Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
9-17-2006
Hume: Critique of the Design Argument
Thesis: God created the universe in such a way that everything works perfectly
with each other like items in a massive machine. This is similar to the way that people
create houses and clocks. Thru a posteriori argument this information can be used as
proof that God exists and that His intellect is similar to human intellect.
philosopher with some new ideas. Demea seems to be a less learned individual when it
comes to philosophy and argumentation. She could possibly be a member of the nobility
or a figure of religious significance but the text is not exactly clear on whom she is. Philo
is a more orthodox philosopher. He speaks more than anybody else in this story. At one
point Demea makes reference to a young man named Pamphilus. The reference is such
that it seems like he is present but does not say anything (pg 120, paragraph 3).
Cleanthes begins by telling Demea that he has observed that everything in nature
works together perfectly, as if all of creation is a massive machine created by God. The
machine of creation is put together in much the same way that people would put a house
or a watch together. From this we can see that Gods thought resembles the thought of
posteriori.
Philo argues that the universe is not similar enough to a house or a watch that we
can draw direct comparisons between building a house and building a universe.
Cleanthes counters that when we build a house the steps are made in such a way
that the length of our stride is taken into account so that we can walk up them easily. Our
legs are made in such a way that we can walk or ride (I assume he is referring to riding a
horse). When God creates our legs why can’t He be thinking along similar lines as we do
Demea strongly disagrees with Cleanthes again. To paraphrase her speech in the
vernacular, she said to Philo, ‘What am I paying you for? Stop messing around and show
Philo restates Cleanthes’s argument in such a way that Demea understands it and
then attacks the idea. His attack seems to center on showing how dissimilar the universe
is to a watch. This dissimilarity shows that God does not think the same way that people
think.
proposed that he can prove by experience that God created the universe to act like a
machine in much the same way that he can prove by experience that the moon revolves
conclusions and explains that they believe that the other planets are made up of the same
things that earth is made up of. This includes land, oceans, rivers and mountains.
Therefore his observations about Earth apply to all planets in the universe.
Philo tells Cleanthes that he can’t make the assumption that the universe is like a
massive machine until he has experienced the entire phenomenon of the universe from