Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
This Week
Nature of Law of Tort: Crime, Contract and Tort Vicarious Liability Trespass
Injury/ Loss
YOU
OTHER
WHOEVER
Passers-by, outsider, visitor, public.. Trespassers?
Tort Crime
TORT
Civil wrong (vs Individual) Claimed by injured party Plaintiff v Defendant Compensation Show defendant liable Civil action by civil procedure
CRIME
Offence (vs State) Charged by police/state State v Accused Punishment Show defendant guilty Criminal prosecution by criminal procedure
Tort Contract
CONTRACT
Duty to party of contract (Privity of Contract) Damages to put injured party to position had the contract been performed Claim must be made within six years from time of breach
TORT
Duty to everyone (Neighbour Concept) Damages to restore injured party to his original position
Claim must be made within years from the time damage suffered
Vicarious Liability
A party made liable to an act of negligence due to others act or omissions under his responsibility e.g - an employer held liable in negligence because of his employees negligence during work
Vicarious Liability
But why..? - Employer has full responsible over working practices, safety procedures, financial flow apart from named under insurance companys insurance. Most importantly, is the name under which the business benefits from, hence should therefore stand the risks. As for, Employer - Contractor (maybe, depends) and Contractor - Sub-contractor in the construction industry
Vicarious Liability
Under Master - Servant concept; Employer has right to control work of his employee (Hewitt v Bonvinn, 1940) Employee carrying out work under companys name (as in an architect design is named under the companys name, and not his own) Employee is acting upon instruction from the employer (in the course of his employment)
Vicarious Liability
However, employer who engages independent contractor is not liable for their negligence (as long as he does not authorised the particular action explicitly or impicitly) Independent contractor is on his own liable for any of his action or omission e.g - Architect, Engineer, Specialist Contractor, Consultants, other Experts etc.
Strict Liability
Employer can still be held liable under vicarious liability, over independent contractor, where strict liability is in question:
Extra-hazardous activities Statutory duties Ryland v Fletchers (1886) - Nuissance Operation on the highway
Trespass
PERSO N GOODS UNDERGROUND LAND AIRSPACE
OF
UNAUTHORISED TRANSGRESSION DIRECT INTERFERENCE
TRESPASS
CONCIOUS DECISION TO ENTER
Trespass
Not a criminal offence, only to give civil remedies.. Meaning, trespasser cannot be shot, but can only be fine Who can sue? Rightful owner to the physical possession and control over Who can be sued? Whoever in which activity constitutes direct invasion or interference Governed by Section 5 and 44(1) National Land Code 1965
Trespass
Minister of Health v Belloti (1944) Anchor Brewhouse Dev. Ltd v Berkley House Ltd. (1987)
End Of Lecture
Any Question? NEXT WEEK Nuissance