Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 27

Developing a Questionnaire

Chapter 4

Types of Questions
Open-ended
high validity, low manipulative quality

Closed-ended
low validity, high manipulative quality

Open-ended
An open-ended question is one in which you do not provide any standard answers to choose from. 1.How old are you? ______ years. 2.What do you like best about your job?

Closed-ended
A closed-ended question is one in which you provide the response categories, and the respondent just chooses one:
What do you like best about your job? (a) The people (b) The diversity of skills you need to do it (c) The pay and/or benefits (d) Other: ______________________________

Dichotomous Questions
Dichotomous Question: a question that has two possible responses
Could be Yes/No True/False Agree/Disagree

Questions based on Level of Measurement


Use a nominal question to measure a variable Assign a number next to each response that has no meaning; simply a placeholder.

Use an ordinal question to measure a variable Rank order preferences More than 5 10 items is difficult Does not measure intensity

Interval Level
Attempt to measure on an interval level Likert response scale: ask an opinion question on a 1-to-5, 1-to-7, etc. bipolar scale
Bipolar: has a neutral point and scale ends are at opposite positions of the opinion

Semantic differential: an object is assessed by the respondent on a set of bipolar adjective pairs

Guttman scale: respondent checks each item with which they agree; constructed as cumulative, so if you agree to one, you probably agree to all of the ones above it in the list

Filter/Contingency Questions
To determine if a respondent is qualified to answer questions, might need a filter or contingency question (also known as knowledge) Limit # of jumps If only two levels, use graphic to jump If you can't fit the response to a filter on a single page, it's probably best to be send them to a page, rather than a question #

How many steps in the response scale?


Statistical reliability of the data increases sharply with the number of scale steps up to about 7 steps
After 7, it increases slowly, leveling off around 11
After 20, it decreases sharply

Should there be a middle category?


Does it make sense to offer it?
Should not be used as the dont know or no opinion option.
The middle option is usually placed between the positive and negative responses. Sometimes its last in an interview.

Direct Magnitude Scaling


Method of obtaining ratio-scaled data
Idea is to give respondents an anchor point, and then ask them to answer questions relative to that

Example:
Suppose you are interested in the severity of crimes. Begin by assigning a number to one crime and then have respondents assign numbers to the others based upon a ratio.

Filtering "Don't Know"


Standard format
No "don't know" option is presented to the respondent, but is recorded if the respondent volunteers it.

Quasi filter
A "don't know" option is included among the possible responses.

Full filter
First the respondent is asked if they have an opinion. If yes, the question is asked.

Question Placement
It's a good idea to put difficult, embarrassing or threatening questions towards the end
More likely to answer. If they get mad and quit, at least you've gotten most of your questions asked!

Put related questions together to avoid giving the impression of lack of meticulousness Watch out for questions that influence the answers to other questions.

Wording of Questions
Direction of Statements
Response bias Socially desirable

Always and never


Avoid this Better to phrase as most, infrequently

Language
Reflect educational level and reading ability Need for various languages

Frequency and Quantity


Consider both frequency and quantity Consider number of times Consider duration of times

Mutually Exclusive and Exhaustive


Mutually exclusive: not possible to select more than one category/value Exhaustive: providing all possible categories/values

Forced Choice
Choose between 2 choices Might not be relevant Other choices exist (or at least possible) Lesser of two evils

Recalling Behavior
Can be difficult to remember
Ask questions that can be answered

Choose time frames that are reasonable


Pilot test for time frame issues

Response Bias
Exaggerating the truth
Socially desirable answers

Consider using trap questions


Possibly fictional choice

Sensitive Items
More comfortable answering in categories
Minimize missing data Might loose statistical power

Evaluating Questions
Pre-testing Cognitive interviewing Behavior coding Peer review

Peer review has shown to be the best method but its the least used.

Validity and Reliability Questions


Evaluative strategies:
Analysis of data to evaluate the strength of predictable relationships among answers and with other characteristics of respondents. Comparisons of data from alternatively worded questions asked of comparable samples. Comparison of answers against records. Measuring the consistency of answers of the same respondents at two points in time.

Coding the Questionnaire


Create a codebook: reference guide for the data set
Code: assigning a value to a response category
Often numeric code Pre-coding makes it easier Content analysis on open-ended items Yes/No often coded as present or not (0 or 1)

Missing Responses
Why blank?
Missed them Refusal to answer Didnt feel it applied Didnt know the answer

To code or not
Analyze the difference If know why, might consider

Piloting the Questionnaire


Test it on yourself
Possibly other experts

Test on people similar to sample


Dont reuse (some exceptions)

Discuss the survey with individuals


During completion or After

Finding Respondents
Best Methods of Selection
Even with a good survey, poorly chosen sample leads to poor results

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi