CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

Lec 5 SPICE Modeling of MOSFET

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

SPICE Modeling of MOSFETS

Goals
Understand the element description for MOSFETs Understand the meaning and significance of the various parameters in SPICE model levels 1 through 3 for MOSFETs Understand the basic capacitance models Have a general notion of BSIM model parameters Become award of some newer models Understand the use and shortcomings of the models covered

Note: In the following, HSPICE = Star-HSPICE Rederences

Massobrio, G., and P. Antognetti, Semiconductor Device Modeling with SPICE, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1993. Foty, D., MOSFET Modeling with SPICE Principles and Practice, Prentice Hall PTR, 1997. StarHspice Manual, Avant! http://cmbsd.cm.nctu.edu.tw/~yumin/tutorial/hspice_qrg.pdf

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

The MOSFET Description Lines Model and Element

What does SPICE stand for?

Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis

The MOSFET Model and Element Description Lines

Process and circuit parameters which apply to a particular class of MOSFETS with varying dimensions are described for that class of MOSFETS in a single .model line in which + is used to denote line continuation. The dimensions are given on the element description line. In both, it is critical to watch the units; they are basically illogical! The SPICE element description line for a MOSFET has the following form: Mxxxxxxx nd ng ns <nb> mname <L=val W=val AD=val + AS=val PD=val PS=val NRD=val OFF IC=vds, vgs, vbs TEMP=val> All parameter value pairs between < and > are optional.

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

The MOSFET Description Lines Element Line (Continued)

Additional optional HSPICE parameters: <RDC=val RSC=val M=val DTEMP=val GEO=val DELVTO=val> TEMP=val is not used on element line in HSPICE and not used for level 4 or 5 (BSIM) models. Parameter Definitions See http:\\cmbsd.cm.nctu.edu.tw\~yumin\tutorial\hspice_qrg.pdf

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

DC SPICE Models Level 1 (Shichman-Hodges) DC Model

Equations VT Equation as derived previously ID Equations as derived previously with linear mode equation times (1+VDS) for continuity across linear-saturation boundary. Both use Leff in place of L where: Leff = L 2 LD Key Parameters: What do they represent? See Kang and Leblebici Table 4.1 NMOS, PMOS (obvious) MOSFET channel type KP process transconductance k VTO (note O, not 0!) zero substrate-bias threshold voltage VT0 GAMMA substrate-bias or body-effect coefficient

PHI twice the Fermi potential 2F LAMBDA channel length modulation

5
CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

DC SPICE Models Level 1 (Continued)

Additional Parameters: What do they represent? LD Lateral diffusion (If not present, may need to find Leff manually!) TPG Type of gate material: 0 A1, +1 opposite to substrate, -1 same as substrate. Default +1. For the typical CMOS process, TPG = 1 for NMOS and 1 for PMOS NSUB substrate impurity concentration NA (NMOS) ND (PMOS) NSS Surface state density Used to define surface component of VT0. TOX Oxide thickness tox U0 (note 0, not O) Surface mobility 0 RD, RS Drain resistance, Source resistance RSH Drain and Source sheet resistance (/) Derived Parameters. Note that if some parameters missing, others, if present, can be used to derive them. E. g. NSUB to derive PHI, and TOX and U0 to derive KP. Question: What parameters to derive GAMMA? If the derivable parameters are present in the model, they will be used; if not, derived if possible from other parameters (and defaults), else, defined.
6
CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

DC SPICE Models Level 2

What about defaults and units? See Table 4.1. of Kang and Leblebici Other parameters in Level 1 are related to capacitance (later) or irrelevant to digital applications.

Level 2
Analytical model that takes into account small geometry effects. Equations that use most of the parameters are given in the text. Parameters in addition to those for Level 1: NFS - Fast surface state density Used in modeling subthreshold condition. NEFF Total channel charge coefficient Empirical fitting factor multiplied times NSUB in the calculation of the short channel effect . Used only in Level 2. XJ Junction depth of source and drain. VMAX Maximum drift velocity for carriers use for modeling velocity saturation. DELTA Channel width effect on VT.

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

DC SPICE Models Level 2 (Continued)

XQC Coefficient of channel charge share. Used to specify the portion of the channel charge attributed to the drain. Also, more importantly causes the Ward capacitive model to replace the Myer capacitance model. Both have their disadvantages. Next three parameters produce a multiplicative surface mobility degradation factor to multiply times KP and appear in Level 2 only. UCRIT Critical electric field for mobility degradation. UEXP Exponent coefficient for mobility degradation. UTRA Transverse field coefficient for mobility degradation. Coefficient of VDS in denominator of the factor. See Table 4.1. of Kang and Leblebici.

