Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Silva
1 Centro das Construes (CEC) e Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto 2 Grupo de Matemtica e Informtica, Faculdade de Economia da Universidade do Porto 3 Unidade de Investigao Matemtica e Aplicaes (UIMA), Universidade de Aveiro
COMPSTAT 2008
August, 2008
1/1
Outline
Introduction
Least square estimation using HOS Monte Carlo results and application to real data Final remarks
August, 2008
2/1
Introduction
August, 2008
3/1
Introduction
August, 2008
3/1
Notation:
X (s1 , . . . , sk1 ) : kth-order joint moment of Xt , Xt+s1 . . . , Xt+sk1 , (s1 , . . . , sk1 R) X (s1 , . . . , sk1 ) = E[Xt Xt+s1 . . . Xt+sk1 ] X = E[Xt ]
Introduction
August, 2008
3/1
Introduction
August, 2008
4/1
Xt = 1 Xt1 + 2 Xt2 + + p Xtp + et 0 i < 1, i = 1, . . . , p 1, and 0 < p < 1, such that p k < 1 k=1 thinning operation [Steutel and Van Harn, 1979; Gauthier and Latour, 1994)]
ti i Xti = j=1 Yi,j , for i = 1, . . . , p,
Introduction
August, 2008
4/1
Xt = 1 Xt1 + 2 Xt2 + + p Xtp + et 0 i < 1, i = 1, . . . , p 1, and 0 < p < 1, such that p k < 1 k=1 thinning operation [Steutel and Van Harn, 1979; Gauthier and Latour, 1994)]
ti i Xti = j=1 Yi,j , for i = 1, . . . , p,
X (0, 0) =
i j k X (i j, i k) + 3 j i 2 X (i j) + 3X e i 2 + e
i=1 j=1 i=1 p p p p i=1 i=1 j=1 i=1
2 + 3X (e + e 2 ) i + 3e i j X (i j) + X (i 3i i 2 i3 )
X (0, k) = i X (0, k i) + e X (0), k > 0 X (k, k) = i j X (k i, k j) + i 2 X (k i) + 2e X (k) X (e 2 e 2 ), k > 0 X (k, m) = i X (k, m i) + e X (k),
i=1 i=1 j=1 p i=1 i=1 p p p
m>k>0
August, 2008
5/1
X (0, 0) =
i j k X (i j, i k) + 3 j i 2 X (i j) + 3X e i 2 + e
i=1 j=1 i=1 p p p p i=1 i=1 j=1 i=1
2 + 3X (e + e 2 ) i + 3e i j X (i j) + X (i 3i i 2 i3 )
X (0, k) = i X (0, k i) + e X (0), k > 0 X (k, k) = i j X (k i, k j) + i 2 X (k i) + 2e X (k) X (e 2 e 2 ), k > 0 X (k, m) = i X (k, m i) + e X (k),
i=1 i=1 j=1 p i=1 i=1 p p p
m>k>0
INAR processes have a non-linear structure 1 and 2 order moments are not sufcient to describe dependence structure
Least square estimation using HOS August, 2008 5/1
st
nd
August, 2008
6/1
third-order moments X (0, k), k > 0, which can be represented in the following matrix form:
X (0, 1)
X (0, 2) . . . X (0, p)
X (p 1, p 1) X (p 2, p 2) . . . X (0, 0)
2 . . . p
p
+ e X (0)
1 1 . . . 1
X (0)1p ]
and
= [ 1
e ]T
3,X = H
August, 2008
7/1
X (0)1p ]
and
= [ 1
e ]T
3,X = H
may be estimated by least squares, ie, minimizing the squared error between 3,X
and the third-order moments of the data:
3 = [ (0, 1)
(0, p) ]T
August, 2008
7/1
X (0)1p ]
and
= [ 1
e ]T
3,X = H
may be estimated by least squares, ie, minimizing the squared error between 3,X
and the third-order moments of the data:
3 = [ (0, 1)
Least Squares estimator of using HOS (LS_HOS)
(0, p) ]T
= min {L ( )} = min {( 3 H )T ( 3 H )}
August, 2008
7/1
X (0)1p ]
and
= [ 1
e ]T
3,X = H
may be estimated by least squares, ie, minimizing the squared error between 3,X
and the third-order moments of the data:
3 = [ (0, 1)
Least Squares estimator of using HOS (LS_HOS)
(0, p) ]T
= min {L ( )} = min {( 3 H )T ( 3 H )}
In practice:
= min {L ( )} = min {( 3 H )T ( 3 H )}
Least square estimation using HOS August, 2008 7/1
August, 2008
8/1
August, 2008
8/1
The sample bias, variance and mean square error decrease as the sample size increases Distribution of the estimators is consistent and symmetric
August, 2008
8/1
The sample bias, variance and mean square error decrease as the sample size increases Distribution of the estimators is consistent and symmetric For small sample size: evidence of departure from symmetry in the marginal distributions, specially for values of the parameter near the non-stationary region
Monte Carlo results and application to real data August, 2008 8/1
4 2 Bias() 0 2 4
YW
CLS
WHT LS_HOS
YW
CLS
WHT LS_HOS
Figure:
Boxplots of the sample bias for the estimates obtained in 1000 realizations of 50 and 200 observations of the
Number of plants
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1981
Figure:
The number of Swedish mechanical paper and pulp mills, from 1921 to 1981 [Brnns (1995) and Brnns and
Hellstrm (2001)]
Monte Carlo results and application to real data August, 2008 10 / 1
It is not assumed the Poisson distribution for the innovation process: X = 20.40 and S2 = 155.16
August, 2008
11 / 1
It is not assumed the Poisson distribution for the innovation process: X = 20.40 and S2 = 155.16
Method CLS LS_HOS Table: 0.9591 0.9269 e 0.2017 1.3635 2 e 15.2268 19.2253 x 4.9315 18.6525 2 x 192.2764 145.4513 MSE 8.5494 7.4465
The parameter estimates of the number of Swedish mechanical paper and pulp mills
August, 2008
11 / 1
It is not assumed the Poisson distribution for the innovation process: X = 20.40 and S2 = 155.16
Method CLS LS_HOS Table: 0.9591 0.9269 e 0.2017 1.3635 2 e 15.2268 19.2253 x 4.9315 18.6525 2 x 192.2764 145.4513 MSE 8.5494 7.4465
The parameter estimates of the number of Swedish mechanical paper and pulp mills
2 e (1 )(e + e ) 2 and x = 1 (1 )2 (1 + )
August, 2008
11 / 1
It is not assumed the Poisson distribution for the innovation process: X = 20.40 and S2 = 155.16
Method CLS LS_HOS Table: 0.9591 0.9269 e 0.2017 1.3635 2 e 15.2268 19.2253 x 4.9315 18.6525 2 x 192.2764 145.4513 MSE 8.5494 7.4465
The parameter estimates of the number of Swedish mechanical paper and pulp mills
2 e (1 )(e + e ) 2 and x = 1 (1 )2 (1 + )
MSE between the observations and the tted models based on LS_HOS and CLS estimates
Monte Carlo results and application to real data August, 2008 11 / 1
Number of plants
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1981
Figure:
The number of plants and the tted values considering the LS_HOS and CLS estimates
Monte Carlo results and application to real data August, 2008 12 / 1
Final remarks
Advantage of HOS: capability to detect and characterize the deviations from Gaussianity and non-linearity of the processes
Final remarks
August, 2008
13 / 1
Final remarks
Advantage of HOS: capability to detect and characterize the deviations from Gaussianity and non-linearity of the processes INAR processes are non-Gaussian Parameter estimation method: Least squares using HOS Minimize the errors between the third-order moment of the observations and of the tted model
Final remarks
August, 2008
13 / 1
Final remarks
Advantage of HOS: capability to detect and characterize the deviations from Gaussianity and non-linearity of the processes INAR processes are non-Gaussian Parameter estimation method: Least squares using HOS Minimize the errors between the third-order moment of the observations and of the tted model Monte Carlo results: LS_HOS provides good results, in terms of sample bias, variance and mean square error
Final remarks
August, 2008
13 / 1
Final remarks
Advantage of HOS: capability to detect and characterize the deviations from Gaussianity and non-linearity of the processes INAR processes are non-Gaussian Parameter estimation method: Least squares using HOS Minimize the errors between the third-order moment of the observations and of the tted model Monte Carlo results: LS_HOS provides good results, in terms of sample bias, variance and mean square error When used in the context of a non-Poisson real dataset the LS_HOS estimates provide a model with mean, variance and autocorrelations closer to the sample values
Final remarks August, 2008 13 / 1
References
BRNNS, K. (1995). Explanatory Variables in the AR(1) Count Data Model. Ume Economic Studies 381. BRNNS, K. and HELLSTRM, J. (2001). Generalized Integer-Valued Autoregression. Econometric Reviews 20 (4), 425-443. GAUTHIER, G. and LATOUR, A. (1994). Convergence forte des estimateurs des paramtres dtun processus GENAR(p). Annales des Sciences Mathmatiques du Qubec 18, 49-71. LATOUR, A. (1998). Existence and stochastic structure of a non-negative integer-valued autoregressive process. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19, 439-455. SILVA, I. (2005). Contributions to the analysis of discrete-valued time series. PhD Thesis. Universidade do Porto, Portugal. SILVA, M. E. and OLIVEIRA, V. L. (2004). Difference equations for the higher-order moments and cumulants of the INAR(1) model. Journal of Time Series Analysis 25, 317-333. SILVA, M. E. and OLIVEIRA, V. L. (2005). Difference equations for the higher-order moments and cumulants of the INAR(p) model. Journal of Time Series Analysis 26, 17-36. STEUTEL, F. W. and VAN HARN, K. (1979). Discrete analogues of self-decomposability and stability. The Annals of Probability 7, 893-899. References August, 2008 14 / 1