Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CADASIL locus
Clinical and MRI features of an ischaemic SADB Autosomal dominant ischaemic SADB Highly specific EM marker: Granular Osmiophilic Material Linkage to chromosome 19p13, first molecular marker Gene identification and mutation spectrum establishment
Stroke1991/1993; Nat Genet 1993 Nature 1996; Lancet 1997
Gene
14
24
33
34 EGFR
LNR TM
ANK
PEST
Heterodimer
S1 S2 S3
Confirmation of this highly stereotyped nature of CADASIL mutations in large series of biopsy proven CADASIL patients
Dichgans group: 125 EM biopsy proven CADASIL patients / Mutation identified in 120 / in all cases mutations led to an odd number of cystein residues whatever the mechanism (missense, small in frame deletions taking a Cys residue)
Kalimos group: 131 EM biopsy proven CADASIL patients / Mutations identified in 131 / in all cases mutations led to an odd number of cystein residues whatever the mechanism (missense, duplication involving a cys residue)
All Mutations in CADASIL biopsy proven patients lead to an odd number of cystein residues within one of the EGF-like motifs
Joutel et al 1997: 69 % patients have a mutation en Exons 3 and 4 (EGF1-5) Peters et al 2005: 67,5 % in exons 3-4 (EGF1-5) Federico et al 2005 review: 62,5 % in exons 3-4 (EGF1-5)
1993-2003:
1993: linkage analysis possible only in large families and/or skin biopsy search for GOM
1996: gene identification / sequencing available but cost +++ / combination of exons 3-4 sequencing and EM skin biopsy study 2001: combination of exons 3-4 sequencing and skin biopsy immunostaining (Notch3 Ab)
2003-2013 NOTCH3 sequencing experience in Lariboisire Yield of screening for CADASIL mutations
2721 index patients referred Lacunar infarcts + leukoaraiosis Cognitive defects + leukoaraiosis Familial or sporadic
Identification of a CADASIL type mutation in a SADB patient Implications for the patient and his/her family
Importance of a diagnostic test to avoid mis-diagnosis in the index patient : 20 % of CADASIL patients were previously diagnosed as having multiple sclerosis and received inadequate treatments. Others were diagnosed as Alzheimers disease patients or psychiatric patients.
Importance to avoid mis diagnosis and /or long and costly investigations in the affected relatives of the index patient
2003-2013: 208 relatives (> 95 % of them being clinically affected) of the 361 index patients were referred for diagnostic and shown to be mutated
Importance to answer the questions of patients and families and genetic counseling
Genetic counseling
Answering questions of patients and family members Presymptomatic testing (PT): caution +++ screening an adult asymptomatic member for a CADASIL mutation requires important precautions Experienced multidisciplinary team (neurologist / geneticist / psychologist) and established multi-step procedure including follow-up after testing Lariboisire 2007-2010 experience in presymptomatic testing:
And in addition
76 index patients (2.8 %) Rare missense mutation which do not affect the number of cystein
Do patients with rare non cystein missense mutations have GOM ? A systematic survey
Sequencing of EGF 2-24 and no mutation leading to an odd number of cysteins Non cystein missense mutations absent from all databases (15 mutations) or with a frequency < 1/ 2000 (3 mutations) Skin biopsy: EM search for GOM
PATIENT
AA MUTATION
NT MUTATION*
Exon
Skin Biopsy
P1
P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P13
I658T
A564T G536V A40V R764H L925V P81R A1057V L295R A1342D W1028S D524N R1120Q
2051T>C
1768G>A 1685G>T 197CT 2378G>A 2851C>G 320G>C 3248C>T 962T>C 4103C>A 3161G>C 1648G>A 3737G>A
13 No
11 No 11 No 2 No 15 No 17 No 4 No 20 No 8 No 24 No 19 No 10 No 22 No
P14
P15 P16 P17 P18 P19
V560M
R767H R680H R61W G73R G73R
1756G>A
2378G>A 2117G>A 259C>T 295G>C 295G>C
11 No
15 No 13 No 3 No 3 Yes 3 Yes
2 out of 19 patients with rare non cystein mutations have GOM (10 %)
Both of these unrelated index patients have a G73R mutation
Skin
PATIENT P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P14 P15 P16 P17 P18 P19
AA MUTATION I658T A564T G536V A40V R764H L925V P81R A1057V L295R A1342D W1028S D524N R1120Q V560M R767H R680H R61W G73R G73R
NT MUTATION* 2051T>C 1768G>A 1685G>T 197CT 2378G>A 2851C>G 320G>C 3248C>T 962T>C 4103C>A 3161G>C 1648G>A 3737G>A 1756G>A 2378G>A 2117G>A 259C>T 295G>C 295G>C
2 patients without a mutation affecting the number of cystein residues (EGF 2-24 sequenced) These 2 patients have typical GOM and are therefore true CADASIL patients Is G73R causing CADASIL and if so, what is the mechanism ? Or have we missed the true CADASIL mutation ?