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

DC SPICE Models Level 3

More empirical and less analytical than Level 2; this permits improved convergence and simpler computation while sacrificing little accuracy. The parameters have beyond those in Level 2 (Note that the following Level 2 parameters are deleted: NEFF, UCRIT, UEXP, and UTRA.) KAPPA Saturation field factor. An empirical factor in the equation for the channel length in saturation. ETA static feedback on VT. Models effect of VDS on VT, i.e., DIBL (Drain-Induce Barrier Lowering) THETA Mobility modulation. Models the effect of VGS on surface mobility. See Table 4.1 of Kang and Leblebici.

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

Capacitance Models
Level 1 through 3 use the Myer capacitance model (see Kang and Leblebici Fig.3.32) as the default for the channel capacitance with the option of the Ward model (see Kang and Leblebici Fig.4.8) in Levels 2 and 3. For the source and drain capacitances, note the junction equation with reverse bias V with VT, the thermal voltage, I=Is(eV/VT-1)=-Is for V-4VT and recall that Cj =Cj0/(1-V/0)m where m = 1/2 for an abrupt junction and m = 1/3 for a graded junction. The parameters: IS Bulk junction saturation current. JS Bulk junction saturation current density (used with junction areas)

10

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

Capacitance Models (Cont.)

PB - 0 Bulk junction Potential (Built-in voltage) CJ Zero-bias bulk junction capacitance per m2 MJ m Bulk junction grading coefficient CJSW Zero-bias perimeter capacitance per m MJSW m Perimeter capacitance grading coefficient FC Bulk junction forward bias coefficient used in evaluating capacitance under strong forward bias. CGBO Gate-bulk overlap capacitance per meter of L; should be set to 0 if modeled as interconnect instead. CGDO Gate-drain overlap capacitance per meter of W GDSO Gate-source overlap capacitance per meter of W See Table 4.1. of Kang and Leblebici

11

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

More SPICE Models BSIM (Level 4)

An empirical model that includes: all of the typical small geometry effects the nonuniform doping profile for ion-implanted devices an automatic parameter extraction program which produces a consistent set of parameters L and W for the channel For BSIM parameters, see Foty Table 8.1 We will not look at these parameters in detail, but it is quite important to look at the form of the electrical parameters. Each electrical parameters P is represented by three process parameters P0, PL, and Pw associated with P

P P0

PL PW L DL WL W Leff W eff
CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

12

SPICE Models BSIM (Cont.)

L and W are drawn dimensions and DL and DW are the net size changes in the drawn dimensions due to the entire sequence of fabrication steps. The difference shown give Leff and Weff. The equation for P allows for an adjustment of the electrical parameter as a function of the effective length and width of the channel

Parameter extraction uses devices sizes. P0 is for long, wide MOSFET. BSIM also uses a new approach to capacitance modeling that avoids the difficulties of errors and lack of charge conservation in the Meyer model and the errors and convergence problems in the Ward model. See Massobrio and Antognetti p. 219 for trios of parameters. Note that model file has only numerical values identified by position; this is an alternate form of the model that cryptic.

13

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

More SPICE Models HSPICE Level 28, BSIM2, BSIM3

HSPICE Level 13 is BSIM HSPICE Level 28 - a very popular modification of BSIM, but can only be used in HSPICE BSIM2 (HSPICE Level 39) typical model today for those not using HSPICE BSIM3 Version 3.2 (HSPICE Level 49) a complex new public domain model that is frequently used today. This is our model unless otherwise specified. See http:/cmbsd.cm.nctu.edu.tw/~yumin/tutorial/n96g.L49

14

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

Which Model Should I Use?

Level 1: At best, for quick estimates not requiring accuracy. Very poor for small geometry devices. Viewed as obsolete by some. Level 2: Due to convergence problems and slow computation rate, abandoned in favor of Level 3 or higher. Level 3: Good for MOSFET down to about 2 microns. BSIM Level 4 (HSPICE Level 13): good for small geometry MOSFETS with L down to 1 micron and tox down to 150 Angstroms. Problems near Vsat; negative output conductance; discontinuity in current at VT. For submicron dimensions, replaced by BSIM2 and HSPICE Level 28. BSIM2 (HSPICE Level 39): Good for small geometry MOSFETs with L down to 0.2 micron and tox down to 36 Angstroms. HSPICE Level 28: BSIM with its problems solved; good choice for HSPICE users. BSIM3 Version 3 (HSPICE Level 49): Most accurate, but complex.

15

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

Summary

Learned the element description line for MOSFET Reviewed the first generation SPICE model parameters, levels 1, 2, and 3 Reviewed the device capacitances and associated parameters for the BSIM model Obtained a sense of the form of the parameters for the BSIM model Obtained an awareness of some of the newer models Obtained a comparative viewpoint of the models and their use.

16

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits