Content 40%

Is well researched and supports the research objective Has sufficient breadth and depth of information

Critical thinking 30%

Reflects good application of critical thinking Design philosophy clearly understood Clearly focused and succeeds excellently in relating philosophy to works

Organization, Clarity of thought and Communication Variety of Resources , and methods of illustration 20%
Information is constructed in a logical pattern to support the research without any irrelevant information Excellent clarity of idea and effectiveness in conveying it Shows originality in writing Large variety of sources used Uses adequate variety of images to clarify and illustrate the main points

Score Levels

Format and Presentation 10%

Format enhances the content. Has cover and content pages Has numbered headings and sub headings Has captions and citations Has references Follows instructions on formatting No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors

Has considerable amount of original content relating to direct experience of author with works

Is well researched and supports the research objective Has some breadth and depth of information Has limited amount of original content obtained from other people/ and or books relating the architect

Reflects some application of critical thinking Design philosophy somewhat understood Focused and succeeds somewhat in relating philosophy to works

Information is focused in an organized and thoughtful manner but also contains some irrelevant information Good clarity of idea and effectiveness in conveying it shows some originality in writing several sources used Includes several images to illustrate the main points.

Format is appropriate for the content. Has cover and content pages Has numbered headings and sub headings Has captions but no citations Has references Follows most instructions on formatting No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors Few (1 to 3) spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors

 Is somewhat well researched and somewhat supports the research objective Has some breadth and inadequate depth of information

reflects little application of critical thinking Design philosophy understood a little Focused and succeeds poorly in relating philosophy to works

Information appears to have some logic but loses focus and loosely supports the answer as there is considerable irrelevant information. Little clarity of idea and limited effectiveness in conveying it Shows limited originality in writing Uses limited other resources Few images that loosely illustrate the main points

Format does not suit the content. Has cover and content pages Has headings and sub headings but not numbered Has no captions but no citations Has references Follows most instructions on formatting Minimal (3 to 5) spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors

Has no original content obtained from other people/ and or books relating the architect

Is poorly researched and inadequately supports the research objective Has inadequate breadth and depth of information Has no original content obtained from other people/ and or books relating the architect Has significant factual errors, misconceptions, or misinterpretations

Reflects poor application of critical thinking Design philosophy not understood Unable to relate philosophy to works

Content is unfocused and haphazard and does not support the research and considerable irrelevant information which detracts from objective Poor clarity of idea and effectiveness in conveying it poor originality in writing and copied from resources number and variety of resources clearly wanting inadequate and inappropriate Images used that do not directly and clearly support the answer

Format does not enhance content. Report appears sloppy and/or unfinished. Has cover and content pages Has headings and no sub headings Has no captions but no citations Has no references Does not follow all instructions on formatting More than 5 spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors