacturer.
Retailer observes customer demand, Dt. Retailer orders qt from manufacturer.
Dt Retailer qt L Manufacturer
Consequences.
Increased safety stock Reduced service level Inefficient allocation of resources Increased transportation costs
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Reality is Different..
On-line Furniture Industry
After an investment of $70M Living.com declared bankruptcy in August 2000 Logistics brought the recent downfall of Furniture.com after about 20 months of operation
Reality is Different..
Amazon.com Example
Founded in 1995 1996: $16M Sales, $6M Loss 1999: $1.6B Sales, $720M Loss 2000: $2.7B Sales, $1.4B Loss Last quarter of 2001: $50M Profit Total debt: $2.2B
Reality is Different.
Dell Example:
Dell Computer has outperformed the competition in terms of shareholder value growth over the eight years period, 1988-1996, by over 3,000% (see Anderson and Lee, 1999)
to a Push-Pull System
Parts inventory is replenished based on forecasts Assembly is based on accurate customer demand
Demand Forecast
The three principles of all forecasting techniques: Forecasts are always wrong The longer the forecast horizon the worst is the forecast Aggregate forecasts are more accurate
The Risk Pooling Concept
to a Push-Pull System
PUSH STRATEGY
PULL STRATEGY
Push-Pull Boundary
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
to a Push-Pull System
Parts inventory is replenished based on forecasts Assembly is based on accurate customer demand
Demand Forecast
The three principles of all forecasting techniques: Forecasts are always wrong The longer the forecast horizon the worst is the forecast Aggregate forecasts are more accurate
The Risk Pooling Concept
Direct-to-Consumer:Cost Trade-Off
Cost Trade-Off for BuyPC.com
$20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 0 5 10 15 Number of DC's
Cost ($ million)
Pull
I
Computer
II
Furniture
IV
Books & CDs
III
Grocery
H
Push
L L
Pull
Push
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Outline
Supply Chain Dynamics Supply Chain Integration
A new Supply Chain Paradigm
E-Business Strategies
Business-to-Consumer Strategic Pricing Business-to-Business
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Smart Pricing?
Dell:
Same product is sold at a different price to different consumers (private/small or large business/government/academia/health care) Price of the same product for the same industry is nothing but fixed
Amazon
Books.com had a lower price than Amazon 99% of the time, yet Amazon had 80% of the market in 2000 while Books.com only 2%
Nikon, Sharp
Mail-In-Rebate
Mail-in-Rebate
What is the manufacturer trying to achieve with the rebate?
Why the manufacturer and not the retailer?
Should the manufacturer reduce the wholesale price instead of the rebate? Are there other strategies that can be used to achieve the same effect?
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Mail-in-Rebate
A Retailer and a manufacturer.
Retailer faces customer demand. Retailer orders from manufacturer.
Variable Production Cost=$200 Selling Price=?
Retailer
Manufacturer
Wholesale Price=$900
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Demand-Price Relationship
10000
Demand
P=2000-0.2Q
2000
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Price
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 3,654 4,110 4,567 4,547
Order
$1,370,096
1,400,000 1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 3,654 4,110 4,567 4,547
Order
Manufacturer Profit
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
50 0 00 00 10 54 67 00 00 47 61 41 7, 4 88 14 2, 0 2, 5 5, 3 5, 7 1, 5 1, 0 4, 5 4, 5 3, 0 3, 5 3, 6 4, 1 4, 9 01 28 6, 6 6, 2 7, 0 7, 8 55 00 00 74
Order
Manufacturer Profit
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
$1,750,000
1,000,000
0
50 0 00 00 10 54 67 00 00 47 61 41 7, 4 88 14 2, 0 2, 5 5, 3 5, 7 1, 5 1, 0 4, 5 4, 5 3, 0 3, 5 3, 6 4, 1 4, 9 01 28 6, 6 6, 2 7, 0 7, 8 55 00 00 74
Order
1,200,000
Retailer Expected Profit
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,110 4,567 4,547 4,961
Order
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
$1,644,115
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
Retailer Expected Profit
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,110 4,567 4,547 4,961
Order
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Manufacturer Profit
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
1, 00 0 1, 50 0 2, 00 0 2, 50 0 3, 00 0 3, 50 0 4, 00 0 4, 11 0 4, 56 7 4, 54 7 4, 96 1 5, 37 4 5, 78 8 6, 20 1 6, 61 4 7, 02 8 7, 44 1 7, 85 5 8, 26 8
Manufacturer Profit
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
$1,810,392
1,000,000
1, 00 0 1, 50 0 2, 00 0 2, 50 0 3, 00 0 3, 50 0 4, 00 0 4, 11 0 4, 56 7 4, 54 7 4, 96 1 5, 37 4 5, 78 8 6, 20 1 6, 61 4 7, 02 8 7, 44 1 7, 85 5 8, 26 8
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,110 4,567 5,024
Order
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
$1,654,508
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,110 4,567 5,024
Order
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi
Manufacturer Profit
3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,110 4,567 5,024 4,961 5,374 5,788 6,201 6,614 7,028 7,441 7,855
Order
Manufacturer Profit
3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,110 4,567 5,024 4,961 5,374 5,788 6,201 6,614 7,028 7,441 7,855
$1,800,000
Order
Mail-in-Rebate
Strategy No Rebate With Rebate ($100) Reduce Wholesale P ($100) Global Optimization Retailer Manufacturer 1,370,096 1,750,000 1,644,115 1,810,392 1,654,508 1,800,000 Total 3,120,096 3,454,507 3,454,508 3,929,189
Managerial Insights
Mail in Rebate allows supply chain partners to move away from sequential strategies toward global optimization
Provides retailers with upside incentive
Smart Pricing
Customized Pricing
Revenue Management Techniques
Distinguish between customers according to their price sensitivity
Influence retailer pricing strategies Move supply chain partners toward global optimization
Smart Pricing
Dynamic Pricing
Changing prices over time without necessarily distinguishing between different customers Find the optimal trade-off between high price and low demand versus low price and high demand
Customer Segmentation
Difficult in conventional stores and easier on the Internet
Testing Capability
Copyright 2002 D. Simchi-Levi