Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
OBJECTIVE
UNDERSTAND GENDER, GENDER RELATIONS UNDERSTAND GENDER MAINSTREAMING OBSTACLES TO GENDER MAINSTREAMING (SOCIALLY) OBSTACLES IN MAKING AN ORGANISATION GENDER FRIENDLY ESSENTIAL FEATURES TO MAKE ORG. GENDER FRIENDLY SEXUAL HARASSMENT, REF 4/2004 SUGGESTED REMEDIES
The dictionary meaning of gender is the class in which a noun or pronoun is placed in grammatical grouping {in English, these are masculine, feminine, neuter}
AIM
The aim of gender sensitization to make people aware of the power relations between men and women in society and to understand the importance of affording women and men equally opportunities and treatment.
Mainstreaming of Gender
It is the process of assessing the implication for women and men of any planned a chain, including legislation, policies or programmes, in all areas and all levels. Its a strategy for making womens as well as mens concern & experience an integral dimension of the design, implementation, monitoring & evaluation of polices so that equality is generated and inequality is not perpetuated.
4. Structural factors
Gender Stereotype
Mens Perceptions
Women suited for feminine functions Women same pay but do less work Women find it difficult to cope with police job Not enthusiastic or career minded Escort only female prisoners
Womens Perceptions
Can perform all functions Do equal work No problem Committed and challenged Can escort male prisoners also
there is discrimination
not give the same kind of job
No need to integrate
Superiros not selective in assigning jobs Should not be given duties on par with men Women need special training to bring Par with men
To be professional, to make a career, Great Lord, Help me when they say I should not be here. I work the long hours, face all the dangers and do the same Things that they do in law enforcement maters, Grant me the respect like the others, for I am one. Set aside for every other one, Lord, Being a policewoman is the ost challenging job I have ever done, Be with me on my daily run, as you are with us all,
Women do not have enough male allies in their organizations indeed the interviews reveal residual male fear and resentment of any attempts to change gender relations. However, women themselves may bear some responsibility for ghettoizing gender in organizations. As gender experts, we may create resistance by monopolizing gender issues, disempowering potential allies including men, or mystifying gender issues with jargon or heavily charged language.
We need to sell the idea of gender in our organizations (and with counterparts) via dialogue rather than antagonizing or mystifying. It is also important to emphasize the opportunities for change rather than concentrating only on finding and countering resistance.
What is the barrier between our words, our policies and theories and what we do? Are we afraid that reflecting on gender in our own organizations may be just too painful?
Some very general features that would seem essential to making any organization more gender sensitive and more gender equal are as follows: Gender equality should be a priority not only in the organizations mission statement, general objectives, and policies, but also in its internal regulations (recruitment procedures, terms and conditions for workers, etc.)
Adequate resources should be devoted to putting such policies into practice. Accountability to women should be written into the organizations policies and carried out in its practice. There should be greater parity in numbers and distribution of staff, more importantly, women on the staff and especially in management must be committed to gender equality. This means not feminine management, but feminist management, understood as management (by both sexes) that is committed to womens empowerment.
Since some degree of hierarchy is inevitable in any but very small organizations, this should be offset by a style of management
stimulating colleagues.
vertical
listening.
as
possible:
open,
consultative,
The organization should offer non-genderstereotyped roles and choices for both men and women.
There should be space for, and encouragement of, bottom-up initiatives and informal, horizontal for ideas and dialogue.
There should be scope for different organizational styles and cultures to coexist and be valued and for men and women together to explore and utilize difference without disempowering either side. Management should give unequivocal support to gender teams and staff members with specific responsibility for gender issues. Decision-making access for women should be built into the organizations structures, not dependent on informal agreements or arrangements, so that womens access to decision-making does not depend on the personalities and efforts of individuals.
The
organization should be one in which not only women, but everyone feels happy; one in which most peoples best qualities are stimulated and recognized.
MYTH- 01
Sexual harassment is rare.
FACT - 1
Sexual harassment is rampant extremely widespread. It touches the lives of 40 to 60 percent of working women, and similar proportions of female students in colleges and universities.
MYTH - 2
If you ignore sexual harassment, it will stop.
FACT - 2
It will not. Generally, simply ignoring sexual harassment will not stop it. Ignoring such behavior may be taken as a sign of encouragement or tacit consent. Many reports, that when they directly tell the harasser to stop, the harassment often, but not always ends. Ignoring such conduct may even be perceived as complicity, condoling and encouragement of the act.
MYTH - 3
Women enjoy attention from the other sex and when they cant handle they complain of sexual harassment.
