Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Conflict Management
In simple words, conflict may be understood as disagreement. Conflict can be defined as the struggle between incompatible or opposing needs, wishes, ideas, interests, or people. Conflict arises when individuals or groups encounter goals that both parties cannot obtain satisfactorily. Conflict exists in situations where goals, interests, needs or values of people are incompatible and they block others efforts to achieve their goals.
2
Some level of conflict is inevitable given the wide range of goals in a group.
Some conflict is good for group performance. Too much causes people to spend much time responding to conflict.
Conflict promotes change. Persons are more aware of injustices, inefficiencies, and frustrations, and see the need to correct them.
4
Contd
2. Dysfunctional : Conflicts hinder and prevent group goals from being achieved and also hinder group performance. What differentiate functional or dysfunctional ? a. Task conflict: relates to the content and goals of the work. b. Relationship conflict: focuses on interpersonal conflict. (dysfunctional) c. Process conflict : relates to how the works get done. Low to moderate level of Process and Task conflict is functional as it stimulates discussion of ideas that help to perform better.
5
TYPES OF CONFLICT
1. Intra-individual Conflict:
It involves frustration, goal conflict, and role conflict and ambiguity. Role conflict and ambiguity arises as individual is expected to play various roles and a clash there from. Goal conflict occurs when a goal has both positive and negative features or when an individual has two or more competing goals thus blocking, one another. Three types of goal conflict are generally identified.
8
2. Interpersonal Conflict: It arises from personal differences, information deficiency, role incompatibility and environmental stress. 3. Intergroup Conflict: It occurs between 2 or more teams or groups.
Managers play a key role in resolution of this conflict
Conflict
Scarce Resources
Task Interdependency
11
Sources of Conflict
1.
Different goals and time horizons: different groups have differing goals.
Production focuses on efficiency; Marketing on sales.
2.
Overlapping authority: two or more managers claim authority for the same activities.
3.
Task Interdependencies: one member of a group fails to finish a task that another depends on.
4.
Incompatible Evaluation or reward system: workers are evaluated for one thing, but are told to do something different.
Groups rewarded for low cost but firm needs higher service.
5.
When all resources are scarce, managers can fight over allocations.
6.
Sources of Conflict
Goals
Conflict Perceptions
Conflict Outcomes
Manifest Conflict
Positive
Decisions Cohesiveness
Conflict emotions
Negative
Turnover Politics Stress
14
Conflict Management
Conflict management is the practice of
identifying and handling conflict in a sensible, fair and efficient manner It refers to interventions that alter the level and form of conflict in ways that maximize its benefits and minimize its dysfunctional consequences.
15
Contd
Two intentions determining the type of conflict-handling behaviour are assertiveness and cooperation. Assertiveness (concern for self) refers to an attempt to confront the other party; and Cooperation (concern for others) refers to an attempt to find an agreeable solution.
16
Low Assertiveness
18
Avoiding
No winners, no losers Fundamental premise: This isn't the right time or place to address this issue Strategic philosophy: Avoids conflict by withdrawing, sidestepping, or postponing When to use:
When the conflict is small and relationships are at stake When you're counting to ten to cool off When more important issues are pressing and you feel you don't have time to deal with this particular one When you have no power and you see no chance of getting your concerns met. When you are too emotionally involved and others around you can solve the conflict more successfully. When more information is needed.
Drawbacks:
Important decisions may be made by default. Postponing may make matters worse.
20
Competing
I win, you lose Fundamental premise: Associates "winning" a conflict with competition Strategic philosophy: When goals are extremely important, one must sometimes use power to win When to use:
When you know you are right When time is short and a quick decision is needed When a strong personality is trying to steamroller you and you don't want to be taken advantage of When you need to stand up for your rights
Drawbacks:
Can escalate conflict Losers may retaliate
21
Accommodating
I lose, you win Fundamental premise: Working toward a common purpose is more important than any of the peripheral concerns; the trauma of confronting differences may damage fragile relationships Strategic philosophy: Appease others by downplaying conflict, thus protecting the relationship When to use:
When an issue is not as important to you as it is to the other person When you realize you are wrong When you are willing to let others learn by mistake When you know you cannot win When it is not the right time and you would prefer to simply build credit for the future When harmony is extremely important When what the parties have in common is a good deal more important than their differences
Drawbacks:
One's own ideas don't get attention
22
Collaborating
I win, you win Fundamental premise: Teamwork and cooperation help everyone achieve their goals while also maintaining relationships. Strategic philosophy: The process of working through differences will lead to creative solutions that will satisfy both parties' concerns. When to use:
When there is a high level of trust.
Drawbacks:
The process takes lots of time and energy. Some may take advantage of other people's trust and openness.
23
Compromising
You bend, I bend Fundamental premise: Winning something while losing a little is OK. Strategic philosophy: Both ends are placed against the middle in an attempt to serve the "common good" while ensuring each person can maintain something of their original position. When to use:
When people of equal status are equally committed to goals. When time can be saved by reaching intermediate settlements on individual parts of complex issues. When goals are moderately important.
Drawbacks:
Important values and long-term objectives can be derailed in the process.
24