Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
, C.C. Tsao
Department of Power Mechanical Engineering, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan, ROC
Abstract
Beside the twist drill, the effects of various drill geometries were rarely discussed in analytical fashion. This study presents a compre-
hensive analysis of delamination in use of various drill types, such as saw drill, candle stick drill, core drill and step drill. In this analysis,
the critical thrust force at the onset of delamination is predicted and compared with the twist drill.
2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Delamination; Drilling; Saw drill; Candle stick drill; Core drill; Sep drill
1. Introduction
Composite materials possess peculiar characteristics that
govern behavior during machining. Drilling is the most fre-
quently employed operation of secondary machining for
ber-reinforced materials owing to the need for structure
joining. Twist drills are widely used in industry to produce
holes rapidly and economically. In fact, the chisel edge of
the drill point pushes aside the material at the center as it
penetrates into the hole. Various drills have been used for
neat drilling of composite materials, such as saw drill, can-
dle stick drill and core drill etc.
The delamination damage caused by the tool thrust has
been recognized as one of the major problem during drilling.
A lot of reference of the drilling of ber-reinforced plastics
reports that the quality of the cut surfaces is strongly depen-
dent on drilling parameter [1]. As early as 1967, the fact that
a rapid increase in feed rate at the end of drilling will cause
the cracking around the exit edge of the hole was found [2].
It was also stated that the larger the feeding load, the more
serious the cracking. The drill geometry is also considered
the most important factor that affects drill performance [3].
Damage development and detection, new tooling design,
and the inuences of cutting conditions have been studied
[4,5].
Haggerty and Ernst found that spiral point drills per-
formed much well than the conventional ones [6]. Wu used
_
dU
1
da
+
dU
2
da
_
=
p
2
1
a
16M
+
p
2
2
16M
_
a
2c
2
a
+
c
4
a
3
_
(9)
where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the variables for the
central concentrated force and the peripheral circular force,
respectively. Let
p
2
= p
1
(10)
The thrust force p
1
can be calculated
p
1
=
_
32G
IC
M
1 +
2
(1 2s
2
+s
4
)
(11)
Substituting Eqs. (10) and (11) into Eq. (8), one obtains the
thrust force of the candle stick drill at the onset of crack
Fig. 5. Circular plate model for delamination analysis (core drill).
propagation:
F
C
= (1 +)
_
32G
IC
M
1 +
2
(1 2s
2
+s
4
)
(12)
The comparison of F
C
and F
A
in Eqs. (12) and (5) gives
F
C
F
A
=
1 +
_
1 +
2
(1 2s
2
+s
4
)
(13)
2.2.4. Distributed circular load (core drill)
Fig. 5 depicts the schematics of a core drill and the in-
duced delamination. Since the toolwork contact is located
in a circular area at bottomof drilling core, the thrust force of
the core drill is considered a downward area load (P
1
) sub-
tracted by an upward area load (P
2
), as shown in Fig. 5. Let
P
2
= (1 )
2
P
1
(14)
where t is the thickness of core drill, and the ratio between
thickness and radius of core drill (namely, t = c).
The energy balance equation can be expressed as follows:
G
IC
2a =
_
P
1
dX
1
da
P
2
dX
2
da
_
_
dU
1
da
dU
2
da
_
=
P
2
1
16M
_
a
c
2
2a
_
P
2
2
16M
_
a
c
2
2a
_
(15)
where the subscripts 1 and 2 denote the variables for the
downward force and the upward force, respectively.
For a laminate subject to an uniformly distributed load
(Fig. 6), the following analysis is available [20]. The outer
and inner deection of a circular plate of radius a, which is
clamped and subjected to a uniformly distributed load over
a central circular area of radius c, is given by
(i) 0 r c (inner portion):
X=
P
1
64M
_
_
4a
2
3c
2
+4c
2
ln
c
a
_
2r
2
_
c
2
a
2
4 ln
c
a
_
+
r
4
c
2
_
(16)
338 H. Hocheng, C.C. Tsao / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 140 (2003) 335339
P1
n
~
Delamination
h
H
a
X
c
Drill
q
Fig. 6. Circular plate model for uniform load.
(ii) c r a (outer portion):
X=
P
1
32M
_
2a
2
+c
2
r
2
_
2 +
c
2
a
2
_
+2c
2
ln
r
a
+4r
2
ln
r
a
_
(17)
The stored strain energy is
(i) 0 r c (inner portion):
U
1
=
_
c
0
M
_
_
d
2
X
dr
2
+
1
r
dX
dr
_
2
_
r dr
=
P
2
1
64M
_
2c
2
3
c
4
a
2
+
c
6
2a
4
4c
4
a
2
ln
c
a
+4c
2
ln
c
a
+8c
2
_
ln
c
a
_
2
_
(18)
(ii) c r a (outer portion):
U
2
=
_
a
c
M
_
d
2
X
dr
2
+
1
r
dX
dr
_
2
r dr
=
P
2
1
64M
_
2a
2
2c
2
+
c
4
2a
2
c
6
2a
4
8c
2
_
ln
c
a
_
2
+
4c
4
a
2
ln
c
a
_
(19)
The critical thrust force P
1
at the onset of crack propa-
gation can be calculated:
P
1
=
_
32G
IC
M
1 (1/2)s
2
(20)
where s = c/a. The comparison of P
1
and F
A
in
Eqs. (20) and (5) gives
P
1
F
A
=
1
_
1 (1/2)s
2
(21)
The critical thrust force F
CR
at the onset of crack prop-
agation can be calculated:
F
CR
=(2 )
_
32G
IC
M
{[1 (1 )
4
] (1/2)s
2
[1 (1 )
6
]}
(22)
The comparison of F
CR
and F
A
in Eqs. (22) and (5) gives
F
CR
F
A
=
(2 )
_
{[1 (1 )
4
] (1/2)s
2
[1 (1 )
6
]}
(23)
2.2.5. Stepwise distributed circular load (step drill)
DiPaolo et al. uses an experimental setup that exploits
the technology of video to view the complete crack growth
as the drill emerges from the bottom side of the workpiece
[21]. It reported that the crack growth is divided into three
regions. Region 1 is identied as the initial growth of the
crack, mostly within the drill radius, formed under the forces
due to the chisel edge and cutting lips of the drill. The sec-
ond region, the end of which is marked with the end of
thrust force, is characterized by crack growth due to the force
exerted by the cutting lips only. The third region of crack
growth is due to the drill force after the cutting lips and the
chisel edge exited the laminate. In order to realize the proce-
dure of drilling composite plate with a step drill (Fig. 7(a)),
the whole drilling processes were divided into eight steps as
shown Fig. 7(b)(e). The sequence shows how the step drill
Fig. 7. Circular plate model for delamination analysis (step drill).
H. Hocheng, C.C. Tsao / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 140 (2003) 335339 339
emerges from the laminate. Before the chisel edge emerges
from the laminate, the chisel edge and primary cutting lips
exert an uniformly distributed load on the laminate. When
the chisel edge exits the laminate, the force evolves to a dis-
tributed circular force. The critical thrust force (F
T
) at the
onset of crack propagation can be calculated:
(F
T
)
i
=[1 (i)
2
]
_
32G
IC
M
{[1 (i)
4
] (1/2)s
2
[1 (i)
6
]}
, i = 1n
(24)
where n is the number of sequential increment of secondary
cutting lips in action, the divided thickness of the last
laminar according to n. The critical thrust force (F
T
) based
on the concentrated force assumption is given in Eq. (5).
Thus, the ratio between the two critical thrust forces becomes
(F
T
)
i
F
A
=
[1 (i)
2
]
_
{[1 (i)
4
] (1/2)s
2
[1 (i)
6
]}
, i = 1n
(25)
While i = 1n indicates the chisel edge and the primary
cutting lips that emerged from the laminate, the secondary
cutting lips cut and bend the last laminar.
3. Discussions and summary
The reduction of critical thrust force for various drills
is shown in Table 1. The physical effects of various drill
geometry can be illustrated mathematically as follows:
(1) For saw drill, the case of s = 0 reduces the twist drill,
while s approaches to 1 allows for very high critical
thrust force.
(2) For candle stick drill, the case of = 0 reduces to the
twist drill, while = approaches to the saw drill.
(3) For core drill, the case of s = 0 and = 1 reduces to
the twist drill.
Table 1
Reduction of critical thrust force for various drills
Twist drill, Saw drill, Core drill,
Saw drill, s = 0
Candle stick drill, = 0 =
Core drill, = 1, s = 0
Step drill, i = = 0, s = 0 i = = 0, = 1
(4) For step drill, the case of i = = 0 and s = 0 reduces
to the twist drill case. While i = = 0 and = 1
approaches to the core drill.
References
[1] R. Komanduri, B. Zhang, C.M. Vissa, Machining of ber reinforced
composites, Process. Manuf. Comp. Mater. 49/27 (1991) 136.
[2] A. Kobayashi, Machining of Plastics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
[3] D.F. Galloway, Some experiments on the inuence of various factors
on drill performance, Trans. ASME 79 (1957) 191237.
[4] G. Caprino, V. Tagliaferri, Development in drilling glass ber re-
inforced plastics, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 35 (6) (1995) 817
829.
[5] J.A. Miller, Drilling Graphite/Epoxy at Lockheed, American Machine
Automatic Manufacture, 1987, pp. 7071.
[6] W.A. Haggerty, H. Ernst, The spiral point drillself-centering drill
point geometry, ASTE Paper No. 101, 1958, p. 58.
[7] S.M. Wu, J.M. Shen, L.H. Chen, Multifacet drills, in: Proceedings
of the 14th National SAMPE Technology Conference, 1982, pp.
456463.
[8] R. Doerr, E. Greene, B. Lyon, S. Taha, Development of effective
machining and tooling techniques for kevlar composites, Technical
Report, No. AD-A117853, 1982.
[9] J.H. Doran, C.R. Maikish, Machining boron composite, in: B.R.
Noton (Ed.), Composite Materials in Engineering Design, ASM,
1973, pp. 242250.
[10] A. Koplev, A. Lystrup, P. Vorm, The cutting process, chips and cutting
forces in machining CFRP, Composites 14 (4) (1983) 371376.
[11] K. Sakuma, Y. Yokoo, M. Seto, Study on drilling of reinforced
plasticsrelation between tool material and wear behavior, Bull.
JSME 27 (228) (1984) 12371244.
[12] F. Veniali, A.Di. Llio, V. Tagliaferri, An experimental study of the
drilling of aramid composites, ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
117 (1995) 271278.
[13] W. Koenig, P. Grass, A. Heintze, F. Okcu, C. Schmitz-Justin, Devel-
opments in drilling, contouring composites containing kevlar, Prod.
Eng. 63 (8) (1984) 5661.
[14] R. Komanduri, Machining ber-reinforced plastics, ASME Mech.
Eng. 115 (4) (1993) 5864.
[15] H. Hocheng, C.K.H. Dharan, Delamination during drilling in com-
posite laminates, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 112 (1990) 236239.
[16] A.B. Sadat, W.S. Chan, B.P. Wang, Delamination of graphite/epoxy
laminate during drilling operation, ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
114 (1992) 139141.
[17] S. Jain, D.C.H. Yang, Effects of feedrate and chisel edge on delam-
ination in composite drilling, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 115 (1993) 398
405.
[18] S. Jain, D.C.H. Yang, Delamination-free drilling of composite lam-
inates, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 116 (1994) 475481.
[19] P.C. Upadhyay, J.S. Lyons, On the evaluation of critical thrust for
delamination-free drilling of composite laminates, J. Reinf. Plast.
Comp. 18 (14) (1999) 12871303.
[20] S. Timoshenko, S. Woinowsky-Keiger, Theory of Plates and Shells,
2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959, pp. 5159 and 376
377.
[21] G. DiPaolo, S.G. Kapoor, R.E. DeVor, An experimental investigation
of the crack growth phenomenon for drilling of ber-reinforced
composite materials, ASME J. Eng. Ind. 118 (1996) 104110.