Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The History of Education Has Been One Born Out of Struggle and Conflict
Sadovnik points out that actual classroom
practice has not changed-this interpretation may be open to debate Differences have arisen over
What is the purpose of schooling? Who is being served? What should be taught and how?
increasingly taken on roles once held by family and community Schooling and larger societal issues are linked and often cannot be separated There is no consensus on school reform issues
of the educational role of the family Even now we cannot agree on the purposes of and policies in education Education early on in the Colonial era was only for the upper class-they would be future rulers
strong connections to Puritan ideas and education-delude the devil through schooling Much memorization Secondary education was through tutors or private academies
slaves, usually churchrun Native Americans taught be missionaries Benjamin Franklin one of the first to advocate a more utilitarian education (progressive)
Colonial Era in CT
Before 1650 schools were voluntary and
church supported By 1650 CT Code-each town was to have a schoolmaster Funds raised by taxes-controversial (even to this day)
Colonial Era in CT
1795-Sold off a huge Beginning of civil
tract of land the Western Reserve in the Ohio Territory Instead of using funds for the ministry, the legislature set aside money for School Fund
education
rise of populist movement; A Jackson president Beginning of Industrial Revolution Rise of those calling for free and public education
Barnard
Mann believed in the
Horace Mann
Mann advocated for a state board of education and
became its first Secretary in 1837 Started states first normal school for teacher training Mann was advocating for free, public education.it would both provide good bases for citizenship and also provide equality of opportunity Schools can change society Education can foster social mobility
Henry Barnard
1838 proposed a state board of education and
became its secretary Emphasis on accountability Began a process of some uniformity across the state in curricula and methods albeit primitive 1840-1870-73% rise in CT population Towns given local authority-thought to be more efficient Parents continued to pay tuition 1854-local property tax instituted to help pay for education; his idea of a state tax did not fly
Barnard
An early progressive
authority in educational matters-supposed to be more efficient (school boards) Eventually his idea of a local property tax took hold Ideas on establishment of public high schools
19th century progressed; Education for women had been considered too stressful for them-began to change mid century African-Americans won the right to educate their own-establishment of separate schools
early on Gave rise to academies and schools for girls Miss Porters founded in 1834 Prudence Crandall founded an academy in Canterbury
resistance for enrolling a black young woman she opened an all black academy School had to close in 1834 after losing its legislative battle with the CT General Assembly Academies partly the model for public schools
in 1849 State Board of Education formed in 1865 220 men and women admitted. Opened in 1850 in New Britain By 1868 all public elementary schools were free By 1872 all high schools as well
were women fully integrated into the system with compulsory attendance
reform movements Second Industrial Revolution (late 1800searly 1900s) Rise of immigration to US from Eastern and Southern Europe John Dewey takes center stage
on education in a more deliberate and systematic way Schools can preserve and promote democratic principles John Dewey The emergence of the High School Continued rise in numbers of pupils attending school
During the Progressive Era the trend began toward compulsory school laws
By 1918 all states had such laws
1950s in CT
Sentiments that the state of the state
education was in crisis Still hopes that it would be the great equalizer Increase in immigration and baby boom
duty of life Model curricula-classical and modern languages, English, mathematics, history and science No talk of vocational education-all students taught the same
of Teaching-Carnegie Units around 1900 All sorts of reports came out with differing views on what should be taught What got adopted depended to a large degree on political and other power structures
goals of education
Education for whom? Purposes of education
Elementary and
educational opportunities, especially post high school-GI Bill Tensions between equity and excellence Sputnik 1962 a watershed
Secondary Education Act 1965-continually amended to this day Continued debate between liberal/progressives and conservatives over nature and purposes of schooling
60s was coupled with a rising awareness of educational inequities between classes and ethnicities/races Exponential rise of politicization of education due to stresses upon the system
Education 1954 Continued debate between progressives and traditionalists over aims and methods Contention over the means of equal access continues this day
excellence in education This, interestingly, at a time of conservatism in the U.S. presidential administration More and more we are seeing the federal government involved in education
Other Reform
Measures
School based management Teacher empowerment School choice
blacks and whites in education We are seeing the legacy of this today in magnet and charter schools
70% of financing from local support. There is a patchwork of funding sources: state, local, federal and public borrowing.
in the mid 70s with the Horton vs. Meskill case, an attempt to equalize the funding across the state 1979-General Assembly developed the Guaranteed Tax Base formula The GTB is still an issue with changes in the legislation-stay tuned
Conclusion
More and more students have entered the system Increased demand for access and equality of
opportunity Continued conflict over goals and purposes of education We still have not as a nation resolved the sticky issues associated with social class and education Do we educate for a common, American culture or toward a more pluralistic view of culture? Do we educate toward excellence or toward inclusion of all with a view toward equity?