Quality Management Plan

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Quality Management Plan Template

Design-Build Program
The contents of this document provide the minimum level of quality expected from the design-build Contractor. Each Contractor shall update and modify this manual on each project. The Contractor shall update any forms, procedures, and processes within this template to reflect the most recent standards and provisions outlined in Book 1, Book 2, and Book 3 of the RFP.
{Contractor}
District: X Rev {date}
XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

2 of 32
The information presented in this document define the Quality Management System that complies with the project requirements. This signature page establishes the {enter team name} commitment to the Quality Management Plan, Design Quality Plan, Construction Quality Plan, and Document Management Plan .
, Quality Manager
, Construction Quality Manager
, Design Quality Manager
, Contractor Project Manager
, Design Manager
, Construction Manager
, Executive Management Committee
MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)
{Contractor}

3 of 32
1.0 SCOPE AND EXCLUSIONS......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 General ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 6 General ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Definitions......................................................................................................................................... 7
3.0 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ..................................................................................... 15 3.1 General ............................................................................................................................................. 15 3.3 Quality Organization ........................................................................................................................ 15 3.3.1 Quality Control Organization.................................................................................................... 16 3.3.2 Quality Assurance Organization ............................................................................................... 16 3.4 Quality Manual Documentation ....................................................................................................... 19 3.4.1 General ...................................................................................................................................... 19 3.4.2 Writing Quality Procedures ...................................................................................................... 19 3.4.3 Updating and Maintaining Quality Procedures ................................................................... 20 3.5 Resource Management Training ...................................................................................................... 21 4.0 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY ....................................................................................... 22 4.1 Management Commitment .............................................................................................................. 22 4.2 Responsibility and Authority ......................................................................................................... 22 4.3 Management Review .................................................................................................................. 22 4.4 Quality Incentives (optional to contractor) ............................................................................... 23 5.0 NON-CONFORMANCES ............................................................................................................ 24 5.1 General ................................................................................................................................ 24 5.2 Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................. 24 5.3 Reporting, Documenting and Resolving NCR Process....................................................... 25
6.0 STOP WORK ................................................................................................................................ 27 6.1 General ........................................................................................................................................ 27 6.2 Responsibilities ........................................................................................................................... 27 6.3 Procedure .................................................................................................................................... 27 7.0 MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT......................................................... 28 7.1 General ........................................................................................................................................ 28 7.2 Monitoring and Measurement ..................................................................................................... 28 7.2.1 Quality Management System Performance ......................................................................... 28 7.2.2 Measurement and Monitoring of Design ............................................................................ 29 7.2.3 Measurement and Monitoring of Construction ................................................................... 29 7.2.4 Worker Identified Opportunity for Improvement (WI-FI) .................................................. 30 7.3 Improvement ............................................................................................................................... 30 7.3.1 General ................................................................................................................................ 30 7.3.2 Corrective and Preventative Actions ................................................................................... 30 7.4 Reporting..................................................................................................................................... 31
{Contractor}

4 of 32
LIST OF FORMS Number QM501FA QM501FB QM603FA QM603FB QM720 QM725 QM730 QM740FA QM740FB Title Non-Conformance Report Non-Conformance Report Log Stop Work Notification Stop Work Notification Log Audit Findings WI-FI Form Corrective and Preventive Action Process (CAP) Monthly Quality Program Report Summary Month Quality Program Certification Statement
Date
{Contractor}

5 of 32
1.0 SCOPE AND EXCLUSIONS

Rev , Date
1.1 General
This Quality Management Plan (QMP), as part of the Quality Manual (QM), contains the general policies and specific procedures for the design- and construction-related activities of XXXXXX. The Quality Manual, procedures, work instructions, and records comprise the Quality Management System (QMS).
1.2 Project
This Quality Manual is written to meet the requirements of the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the XXXXXXX Project S.P. XXXX-XX. 1.3 Scope This Quality Manual addresses both the design- and construction-related Quality Management System requirements of the conformed RFP. The systems defined in this document will meet the requirements and promote a seamless, transparent interface with MnDOT in which MnDOT staff have the opportunity to observe all deliverables for the Project as they are developed. This Quality Management Plan is not ISO-compliant and is not required to be so unless deemed necessary by the Contractor. This Quality Manual will be maintained by the Quality Manager, who will review and update the manual at least every three months, based on the discussion and findings of quality management meetings. The Quality Manual is considered a living document and is subject to revision as necessary to facilitate and improve the quality process for the Project. The Quality Manual will not be revised without prior written approval from MnDOT.
{Contractor}

6 of 32
2.0 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Rev , Date
2.1 General
This section provides standardized definitions for the terms used in this Quality Management Plan. It also identifies frequently used abbreviations and acronyms. Should any discrepancies exist; definitions set forth in the Contract will take precedence over definitions contained in this QMP.
2.2 Acronyms
The following terms and definitions supplement the acronyms in Book 1, Exhibit A and Book 2. CAP CAPM CD COC CQM CR DCR DQAM DQCM DQMP DTM FDC IAST IS ISO ITR MnDOT NCR NDC QAM QCM QM Corrective or Preventive Action Plan Critical Activity Point Manager Construction Documents Certificate of Compliance Construction Quality Manager Constructability Review Discipline Coordination Review Design Quality Assurance Manager Design Quality Control Manager Design Quality Management Plan, part of the QMP Design Task Manager Field Design Change Independent Assurance Sampling and Testing Information Systems International Standards Organization Independent Technical Review Minnesota Department of Transportation Nonconformance Report Notice of Design Change Quality Assurance Manager Quality Control Manager Quality Manual
{Contractor}

7 of 32
QMP QMS QP RCF RDC RFC RFI RFP RFR TI WI-FI
Quality Management Plan Quality Management System Quality Procedure Review Comment Form Request for Document Clarification Released for Construction Request for Information Request for Proposal Request for Revision Testing and Inspection Procedure Worker-Identified Opportunities for Improvement
2.2 Definitions
The following terms and definitions supplement the definitions in Book 1, Exhibit A and Book 2. Acceptance Criteria Specified limits placed on characteristics of an item, facility, process, or service defined in codes, standards, or other design documents. A systematic, independent and documented activity performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists to verify, by examination and evaluation of objective evidence, that applicable elements of the quality program have been developed, documented, and effectively implemented in accordance with specified requirements. An audit differs from surveillance or inspection activities. A deficiency or discrepancy of an item, activity, or document identified during audit and recorded on an Audit Finding Sheet. Any individual who conducts an audit. Person who reviews the Checker's comments. Except in extraordinary circumstances, the Back Checker should be the Originator.
Audit
Audit Finding
Auditor Back Checker
{Contractor}

8 of 32
Basis of Design
The requirements upon which the detailed design is to be based, provided by the Design-Build Contract. A document signed or otherwise authenticated by an authorized individual or qualified party attesting that the materials, items, or services are in accordance with specified requirements and accompanied by additional information to substantiate the statement. The act of determining, verifying, and attesting, in writing, to the qualifications of personnel, processes, procedures, materials or items in accordance with applicable requirements. The person assigned by the Design Manager to check documents developed by designers and drafters in a particular discipline or section. Except in extraordinary circumstances, the Checker should also serve as the Verifier. A list of items required to be considered as part of a quality procedure. Serving as documentation of completion, a check list is a required part of the Project record. Copy of Document Original in final format used for checking and recording additions, deletions, and corrections. A special stamp to be affixed on the face of document (or on the back of the document, if room is not available in front) to record who performed various checks and reviews and the dates those activities were completed. Software to support engineering calculations and drawings, used to create plan sheets; in particular, GEOPAK for engineering calculations and MicroStation for drafting. The person assigned to implement construction quality activities and supervise the quality inspection and testing personnel. Verifies that the construction-related work is being properly implemented, inspected, and tested by trained staff. This individual reports to the Executive Management Committee.
Certificate of Compliance
Certification
Checker
Check List
Check Print
Check Print Stamp
Computer Assisted Design and Drafting (CADD) Construction Quality Manager (CQM)
{Contractor}

9 of 32
Controlled Document
Any document subject to documented control procedures to ensure information is disseminated completely and recorded properly. Examples of controlled documents include QMP and plans that have been reviewed or released for construction. Measures taken to rectify conditions adverse to quality and, where necessary, to preclude repetition or an undesirable occurrence. A specific point in the design or construction process at which further activity associated with the deliverable is suspended until formal acceptance of the interim product is obtained. Acceptance is formally obtained when all issues and design changes have been resolved, all materials testing and inspection procedures have been performed and provide passing results, and the Work meets Contract requirements. The Critical Activity Point Manager, the foreman in charge of the activity, and MnDOT will sign off at the Critical Activity Point to provide formal acceptance. Technical and management processes that commence with identification of design input (requirements) and lead to and include the issuance of design output documents that define the characteristics (specifications) of the expected product or process. Technical specialties within the Design Organization that comprise the primary engineering skill areas and operations. See Engineer of Record. A change to a drawing, specification, or other design document that has been released for construction. The formal series of memoranda established to describe and convey drawings, criteria, parameters, or other design requirements subsequent to establishment of the original Basis of Design. Those criteria, parameters, basis, or other design requirements upon which detailed design (output) is based.
Corrective Action
Critical Activity Point
Design
Design Disciplines
Designer Design Change
Design Directives
Design Input
{Contractor}

10 of 32
Design Interface
The areas of interaction between design disciplines, or discrete design sections where one element could invalidate another's design assumptions or affect the constructability of the finished design. Documents such as drawings, specifications and other documents that define technical requirements of structures, systems, and components. Technical and management processes that commence with identification of design input, and lead to and include Released for Construction plans and specifications. The elements of the overall Project Quality Management System that address intended Quality Control and Quality Assurance processes to be implemented with the design activities. The person assigned to perform QA audits on all design packages before documents are submitted for review or released for construction, and who oversees the Quality Assurance program for all design operations. A revision to a drawing, specification or other design document during the course of design development and prior to the release of said documents for construction.
Design Output
Design Process
Design Quality Management Plan (DQMP)
Design Quality Assurance Manager (DQAM)
Design Revision
Design Task Manager Person responsible for all design functions, including schedule, budget, and Design Quality Control functions, within a specified discipline or area of expertise. The Design Task Manager may also be the Lead Design Engineer for any specified area or discipline. Discipline Coordination Review (DCR) A formal interdisciplinary review of all or a portion of a design submittal.
{Contractor}

11 of 32
Document
A single drawing or a logical compilation of related calculations, data, report text, design analyses, specification sections, cost estimates, meeting minutes, or Project-related correspondence that describe, define, specify, report or certify activities, requirements, procedures, or results. The medium can be paper, magnetic, electronic, optical or computer disc, photograph, master sample or combination of these. The up-to-date original drawing, text, form, or other document type from which copies to be delivered to the client will be reproduced. The plans or sheets that form the graphical representation of the designed and planned work, included in the Construction Documents. Initiation of construction activities based upon plans that cover preliminary work, such as grading, and do not include any detail on final construction. Although MnDOT will accept documents prior to their release for construction, early start activities are undertaken at Contractor's own risk. The designer for the Project. The surveys, topographic mapping, utility locations, plans for existing structures and all other drawings and reports defining existing physical conditions of a site or facility. A document produced by the contractor to notify MnDOT of a change in design resulting from situations discovered in the field after the design package has been Released for Construction. A Field Design Change (FDC) could affect Released for Construction documents. Process to ensure that a documented review on all testers and observers working on the Project is performed on a yearly basis. The review is an independent check of all testers and each type of test they run on the Project, in order to validate proper sampling and testing procedures are being followed, and that equipment is calibrated correctly.
Document Original
Drawings
Early Start of Construction
Engineer of Record Existing Conditions
Field Design Change (FDC)
Independent Assurance Sampling and Testing (IAST)
{Contractor}

12 of 32
Internal Audit
An unbiased and independent audit of the Quality Control System being employed by a given Organization in order to allow self-declaration of conformance. Formal MnDOT process of oversight associated with a preliminary, intermediate, Early Start of Construction, or Released for Construction package. A document produced by the Designer to notify the Contractor of a change in design that could affect previously Released for Construction documents. Documents or records in the highest, most complete form in which they exist in the active project files. This includes but is not limited to copies of outgoing correspondence, printed copies of a published document, original copies of calculations, quantity take-off and other design analyses, original reproducible drawings, original resident engineer diaries, and field records. The engineer, architect, planner, designer, or other person who develops a specific document. In the case of drawings, the Originator is the individual who provides the design information, sketches, and instructions to the CADD operator. Informal meetings between the Contractor and MnDOT Design staff during the development of a design package intended to generate discussion and provide conceptuallevel feedback. No minutes of these meetings are kept and any Contractor actions based on these meetings are at Contractors own risk. However, the effort put forth by the Contractor toward these OTS reviews should help streamline MnDOT Design Reviews. Performs functions of Project Design Manager after design phase is complete. Reviews submittals, responds to Reqests for Information (RFIs), FDCs, and NDCs.
MnDOT Design Review
Notice of Design Change (NDC)
Originals
Originator
Over-the-Shoulder Reviews
Post-Design Services Manager
{Contractor}

13 of 32
Procedure
A documented, written specification for performing a particular activity. It may include specification of duties, functions, responsibilities, methods to be employed, equipment or materials to be used, and sequence of operations. The characteristics or abilities gained through training or experience or both, as measured against established requirements such as standards or tests specified to qualify an individual to perform a required function. An approved procedure that has been demonstrated to meet the specified requirements for its intended purpose. The total effort of developing, documenting, and implementing policies and procedures and defining roles and responsibilities in order to achieve and verify quality in accordance with specified requirements. The program's objectives are to achieve Customer confidence and satisfaction and to assure that a design output, structure, facility, system, or component will perform satisfactorily in service. The acts of examining, witnessing, inspecting, checking, and testing and, when necessary, revising in-process or completed design work, including plan sheets, studies, charts, and reports, to determine conformity with contract requirements. The Quality Policy, Quality Objectives, Quality Management Plans, procedures, work instructions, and records. A completed document or record furnishing evidence of successful implementation of any given aspect of the Quality Management Program. These records may include e any number of formats or media, such as written reports, electronic media, drawings, or charts. A request of the Engineer for additional information to clarify design information on plans that have been Released for Construction.
Qualification
Qualified Procedure
Quality Assurance (QA)
Quality Control (QC)
Quality Management System (QMS) Quality Record
Request for Document Clarification (RDC)
{Contractor}

