Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Trace
CS
US
Explicitly Unpaired
CS
minutes
US
CS
Delay
CS
US
Is contiguity necessary?
Distinctive flavor
LiCl injection
Choice Test
?
vs
Is contiguity sufficient?
CS-US belongingness
Because A already predicts the US in the Blocking group, the US is not surprising during Phase 2 trials.
Salience effects
Overshadowing in compound conditioning, the more salient CS wins
Group Overshadow Control Treatment Ax+ x+ Test x cr CR
Correlated Group
Uncorrelated Group
CS
US
Correlated Group
Uncorrelated Group
CS
US
Correlated Group
Uncorrelated Group
CS US
P (US|CS) = 0.5 P(US|noCS) = 0.5
P(US | CS)
P(US | ~CS))
CR
.1
.2
P(US | noCS)
.4
CS preexposure
Group Experimental Control Phase 1 CS---Phase 2 CSUS CSUS Test CS cr CR
Second-order conditioning: Pairing a neutral stimulus with a CS confers associative strength upon the neutral stimulus
Conditioned Inhibition
X
A US A A US
X
A US X A US A A US A US A
Second-Order Conditioning
A+/AX- training. Look familiar? However, number of AX- trials is critical - Few AX- trials leads to SOC - Many AX- trials leads to conditioned inhibition
also, SOC typically produced in two phases. - A+ training followed by AX+ training.
Ph. 1 A+ B+
VA
1 1 1 0
Rescorla-Wagner Spreadsheet
Overshadowing (Pavlov)
Ax+, A-US association develops faster than X-US CSs have unequal learning rate parameters.
Overexpectation Effect
Group Experimental Control Ph. 1 A+/X+ A+/X+ Ph. 2 AX+ --Test X cr CR
CS US
UR
CS US
UR