Is G73R causing CADASIL and if so, what is the mechanism ? Or have we missed the true CADASIL mutation ?
Three main hypotheses: 1- R73G leads per se, without a need for changing the number of cystein residues to CADASIL and GOM by a so far totally unknown mechanism (conformational change ? Interaction of this aa with a component of basal membrane ?) 2- R73G leads by a splicing effect to an abormally spliced NOTCH3 mRNA having an odd number of cystein residues 3- R73G mutation is in tight linkage disequilibrium with a true CADASIL mutation undetecble by exonic genomic sequencing ie a deep intronic mutation leading to abnormal splicing or a genomic deletion taking off an odd number of cystein. Strategy and preliminary results Sequencing of cDNA should provide the answer for hypotheses 2 and 3. Extraction of NOTCH3 mRNA from skin fibroblasts (P19) / sequencing of the NOTCH3 cDNA Search for deletions using copy number analysis for all exons encoding EGF motifs No deletion detected so far and no additional mutation in the cDNA but part of the cDNA has not yet been sequenced.
And in addition
76 index patients (2.8 %) Rare missense mutations which do not affect the number of cystein
Are NOTCH3 stop codons polymorphic or deleterious variants ? Phenotype(s) of NOTCH3 stop codon carriers ?
Three main hypotheses: 1 - NOTCH3 stop codons could be polymorphic, non deleterious variants (fortuitous discovery) 2 - NOTCH3 stop codons could be deleterious variants leading, at least for some of them, to abnormal splicing and an odd number of cystein residues and true CADASIL 3 - NOTCH3 stop codons could be deleterious variants causing haploinsufficiency of the notch3 receptor which would lead to a novel SVD phenotype, yet to be described. Strategy Skin biopsy should answer hypothesis n3 RT-qPCR quantification of NOTCH3 mRNA from skin fibroblasts or muscle should clarify the existence of an haploinsufficiency Once haploinsufficiency is established, a cosegregation analysis of the stop codon with the SVD phenotype is required to establish its causality
Patients and families 1996-2013: 12 unrelated index patients with stop codons 5 of these 12 patients have known SADB clinically affected relatives Strategy Skin biopsy EM study in 6 index + RT-qPCR in muscle from 2 index Clinical and MRI investigation of consenting relatives (national PHRC) Genotyping of all consenting adult relatives
No GOMs in the index patients RT-qPCR on mRNA extracted from muscle from 2 index patients: mutated RNA=5% of normal mRNA Notch3 haploinsufficiency
F2 index, 57 yo
F4 sister, 71 yo
F3 index, 55 yo
F5 index, 68 yo
F3 father, 72 yo
F6 index, 49 yo
F2 index, 51 yo
F2 index, 57 yo
F3 index, 49 yo
F3 index, 55 yo
F1 index, 60 yo
F1 index, 71 yo
Family 3 3 genotyped members aged > 45 yo and with an MRI - 2 affected and mutated - 1 unaffected and not mutated
Cosegregation of the phenotype with the genotype but need to screen additional relatives (on going) to firmly establish cosegregation
And
76 index patients (2.8 %) Rare missense mutations which do not affect the number of cystein
Next step What about the 84 % of SVD patients with no NOTCH3 mutation ?
Institutions: INSERM U740 / Univ Paris7, Genetics diagnostic facility, Lariboisire AP-HP hospital / Neurology dpt, Lariboisire AP-HP hospital / CERVCO
Support: INSERM, PHRC 2006-2009, Leducq Foundation 2007-2013, French National Plan for Rare Disease