Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A Case Study
Ravish Modi (48) Anand Mohta (49) Shivanshu Murarka (50)
Wednesday, January 26, 2005. DaimlerChrylsers Toledo, Ohio. An Employee walked into a Jeep Plant and in matter of minutes, killed one man, wounded two and then shot and killed himself.
Incident
Aftermath
An another employee who was also injured in this event filed the suit against the company and security firm for not having adequate security.
Any physical assault, threatening behavior in the work setting involving an explicit or implicit challenge to peoples safety, well-being or health
Expressions of hostility Gestures, facial expressions & verbal assaults Threats of physical violence Harassment, intimidation, bullying
Facts
The Centers for Disease Control has called workplace violence a "national epidemic"
American business and government offices spend over $36 billion per year on costs related to workplace violence
Homicide is the fourth leading cause of occupation al death in the United States.
Oct 09th, 2010 Upset over the duty allotted to him, a CRPF constable allegedly shot dead an assistant commandant and a sub-inspector besides leaving a Havildar seriously injured at a paramilitary camp in Bihar's Rohtas district.
Source: http://www.asianage.com/india/fratricidecase-crpf-constable-kills-commandant-si-422
Assumptions
Individual
Ineffective or absence of anti-violence policies.
Analysis
Family Values
Substance Abuse
Low/Medium
High
High
Low
Low
Modern
High
Traditional/ Semi-modern
How liable should companies be for the violent act committed during work by their employees?
Can companies completely prevent workplace violence? If not, how can they reduce it?
Companies may be sued in court of law Companies may be liable for monetary compensation and/or family responsibilities Courts often award money to claimant even if responsibility seems questionable
Prevention
Can increase chances of detection Reduce chances of occurrence Generate awareness and increase associate satisfaction
Installing metal detectors. Can companies take prevention too far including infringing privacy?
Policy Implementation
Myth - Companies feel workplace violence is a rare phenomenon , wont happen in the presence metal detector Many laws defined for almost all forms of violence, hence redundant to define anti-violent policy in company Socio-economical culture & its influence
Zero Tolerance
Safety and Security on prime priority Maintain respect & integrity of employees Use advance technologies
Environmental
On the Job
Background Verification
Changing attitude towards security and policies Staff Training to anticipate, recognize and respond
Zero tolerance for violence Consistent Discipline Encourage Reporting Identify warning signs
Take timely disciplinary actions including termination
Biometric Systems
Media Contact
CI & CB Analysis
CONTROL
Influence of Society Government Policies Low Control High Impact Mentally Unstable Low Control Low Impact
I M P A C T
HBLC
C O S T
Encourage Reporting Disturbance/ Grievance Handler Take timely disciplinary actions including termination Identify warning signs
HBHC
Physical Barriers/ Turnstiles CCTV Surveillance Biometric Systems Metal & Explosive Detectors Armed security personnel
C O S T
Putting Together
Person
Ramification loss of human life emotional trauma loss of employees financial costs may close the business Workmans compensation, legal expenses and lawsuits
Sources
Setting Situation
Act Now
Careful hiring practices Close employee supervision. Note behavior changes Report and document all threats Listen emphatically to employee concerns Know the warning signs Personal Conduct to de-escalate confrontation Develop Response team
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction -E. F. Schumacher