FACT - 3
a) b)
Display of Power on the part of perpetrator is the root cause of Sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is form of harassment-which is unwanted and unacceptable to the victim. A.P. survey (Women Police Officers) 86% of Sexual harassment are true. Infact most cases of Sexual Harassment go unreported as 48.2 % - embarrassed Fear of being blamed.
MYTH-4
Many women make up and report stories of sexual harassment to get back at their employers or others who have angered them.
FACT-4
Research shows that less than one percent of the complaints are false. Women rarely file complaints even when they are justified in doing so.
MYTH-5
Only those women object who have no sense of humour.
FACT-5
Sexual harassment is offensive, frightening and insulting to women. It has an adverse effect on their mental and physical health.
Culture of silence
Women usually keep quiet out of fear, to protect the family honor , for childrens sake or she thinks she is at fault. Many women think it is all normal and inevitable. It is a womans lot and there is seemingly little she can do to escape her lot.
U.N Declaration
UN declaration, 1993, on elimination of violence against women defines violence as : Any gender based violence that results or is likely to result in physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women. Includes threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or private.
A form of gender violence which is now defined is sexual harassment, Before sexual harassment was given a name women just called it life. Lyn Farleys 1978 book, Sexual Shakedown, introduced the term. Further reinforced when in 1979, Catherine MacKinnon published, The sexual harassment of
Key legislation and broad feminist theorizing about gender relations and politics have helped to define and popularize the concept.
Government Offices
Employees Superiors, colleagues and union employees
Modelling
Models -
here).
On the Streets
PedestriansLorry drivers, bus Women drivers- drivers,car drivers, (two and four scooterist,s motor
wheelers)
cyclists, cyclists,
Publishers
NGO Offices
Employees Directors and other employees
International Debates
Sexual harassment as a criminal offence was recognized by the courts in USA only in 1980s. In 1980 , The Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, issued guidelines. In countries where sexual harassment is seen as a general phenomena, the legal remedy is situated in the frame work of the criminal laws. In other countries where it is seen as a work place phenomena, Civil and labor law frame works are applied. Internationally it is covered by four types of laws, Criminal, Civil( anti discrimination), Labor and Tort Law ( non Contractual judgments made on grounds of mental anguish, negligence).
In 1986, a landmark Judgment in the USA in Vinson Vs. Meritor Savings Bank case ruled that sexual harassment is a violation of an individuals right to equal employment opportunities and further defined the employer as liable for sexual harassment claims.
Sexual Objectification of an individual through sexual relations not intended: This includes not only work situations but also harassment in public or social situations, for example on the roads, in buses , negative comments. Hostile and anti women environment: Pornography in public places, use of foul language. This may not be directed against any particular woman but the effect is of discomfort.
Loss of Job- a woman may quit or protest and quit. Psychological rape- nervousness, loss of self esteem and confidence, humiliation, guilt feeling, that they are the cause. Restriction on womens mobility; late night shifts, public transport. Victim turned into wrong doer; slander on her morals and character.
She is saying No but she means a yes. It is normal male flirting- natural for men. It is an assertion of power rather than expression of sexuality. Women enjoy sexual harassment or eve teasing- it is humiliating and degrading. Women ask for it- revealing clothes, single or divorced.
It is harmless and women who object have no sense of humor women seen as evestemptress, belittling women. It is a personal problem between two individuals- it is a pervasive public problem needing public solutions. Women use sex to get ahead- women misuse claims of sexual harassment. Prostitutes cannot be sexual harassed- regularly by Police, middlemen and clients.
A Survey
A survey was conducted in Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Bangalore by Week between March 22nd to 25th , 2009. More than half these women were in the public sector. 43% were in the 21-30 age bracket. 75% were married.
No openion No form of sexual harresment occures in my office showing sexually explict pictures, pornography Demanding sexual favour Sending sexually suggestive messages Physical contact Winking,staring Sexually coloured Remarks, Vulgar jokes Constant comments on appearance/ dress
39 37 3 5 6 10 11 14 15
Does the office have a clear policy to handle cases of sexual harassment ?
46
33 21
Yes
No
Dont Know
Working women must be ready to face some sexual harassment May be harrsed by other men Dont know how to lodge a comaint
8 13 19 24
28
Fear of loosing job
36
The women may be blamed
41
Social Embarresment
23
None of the above
Physical contact Demand for sexual favoures Pronography Suggestive messages sexually coloured remarks Constant comments on appearance/dress Winking/Staring None of the above
39 35 26 23 21 18 13 27
Yes
No
Dont Know
No Opinion
64
Less than 70% of the compalints are true ,
32
Ammendments to laws on sexual violence in the last two decades have failed to cover sexual harassment. Section 209, IPC- Obscene acts and songs- punished by imprisonment of 3 months or fine or both. Section 354, IPC-Assault or criminal force to a woman with the intent to outrage her modesty- punishment 2 years or fine or both. Section 509, IPC-word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of women- 1year or fine or both. Industrial Disputes Act , Rule 5, Schedule 5, Unfair labor practices. Civil suit under Tort laws.
