Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

# Cheat Sheet: Algorithms for Supervised- and Unsupervised Learning

## Algorithm Description Model Objective Training Regularisation t = arg max

C

1
Complexity Non-linear Online learning

i:xi Nk (x,) x

(ti , C) Use cross-validation to learn the appropriate k; otherwise no training, classication based on existing points. k acts as to regularise the classier: as k N the boundary becomes smoother. O(N M ) space complexity, since all training instances and all their features need to be kept in memory.

k-nearest neighbour

The label of a new point x is classied with the most frequent label t of the k nearest training instances.

Nk (x, x) k points in x closest to x Euclidean distance formula: D 2 i=1 (xi xi ) (a, b) 1 if a = b; 0 o/w

No optimisation needed.

## Multivariate likelihood p(x|Ck ) = y(x) = arg max p(Ck |x)

k k

pMLE (xi

v|Ck )

j=1

Naive Bayes

Learn p(Ck |x) by modelling p(x|Ck ) and p(Ck ), using Bayes rule to infer the class conditional probability. Assumes each feature independent of all others, ergo Naive.

k D

## (tj = Ck xji = v) N j=1 (tj = Ck ) D

xi i=1 p(wordi |Ck )

i=1

## log p(xi |Ck )

Use a Dirichlet prior on the parameters to obtain a MAP estimate. Multivariate likelihood pMAP (xi = v|Ck ) = (i 1) + N Can only learn linear boundaries for multivariate/multinomial attributes. With Gaussian attributes, quadratic boundaries can be learned with uni-modal distributions. To be added.

i=1 D i=1

= arg max
k

## j=1 (tj = Ck ) xji = v|Ck ) = N D j=1 d=1 (tj = Ck ) xdi

Multinomial likelihood

## (tj = Ck xji = v) |xi |(i 1) + N (tj = Ck ) j=1

j=1

O(N M ), each training instance must be visited and each of its features counted.

xji is the count of word i in test example j; xdi is the count of feature d in test example j. Gaussian likelihood p(x|Ck ) = D N (v; ik , ik ) i=1 Gradient descent (or gradient ascent if maximising objective): n+1 = n L . . . where is the step parameter. log p(t|x) m m (x, t) LMLE (, D) =

pMAP (wordi = v|Ck ) = (i 1) + N (tj = Ck ) xji j=1 N D ((tj = Ck ) xdi ) D + D d j=1 d=1 d=1 Penalise large values for the parameters, by introducing a prior distribution over them (typically a Gaussian). Objective function Reformulate the class conditional distribution in terms of a kernel K(x, x ), and use a non-linear kernel (for example K(x, x ) = (1 + wT x)2 ). By the Representer Theorem: O(IN M K), since each training instance must be visited and each combination of class and features must be calculated for the appropriate feature mapping. p(Ck |x) =
T 1 e (x,Ck ) Z (x) N K T 1 = e n=1 i=1 nk (xn ,Ci ) (x,Ck ) Z (x) N K 1 = e n=1 i=1 nk K((xn ,Ci ),(x,Ck )) Z (x) N 1 = e n=1 nk K(xn ,x) Z (x)

## y(x) = arg max p(Ck |x)

k k

Log-linear

Estimate p(Ck |x) directly, by assuming a maximum entropy distribution and optimising an objective function over the conditional entropy distribution.

m m (x, Ck )

(x,t)D

(x,t)D

p(Ck |x) =

(x,t)D

k

(x,t)D

## E[(x, )] (x, t) E[(x, )] (x, t)

m m (x, t)

LMAP (, D, ) = 2 + . . . where

(x,t)D

m m (x,Ck )

(x,t)D

(x,t)D

(x,t)D

(0)2 2 2

(x,t)D

E[(x, )] =

(x,t)D

## (x, )p(Ck |x)

= arg min

(x,t)D

log p(t|x)

Online Gradient Descent: Update the parameters using GD after seeing each training instance.

2 m

2 2

(x,t)D

log p(t|x)

log p(t|x)

Binary, linear classier: y(x) = sign(wT x) Directly estimate the linear function y(x) by iteratively updating the weight vector when incorrectly classifying a training instance. . . . where: sign(x) = Tries to minimise the Error function; the number of incorrectly classied input vectors: arg min EP (w) = arg min w T xn t n
w w nM

Iterate over each training example xn , and update the weight vector if misclassication: w
i+1

= w + EP (w) = wi + xn tn

Perceptron

+1 1

if x 0 if x < 0

. . . where typically = 1. For the multiclass perceptron: wi+1 = wi + (x, t) (x, y(x))

Ck

## . . . where M is the set of misclassied training vectors.

The Voted Perceptron: run the perceptron i times and store each iterations weight vector. Then: y(x) = sign ci sign(wT x) i
i

O(IN M L), since each combination of instance, class and features must be calculated (see log-linear).

Use a kernel K(x, x ), and 1 weight per training instance: N y(x) = sign wn tn K(x, xn )
n=1

## . . . and the update:

i+1 i wn = w n + 1

## Primal arg min

w,w0

The soft margin SVM: penalise a hyperplane by the number and distance of misclassied points. 1 ||w||2 2 n

## Use a non-linear kernel K(x, x ):

N N

Primal
N 1 arg min ||w||2 + C n 2 w,w0 n=1

y(x) =

n t n xT xn + w 0

n=1

## Online SVM. See, for example:

s.t. Support vector machines A maximum margin classier: nds the separating hyperplane with the maximum margin to its closest data points. y(x) =
N

tn (wT xn + w0 ) 1
N N

Dual n t n xT xn + w 0 L() =
N

## Quadratic Programming (QP) SMO, Sequential Minimal Optimisation (chunking).

s.t. Dual

n=1

n=1

n m t n t m xT xm n

tn (wT xn + w0 ) 1 n ,
N N N

n > 0

QP: O(n3 );

SMO: much more ecient than QP, since computation based only on support vectors. L() = =

n tn K(x, xn ) + w0

n=1 N N N N N N

The Huller: A Simple and Ecient Online SVM, Bordes & Bottou (2005) Pegasos: Primal Estimated sub-Gradient Solver for SVM, Shalev-Shwartz et al. (2007)

n=1 m=1 N

L() = n s.t.

n=1

n m t n t m xT xm n

n=1 m=1 N

n=1

n n

n m tn tm xT xm n

n=1 m=1

s.t.

n 0,

n tn = 0,

n=1

n m tn tm K(xn , xm )

0 n C,

n tn = 0,

n=1

n=1

n=1 m=1

Hard assignments rnk {0, 1} s.t. n k rnk = 1, i.e. each data point is assigned to one cluster k. k-means A hard-margin, geometric clustering algorithm, where each data point is assigned to its closest centroid. Geometric distance: The Euclidean distance, l2 norm: D ||xn k ||2 = (xni ki )2
i=1

Expectation:
N K

## rnk = rnk ||xn k ||2 2

arg min
r,

1 0

if ||xn k ||2 minimal for k o/w n rnk xn n rnk Only hard-margin assignment to clusters. To be added.

For non-linearly separable data, use kernel k-means as suggested in: Kernel k-means, Spectral Clustering and Normalized Cuts, Dhillon et al. (2004).

n=1 k=1

Maximisation: MLE =
(k)

Sequential k-means: update the centroids after processing one point at a time.

. . . i.e. minimise the distance from each cluster centre to each of its points.

. . . where (k) is the centroid of cluster k. Expectation: For each n, k set: nk = p(z (i) = k|x(i) ; , , ) = K L(x, , , ) = log p(x|, , ) K N = log k Nk (xn |k , k )
n=1 k=1

(= p(k|xn ))

## p(x(i) |z (i) = k; , )p(z (i) = k; )

j=1

Mixture of Gaussians

A probabilistic clustering algorithm, where clusters are modelled as latent Guassians and each data point is assigned the probability of being drawn from a particular Gaussian.

Assignments to clusters by specifying probabilities p(x(i) , z (i) ) = p(x(i) |z (i) )p(z (i) ) . . . with z (i) Multinomial(), and k nk p(k|xn ) s.t. j=1 nj = 1. I.e. want to maximise the probability of the observed data x.

Maximisation:

## k N (xn |k , k ) = K j=1 j N (xn |j , j )

N

p(x(i) |z (i) = l; , )p(z (i) = l; ) Online Gaussian Mixture Models. A good start is: To be added. Not applicable. A View of the EM Algorithm that Justies Incremental, Sparse, and Other Variants, Neal & Hinton (1998).

## 1 k = nk N n=1 N T n=1 nk (xn k )(xn k ) k = N n=1 nk N nk xn n=1 k = N n=1 nk

The mixture of Gaussians assigns probabilities for each cluster to each data point, and as such is capable of capturing ambiguities in the data set.

1 Created

by Emanuel Ferm, HT2011, for semi-procrastinational reasons while studying for a Machine Learning exam. Last updated May 5, 2011.