14 of 32
Request for Information (RFI)
A formal request for additional information regarding the design and construction of the Project that may be initiated by anyone associated with the Project. The forms used to document all comments and their resolution. They are generated in project reviews such as DCR, CR, ITR, and MnDOT reviews. Drawings submitted by the Design-Builder depicting the proposed fabrication and/or assembly of structural elements or the installation of materials or equipment. Shop Drawings do not require review and approval from a Registered Engineer. They are to be submitted to the Design Manager for review and processing and upon review, copies are to be forwarded to MnDOT. The result of a particular standardization effort approved by a recognized authority. Construction activities covered by design documents but not incorporated into the final constructed Project. MnDOT does not test or inspect temporary construction. Temporary construction may include Early Start of Construction items. The act of reviewing, inspecting, observing, testing checking, auditing, or otherwise determining and documenting whether items, processes, services or documents conform to specified requirements. A copy of a document that the Design Manager or other person responsible for reproduction of that item has marked with his/her signature and date to indicate that the copy represents a current, complete, and accurate reproduction of the document as it exists in the Project files. The person who verifies that changes recommended by the Checker and accepted by the Back Checker have been made on the original document. Except under unusual circumstances, the Checker is also the Verifier.
Review Comment Forms
Shop Drawings
Standard
Temporary Construction
Verification
Verified Copy
Verifier
{Contractor}

15 of 32
3.0 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Rev , Date
3.1 General
The Contractor has established and, on an ongoing basis, documents, implements, and maintains a Quality Management System (QMS). This section describes the QMS to be implemented for this Project. The QMS consists of general, design, and construction quality procedures and is supported by defined procedures and programs presented in other documents, which may include the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Document Control Plan CADD Standards Safety Management Plan Public Information Plan Environmental Management Plan Visual Quality Management Plan Traffic Management Plan Plan As-Built Documents
3.3 Quality Organization

The Project quality organization includes both design quality staff and construction quality staff. The organization is depicted graphically below:
Insert Quality Organizational Chart.
{Contractor}

16 of 32
3.3.1 Quality Control Organization Quality Control operates under the Project Manager. Quality Control is the responsibility of the Contractor during all phases (e.g. design, fabrication, construction, environmental compliance) of the Project. Staff performing QC functions have sufficient authority and organizational freedom to identify quality problems and to initiate, recommend, provide, and verify implementation of the solutions. The QC may be indirectly or directly involved with design or construction production activities. The project QC Organizations functions including the following: Name (s) Title Design Quality Control Manager (DQCM) Role Reports to (or is) the Design Manager, is primarily responsible for design quality control on the project May be a foreman or superintendent responsible for Quality Control activities. The QC Inspector, is encouraged, but does not need to hold MnDOT Technical Certifications associated with this project. Responsible for performing tests in accordance with the Materials Control Schedule. The QC Testers must be MnDOT Certified in the areas in which they are performing testing.
Quality Control (QC) Inspector
Quality Control Testers (QCT)
contractor to insert other QC staff}
3.3.2 Quality Assurance Organization The Project Quality Assurance organization operates under the oversight of the Quality Manager, who reports directly to the Executive Management Committee and also to MnDOT. Quality Assurance staff must be independent of QC staff.
{Contractor}

17 of 32
Staff performing QA functions have sufficient authority and organizational freedom to identify quality problems and to initiate, recommend, provide, and verify implementation of the solutions. The Quality Assurance staff do not report to and are not under the authority of any design or construction staff. The project QA Organizations functions including the following:
Establishing and implementing a Quality Program that foster technical excellence, reduces the risk of errors and omissions, directs proper attention to liability. Overall coordination and direction of the Quality Program. Preparing, coordinating, distributing, and maintaining quality policies, procedures, standards, and guidelines. Organizing and conducting audits, and establishing the responsibilities related to the conduct of such audits as required in determining that engineering and management activities are being correctly performed. Approving revisions or waivers from the procedure and obtain MnDOT approval on these revisions and waivers. MnDOT will review any and all proposed changes or additions to the QMP for comment and approval. MnDOT will be notified of all approved revisions or waivers.
The primary individuals within the QA organization include: Name (s) Title Primary Role and Minimum Qualifications Quality Manager (QM) Implements the quality management plan Reports to the Executive Management Committee the effectiveness of the Quality Management System, Quality training Maintain the QMS at the direction of the Executive Management Committee or MnDOT.
{Contractor}

18 of 32
Design Quality Assurance Manager (DQAM)
Reports to QM. Implements the design-related functions and policies defined in the Quality Manual, Trains staff on Design Quality procedures, Day-to-day ensurance that design quality control procedures are being followed, Audits deliverables packages
Construction Quality Manager (CQM)
Reports to the QM. Implements the constructionrelated function and policies identified in the Quality Manual. Trains staff in the Construction Quality Procedures Supervises CAPMs and QA inspectors Auditing construction quality management systems Coordinating the flow of quality information from supplier and subcontractors to the Project,
Critical Activity Point Managers (CAPM)
Reports to the CQM. Coordinates and compiles documentation required for CAPs. Notifies MnDOT of CAP progress Must be MnDOT technically certified in the areas in which they are overseeing CAPs. Reports to the CQM,
Bridge Inspector
{Contractor}

19 of 32
Performing bridge/structure testing and inspection per the Construction Quality Management Plan. Must be technically certified in MnDOT Bridge Construction. May also serve as a CAPM. contractor to insert other QA staff}
3.4 Quality Manual Documentation

