Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By Anant Joshi
Objective: - To study and comparatively analyzes the performance of a Variable Refrigerant Flow based Unitary Air Conditioner with Constant Volume Air Conditioner using the field performance testing and simulation model.
Inverter AC Current
AC to DC conversion DC to 3 Phase DC Conversion
Reluctance DC Motor
Variable frequency controls the motor speed Swing compressor
Schematic view of the inverter principle (Source: Service Manual Daikin inverter pair)
4
Swing Compressor
5 Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjzJqzKx2V0
Construction details: 1. Wall: 4 Single Brick wall with cement plaster 2. Window: 2mm clear glass with window blinds 3. Roof: Fiber cement pitched roof with 300slope 4. Falls ceiling (floor to ceiling height 9)
Details of Equipment
Non VRF AC
MODEL DESCRIPTION CAPACITY EER STAR RATING MOISTURE REMOVAL AIR CIRCULATION Lt/H m3/min 17.5 UNIT TR KW/KW (Indoor/Outdoor) 1.5 3.4 5 STAR
5016 5016
VRF AC
DESCRIPTION UNIT MODEL FTKD50FVM inverter pair 5.2 (1.5-5.9) 1.600 (450-2,300) 3.25
Capacity Rated (Min.-Max.) Power consumption Rated (Min. -Max.) COP Rated
kW W W/W
M3/min (cfm)
16.8 (593)
5 sets, quiet and automatic 44/35/32 290x1050x238 12
OPERATING VOLTAGE
RUNNING CURRENT POWER INPUT
V
A W mm
230
6.8 1,530 290/1,050/238 12 595/785/300 38 45/35 15.88/6.35
dB (A) mm kg
dB (A)
mm
0CDB
47/44
735x825x300
GAS/LIQUID
CONNECTION METHOD MAX PIE LENGTH/HIGHT
Inch
5/8-1/4
FLARE
METER
30/15
30 20
SIMULATION MODEL
10
11
Cooling Capacity Ratio as a Function of Outdoor Drybulb and Indoor Wetbulb Temperature
12
14
15 Cooling Energy input Ratio as a Function of Outdoor Drybulb and Indoor Wetbulb Temperature
16
Cooling Load profile of Zone VRF and Zone Non VRF AC in February and March
17
18
19
Zone Avg Temp Profile of VRF and Non VRF AC throughout a Day
20
21
22
23
Daily Energy Saving of VRF AC with Mean, Max and Avg Outdoor Temperature
24
Daily Energy Consumption with Mean, Max and Minimum outdoor Temperature
25
26
27
28
CONCLUSIONS
VRF systems meet the zone set point without significant fluctuations in the zone temperature whereas in constant volume system fluctuations of 2 0C were observed. Energy savings up to 40% are measured in VRF system at moderate temperature conditions however at high temperature conditions VRF AC consume more power as compared to the constant volume AC. VRF AC only gives energy saving at part load conditions, therefore VRF technology must be used only where the AC runs most of the times at part load conditions. In VRF systems electric load only changes when heat load on the system changes and there is no cyclic fluctuation in electric load profile. Whereas in a constant volume system there is frequent variation in the electric demand load due to its ON OFF cycle operation.
29
30