Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FOR A
GEOCHEMICAL STUDY
1
Fig.1
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Example
3
Fig.3
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Oils characterization
Data set
4
Fig.4
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
5
Fig.5
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
GC-MS
3D PETROLEUM analysis
SYSTEM MODELLING
1712.3 m (PT2067)
Abundance
1790.5 m (TS11214)
Abundance
TIC: 7955HCS.D
2000000
TIC: 7957HCS.D
1800000
1800000
1600000
1600000
1400000
1400000
1200000
1200000
1000000
1000000
800000
800000
600000
600000
400000
400000
200000
200000
10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
Time--> 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
Abundance Abundance
Time-->
Ion 191.20 (190.90 to 191.90): 7955HCS.D Ion 191.20 (190.90 to 191.90): 7954HCS.D
190000 95000
180000 90000
170000 85000
160000 80000
150000 75000
140000 70000
130000 65000
120000 60000
110000 55000
100000 50000
90000 45000
80000 40000
70000 35000
60000 30000
50000 25000
40000 20000
30000 15000
20000 10000
10000 5000
0 0
25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
1773.5 m (PT1183)
Time--> Time-->
1856.6 m (TS10910)
Abundance Abundance
10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
Time-->
Abundance Time-->
Abundance
90000 80000
85000 75000
80000 70000
75000
65000
70000
60000
65000
55000
60000
50000
55000
45000
50000
45000 40000
6
40000 35000
35000 30000
30000
25000
25000
20000
20000
15000
15000
Fig.6
10000
10000
5000
5000
0 0
25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
Time--> Time-->
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Oils Isotopic Characterization
-24,00
-25,00
Carbon Isotopic Ratio (Sat. v s. Aro.)
-26,00
-27,00
δ C ARO.
-28,00 1773,50
1865,60
-27,00
13
1712,30
-29,00
1790,50
Carbon Isotopic Ratios in Oil Fractions Legend:
-30,00
-27,50 1 = Saturates
2= Aromatics
AROM. 3= NSO
-31,00
-28,00 4= Asphaltenes
ASPH
δ C
-32,00
13
SAT.
-32,00 -31,00 -30,00 -29,00 -28,00 -27,00 -26,00 -25,00 -24,00
-28,50
13
δ C SAT
-29,00 NSO
1773,50
-29,50 1712,30
1865,60
1790,50
-30,00
1 2 3 4
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
GC-MS and Isotopic analyses
Conclusions
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
GC-Fingerprint analysis
A/B
3.5
o/p C/D
3
* * * * * H I E R A R C H I C A L C L U S T E R A N A L Y S I S * * * * * *
k/l 2.5 G/H
2
Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups)
1.5
Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine i/j I/J
1
1712.3
C A S E 0 5 10 15 20 25 0.5 1773.5 QC
Label Num +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ 1773.5
0
1790.5 QC
g/h K/L 1790.5
1773.5 QC 2
1865.6
1773.5 3
1712.3 1
1790.5 QC 4 a/b M/N
1790.5 5
1865.6 6
Y/Z Q/R
U/V S/T
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
10
Fig.
10
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
11
Fig.
11
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
Light Hydrocarbons
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Supermature
q/t (2,2-DMP+3,3-DMP/3-EP+2,3-DMP+2,4-DMP)
0.1000
40.0000
Heptane value
Aliphatic curve
0.0900
1773.5 m QC
30.0000
Mature 1773.5 m
1712.3 m
1865.6 m
0.0800
Normal 1790.5 m1773.5
1773.5
QC m
1712.3m
mQC
Aromatic curve
20.0000
Biodegraded 0.0700
10.0000
0.0600
0.0000 0.0500
0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000 2.5000 3.0000 3.5000 4.0000 4.5000 5.0000 105.0 107.0 109.0 111.0 113.0 115.0 117.0 119.0 121.0 123.0 125.0
Isoheptane value Ctemp (2,4/2,3-DMP)
1790.5 m
90000 1790.5 m
1790.5 m QC
1790.5 m QC 1773.5 m
80000 200000
1773.5 m 1865.6 m
1865.6 m
70000
1773.5 m QC
1773.5 m QC
1712.3 m
60000 150000
1712.3 m
P3
50000
40000
P2 100000
30000
12
20000
50000
10000
0
0
0 50000 100000 150000
P2+N2
200000 250000 300000 350000
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 Fig.
0.9 0.95 1
N2/P3
12
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Light Hydrocarbons
- there are two groups of oils whose are different for both
maturity and “kitchen” of the source rock;
13
Fig.
13
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
14
Fig.
14
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
GC-MS-MS of saturates
Taking into account the age of the possible sources as well the
stratigraphic sequence of the study area, some specific age-
related biomarkers were investigated. In particular, because
Triaromatic Dinosteroids were proved to be absent in samples
coming from Permian sources while they were found in
hydrocarbons extracted from sources younger than Permian
and older than Carboniferous, particular attention was focused
in searching for these compounds.
15
Fig.
15
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
GC-MS-MS of saturates
2a & 3b-Methyl-24-EthylSteranes
4a-Methyl-24-EthylSteranes
DINOSTERANES
Devonian Oil
Studied Oil
16
Fig.
16
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
17
Fig.
17
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Oil characterization
Conclusions
A main oil family was recognized to be responsible for the four
studied oils.
