Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Barker, Rodems & Cook, PA, 05-CA-7205 Hillsborough County, Florida - Thirteenth Judicial Circuit
1. Hillsborough Co. 05-CA-7205: Gillespie v. Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A., Aug-11-2005 to Jun-21-2011. (Mr. Bauer appeared for Gillespie April 2, 2007 through October 1, 2009) Hillsborough Co. 05-CA-7205: Vexatious libel counterclaim, BRC v. Gillespie, Jan-19-2006 to Sep-28-2010. (Mr. Bauer appeared for Gillespie April 2, 2007 - October 1, 2009)
2.
Cases in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division
11. Case No. 5:10-cv-503: Gillespie v. Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Fla., Sec. 1983 Civil Rights/ADA. (Gillespie pro se) (closed, appeal) Case No. 5:11-cv-539: Estate/Gillespie v. Thirteenth Jud. Cir., FL., Estate Claims, Civil RICO. (Gillespie pro se) (closed, appeal)
12.
14.
16.
17.
18.
Original Litigation
19. Case No. 99-2795-CIV-T-26C, Eugene R. Clement v. AMSCOT Corporation, class action complaint in U.S. District Court, M.D. Fla., Tampa Div., filed December 9, 1999. Appeal No. 01-14761-AA, Eugene R. Clement, Gay Ann Blomefield, and Neil Gillespie v. AMSCOT Corporation, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, filed August 20, 2001.
20.
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement shows persons relevant to complaint: Alpert, Jonathan L., Esq. Amscot Corporation Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A. Barker, Chris A., Esq. Cook, William J., Esq. Gillespie, Neil MacKechnie, Ian Rodems, Ryan Christopher, Esq. Mr. Rodems has committed multiple violations of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar while representing his law firm and partner in civil litigation against me, a former client on the same or substantially related matter, contrary to Bar Rules 4-1.7, 4-1.9, 4-1.10 and the holding of McPartland v. ISI Inv. Services, Inc., 890 F.Supp. 1029, M.D.Fla., 1995, and other similar cases. Mr. Rodems and is guilty of misconduct, conflict of interest, dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Beginning in August 2005 through the present, Mr. Rodems has represented his firm and partner against me, a former client on the same or substantially related matters in cases 1-11, and 14-18, a total of 16 cases or matters.