Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Where BP Operates
In 2004, we have had 2 contractors and 2 members of the public die in driving and vehicle-related incidents 3 in the US, 1 in Algeria.
Operations / Wells
67% of severe vehicle incidents occurred in Operations 13% of 2004 HiPos are driving related (4 Incidents) One 3rd Party Vehicle Fatality in OUSBU / Two in Shelf
20 1.75 25 2.09
Assets
Two TUs (Arkoma and Canada) had 39% of the severe vehicle incidents. Hugoton had 3 HIPOs involving vehicle incidents
1.49 15 1.34 1.25 1.22 1.22 1.20 1.23 1.25 1.26 1.22 1.21
1.44
1.50
10
Two assets did not have any severe vehicle incidents: Permian and South Louisiana
5 0.33 0.32 0.26 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.10 0.00 May 0.50
Companies Involved
21 companies (incl. BP) reported severe vehicle incidents 76% of companies reported single incidents Companies reporting 2 incidents A & A Tank and Truck Co. (Arkoma) Bob Dale (FTE) (Canada) Flare Construction (Overthrust/Moxa) Hodges Trucking Company (Arkoma) Triple S Trucking (San Juan North and South)
0.20
Total SVAR
Total Veh
Veh TVAR
Veh SVAR
Interventions
Developing contract language for high risk & 100% use contractors 3rd Party Fatality Reviews - SET Implemented Driving Standard Targeted Transportation Sector Commitment Sessions U.S. Logistics - CVP
vehicle is fit for purpose, inspected and confirmed to be in safe working order passenger number does not exceed manufacturers design specification for the vehicle loads are secure and do not exceed manufacturers design specifications or legal limits for the vehicle seat belts are installed and worn by all occupants safety helmets are worn by riders and passengers of motorcycles, bicycles, quads, snow-mobiles and similar types of vehicle
Drivers must not be authorised to operate the vehicle unless: they are trained, certified and medically fit to operate the class of vehicle they are not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and are not suffering from fatigue they do not use hand-held cell phones and radios while driving (best practice is to switch off all phones and two-way radios when driving)
23 January 2004
Objectives
Driver Requirements 4. They are licensed, trained, and medically fit 5. They are appropriately rested and alert 6. They do not use a mobile phone while operating the vehicle 7. In high risk countries journey management plans in place
8. Seatbelts worn by all occupants 9. Not under the influence of alcohol or drugs 10. Safety helmets worn by rider and passengers of motorcycles etc
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Assist development of Standard via RSLT Network impact widely Support implementation pilot Communicate pending approval of Driving Standard
Use tool to identify capabilities and resources Baseline level of compliance and conduct gap analysis Prioritise gaps and estimate costs Submit plan of implementation
Segment Accountabilities
Implement standard Run driver engagement workshops Report implementation progress Reflect intent of Standard in transport contracts Share good practices Leadership engagement and support (ride-alongs etc) Self-verification and monitoring
Driving Safety Immersion Intent : Improve the competency and capability of workforce to operate vehicles safely
Create awareness and knowledge of driving risks and vehicle incident causes Share learnings from incidents Improve knowledge of safe driving by application of Onshore US BU Driving Practice Verify safe driving expectations are clear with workforce (bp and contractor) and resources available
Phase 1
(Learning)
April/July
Representatives: OCs: Dave Rothbauer, Gary Munson, Dave McKenna, Kurtis Peden HSE: Duane Kortsha, Jerry Piper, Cheryl Metzler Training & Development: Mike Thompson Drilling/Wells: David Sims Supply Chain Management: Fred Fitzhugh Legal: Ken George
Scope
The Tool captures the detailed gaps, actions and resources which will inform the Implementation Plans - it is not, in itself, an Implementation Plan
Format
Four Excel spreadsheets
One PowerPoint user training pack
May
June
July
Aug
Sept.
Oct
Nov
Dec
Element 1. Vehicle fit for purpose 2. No. of Passengers 3. Loads Secure 4. Driver Training 5. Fatigue/Tiredness Training 6. Mobile Telephones 7.Journey Mgmt 8. Seatbelts
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up Retrofit/replace vehicles for ABS&Airbags Assure manuf. specified vehicle maint schedules met and documented COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up
Assure loads, equipment and vehicle components are addressed ID BP Drivers and document Develop trng. matls ID Instructors Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers Conduct and continue medical assessments (Ongoing 3 yr. Freq.) Continue trng. for non-Prof. Drivers
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up N/A- OUSBU not operating in a High-Risk Classified Country; OUSBU Driving Safety Practice encourages Journey Management.
9. Alcohol/Drugs
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up
10. Helmets
6 April 2004
What Is A VDR?
A mechanical/electronic system which records and transmits to a portal key driving performance information
A black box of sorts for vehicles to record (with set thresholds):
Management can demonstrate their commitment to this Immersion and to promoting Driving Safety through the ASA process. An example of a Driving Safety ASA courtesy of San Juan North OC is available. (click on icon for sample ASA)
Western Hem LV 1617 June 2005 Africa, Middle East, Russia and Caspian 1-3 Sep 2005
Questions ?????