Fig.
18
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Oil characterization
a) there is a single source rock in terms of age and organic matter
as suggested by biomarkers and isotopes, but physically
separated into two different kitchens (source dependent light
HC’s and Phenols), one more deep and more mature than the
other (maturity dependent Light HC’s);
b) there are two different source rocks, one younger and less
mature (mainly responsible for asphaltenes Tmax, isotopic and
biomarker data) and another one, older, deep seated and very
mature (depleted in biomarkers and asphaltenes). This second
source has generated a light oil which has mixed with the
former one modifying drastically its light HC’s fraction and
introducing all the elements of diversity discussed before.
Depending on the mixing between the two oils, it is also
possible to explain the differences in maturity between the
shallower and the deeper oils.
18
Fig.
19
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Oil characterization
20
Fig.
21
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
Source rock evaluation
UPPER
JURASSIC
Depth (m)
MIDDLE
JURASSIC
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
L. JURASSIC
TRIASSIC
ASSELIAN
ASSELIAN (Carb.)
2300 2300 2300 2300 2300
CARBONIFEROUS Indigenous Vitrinite
Vitrinite "B"
T.D. 2360 Serie1 Serie1 Serie1
Caved Vitrinite
Serie1
Oxidated Vitrinite
2500
21
2500 2500 2500 2500
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 400 420 440 460 480 500 0.1 0,55 1.0 1,35 10.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
(%) (kg HC/ton of rock) (mg HC/g TOC) (°C) (%)
LEGEND
(P= Poor F= Fair G= Good VG= Very Good ) ( III= Type III II= Type II I= Type I ) (IMM= Immature M= Mature VM= Very Mature) MARCH 2003
Fig.
22
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
S2 vs T.O.C. HI vs Tmax
100.0
Very Poor Poor Fair Good Very Good 1000
immature oil zone gas zone
Ro 0,5
Type I
Very Good
800
10.0
MATURITY PROFILE
Petroleum Potential (Kg Hc/Ton of Rock)
LOWER CRETACEOUS
4,
Good
600 MIDDLE JURASSIC QUATERNARY-
2,0 Type II LOWER JURASSIC Indigenous Vitrinite - TERTIARY
Fair
TRIASSIC
1.0 PERMIAN (ASSELIAN) Vitrinite "B"
Poor
PERMIAN (ASSELIAN Carbonates)
UPPER CRETACEOUS
0,5 CARBONIFEROUS Caved Vitrinite
400
Oxidated Vitrinite
500
Very Poor
LOWER CRETACEOUS
0.1
UPPER JURASSIC
MIDDLE JURASSIC Ro 1,35
200 ?
LOWER JURASSIC
Type III
LOWER CRETACEOUS
TRIASSIC
PERMIAN (ASSELIAN)
PERMIAN (ASSELIAN Carbonates) 1000
CARBONIFEROUS
Depth (m)
0.0
0
0.0 0.1 0,2 0,5 1.0 2,0 10.0 100.0
380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520
Total Organic Carbon (T.O.C. %)
HI vs OI Tmax (°C)
1000
Type I
UPPER
1500 JURASSIC
800
MIDDLE
JURASSIC
HYDROGEN INDEX (mgHC/g TOC)
Type II
600 2000
L. JURASSIC
LOWER CRETACEOUS
TRIASSIC
ASSELIAN
UPPER JURASSIC ASSELIAN (Carb.)
CARBONIFEROUS
MIDDLE JURASSIC
400
LOWER JURASSIC T.D. 2360
TRIASSIC
2500
PERMIAN (ASSELIAN)
0.1 0,55 1 1,35 2 10
PERMIAN (ASSELIAN Carbonates)
CARBONIFEROUS Ro%
200
22
Type III
0
0 100 200
23
Fig.
24
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP
3D PETROLEUM SYSTEM MODELLING
DIRECT OIL-SOURCE ROCK CORRELATION
Abundance
Abundance
TIC: 8137TQ.D
550000
TIC: 7956HCS.D
2000000
1800000
450000
1600000
Permian source
400000
1400000
350000
1200000
300000
1000000
250000
800000
200000
600000
150000
400000
100000
200000
50000
10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
Abundance
10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 Time-->
Time-->
Abundance Ion 191.20 (190.90 to 191.90): 7956HCS.D
13000 90000
12000
80000
11000
10000 70000
9000
60000
8000
7000 50000
6000
40000
5000
30000
4000
3000 20000
2000
10000
1000
0 0
35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00
Time-->
Abundance Abundance
Time-->
4000 20000
3000 15000
2000 10000
1000 5000
0 0
42.00 43.00 44.00 45.00 46.00 47.00 48.00 49.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 53.00 33.00 34.00 35.00 36.00 37.00 38.00 39.00 40.00 41.00 42.00 43.00
Time--> Time-->
Abundance Abundance
24
6000 30000
5000 25000
4000 20000
3000 15000
2000 10000
1000 5000
Fig.
0 0
42.00 43.00 44.00 45.00 46.00 47.00 48.00 49.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 53.00 33.00 34.00 35.00 36.00 37.00 38.00 39.00 40.00 41.00 42.00 43.00
Time--> Time-->
25
3D BASIN
Eni Corporate University – Eni E&PMODELLING
Division GROUP