Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The Problem
1 It is often claimed in the physics literature that 2 eikx dk is equal to the Dirac delta function, but this relation is not strictly true because the integral is not convergent. To see why this integral cannot converge, 1 just consider the real part, which is 2 cos(kx) dk by Eulers formula. The integral is oscillatory, so it never converges to an exact value. However, it is still possible to dene a correspondence based on a double integral. Let the function g(x) correspond to the integral f (x, k) dk i b b
PV
a
f (x, k) dx dk =
a
g(x) dx
for all nite choices of a, b. Here, P V denotes the principal value of the integral. Notice that the order of integration has been switched. Switching the order of integration back is not justied and will break the . equality. If we write this correspondence as f (x, k) dk = g(x), then we can show that
. eikx dk = 2(x)
The Correspondence
Theorem 1.
ikx e
. dx = 2(x)
b b
eikx dx dk =
a
2(x) dx
PV
a
eikx dx dk = P V
a
eikx dx dk + P V
0 a
eikx dx dk
= PV
a
ei(k)x dx d(k) + P V
0 b a b a b
eikx dx dk
0 a
= PV
0
eikx dx dk + P V
eikx dx dk
= 2P V
0 a
Re[eikx ] dx dk
eia
= cos(a) + i sin(a),
b
= 2P V
0 a N
cos(kx) dx dk
b
0 N N
cos(kx) dx dk
a
0 N
sin(bk) sin(ak) k k
dk
Since the lower limit of integration never reaches zero, we do not have to worry about the division by zero.
N
= 2 lim lim
0 N
sin(bk) dk k
sin(ak) dk k
= 2 lim lim
0 N
sin(u) du u
aN a
sin(u) du u
If either of the variables a and b are negative, the limits become 0 to , which negates the value of the integral since the integrand is symmetric about zero. Therefore,
N
= 2 lim lim
0 N
sgn(b)
sin(u) du sgn(a) u
sin(u) du u
The integral here is called the sine integral where the upper limit of integration is the parameter to the sine integral function. = 2(sgn(b) sgn(a))Si() = (sgn(b) sgn(a)) since Si() = /2. Now, we notice that
b a 2(x)
(x) =
(x )(x x ) dx 1 2
(t)
eik(xx ) dk
dx
1 = 2
1 2
1 = 2 where 1 (k) = 2
(x )eikx dx