Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
11x
Objectives
Discuss the basic differences between wireless LANs and wireless mobile systems. Discuss the evolution of the IEEE 802.11 standard and its extensions IEEE 802.11x. Discuss the fundamental differences between wired and wireless LANs. Explain the basic architecture of IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs. Discuss the services offered by the wireless LAN MAC sub-layer Discuss the MAC layer operations used to access and join a wireless network.
Objectives
Explain the basic details of WLAN FHSS and DSSS physical layers. Discuss the adoption of the higher-rate IEEE 802.11x standards and the technical details of IEEE 802.11b/a/g. Discuss the present status of wireless LAN security as embodied by IEEE 802.11i. Discuss the status of competing wireless LAN technologies. Discuss typical wireless LAN hardware and system deployment strategies.
ALOHA Net
Radio and network technology combined Computers at seven campus communicate with central computer at university of Hawaii Star topology Radio based LAN uses ISM band located between 920 GHz to 5.85 GHz
Layer 1: Overview
WLAN radio cards WLAN access points Ad hoc or peer-to-peer connection WLAN radio link The radio cards and the access points contain radio transceiver hardware that provides the radio link for the transmission of data back and forth between the two units.
Design issues
In a wired LAN, an IP address is equivalent to a physical location or a hardwired connection. In a WLAN, the addressable unit is known as a station (STA). Wired (point-to-point) connections yield highly predictable and reliable transmission of signals whereas wireless radio links are highly unreliable. WLAN radio link signals are not protected from outside EM interference. WLAN radio links experience time-varying multipath effects. This consequence of the use of wireless is sometimes referred to as the hidden station effect. IEEE 802.11 is required to handle both mobile and portable stations and deal with battery-powered equipment.
Logical architecture of the IEEE 802.11 standard Logical architecture of the IEEE 802.11 standard
Distribution
Every time a data message is sent either to or from a station that is part of an ESS. Consider the transfer of a data message from a station in one BSS to a station in another BSS where both BSSs are of an ESS network. The message from the originating station is transferred to the station/AP that connects' to the DS. The AP hands off the message to the DS. The DS delivers the message to the AP/station of the destination BSS and the data message is finally transferred to the destination station.
Primitives are having the following basic forms: request, confirm, indication, and response. Through the use of the, primitives, a layer may request another layer to perform a specific service, a layer may confirm the results of .i previous service primitive request, a layer may indicate the occurrence of a significant event, or a layer ma;, provide a response primitive to complete an action that was initiated by an indication primitive.
Each MAC frame consists of the following basic components: a MAC header, a variable length frame body, and a frame check sequence (FCS). The MAC header consists of several fields including frame control, duration, address, and sequence control information, The frame body contains information that is specific to the frame type. The FCS contains an IEEE 32-bit cyclic redundancy code (CRC). The four address fields in the MAC frame format are used to indicate the basic service set identifier (BSSID), destination address (DA), source address (SA), receiver address (RA), and transmitter address (TA) (although not all at the same time). Each address field is 48 bits in length The group address can be one of two types, either a multicast group or a broadcast group (i.e., all of the stations presently active in the wireless LAN). The BSSID field is used to uniquely identify each BSS. The sequence field consists of 16 bits that are composed of two subfields of 4 bits and 12 bits. The 12 bit field provides a sequence number for each MSDU and the 4-bit field provides a MSDU fragment number, if needed. The frame body field has a minimum length of 0 bytes and as shown in the figure can be as long as 2312 bytes.
802.11 MAC layer operations accessing and joining a wireless network Operational details Collision window backoff time Point coordination function Beacon frame operation
IEEE 802.11g
Details Bit rates: 54 to 6 Mbps ERP (Extended Rate Physical) layer operation DSSS-OFDM operation Successful successor of 802.11b, performance loss during mixed operation with IEEE 802.11b
WEP encryption block diagram The ICV is appended to the data and the resulting data stream is mathematically combined with the correct length key sequence. Finally, the IV is broadcast with the encrypted data as the composite message.
Figure shows the decryption process that occurs after reception of the transmitted data. The incoming PV is used to generate the required key sequence to decipher the incoming message. The integrity check algorithm is performed on the recovered data and the result is compared to the transmitted ICV. If the two values of ICV are not equal an error message is sent to MAC management.
WPA version 2 or WPA2 employing the IEEE 802.1 H standard are known as robust security networks (RSNs). WPA2 to an advanced form of encryption known as AES (advanced encryption standard) In an effort to prevent a reoccurrences the WEP security problems, the international cryptographic community played an active role in the development of the IEEE 802.11 i standard. AES is a block cipher that was chosen for its robustness. Present, it resists all known techniques of cryptanalysis
A HomeRF working group was formed in 1998 with a goal of providing an open industry specification to le known as SWAP for the purpose of wireless home networking between PCs and consumer electronic devices. SWAP (shared wireless access protocol) was to operate at 2.4 GHz, use FHSS, and provide data rates of 1 and 2 mbps. The early versions of HomeRF were incompatible with IEEE 802.11b. In 2002 the group moved toward the endorsement of IEEE 802.11a as the next generation of wireless LANs.
This is a fairly recent Japanese initiative that appears to have just as quickly faded away. Recall that IEEE 802.11j that has recently been adopted addresses the Japanese market. The IEEE 802. 11x standard has proven to be an impressive market leader and may soon prove to be the de facto worldwide standard for wireless LANs if that is not already the case.