Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Power
Washington Department of Ecology Nuclear Waste Program April 1, 2003
Contamination Removal
Case 1: Contamination Removed
Existing Risk
R i s k
Time
Underlies both unrestricted use for contaminated sites and deep geologic disposal for hotter nuclear waste
R i s k
Time
Institutional controls
Access restrictions Use restrictions
E.g. deed restrictions, zoning, covenants, easements, drilling and digging prohibitions
Attenuation
Rely on physical/chemical processes
E.g. radioactive decay, chemical oxidation Depends on adequate characterization and understanding of processes
Controls + Attenuation
Case 3: Controls until risk attenuates naturally
Existing Risk
R i s k
Time
R i s k
Time
Physical Barriers
Limited evidence on long-term performance Regulations assume limited life (e.g. 30 years in RCRA) Note: Our civilization uses barriers to keep people out of bad things; ancient civilizations used them to keep people out of treasure troves
Institutional Controls
Again, limited information on long-term performance But the picture isnt good. Zoning, deed restrictions (cf. Love Canal) are ephemeral Courthouses burn down. National Research Council Committee: ICs will fail.
. . .and. . .
Redundancy, redundancy, redundancy
Information stashes Accountable parties Interested parties
. . . Or . . .
Deep geologic isolation
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (New Mexico) for transuranic wastes Yucca Mountain geologic repository
Uncertainties Remain
But shift from concrete to calculational Numerical results of analyses extending to geological times, if presented without sufficient discussion of their significance, lead understandably to accusations of overoptimism, hubris, or even irrationality.
Relative Contribution of Waste Isolation Barriers
Percent of Capability 100% Yucca Mountain Repository
1999 DOE Data
99.7%
80%
Waste Package
60%
40%
20%
Spent Fuel Cladding Yucca Mountain Overburden Yucca Mountain Geology
0%
0.2%
0.09%
Barrier Type
0.008%