N.Radha bai vs. D.Ramchandran: In 1973, Radhabai, secretary to then State Social Welfare Minister, protested against his abuse of girls in welfare institutions. She was molested and dismissed. In 1975, Supreme Court passed a judgment in her favor with back pay and benefits. S.C Bhatia Prof in Dept. of Adult and Continuing Education, Delhi University finally dismissed in 1992. Rupen Deol Bajaj vs. KPS Gill, in 1988 at a dinner slapped her posterior. In 1998 won fined 2.5 lakhs in lieu of 3 months rigorous imprisonment under section 294 and 509.
Meaningful legislation
Dialogues on meaningful legislation has been located with in the sexual assault discourse. Draft Bill on sexual assault, 1993, by National commission for women. It views sexual harassment as an offence on the continuum sexual assault.
Research Centre, New Delhi, advocated treating sexual harassment as an offence separate from sexual assault. More as a violation to safe working conditions.
Landmark case that led to the Supreme Court laying down broad guidelines in August 1997 to be followed. A public interest litigation filed by several Womens organizations. Social worker under the Governments Womens Development Program in Bhateri village in Rajasthan faced Sexual harassment , in trying to prevent Child marriage.
Physical contact and advances Demand or request for sexual favors. Sexually colored remarks. Display of pornography. Any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.
It shall be the duty of the employer or other responsible persons in the work place or other institutions to deter the commission of acts of sexual harassment. It is the duty of the employer to provide the procedures for the resolution, settlement or prosecution of acts of sexual harassment by taking all steps required.
Preventive Steps
All employers or persons in charge of the workplace should take the following steps: Prohibition of sexual harassment should be notified, published and circulated in appropriate ways. The rules/regulations of conduct and discipline should include for prohibiting sexual harassment and appropriate penalities. In private employers case should be included in standing orders under Industrial Employment Acts, 1946. Provide appropriate work conditions in respect to work, leisure, health and hygiene.
Disciplinary Action
When such conduct amounts to misconduct in employment as defined by the relevant service rules, appropriate disciplinary action should be initiated by the employer in accordance with those rules.
MECHANISM TO PREVENT
S.O. 4/2004 As per S.O.4/2004 it includesp1- Physical contact & advances. 2- A demand or request for sexual favours 3- Sexually coloured remarks 4- Eve-teasing 5- Unsavoury remarks 6-Jokes causing or likely to cause awkardness or embarrassment
12- Forcible physical touch or molestation 13- Physical confinement against ones will and other act likely to violate ones privacy 14- Any other unwelcome physical, verbal, or non-verbal conduct of social nature
UNDERTAKING STEPS FOR DETERENCE TO ENSURE DIGNITY OF WOMEN ESTT OF GRIEVANCE & REMEDIAL SYSTEM ENSURE NOTIFICATION PUBLICATION & CIRCULATION IN APP WAYS TO PROVIDE CONDUCIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT TO PROVIDE SUPPORT IN CASE OF SH BY AN OUTSIDER
WOMEN COMMISSION
NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN STATE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN CENTRAL COMPLAINT COMMITTEE SECTOR COMPLAINT COMMITTEES WOMEN CELL AT POLICE STATION
LODGING OF WRITTEN COMPLAINT SUO MOTTO ACTION BY CC RULE 14 CCA(CCS) RECOMMENDATIONS PUNISHMENTS APPEAL
DURING VISIT/INSPECTIONS WILL REITERATE INST IN MEETING & SAINIK SAMMELANS. REVIEW THE COMPLAINTS RECEIVED. ENSURE PROPER WORKING ENVIRONMENT FOR WOMEN & ARE NOT DISCRIMINATED ON ANY POINT.
SUGGESTIONS
CHANGE IN RECTT POLICY SEXUAL HARASSMENT AWARENESS TRAINING SENSING MECHANISMS COMMITMENT FROM TOP PRACTICES CONSISTENT WITH POLICIES
CONCLUSION
equality together we can achieve the common goals of organization not merely with
On the
platform
of
legal
attitudinal changes.
changes
but
definitely
with
THANKS