Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Coulombs Law:
A Laboratory Upper Limit on the
Photon Rest Mass
E.R. Williams, J. E. Faller and H.A. Hill (1971)
Abstract
A high-frequency test of Coulombs law is
described.
The sensitivity of the experiment is given in
terms of a finite photon rest mass, using the
Proca equations.
The null result of our measurement expressed
in the form of the photon rest mass squared is
2 19 2
10 ) 2 . 1 04 . 1 (
= cm
Abstract
Expressed as a deviation from Coulombs
law of the form , our experiment
gives . This result
extends the validity of Coulombs law by
two orders of magnitude.
q
r
+ 2
1
16
10 ) 1 . 3 7 . 2 (
= q
Coulomb, Charles (1736-
1806)
French physicist who performed
experiments with a torsion balance.
His investigations led him to suggest
that there were two "fluids" of
electricity and magnetism.
He showed both forces were inverse
square, and stated that they were
unconnected separate phenomena.
The inverse square of electricity has
come to be known as Coulomb's law.
Historical review
Using a Torsion
balance Coulomb
demonstrated directly
that two like charges
repel each other with a
force varies inversely
as the square distance
between them.
Robinson, John (ca. 1725-?)
English doctor who, in 1769, measured
electrical repulsion went as r
-2.06
and
attraction as r
-c
where c < 2. From these
results he surmised r
-2
was correct. This
determination was made before Coulomb
proposed just this result, now know as
Coulomb's law.
A deviation from Coulombs
law?
A photon with a finite rest mass will cause a
deviation, according to Proca equations.
A deviation from the Euclidian space can
cause a deviation from the r square law.
This effect will be neglected when calculating a
deviation due to the existence of a photon rest
mass which varies from zero.
Historical review
Cavendish (1773) noted that if the force
between charges obeys the inverse square
law there should be no electric forces (I.e.
electric fields) inside a hollow charge free
cavity inside a conductor.
Maxwell has found that the exponent of r in
Coulombs law could differ from two by
less than 1/21600.
Historical review
Plimpton and Lawton (1936) charged an
outer sphere with a lowly varying
alternating current and detected the
potential difference between the inner and
outer spheres. They reduced Maxwells
limit to 2x10
-9
.
Bartlett Goldhagen & Phillips (1970)
achieved an upper limit of 1.3x10
-13
.
Bartlett Goldhagen & Phillips (1970)
Using five concentric
spheres, and applying
a potential difference
of 40 KV at 2500Hz
between the outer
spheres.
The potential
difference between the
inner two spheres was
read using a Lock-in
detector.
Theory- Proca equations
In conventional electrodynamics the mass
of the photon is assumed to vanish.
However, a finite photon mass may be
accommodated in a unique way by
changing the inhomogeneous Maxwell
equations to the Proca equations.
Let us explain the basic concepts which lead
to these equations
Some topics in Quantum
Electrodynamics
The description of the interaction between the
electromagnetic field and the electron-positron
field constitutes the main problem of QED.
We will look on a combination of Maxwell
equations with the Dirac form of the current
(comes from the solution of Dirac equation).
The high-energy experiments test QED in a situation where the
four-momentum transfer characteristic of the experiment, is as
large as possible. The verdict, as far as the high-energy tests
are concerned, is that the Maxwell equations with the Dirac
form of the current for the electron and Muon are correct.
The electromagnetic field
We can describe the electromagnetic field
by means of the equation of retarded
potentials A
=j
(=1,2,3,4)
A
is the potential of the electric field.
j
is the current describing the charged
particles
is the solution for Dirac equation for a
particle interacting with an electromagnetic
field.
is related to the Dirac operators.
ie j =
\
|
=
h
c m
0
0
) ( =
}
= + - V 0 ] 4 [
3
0
2
x d e V E
t ie
t
Developing the necessary equations
Therefore E(r) is given by
(3)
Where q is the total charge on the inner shell.
A complete solution of the fields inside a
symmetrically charged single sphere will give,
after neglecting second order terms in the
electrical filed , equation (3) and H=0.
r r e V qr r E
t i
)
3
1
( ) (
0
2 2 e
=
Approaching the final equation
Since inside,
The voltage appearing across the inductor is
then simply given by
(4)
0 =
c
c
t
H
0 = -
}
l d E
) (
6
2
1
2
2
0
2
2
1
R R
e V
C
q
l d E
t i
R
R
= -
}
e
t
2
4 = - V E
|
.
|
\
|
=
h
c m
0
notes
Analyzing the signal to noise
ratio of the system (conventional
circuit theory) results that the use
of
High frequency
High Q circuits
Large apparatus
High V
0
Will serve to maximize the
experimental sensitivity.
Experimental Setup
Charging a conducting shell
(1.5m in diameter-Large) with
10KVolts peak to peak with
a 4Mhz Sinusoidal voltage.
Fiber optics
We would like to transmit data, to and from the
inner sphere.
We cannot use Electrical wires since they will
efffect the measurment.
So we use Fiber Optics, through a hole in the
sphere.
In order to prevent penatration of Outer fields
through the hole, we use the fiber as a Waveguide.
The waveguide diameter must be smaller than the
cutoff frequency.
m fiber
m v c
6
6 8
10 * 5 . 1 ) (
75 10 * 4 / 10 * 3 /
=
= = =
Noise
stray electric and magnetic fields
Noise - Solution
Adding 3 shells in order
to prevent stray electric
and magnetic fields
inside the sphere.
Another Noise
Johnson effect =
gives noise of
f T K
b
A
V
12
10
Results
The experimental
result is statistically
consistent with the
assumption that the
photon rest mass is
identically zero.
How does the experiment fit in
references
E. R. Williams, J. E. Faller, H. A. Hill.
Phys. Rev. Let. 26 721 (1971)
Metrology and Fundamental Constants
(oxford 1980)
D. F. Bartlett, P. E. Goldhagen, E. H.
Phillips. Phys. Rev. D2 483 (1970)
Alfred S. Goldhaber, Michael Martin Nieto.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 567 (1968)
S.J. Plimpton, W. E. Lawton. Phys. Rev. 50
1066 (1936)
Varying Internet sites