3.4.1 General The Quality Management System will be documented within this Quality Manual. This Quality Manual incorporates several manuals under which the Contractor and its subcontractors currently operate. It is compliant with or based on relevant sections and procedures taken from Contractor and Contractors member organizations or suppliers. 3.4.2 Writing Quality Procedures The Quality Manager, Design Quality Assurance Manager and the Design Manager, with input from the Construction Team, are responsible for identifying the project activities that require a procedure for Design. The Quality Manager, Construction Quality Manager, with input from the design and construction team, and the Project Manager will identify the project activities that require a procedure for Construction. While the quality staff members are responsible for the preparation, coordination, maintenance and initial approval of the quality procedures, other project staff may be called upon to initiate or review procedures. The Quality Manager and a designated member of the Executive Management Committee, along with the MnDOT will review and approve all procedures before they are distributed and implemented. Quality Procedures will be written using the following: 1. Quality Procedures are produced with the headers, footers, margins, fonts and formatting shown in the Design and Construction Quality Procedures.
{Contractor}

20 of 32
2. The Design Quality Manager or Construction Quality Manager assigns procedure numbers prefixed by DQP for the general and design procedures or CQP for the test and inspection plan. The Quality Procedures address the following areas: DQP101 through DQP199 General DQP201 through DQP299 Communication DQP301 through DQP399 <RESERVED> DQP401 through DQP499 Design-related DQP501 through DQP599 Design/Field Coordination Forms for each procedure are numbered similar to the procedure with the number followed by FA or FB for the first and second forms associated with a procedure. For example, DQP404 is the Review Comment Procedure and DQP404FA is the Review Comment Form. Testing and Inspection procedures and forms are numbered as follows: CQP100 through CQP199 General CQP200 through CQP299 Design/Field Coordination CQP300 through CQP399 Construction Quality Inspection Procedures
3.4.3 Updating and Maintaining Quality Procedures The Quality Manager and a designated member of the Executive Management Committee are responsible for updating and maintaining the quality procedures. The Department will review and approve all procedures before they are distributed and implemented. When a revision is issued to a previously approved procedure the revision will be incorporated as follows: Deleted text is colored red and struck-through in red. Added text is in red (added text). Changes in the document will be followed by a superscripted number ( 1) denoting the revision number associated with the change that is numbered.
{Contractor}

21 of 32
Revisions are numbered xxx.01, xxx.02, and so on. The revision box in the header is filled in with the revision number and the date of the revision. The table of contents is revised to include the new documents and revision numbers; any eliminated forms/procedures are struck-through in red with red font, added forms/procedures are in red font. The revised procedures will be put into practice as soon as they are delivered to document control. Document control will distribute the updated procedures to all staff holding copies of the controlled document. The Quality Manager will approve all quality procedures and revisions to procedures. Revisions to procedures follow the same general review pattern as the original procedures. All new or revised DQP and CQP Procedures are reviewed by the Project Manager and Design Manager, and reviewed and approved by the Departments Project Manager prior to inclusion in the QMP.
3.5 Resource Management Training

The Project Manager, Quality Manager, Design Quality Assurance Manager, and Construction Quality Manager will determine the competence necessary for personnel working on the Project. Where deficiencies are identified, training will be provided or other personnel secured. The Project Manager, Quality Manager, Design Quality Assurance Manager, and Construction Quality Manager will make all personnel aware of the importance of their work and their contribution to quality objectives. All staff will undergo quality training at the initial stages of the Project to ensure that the QMS implementation goes smoothly. This training will also make all staff aware of

the relevance and importance of their activities, how the individual members function as a team, and how each worker contributes to meeting the quality objectives.
The Quality Manager will keep track of ongoing education, training, skills, experience, and performance of all staff. These records are maintained corporately and project managers review these records in order to identify staff for projects of all kinds, including initial and ongoing needs of long-term projects.
The Design-Builder shall insert their technical certifications and training plan here.
{Contractor}

22 of 32
4.0 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

Rev , Date
4.1 Management Commitment

Management has established its commitment to quality on this Project with a comprehensive Quality Management System. Management has committed to the following:

Establish a quality policy Establish quality objectives Communicate the importance of meeting customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements Conduct management reviews Provide resources necessary to meet Project requirements Continually improve the work processes and deliverables
4.2
Responsibility and Authority
Management has delegated authority and responsibility to the Project Manager to design and build the Project to the requirements of the RFP, MnDOT Standards, and all applicable state and federal regulations and laws. The Project Manager has been directed to use the Quality Management System in the design and construction of the Project. To show compliance to MnDOT requirements, workers have been directed to identify quality problems during design and construction, and to show improvement during the design and construction process. The Executive Management Committee has delegated authority and responsibility to the Quality Manager to develop, implement, and maintain a Quality Management System consistent with the RFP. The Quality Manager has directed the Design Quality Assurance Manager and Construction Quality Manager to help implement the QMS.
4.3
Management Review
The Quality Assurance Organization will meet monthly throughout the Project with the Contractors Executive Management for the express purpose of assessing the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the QMP. The quality procedures, testing,
{Contractor}

23 of 32
reviews, analyses, and audit findings will be summarized and presented for review by all attendees. The review will identify opportunities for improvement and required modifications to the Quality Management System. MnDOT will be invited to attend and will be given copies of all reports and summaries. The review meetings will assess Project quality and the adequacy of the QMP based on the following agenda items: Worker-identified problems Results of audits MnDOT feedback Process performance and product conformity Status of preventative and corrective actions Follow-up actions from previous review meetings Changes that affect the QMP Suggestions for improvement
When it is determined that improvements are needed, one or more of the following actions will be taken: Improve the effectiveness of the QMP in general, Improve the effectiveness of specific processes and procedures, Improve the product as it relates to customer requirements, and Improve the availability of necessary resources.
4.4
Quality Incentives (optional to contractor)
The Quality Incentive Program establishes guidelines for use in identifying improvements and recognizing staff members who have contributed to the performance of the Contractors team in a manner that conserves project resources, positively impacts schedule, improves morale and commitment of team members, facilitates effective communications and exceeds expectations of the Department, the quality staff, and the Executive Management Committee Members. The Executive Management Committee has established a budget of XXXXX and the full amount will be awarded throughout the duration of the project. {contractor to identify how the incentive plan will be implemented
{Contractor}

24 of 32
5.0 NON-CONFORMANCES
Rev , Date
5.1
General
Non-conformances apply to any element of the Project not meeting the Contract requirements.
The Quality Management System will identify design documents, materials, products, and construction that do not conform to Project requirements. Each instance will be documented, evaluated, resolved, and corrective action taken to prevent a recurrence. Any person (including MnDOT staff) working on the project has the responsibility to identify and report nonconforming design or construction to the Quality Manager or any other QA staff member. 5.2 Roles and Responsibilities
The QM, DQAM, DQCM, and CQM have the responsibility and authority to investigate the validity, and assist in the closure of all non-conformance reports to achieve compliance with contract requirements. The Quality Manager, or designee within the QA organization, is responsible for the following:

Ensuring that a NCR control number is assigned for tracking purposes Monitoring the Nonconformance Report Log Reviewing the nonconformance description for accuracy and completeness Performing the initial review of NCRs to evaluate their validity Reviewing the approved NCR disposition to verify that all nonconforming conditions have been addressed, the NCR disposition status is correctly indicated and the proposed corrective action is reasonable Ensuring that the corrective action is accomplished in accordance with the corrective action stated through inspections by the inspection staff, as required Reporting to the Executive Management Committee the contents and status of all NCRs on at least on a monthly basis Initiating NCRs when warranted or supervising the inspection staff initiating NCRs Reviewing, determining and reporting any identified trends based on audits of the NCR process
{Contractor}

25 of 32
The Project Manager or designee is responsible for the following:

Ensuring that proposed corrective action resolves the nonconformance, prevents recurrence, and meets specification design requirements Initiating and coordinating reviews and approvals/acceptance (from construction and engineering staff, quality control, MnDOT, etc.) as required Review the status of all open NCRs on at least a monthly basis Review with Executive Management Committee any reported trends or serious nonconformances Reporting, Documenting and Resolving NCR Process
5.3
1. NCRs will be written to document work not conforming to contract requirements. The originator will fill out boxes 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 on Form QM 501FA. 2. All NCRs will be delivered to the Quality Manager, who will assign the NCR Control (box 1), determine if the NCR is required (Box 10) and record the NCR in the log (Form QM 501FB). 3. If the NCR is required, the Quality Manager will assign the responsibility to individual/organization to investigate the NCR. This person/organization will determine the root cause of the non-conformance (Box 13) and identify corrective actions to prevent recurrence (Box 14) and disposition status (Box 15), identifying if a design change is required (Box 16), and sign Box 18. 4. Within five days of the origination of the NCR, the QM (or CQM or DQAM), Design Engineer, PM and MnDOT will review the proposed NCR disposition, verify that all nonconforming conditions identified have been addressed, and the proposed corrective action is reasonable. If agreed, parties will sign boxes 18, 19, 20 and 21. The QM will update the log. 5. Quality Assurance staff will conduct inspections to verify that corrective actions are completed in accordance with the NCR instructions. The method of verification and the results of the verification/inspections are documented on the Daily Field Report. If acceptable, QA staff will sign box 22.. 6. The QM will retain all records of the NCR in document control and provide MnDOT with a copy. 7. If a nonconformance is found at a construction Critical Activity Point, the appropriate corrective actions will be completed in accordance with the NCR instructions and the NCR will be closed prior to the Critical Activity Point Manager signing off at the Critical Activity Point. 8. The nonconforming designs, material, product, or construction will be marked or tagged to prevent its unintended use. The material product or construction will
{Contractor}

26 of 32
not be used until the nonconformance is resolved. When the nonconformance is corrected, additional tests or inspections will be performed to verify the material, product, or construction is proper for the intended use. FORMS QM501FA Non-Conformance Report
QM501FB Non-Conformance Report Log
{Contractor}

