How Unethical Practices Almost Destroyed WorldCom

Group Members
Amit Yadav Samarpal Singh Ravindra Kumar Apporva Verma Saurabh Tripathi Udit Varshney Vimal Verma

WORLDCOM LEADERSHIP

CEO Bernard Ebbers

CFO Scott Sullivan

COMPANY BACKGROUND

Worldcom founded in 1983 in hattiesburg , mississippi Initially called LDDS- Long Distance Discount Service Bernard Ebber as CEO in 1985 Growth=survival $650000=$1.5 m Worldcom went public in 1989 1993-metromedia co. & resergens communication 1995- william technology 1998-Biggest acquisition($40 billion revenues)

 1999 sprint merger worth $129 billion crashed Stock declined by 2000 Heavy loans unstabilized his position as he left he said New CEO-John Sidgmore & CFO Scott Sullivan investigation launched by :SEC (Security exchange commission) Internal auditor Purchased by Verizon communication on 2001 known as Verizon business.

Truth Behind the Scandal

Unrealistic financial targets and inability to meet them Recording of a/c entries without any evidences Company was capitalizing its line costs. Line costs were operating expenses but classified as capital expenditure False figures 3.055 Bn $ in 2001 & 797 Mn $ in 2002 In 2000 and 2001, WC claimed pre tax revenue of 7.6 and 2.4 Bn $ respectively. Later discovered as loss of 49.9 and14.5 Bn $ for the respective years Reserve accounts were manipulated to increase figures Two versions of accounts the actual version and the Final version for investors

Nemesis catches up with world com

Attempt to acquire sprint in oct 1999 but failed. Ebbers lacked strategic sense of direction and company started drifting. A company suffered financial crunch because of decline in revenue,over capacity and huge debts. Fear amongst CEO and the top brass of the company. Stock price dropped to 0.5 $ in jan 2002. In june 2002,co. announced inflation of profits and improper accounting of 3.9 Bn$. In august 2002,another 3 Bn$ was improperly accounted.

Why WorldCom failed????

Reasons for the fiasco

Corporate culture
Variety of people Acquisition of various business entities Department were distant from each other Hierarchical nature of the organization

Inorganic growth
Acquisition of business units Financed by companies high value stock Industrial slow growth rate and recession

Failing leadership
No technical qualification , no experience Priority to personal interest over organization's interest. No backup plan

Unalert top management Whimsical CEO Large pay packages of top executives Unreasonable long tenures of board members Unreasonable loans and benefits given to Ebbers

Unconcerned and Malfunctioning Board of directors

Other reasons
Recession of the economy Vast oversupply of capacity Unhealthy focus on profits

THE FINANCIAL MESS

SEC revealed the fact that WorldCom had a debt of 5.75 billion dollar. WorldCom has also signed a deal with 26 banks according to which It has to pay 2.65 billion dollar per year. Banks agreed to give the loans without any collateral. WorldCom manipulated the value of its total assets

WorldCom also defaulted to give 0.60 dollar on its MCI group tracking stock. This step was taken by WorldCom stating the fact that by this it can save upto 284 million dollar a year.

How the stakeholders were affected?

Decline the value of stock

Workforce cut down drastically Customer

Financial institutions The Indian connection

The Blame Game

Arthur Anderson was external auditor of WorldCom since 1989. They denied any involvement in the Fiasco. Arthur Anderson missed opportunities where they could have disclosed the fraud. They have been criticized for their way of handling WorldCom accounts books and policies.

 Arthur Anderson had series of audit fraud including Enron and WorldCom. Observers commented that Arthur Anderson could have paid more attention towards aggressive practices when it was aware of such practices before.

Summary
WorldCom is not only about greed Corporate fraud is the result of how a corporation is led, how employees are motivated, the nature of the work, and the degree of individual autonomy Ethics training and compliance programs dont work in a culture that is exclusively materialistic and that devalues the dignity of work and workers The basic assumptions about how corporations are organized and run need to be rethought Corporate executives must re-learn how to lead Leadership training must be holistic, emphasizing free will, personal responsibility and transparency i.e.: continuous, open, information-sharing

Why good managers make bad ethical choices ( Four Rationalizations To Justify Questionable Conduct 1) Believe that the activity is not really illegal 2) Believe that it is in the individuals or corporations best interest 3) Believe that it will never be found out 4) Believe that the company will condone actions that are taken in its interest and will even protect the managers responsible
21

Conclusion
A good way to avoid management oversights is to subject the control mechanisms themselves to periodic surprise audits The point is to make sure that internal audits and controls are functioning as planned It is a case of inspecting the inspectors and taking the necessary steps to keep the controls working efficiently It is up to Top Management to send a clear & pragmatic message to all employees that good ethics is still the foundation of good business
22

Key Take Aways

No job is worth breaking the law or committing unethical acts for Your personal integrity is your most important asset you own it and control it

What will it profit a man if he gains the world but loose his own soul? (Mark 8:36)Jesus Christ