Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 18

Political communicators and their strategies

Propaganda Public relations Political Marketing

Political communicators
Governments
Domestically and abroad

Political parties Interest groups Non-governmental organizations

Military
Terrorists

Autocratic regimes and communication


Absence of a public, public sphere, or public opinion Subjects are assumed to be immature and politically inept, in need of leadership and control
"..a wise prince should establish himself on that which is his own control and not in that of others; he must endeavour to avoid hatred, as is noted. [...] It is best to be both feared and loved; however, if one cannot be both it is better to be feared than loved. (Machiavelli, Il Principe, 1513)

No modern regime can be based on pure violence and control


Most of what formerly could be done by violence and intimidation must now be done by argument and persuasion. (Laswell, Theory of Public Propaganda, 1927)

Most autocratic regimes employ ideologies to facilitate control


And, according to Herman and Chomsky (Manufacturing Consent, 1988), so do democracies Ideological regimes are transformational and doctrinal, hence necessarily propagandist

Propaganda
Derived from from the Latin verb propagare
'to reproduce (a plant) by cuttings; spread for sprouting; propagate; enlarge'.

[1622] Congregatio de Propaganda Fide

(the congregation for propagating the faith). Established by Pope Gregory XV in order to centralize all of the Roman Catholic Church's missionary activity.

[1789] Increasingly secularized appropriation of the term during the French revolution [1842] political meaning overshadowing the religious, thereby already taking on a derogatory connotation:
"Derived from this celebrated society [for propagating the faith], the name propaganda is applied in modern political language as a term of reproach to secret associations for the spread of opinions and principles which are viewed by most governments with horror and aversion." (W.T. Brande, Dictionary of Science, Literature, and Art)

[1922] First separate entry in Encyclopedia Britannica

Laswells theory of political propaganda


Deliberation
search for the solution of a besetting problem with no desire to prejudice a particular solution in advance

Propaganda
the management of collective attitudes by the manipulation of significant symbols very much concerned about how a specific solution is to be evoked and put over

Propaganda objective: to organize attitudes


towards a person, a group, a policy, an institution, a mode of personal participation

Function of propaganda in modern life


Attributable to social disorganization in the advent of technological changes Most of what formerly could be done by violence and intimidation must now be done by argument and persuasion.

Propaganda techniques
Institute of propaganda analysis (1937)
Name-calling Glittering generality

Euphemisms
Transfer Testimonial

Plain folks
Bandwagon

Propaganda by the deed


Three Italian anarchists (Errico Malatesta, Carlo Cafiero and Emilio Covelli) conceived and developed the idea of Propaganda by Deed through a series of letters to each other between July and October 1876
By actions which compel general attention, the new idea seeps into peoples minds and wins converts. One such act may, in a few days, make more propaganda than thousand pamphlets. Above all, it awakens the spirit of revolt. . . (Kropotkin, Russian Anarchist)

Terrorism is symbolic violence


Violence aims at behaviour modification by coercion. Propaganda aims at the same by persuasion. Terrorism can be seen as a combination of the two. Terrorism, by using violence against one victim, seeks to coerce and persuade others. The immediate victim is merely instrumental, the skin on a drum beaten to achieve a calculated impact on a wider audience. (Schmid, Frameworks for Conceptualizing Terrorism, 2004) The success of a terrorist operation depends almost entirely on the amount of publicity it receives (Walter Laqueur, Terrorism, 1977)

Public relations
the management of communication between an organization and its publics (Grunig & Hunt, Managing Public Relations, 1984)
using communication to adapt relationships between organizations and their publics (Botan, International public relations, 1992) historically, most PR has been weak propaganda (Moloney, Rethinking PR: The Spin and the Substance, 2000)

Two myths of PR
Edward Bernays myth that public opinion could be manufactured for a price, bought and sold like any other commodity Asymmetrical/functional approach Ivy Lees myth that PR is natural, honorable and honest - part of the "two-way street" process of democratic communications between businesses and their "publics" Symmetrical/ co-creational approach