27 of 32
6.0 STOP WORK

Rev , Date
6.1
General
Stop Work procedures apply when design and construction will not meet project requirements, when eminent safety issues exist, or when environmental permit compliance is in jeopardy.
6.2
Responsibilities
The PM, QM, DQAM, DQCM, CQM, Traffic Engineer, Safety Manager, and Environmental Compliance Manager all have authority to stop work. The PM has the authority to resume work only with the concurrence of the QM.
6.3
Procedure
1. Notification No matter who or how the identified potential stop work issue came to
be known by either the QM, DQAM, CQM, DM, PM or MnDOT PM, all shall be notified via email and voice messaging that a Stop Work Notification (SWN) is planned. The Quality Manager is ultimately responsible to notify all parties.
2. Upon notification the QM will investigate the issue or item of work and determine the
need for a Stop Work Notification (SWN). In the event that the QM is not immediately available the progression of authority to investigate and issue a Stop Work Notice will be CQM, and then the DQAM.
3. If the QM determines that the work needs to be stopped, the QM will issue a SWN in
writing to the PM.

4. Project Manager will stop work activities per the SWN. 5. The work shall stop until the QM and MnDOT approve the required corrective
actions, and when the Project Manager determines it is appropriate to proceed.

6. The QM will work with the CQM or DQAM to issue NCRs relating to any
nonconformances associated with the SWN.

7. The QM ensures that the SWN Log is updated as required and that the SWN paper
copy is maintained in file for reference and is uploaded to the DCS website.
8. All SWNs and resolution will be documented in electronic document control system.
FIGURES AND FORMS

QM603FA Stop Work Notification QM603FB Stop Work Notification Log
{Contractor}

28 of 32
7.0 MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT

Rev , Date
7.1
General
Quality staff will review all data gathered through formal and informal audits or any of the monitoring procedures discussed above to assess performance against plans, objectives, and other defined Project goals and Design-Build Program goals. Through this and other analysis, the Quality Manager, CQM, and DQAM will seek to determine the root cause of the nonconformity. Analysis for individual assessments will be defined prior to gathering the data.
7.2
Monitoring and Measurement
7.2.1 Quality Management System Performance 7.2.1.1 MnDOTSatisfaction MnDOT satisfaction will be monitored on an ongoing basis via the following:

Executive Management Committee meetings, attended by the MnDOT, where feedback will be solicited. Review of correspondence, meetings, and memos/letters from the MnDOT.
All personnel are responsible to report all incidents of MnDOT dissatisfaction to the Quality Manager. The Quality Manager will determine the cause of the dissatisfaction, and work with the Project Manager to prevent a recurrence. 7.2.1.2 Internal Audits It is the policy of the Contractor to conduct internal audits of the Quality Management System. The Quality Manager is responsible for planning and carrying out the audits. The audits will focus on conformance to the quality requirements established by the Contractor and the use and effectiveness of the Quality Management System. The audit results will be part of the review input given the Executive Management Committee. Internal audits to be completed during the Project include the following:
Audits of deliverables to the MnDOT or other stakeholders before they are delivered
{Contractor}

29 of 32
Audits of the document control system Periodic informal spot-audits of MnDOT comment forms, internal comment forms, RFIs, and Design Change paperwork to spot trends, problem areas, or inefficiencies Audits of quality activities
All audits will be documented and filed as part of the Project record (Form QM 702 Audit Findings). The QM and/or CQM will audit selected suppliers. Project requirements will be reviewed with the supplier. The suppliers' quality system will be reviewed along with test records from previous production and reporting of quality data during production.
7.2.2 Measurement and Monitoring of Design The Design Manager and design Quality Assurance staff will consider several processes for monitoring and measuring at the beginning of each project. None of these or more than one may be tracked for the entire project or for a given period. Consideration will be given to the number of staff hours required to track the measurements vs. the risks and costs of nonconformance. Processes to be considered for monitoring include:

Evaluation of MnDOT comments type of comments and how they change over time. Evaluation of internal DCR, ITR and/or CR comments usefulness, impacts on cost reduction, time required to complete them, effectiveness as loss prevention tool. Evaluation of RFIs, FDCs and/or NDCs necessity, impacts on costs, time required to complete them, effectiveness at resolving issue in field and ongoing design tasks. Evaluation of time or labor hours required to complete various processes, including such things as preparation of deliverable packages of various types, or time required for formal comment processes, from disbursement of comment forms to final resolution of all comments.
7.2.3 Measurement and Monitoring of Construction All personnel are responsible for identifying quality problems during construction using the Worker-Identified Opportunity for Improvement Program (the WI-FI Program). Quality deficiencies will be reported to the Quality Manager, Construction Quality
{Contractor}

30 of 32
Manager, and all inspectors and testers. The deficiencies will be recorded, investigated, evaluated, and resolved by the Quality Manager. The quality activities will be documented in test sheets, inspection forms, audit reports, and other record documents. The forms will contain acceptance criteria and the person certifying conformance. The records will be kept in electronic form on the Project's electronic document system. 7.2.4 Worker Identified Opportunity for Improvement (WI-FI) All project staff are encouraged to present suggestions that will improve processes and deliverables that will help the design and construction teams meet or exceed the expectations of MnDOT, the Executive Committee, positively impact the project schedule, improve quality, improve communication, or enhances the value of the project. Project staff will submit ideas to the QM, DQAM, or CQM using the WI-FI Form (QM725). The review team will include the Design Manager, Design Task Managers, Construction Supervisors, and Executive Committee Members. The review team will determine the ease of implementation, the potential benefits and make an initial decision on whether to pursue the improvement. The Quality Manager must concur with the decision by signing form QM725.. If the Review Team decides to pursue the improvement, they will undertake the Preventive Action Process described in procedure for Implementing Corrective or Preventive Actions.
7.3
Improvement
7.3.1 General The Contractor will continually seek to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes of the organization, rather than wait for a problem to reveal opportunities for improvement. Improvements can range from small-step ongoing continual improvement to strategic breakthrough improvement projects. 7.3.2 Corrective and Preventative Actions The Contractor will determine the cause of nonconformities identified by the Quality Management System and MnDOT. The Project Manager or Design Manager and
{Contractor}

31 of 32
Quality Manager are responsible for implementing a Corrective and Preventive Action Plan (CAP) and for determining whether the Corrective and Preventive Action is effective. The CAP will be focused on eliminating the root cause of the problemand determining modification(s) to work processes to improve the delivery of services, design packages, and construction activities. Nonconformities can result from:

Significant or repetitive nonconformance. Internal and external audit findings. Management Review of the Quality System. Improvements suggested by staff (WI-FI process) and MnDOT
1. The Quality Manager performs an analysis, evaluates the CAP and determines the severity, priority and impact to the organization for the project. 2. The Quality Manager assigns a control number to CAP. 3. The Quality Manager will work with design and/or construction staff to determine the root cause, developing the Corrective and Preventive Action Plan and determining the implementation time schedule. The Corrective or Preventive Action Plan will identify any immediate needs required to limit damage or liability associated with the CAP. 4. The Quality Manager will submit the CAP to the Design Manager (design-related) or Project Manager (construction-related) for implementation. 5. Once accepted, the Design Manager or Project Manager shares the results with the Department and ensures that the Corrective or Preventive Action Plan is implemented. 6. The Quality Manager is responsible for verifying the effectiveness of the Corrective or Preventive Action. Once verified, through collection of documented objective evidence, it is noted on the CAP Report and the CAP is closed. The Quality Manager submits a copy of this CAP Report to the Design Manager, Project Manager, Originator and MnDOT when the CAP is closed. 7. The Quality Manager is responsible for updating the Quality Manual to reflect the Corrective and Preventive Action Plan. The Quality Manager may delegate this to the DQAM or the CQM.
7.4
Reporting
{Contractor}

32 of 32
The Quality Manager will draft a report following the format of the Monthly Quality Program Support Report (Form QM740FA). 1. The Quality Manager (QM) will draft a report following the format of the Monthly Quality Program Summary Report. 2. The QM, DQAM, CQM, and DQCM will review and sign the report and certification statement. 3. The QM will transmit the original signed certification statement to the Project Manager (Form QM740FB). 4. The Project Manager will review and sign the PMs Certification Statement. 5. The Project Manager will submit originals of both Certification Statements to MnDOT with the monthly report for the project. 6. The QM will transmit the quality summary report and a copy of the Quality Certification Statement to the Executive Management Committee, with a cc: to the Project Manager.
FIGURES AND FORMS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. QM720 Audit Findings QM725 WI-FI Form QM730 Corrective and Preventive Action Process (CAP) QM740FA Monthly Quality Program Summary Report QM740FB Monthly Quality Program Certification Statement

Quality Management Plan

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Quality Management Plan

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Quality Management Plan Template

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

, Construction Quality Manager

, Design Quality Manager

, Contractor Project Manager

, Executive Management Committee

, Executive Management Committee

, Executive Management Committee

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

1.0 SCOPE AND EXCLUSIONS

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

2.0 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

QMP QMS QP RCF RDC RFC RFI RFP RFR TI WI-FI

Auditor Back Checker

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Check Print Stamp

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Critical Activity Point

Designer Design Change

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Design Quality Management Plan (DQMP)

Design Quality Assurance Manager (DQAM)

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Early Start of Construction

Engineer of Record Existing Conditions

Field Design Change (FDC)

Independent Assurance Sampling and Testing (IAST)

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

MnDOT Design Review

Notice of Design Change (NDC)

Post-Design Services Manager

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Quality Assurance (QA)

Quality Control (QC)

Quality Management System (QMS) Quality Record

Request for Document Clarification (RDC)

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Request for Information (RFI)

Review Comment Forms

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

3.0 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

3.3 Quality Organization

Insert Quality Organizational Chart.

MnDOT Design-Build Quality Template (June, 2011)

XXXX Design-Build Project S.P. XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Quality Control (QC) Inspector