Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Independent Project
For this project, assume that it is independent of any other potential projects that Amit Ltd may undertake.
Independent A project whose acceptance (or rejection) does not prevent the acceptance of other projects under consideration.
1
10 K
2
12 K
3
15 K
4
10 K
5
7K
PBP is the period of time required for the cumulative expected cash flows from an investment project to equal the initial cash outflow.
3
15 K 37 K
(a) 4 10 K (c) 47 K
5
7 K (d) 54 K
PBP
1
10 K 30 K
2
12 K 18 K
3
15 K 3 K
4
10 K 7K
5
7K 14 K
Weaknesses:
Does not account
for TVM Does not consider cash flows beyond the PBP Cutoff period is subjective
NPV Solution
Amit Ltd has determined that the appropriate discount rate (k) for this project is 13%.
NPV = Rs.10,000 Rs.12,000 Rs.15,000 + + + 1 2 3 (1.13) (1.13) (1.13)
NPV Solution
NPV = Rs.10,000(PVIF13%,1) + Rs.12,000(PVIF13%,2) + Rs.15,000(PVIF13%,3) + Rs.10,000(PVIF13%,4) + Rs. 7,000(PVIF13%,5) Rs.40,000 Rs.10,000(0.885) + Rs.12,000(0.783) + Rs.15,000(0.693) + Rs.10,000(0.613) + Rs. 7,000(0.543) Rs.40,000 Rs.8,850 + Rs.9,396 + Rs.10,395 + Rs.6,130 + Rs.3,801 Rs.40,000 - Rs.1,428
NPV =
NPV = =
Weaknesses:
May not include managerial options embedded in the project.
PI =
ICO
<< OR >>
Method #2:
PI = 1 + [ NPV / ICO ]
PI Acceptance Criterion
PI = Rs.38,572 / Rs.40,000 = .9643 (Method #1, previous slide)
Should this project be accepted? No! The PI is less than 1.00. This means that the project is not profitable. [Reject as PI < 1.00 ]
Weaknesses:
Same as NPV Provides only relative profitability Potential Ranking Problems
+...+
(1 + IRR)n
IRR Solution
Rs.40,000 = Rs.10,000 + Rs.12,000 + (1+IRR)1 (1+IRR)2 Rs.15,000 Rs.10,000 Rs.7,000 + + 3 4 (1+IRR) (1+IRR) (1+IRR)5
Find the interest rate (IRR) that causes the discounted cash flows to equal Rs.40,000.
X 0.05
0.05
X 0.05
0.05
(Rs.1,444)(0.05) Rs.4,603 X=
X = 0.0157
Weaknesses:
Assumes all cash flows reinvested at the IRR Difficulties with project rankings and Multiple IRRs
Evaluation Summary
Amit Ltd Independent Project
Method Project Comparison Decision PBP IRR NPV PI 3.3 11.47% -1,424 .96 3.5 13% 0 1.00 Accept Reject Reject Reject
Capital Rationing
Capital Rationing occurs when a constraint (or budget ceiling) is placed on the total size of capital expenditures during a particular period.
Example: Amit must determine what investment opportunities to undertake for Amit Ltd. He is limited to a maximum expenditure of Rs.32,500 only for this capital budgeting period.
IRR
NPV
PI
Rs. 5,000 37% Rs. 5,500 2.10 15,000 28 21,000 2.40 12,500 26 500 1.04 5,000 25 6,500 2.30 Projects C, F, and E have the three largest IRRs. The resulting increase in shareholder wealth is Rs.27,000 with a Rs.32,500 outlay.
IRR
28% 19 25
NPV
PI
Summary of Comparison
Method Projects Accepted Value Added PI F, B, C, and D Rs.38,000 NPV F and G Rs.28,500 IRR C, F, and E Rs.27,000
PI generates the greatest increase in shareholder wealth when a limited capital budget exists for a single period.
A. Scale Differences
Compare a small (S) and a large (L) project.
END OF YEAR 0 1 2
Scale Differences
Calculate the PBP, IRR, NPV@10%, and PI@10%. Which project is preferred? Why?
Project IRR NPV PI
S L
100% 25%
3.31 1.29
Rs.198 Rs.198
X Y
50% 100%
2.54 1.82