Quotes
We always tell our clients that honesty is the best policy. [] All our work is done in the open. We aim to supply news. . . . Our plan is, frankly and openly, on behalf of business concerns and public institutions, to supply the press and the public of the United States prompt and accurate information concerning subjects which it is of value and interest to the public to know about. (Ivy Lee, Statement of Principles, 1906)

If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind [it would be possible to] control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it. . . . Theory and practice have combined with sufficient success to permit us to know that in certain cases we can effect some change in public opinion with a fair degree of accuracy by operating a certain mechanism, just as the motorist can regulate the speed of his car by manipulating the flow of gasoline. (Edward Bernays, Propaganda, 1928)

Public relations practice


Applications
Crisis management Reputation management Issue management Investor relations and labour relations Grassroots PR (astroturf PR)

Tools
Press conference Press releases Publicity events (stunts) The circuit Sponsorship

Objectives
Credibility Publicity

Political marketing
Empirical phenomenon
Social change Electoral change Increasing importance of campaigns Professionalization of campaigns

Research paradigm
Market models of politics Expansion of marketing to non-commercial applications Marketing model of party behaviour

Social and electoral change


Social change
Decreasing identifiability and relevance of social class Increasing social mobility Increased education Decreasing relevance of ideology Emergence of new issues/cleavages (Inglehart)

Electoral change
Dealignment Increasing electoral volatility Decreasing explanatory power of variables like age, gender, class Decreasing importance of projection/issue alignment Issue voting; pocketbook voting; retrospective voting

Increasing importance of campaigns


Campaigns are no longer predominantly about mobilizing support
With decreasing base support, voters need to be attracted through campaigning

Campaign context impacts on economic, issue, leadership evaluations


More floating voters to compete over

Increasing importance of mass media


new findings challenging the minimal effects model providing campaigners with reasons to trust in effectiveness of electioneering

Professionalization of campaigns
Exponential increases in campaign spending
Use of consultants, pollsters, commercial advertisers Increasing influence of campaign consultants on policy content of manifestos Policy convergence need for distinguishing from competitors Market research (focus groups, private polling, direct-marketing, database-marketing) Changing media focus, from coverage of issues, coverage of leadership, image and the race, to coverage of strategy, partymedia interaction, and the role of spin

Market models of politics


Schumpeter
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1947) Elitist model of democracy Function of voting: to restrain elites, not to manifest common will

Downs
An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957) Rational choice model of voting Assuming material self-interest as primary motivation of elites and voters Median voter theorem: party platforms will converge, to accommodate voter preferences

Wellhofer
Contradictions in Market Models of Politics: the Case of Party Strategies and Voter Linkages', European Journal of Political Research 1990 Vote production vs. Vote maximization

Marketing model of party behaviour


Three-stage development of modern business practice applied to evolution of organizational behaviour of political parties
Parties may simply stand for what they believe in, or focus on persuading voters to agree with them, or change their behaviour to follow voters opinions (Jennifer Lees-Marshment, 2001: p. 701)

Product-oriented party Sales-oriented party Market-oriented party

Product-oriented party
Ideological Representing/leading social movement Unresponsive to social change Electoral success not an objective in itself Electoral goal: vote production/supporter mobilization

Sales-oriented party
Ideological Intra-organizational choice of policies, leadership Using market research, advertising, communication techniques to sell itself, its policies Electoral goal: persuasion

Market-oriented party
Using market intelligence to identify voter demands Assessing deliverability of demanded policies Assessing intra-party acceptability of policy changes Designing product (party manifesto, leadership selection, etc) accordingly Electoral goal: adapting to the market

Reconciling reputation with theory


Reputation
Political marketing considered to be manipulative (spin doctors), dishonest, close to propaganda, placing style over substance

Effect
Political marketing practice appears to turn people off (decreasing turnout in US since 1970s, collapse of turnout under New Labour since 1997) Public demand for politicians of conviction (but consider the paradox of Margaret Thatcher the pioneer of political marketing in UK, nonetheless understood as principled and ideological)

Theory
Positivistic, presenting political marketing as potentially regenerative force for democracies (by basing policy on public preferences)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi