Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
=
=
1
Total number of items in the sample
Item number
Mean of the sample
=
=
=
n
i
X
m
X
X
m
j
j
=
=
1
Total number of samples
Sample number
The average of the means of the samples
=
=
=
m
j
X
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S633
Constructing R Charts
R Chart
A chart that tracks the change in the variability
by plotting the range within each sample. The
range is the difference between the lowest and
highest values in that sample.
m
R
R
m
j
j
=
=
1
Total number of samples
Difference between the highest
and lowest values in sample j
Average of the measurement
differences R for all samples
=
=
=
m
R
j
R
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S634
Exhibit S6.17
Note: All factors based on the normal distribution.
Source: E. L. Grant, Statistical Quality Control, 6th ed. (New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1988). Reprinted by permission of McGraw-Hill, Inc..
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S635
Exhibit S6.18
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S636
Exhibit S6.19
Chart R
and Chart X
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S637
A Framework for Applying Different
Quality Control Tools
Exhibit S6.20
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S638
Six Sigma
Process Capability
A comparison of control chart limits to design
specification limits to determine if the process
itself is (or is not) capable of making products
within design specification (or tolerance) limits.
Process capability ratio
C
p
=
Upper tolerance
limit
-
Lower tolerance
limit
6s
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S639
Six Sigma
Capability Index
A calculation to determine how well the process
is performing relative to the target dimensions:
is the process closer to the upper specification
limit (USL) or the lower specification limit (LSL).
Capability Index
(
=
s
X USL
s
LSL X
C
pk
3
,
3
min
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S640
Reducing Process Variance So that All Parts
Are within Specification (Tolerance)*
Exhibit S6.21a
*Tolerance: The range within which all individual measurements of units produced is desired to fall.
Source: Robert W. Hall, Attaining Manufacturing Excellence: Just-in-Time Manufacturing, Total Quality, Total People
Involvement (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1987), p. 66. By permission of The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S641
Reducing Process Variance So that All Parts
Are within Specification (Tolerance)* (contd)
Exhibit S6.21b
*Tolerance: The range within which all individual measurements of units produced is desired to fall.
Source: Robert W. Hall, Attaining Manufacturing Excellence: Just-in-Time Manufacturing, Total Quality, Total People
Involvement (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1987), p. 66. By permission of The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S642
The Goal of Six Sigma
Exhibit S6.22
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S643
Impact of 1.5o Shift on 3o Process
Exhibit S6.23a
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S644
Impact of 1.5o Shift on 6o Process
Exhibit S6.23b
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S645
Defect Rates for Different Levels of
Sigma (o) Assuming a 1.5 Shift in
Actual Mean from Design Mean
Exhibit S6.24
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S646
Taguchi Methods
Taguchi Methods
Used for identifying the cause(s) of process
variation that reduces the number of tests that
are necessary.
Use to conduct experiments to determine the
best combinations of product and process
variables to make a product at the lowest cost
with the highest uniformity.
Quality loss function
Relates the cost of quality directly to variation in a
process.
Any deviation from target quality is a loss to society.
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S647
A Traditional View of the Cost of Variability
Exhibit S6.25
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S648
Taguchis View of the Cost of Variability
Exhibit S6.26
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S649
Exhibit CS6.1
Why Customers Has to Wait
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S650
Exhibit CS6.2
Cause and Effect Diagram
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S651
Exhibit CS6.3A
Causes of Callers Waits
ChecklistDesigned to identify the problems
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S652
Exhibit CS6.3B
Causes of Callers Waits (contd)
Reasons Why Callers Had to Wait
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S653
Exhibit CS6.3C
Causes of Callers Waits (contd)
Reasons Why Callers Had to Wait
(Pareto Diagram)
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S654
Exhibit CS6.4A
Effects of QC
A. Effects of QC (Comparison Before and After QC)
Total number Daily average
Reasons why callers had to wait Before After Before After
A One operator (partner out of the office) 172 15 14.3 1.2
B Receiving party not present 73 17 6.1 1.4
C No one present in the section receiving the call 61 20 5.1 1.7
D Section and name of receiving party not given 19 4 1.6 0.3
E Inquiry about branch office Locations 16 3 1.3 0.2
F Others 10 0 0.8 0
Total 351 59 29.2 4.8
Period: 12 days from Aug. 17 to 30.
Problems are classified according to cause and presented in order of the amount of time
consumed. The are illustrated in a bar graph. 100% indicates the total number of time-
consuming calls.
Fundamentals of Operations Management 4e The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 S655
Exhibit CS6.4b
Effects of QC (contd)